PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Marie Célard

Publications and source records attributed to Marie Célard.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Diabetes mellitus and infective endocarditis: the insulin factor in patient morbidity and mortality.

AIMS: To analyse the characteristics of infective endocarditis (IE) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), and to evaluate the prognostic significance of DM according to insulin use. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 559 patients with definite IE including 75 patients (13%) with DM (insulin use n = 22; oral antidiabetic n = 53) were evaluated. Comparison of insulin-DM, oral-DM, and non-DM patients showed an older age (66 +/- 13, 66 +/- 10, 58 +/- 17, respectively; P = 0.004) in DM patients, and more frequent IE on prosthetic valves (32, 11, and 15%, respectively; P = 0.068) in insulin-DM patients. Oral streptococci (0, 8, and 18%, respectively; P = 0.016) were less frequently the causative organism than staphylococci (64, 26, and 29%, respectively; P = 0.002) in insulin-DM patients. Vegetations, dehiscence, abscess, and regurgitation rates did not differ among the three groups, nor did cardiac surgery rates (32, 47, and 48%, respectively; P = 0.334), but in-hospital mortality was higher in insulin-DM patients (50, 19, and 15%; P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, independently of other determinants of death (age, IE location, Staphylococcus aureus, history of heart failure, immunosuppression, creatinine serum), insulin-DM was a predictor of death (OR, 4.69; 95% CI, 1.77-12.44), whereas oral-DM was not. CONCLUSION: IE prognosis in insulin-DM patients is poor due to the coexistence of host and pathogen factors. Insulin-DM patients with IE may require specific management.

Aged↗

Molecular diagnosis of infective endocarditis by PCR amplification and direct sequencing of DNA from valve tissue.

We used broad-range eubacterial PCR amplification followed by direct sequencing to identify microbial pathogens in heart valve material from 29 patients with histologically confirmed infective endocarditis and 23 patients free of infective endocarditis. Microorganisms cultured by conventional techniques matched those identified by PCR in 21 cases. PCR alone identified the causative agent in three cases (Streptococcus bovis, Staphylococcus cohnii, and Coxiella burnetii), allowing better patient management. PCR corrected the initial bacteriological diagnosis in three cases (Streptococcus bovis, Streptococcus mutans, and Bartonella henselae). Among the 29 cases of histologically confirmed infective endocarditis, PCR findings were positive in 27 cases and were consistent with the bacterial morphology seen at Gram staining (26 cases) or with the results obtained by immunohistologic analysis with an anti-C. burnetii monoclonal antibody (one case). In two other cases of histologically confirmed infective endocarditis, PCR remained negative in a blood culture-negative case for which no bacteria were seen at histological analysis and in one case with visualization of cocci and blood cultures positive for Enterococcus faecalis. Ten clinical diagnoses of possible infective endocarditis were ruled out by histopathological analysis of the valves and subsequently by PCR. PCR was negative in 13 of the 14 patients in whom infective endocarditis was rejected on clinical grounds; the other patient was found to have Coxiella burnetii infective endocarditis on the basis of PCR and histopathological analysis and was subsequently included in the group of 29 definite cases. In total, PCR contributed to the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis in 6 of 29 (20%) cases.

DNA, Bacterial↗