Biomedical subjects

Marie Ellström Engh

Publications and source records attributed to Marie Ellström Engh.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Changes in the prevalence of pre-eclampsia in Akershus County and the rest of Norway during the past 35 years.

BACKGROUND: Pre-eclampsia, the etiology of which is unknown, is an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. In Norway there has been a substantial change in lifestyle since 1970. Akershus is a growing urban county. The aim of this study was to identify changes in the prevalence of pre-eclampsia in Akershus County and the rest of Norway during the past 35 years. METHODS: The study is population-based and retrospective. Deliveries are registered per inhabitant and pre-eclampsia per delivery. Prevalence and prevalence ratios are calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Poisson regression analysis is used for assessment of trends. RESULTS: The frequency of deliveries declined from 1.9% to 1.4% for Akershus County and from 1.7% to 1.3% in the rest of Norway. The prevalence of pre-eclampsia increased from 3.1% to 3.7% for Akershus County and from 3.3% to 4.5% in the rest of Norway. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in the prevalence of pre-eclampsia and the difference between Akershus and the rest of Norway are not likely to be explained by changes in genetic material. Altered registration routines throughout Norway since 1998 may influence the observations, and better registration routines may contribute to the observed lower prevalence in Akershus. Changes in lifestyle factors most likely explain the overall increase in the prevalence of pre-eclampsia.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

A three-armed randomized trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures and laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: To compare open Burch colposuspension using sutures (OC) with laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures (LCS) and laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples (LCM) in women with stress urinary incontinence. DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial. SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. POPULATION: Women with genuine stress urinary incontinence or mixed incontinence with a predominantly stress component attending the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. METHODS: The women were assessed objectively using a 48-h frequency-volume chart, a 48-h pad test and a standardized stress test. Subjectively, the women were assessed by a questionnaire including influence on quality of life. The women were randomized to OC using sutures (n = 79), LCS (n = 53) or LCM (n = 79). Anaesthesia/operation time, blood loss, complications and other related surgical parameters were compared. Main outcome measures. Objective and subjective cure rate. RESULTS: Objective cure rates 1 year after surgery were significantly higher in the OC and LCS groups compared to the LCM group analyzed by a standardized stress test. Subjective findings were in concordance with the objective results. Performing an OC was less time consuming than performing a LCS and resulted in more blood loss compared to the two laparoscopic techniques. Patients in the LCM group had a shorter duration of catheter use and hospital stay. CONCLUSION: The use of sutures, irrespective of whether the surgical approach was laparoscopic or open surgery, was superior to the laparoscopic mesh and staple technique.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

A randomised trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: To compare open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence. DESIGN: Multicentre, prospective randomised trial. SETTING: Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Borås County Hospital and Orebro University Hospital, Sweden. POPULATION: Women with genuine stress urinary incontinence or mixed incontinence with a predominantly stress component were included, and were randomised to either open colposuspension (n= 120) or laparoscopic colposuspension (n= 120). METHODS: Women were randomised to open colposuspension with sutures or laparoscopic colposuspension with polypropylene mesh and staples. Anaesthesia/operation time, blood loss, complications and other related surgical parameters were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Objective and subjective cure rates from 48-hour frequency-volume chart, a 48-hour pad test and a subjective assessment of the woman's incontinence and quality of life performed one year after surgery. RESULTS: Objective and subjective cure rates were higher after open compared with laparoscopic colposuspension (P < 0.001). Quality of life was improved following surgery in both groups (P < 0.0001) and the improvement was significantly greater in the open colposuspension group (P < 0.05) with regard to physical activity. Performing an open colposuspension was less time consuming (P < 0.0001), resulted in more blood loss (P < 0.0001), longer catheterisation time (P < 0.01), greater risk of urinary retention (P < 0.01) and a longer hospital stay (P < 0.0001) compared with performing a laparoscopic colposuspension. The rate of serious complications was low in both groups. CONCLUSION: Open colposuspension had a higher objective and subjective cure rate one year after surgery but with a greater blood loss, greater risk of urinary retention and a longer hospital stay than laparoscopic colposuspension.

Adult↗