PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Marinko Marusić

Publications and source records attributed to Marinko Marusić.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

The place and role of serologic methods in detecting Helicobacter pylori infection.

The aim of the study was to determine the place and role of serologic methods in detecting Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, on the basis of estimated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and complement fixation test (CFT) sensitivity and specificity. A total of 549 patients were included in the study. ELISA and CFT as serologic methods were compared with invasive methods (rapid urease test--CLO test, culture, histology). The sensitivity of serologic methods was above 90%, and their specificity was around 80%. Study results confirmed the value, reliability and usefulness of serologic methods in the detection of H. pylori infection.

Adult↗

[Serodiagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection].

Infection with Helicobacter pylori induces antibodies, but these are not able to eradicate the bacterium from the gastric mucosa. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay is the laboratory based method and most commonly used to measure qualitatively and quantitatively anti-Helicobacter pylori antibodies of different immunoglobulin classes in almost all infected patients. Quantitative serological tests are useful in the follow-up of eradication therapy. Serology is the method of choice in population studies and in the retrospective analysis of stored serum samples to study the natural course of this chronic infection.

Antibodies, Bacterial↗

[The rapid urease test].

Today there are many methods in diagnostics of Helicobacter pylori infection. They are divided in two major groups based on using of endoscopy (invasive and non-invasive methods). Helicobacter pylori bacteria are specific because of having very big amounts of urease enzyme that divides urea on NH3 and CO2 which enables environment suitable for survival. Rapid ureas test is based on detecting of the enzyme activity. Because of its simplicity and high sensitivity and specificity it belongs to methods that are used in every day practice in endoscopic laboratories.

Bacteriological Techniques↗

[Helicobacter pylori--overview of therapy].

The clinical significance of Helicobacter pylori infection in the etiopathogenesis of many gastroduodenal disorders, especially peptic ulcer disease and current awareness of the benefits of its eradication has entirely changed the current treatment of these diseases. Eradication was already defined as the disappearance of Helicobacter pylori from the gastric mucosa (finding negativization) confirmed at least 4 weeks (or later) after completed antibiotic eradication therapy. The regimen has to be simple, cheap and tolerable so that the patient could carry it out completely and as easy as possible (good compliance is required). The success of Helicobacter pylori eradication, evaluated by the strict "intention-to-treat" criteria, has to be higher than 80%. Current modern therapy should be triple and not longer than 7 days. One of three proton pump inhibitors is recommended as the antisecretory component (omeprazole, pantoprazole or lansoprazole). Two of three following antibiotis is added to this therapy: metronidazole/tinidazole, clarithromycin or amoxicillin. Treatment failure and growing number of antimicrobial resistant Helicobacter pylori strains require new ways of therapy and more effective drugs. Our results of 7-, 10- and 14-day therapy consisting of omeprazole, amoxicillin and metronidazole are poorer than those of drug combination including clarithromycin instead of amoxicillin. The results of Clinical Hospital "Merkur" showed that combination of amoxicillin, metronidazole and pantoprazole was more effective than the same combination with omeprazole, and the opposite was true for metronidazole and azithromycin combined with omeprazole and pantoprazole, respectively. The results of other medical centers prescribing the same eradication protocols were completely different. The differences are probably caused by poor patient compliance.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗