PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Marie-Claire Antakly

Publications and source records attributed to Marie-Claire Antakly.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

[Thoracic epidural and intrathecal analgesia have similar effects on pain relief and respiratory function after thoracic surgery].

PURPOSE: To compare in a prospective randomized trial the effects of thoracic epidural infusions of fentanyl (F) and bupivacaine (B) to intrathecal morphine (M) and sufentanil (S) on analgesia and respiratory function following thoracotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 55 patients undergoing an elective postero-lateral thoracotomy were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group I (n = 27): received intrathecal S (5 microg) and M (0.5 mg) one hour before surgery. Group II (n = 28) received, after induction of anesthesia, an initial dose of 10 to 20 mL of a solution of B 0.25% and F 2 microg.mL(-1) via an epidural thoracic catheter previously inserted between T5 and T8. The same solution was infused during surgery. After surgery, patients received a continuous infusion of B 0.1% and F 2 microg.mL(-1) with a bolus every 15 min if needed. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), SpO(2), PaCO(2), respiratory rate (RR), forced expiratory volume in one second, peak expiratory flow rate and forced vital capacity were recorded at different times from the day before surgery till T48 = 48 hr after surgery. Subjective pain was assessed using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) scoring at rest and during cough. RESULTS: No significant difference was noted between both groups concerning VAS, HR, MAP, SpO(2), PaCO(2) and RR. Variations of the respiratory function tests were identical in both groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows that intrathecal M and S offer analgesia comparable to thoracic epidural infusion of B and F.

Analgesia↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Regional anesthesia for lumbar microdiscectomy].

GOAL OF THE STUDY: Lumbar microdiscectomy surgery is already performed under spinal anesthesia (SA) in many institutions. The aim of this study is to compare the quality of analgesia and recovery after SA when compared to general anesthesia (GA) after lumbar microdiscectomy surgery. METHODS: Following light sedation, SA is performed with the patient in the left lateral decubitus position, one to two levels above the herniated disc level. Isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine 3-3.5 ml was injected intrathecally followed by wound infiltration with 15 ml of bupivacaine with 1/200 000 epinephrine prior to surgical incision. RESULTS: Despite randomization, we found significantly more females in the GA group. Pain scores at 4 and 8 h postoperatively were lower in SA group as well as total analgesic consumption during the first 24 h. Postoperative recovery including time to drinking, eating and walking were more rapid after SA when compared to GA. During the postoperative period, the incidence of urinary retention was comparable between groups but the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was significantly higher in the GA group. Moreover, the overall patient's and surgeon's satisfaction were significantly better in the SA group. CONCLUSION: SA associated to wound infiltration using bupivacaine is an interesting alternative to general anesthesia for outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy surgery.

Adult↗