PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Mark G Kris

Publications and source records attributed to Mark G Kris.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The Genomic Landscape of MYC-, MYCL-, and MYCN-Amplified Solid Tumors.

PURPOSE: MYC, MYCN, and MYCL amplifications are recurrent oncogenic events across solid tumors. Currently, no standardized selection biomarker is available to identify patients with MYC-dependent tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We analyzed copy-number alterations of MYC family genes and their features in more than 68,000 tumor-normal paired samples from pediatric and adult patients sequenced with MSK-IMPACT (Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets) and annotated with FACETS (Fraction and Allele-Specific Copy Number Estimates from Tumor Sequencing). The relationship between amplification features and MYC mRNA expression levels were evaluated in more than 10,000 samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). RESULTS: Across MSK Cancer Center samples, MYC amplifications were most common, found in 2,949 samples compared with 310 in MYCL and 217 in MYCN. Although MYCN and MYCL amplifications were predominantly focal (<10 Mb, 79% and 93%, respectively), MYC amplifications were frequently broader (>10 Mb, 62%). Although most tumor types showed similar features between broad and focal amplifications of MYC, in select cancer types, we identified differing co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity patterns with other disease-specific drivers. Furthermore, although MYC-amplified TCGA samples showed higher mRNA expression than wild-type ones, the focality of MYC amplification was seen to have limited influence on expression levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that MYC dependency likely depends on many factors, including, but not limited to, total copy number of the detected amplification, lineage-specific factors, concomitant presence or absence of additional oncogenic alterations, and in some cases amplification focality.

Humans

Immune biomarkers and response to checkpoint inhibition of BRAFV600 and BRAF non-V600 altered lung cancers.

BACKGROUND: While 2-4% of lung cancers possess alterations in BRAF, little is known about the immune responsiveness of these tumours. METHODS: Clinical and genomic data were collected from 5945 patients with lung cancers whose tumours underwent next-generation sequencing between 2015 and 2018. Patients were&#xa0;followed through 2020. RESULTS: In total, 127 patients with metastatic BRAF-altered lung cancers were identified: 29 tumours had Class I mutations, 59 had Class II/III alterations, and 39 had variants of unknown significance (VUS). Tumour mutation burden was higher in Class II/III than Class I-altered tumours (8.8 mutations/Mb versus 4.9, P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), but this difference was diminished when stratified by smoking status. The overall response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) was 9% in Class I-altered tumours and 26% in Class II/III (P&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.25), with median time on treatment of 1.9 months in both groups. Among patients with Class I-III-altered tumours, 36-month HR for death in those who ever versus never received ICI was 1.82 (1.17-6.11). Nine patients were on ICI for >2 years (two with Class I mutations, two with Class II/III alterations, and five with VUS). CONCLUSIONS: A subset of patients with BRAF-altered lung cancers achieved durable disease control on ICI. However, collectively no significant clinical benefit was seen.

Biomarkers, Tumor