Why visceral fat is bad: mechanisms of the metabolic syndrome.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Marilyn Ader.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: Recent data have suggested that the insulin resistance observed with aging may be more related to adiposity than aging per se. We asked whether the insulin resistance observed in aged rats was comparable (both in magnitude and location) to that of fat-fed rats. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We performed hyperinsulinemic (5 mU/min per kg) euglycemic clamps with tracer in conscious, 6-hour fasted young (YL), fat-fed young (YF), fat-fed old (OF), and calorically restricted old (OL) rats. RESULTS: Intraabdominal fat measurements showed that OF and YF rats were more obese than YL (p OF>YL). Caloric restriction not only prevented age-related obesity but also reduced the ratio of intraabdominal fat to lean body mass (LBM) compared with YL (OL: 0.59+/-0.05 vs. YL: 1.07+/-0.04; p=0.017). Despite similar incremental insulin, YF and OF rats required 40% less infused glucose to maintain euglycemia than YL and OL rats (p<0.001). Insulin-stimulated glucose uptake (Si(Rd): DeltaRd/(DeltaInsulin x Glucose(SS)) was impaired in OF rats (OF: 14.03+/-1.79 vs. YL: 23.08+/-1.87x10(3) dL/min x kg LBM per pM; p=0.004) and improved in OL rats (29.41+/-1.84x10(3) dL/min x kg LBM per pM; p=0.031) compared with YL. Despite greater obesity, YF rats did not exhibit lower SiRd compared with OF rats (p=0.58). In contrast, the ability of insulin to suppress endogenous glucose production (EGP; Si(EGP): DeltaEGP/(DeltaInsulin x GlucoseSS) was not impaired in OF rats (OF vs. YL; p=0.61) but was markedly impaired in YF rats by approximately 75% (1.72+/-0.66x10(3) dL/min x kg per pM; p=0.013). Surprisingly, separate regression analysis for old and young animals revealed that old rats exhibited a significantly steeper regression between Si (Rd and EGP) and adiposity than young rats (p<0.05). Thus, older rats showed a proportionately greater decrement in insulin sensitivity with an equivalent increase in adiposity. DISCUSSION: These data suggest that, in rodents, youth affords significant protection against obesity-induced insulin resistance.
Atypical antipsychotics have been linked to weight gain, hyperglycemia, and diabetes. We examined the effects of atypical antipsychotics olanzapine (OLZ) and risperidone (RIS) versus placebo on adiposity, insulin sensitivity (S(I)), and pancreatic beta-cell compensation. Dogs were fed ad libitum and given OLZ (15 mg/day; n = 10), RIS (5 mg/day; n = 10), or gelatin capsules (n = 6) for 4-6 weeks. OLZ resulted in substantial increases in adiposity: increased total body fat (+91 +/- 20%; P = 0.000001) reflecting marked increases in subcutaneous (+106 +/- 24%; P = 0.0001) and visceral (+84 +/- 22%; P = 0.000001) adipose stores. Changes in adiposity with RIS were not different from that observed in the placebo group (P > 0.33). Only OLZ resulted in marked hepatic insulin resistance (hepatic S(I) [pre- versus postdrug]: 6.05 +/- 0.98 vs. 1.53 +/- 0.93 dl . min(-1) . kg(-1)/[microU/ml], respectively; P = 0.009). beta-Cell sensitivity failed to upregulate during OLZ (pre-drug: 1.24 +/- 0.15, post-drug: 1.07 +/- 0.25 microU . ml(-1)/[mg/dl]; P = 0.6). OLZ-induced beta-cell dysfunction was further demonstrated when beta-cell compensation was compared with a group of animals with adiposity and insulin resistance induced by moderate fat feeding alone (+8% of calories from fat; n = 6). These results may explain the diabetogenic effects of atypical antipsychotics and suggest that beta-cell compensation is under neural control.
OBJECTIVES: Persistent reports have linked atypical antipsychotics with diabetes, yet causative mechanisms responsible for this linkage are unclear. Goals of this review are to outline the pathogenesis of nonimmune diabetes and to survey the available literature related to why antipsychotics may lead to this disease. DATA SOURCES: We accessed the literature regarding atypical antipsychotics and glucose homeostasis using PubMed. The search included English-language publications from 1990 through October 2004. Keywords used included atypical antipsychotics plus one of the following: glucose, insulin, glucose tolerance, obesity, or diabetes. In addition, we culled information from published abstracts from several national and international scientific meetings for the years 2001 through 2004, including the American Diabetes Association, the International Congress on Schizophrenia Research, and the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. The latter search was necessary because of the paucity of well-controlled prospective studies. STUDY SELECTION: We examined publications with significant new data or publications that contributed to the overall comprehension of the impact of atypical antipsychotics on glucose metabolism. We favored original peer-reviewed articles and were less likely to cite single case studies and/or anecdotal information. Approximately 75% of the fewer than 150 identified articles were examined and included in this review. DATA EXTRACTION: Validity of data was evaluated using the existence of peer-review status as well as our own experience with methodology described in the specific articles. DATA SYNTHESIS: The metabolic profile caused by atypical antipsychotic treatment resembles type 2 diabetes. These agents cause weight gain in treated subjects and may induce obesity in both visceral and subcutaneous depots, as occurs in diabetes. Insulin resistance, usually associated with obesity, occurs to varying degrees with different antipsychotics, although more comparative studies with direct assessment of resistance are needed. A major problem in assessing drug effects is that psychiatric disease itself can cause many of the manifestations leading to diabetes, including weight gain and sedentary lifestyle. While studies in healthy subjects are limited and inconclusive, studies in animal models are more revealing. In the conscious canine model, some atypical antipsychotics cause adiposity, including visceral obesity, a strong risk factor for the metabolic syndrome. Furthermore, while few studies have examined effects of antipsychotics on pancreatic beta-cell function, canine studies demonstrate that expected beta-cell compensation for insulin resistance may be reduced or even eliminated with these agents. CONCLUSIONS: Atypical antipsychotics have been shown to contribute to weight gain, which may well reflect increased body fat deposition. Such increased fat is known to cause resistance to insulin action, although more information regarding effect on insulin action is needed. The effect of these drugs on fat distribution has been clearly shown in animal models. It is known that the normal response to insulin resistance is compensatory hyperinsulinemia, which may prevent diabetes. In animals, there is evidence that the hyperinsulinemic compensation is inadequate in the face of atypical antipsychotic agents. It remains to be examined whether failure of adequate pancreatic beta-cell compensation for insulin resistance plays a central role in the pathogenesis of diabetes associated with this class of drugs.
Only in the last decade did modeling studies predict, and knockout experiments confirm, that type 2 diabetes is a "2-hit" disease in which insulin resistance is necessarily accompanied by beta-cell defect(s) preventing the compensatory upregulation of insulin secretion. This long- delayed insight was associated with the development of a constant, the "disposition index," describing the beta-cell sensitivity-secretion relationship as a rectangular hyperbola. Shifts in insulin sensitivity are accompanied by compensatory alterations in beta-cell sensitivity to glucose. Insulin-sensitive subjects do not require a massive insulin response to exogenous glucose to maintain a normal blood glucose. But if their insulin sensitivity decreases by 80%, as in late pregnancy, they need a fivefold greater insulin response to achieve an identical disposition index. Women with gestational diabetes have an insulin response similar to that of normal volunteers; at first glance, this suggests similar islet function, but the utility of the disposition index is to normalize this response to the amplitude of third trimester insulin resistance, revealing severe beta-cell deficiency. The index is a quantitative, convenient, and accurate tool in analyzing epidemiologic data and identifying incipient impaired glucose tolerance. Separate major issues remain, however: the causes of insulin resistance, the causes of the failure of adequate beta-cell compensation in type 2 diabetes, and the nature of the signal(s) from insulin-resistant tissues that fail to elicit the appropriate beta-cell increment in sensitivity to glucose and other stimuli. The disposition index is likely to remain the most accurate physiologic measure for testing hypotheses and solutions to these challenges in whole organisms.
A defect in transcapillary transport of insulin in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue has been proposed to play a role in the insulin resistance that leads to type 2 diabetes, yet the mechanism of insulin transfer across the capillary endothelium from plasma to interstitium continues to be debated. This study examined in vivo the interstitial appearance of insulin in hindlimb using the fatty acid acylated insulin analog Lys(B29)-tetradecanoyl des-(B30) human insulin, or NN304, as a marker for insulin transport. If the insulin transport were a saturable process, then "swamping" the capillary endothelial insulin receptors with native insulin would suppress the subsequent appearance in interstitial fluid of the insulin analog NN304. This analog binds to insulin receptors with an affinity of about 50% of native insulin. Experimental conditions established a physiologic NN304 dose in the absence or presence of pharmacologic and saturating concentrations of regular human insulin. Euglycemic clamps were performed in dogs under inhalant anesthesia with deep hindlimb lymphatic sampling, representative of skeletal muscle interstitial fluid (ISF). In group 1 (n = 8), NN304 alone was infused (3.6 pmol center dot min(-1) center dot kg(-1)) from 60 to 360 min. In group 2 (n = 6), starting at time 0, human insulin was infused at a pharmacologic dose (60 pmol center dot min(-1) center dot kg(-1)) with the addition of NN304 infusion (3.6 pmol center dot min(-1) center dot kg(-1)) from 60 to 360 min. In group 3 (n = 4), the human insulin infusion was increased to a saturating dose (120 pmol center dot min(-1) center dot kg(-1)). Pharmacologic insulin infusion (group 2) established steady-state human insulin concentrations of 6,300 plus minus 510 pmol/l in plasma and 5,300 plus minus 540 pmol/l in ISF. Saturating insulin infusion (group 3) achieved steady-state human insulin concentrations of 22,000 plus minus 1,800 pmol/l in plasma and 19,000 plus minus 1,500 pmol/l in ISF. Total (bound and unbound) NN304 plasma concentrations rose from a steady state of 1,900 plus minus 110 (group 1) to 2,400 plus minus 200 pmol/l (group 2) and 3,100 plus minus 580 pmol/l (group 3), consistent with a competition-driven decline in NN304 clearance from plasma as the human insulin level increased (P < 0.05 by ANOVA). Steady-state interstitial NN304 concentrations also rose with increasing human insulin levels but did not achieve significance in comparison with analog alone (162 plus minus 15 vs. 196 plus minus 22 and 241 plus minus 53 pmol/l for group 1 versus groups 2 and 3, respectively; P = 0.20), yet the steady-state plasma:ISF ratio for NN304 remained essentially unchanged in the absence and presence of elevated human insulin levels (12.6 plus minus 1.2 vs. 12.4 plus minus 0.5 and 13.1 plus minus 1.5 for group 1 versus groups 2 and 3, respectively; P = 0.93). Last, NN304 rate of appearance in interstitial fluid (i.e., half-time to steady state) was similar between groups; mean half-time of 92 plus minus 4 min (NS between groups). In conclusion, appearance of the insulin analog NN304 in skeletal muscle interstitial fluid was constant whether in the absence or presence of human insulin concentrations sufficient to saturate the endothelial insulin receptors. These findings support the hypothesis, provided that the mechanism of insulin and NN304 transcapillary transport is similar, that transcapillary transport of insulin in skeletal muscle occurs primarily via a nonsaturable process such as passive diffusion via a paracellular or transcellular route.
NN304 [Lys(B29)-tetradecanoyl des(B30) human insulin] is a potentially therapeutic insulin analog designed to exhibit protracted glucose-lowering action. In dogs with infusion rates similar to insulin itself, NN304 exhibits similar glucose uptake (R(d)) stimulation with delayed onset of action. This compartmental modeling study was to determine if NN304 action could be accounted for by the approximately 2% unbound NN304 concentration. NN304 (or human insulin) (n = 6 each) was infused at 10.2 pmol center dot min(-1) center dot kg(-1) under euglycemic clamp conditions in anesthetized dogs. NN304 appearance in lymph, representing interstitial fluid (ISF), was slow compared with insulin (t(1/2) = 70 +/- 7 vs. 14 +/- 1 min, P < 0.001). R(d) was highly correlated with the ISF concentration for insulin and NN304 (r = 0.86 and 0.93, respectively), suggesting that slow transendothelial transport (TET) is responsible for sluggish NN304 action. Insulin and NN304 concentration data were fit to a two-compartment (plasma and ISF) model. NN304 plasma elimination and TET were reduced to 10 and 7% of insulin, respectively. Thus, there was reduction of NN304 transport, but not to the degree expected. In ISF, there was no reduction in NN304 elimination. Thus, this acylated insulin analog demonstrates blunted kinetics in plasma, and full efficacy in the compartment of action, ISF.