PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Mark H Beers

Publications and source records attributed to Mark H Beers.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Propoxyphene use and risk for hip fractures in older adults.

BACKGROUND: Published guidelines have identified propoxyphene as an inappropriate medication for use in aged patients. It is no more effective than acetaminophen, yet has been associated with the same adverse effects (AEs) associated with other opioid drugs. In particular, its central nervous system-related AEs, dizziness and sedation, may increase the risk for fracture resulting from falls in older adults. Nonetheless, US studies have reported widespread use of propoxyphene in the elderly US population. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the risk for fracture associated with propoxyphene use in older adults. METHODS: This prospective cohort study used a large administrative claims data set from adults aged > or =65 years. A time-varying (lagged) covariate defined each person as a propoxyphene user or nonuser based on propoxyphene exposure in the 14 days before each fracture event in the cohort. Another time-varying measure stratified propoxyphene users based on their mean daily dose of propoxyphene (high dose = >260 mg; low dose = < or =260 mg of propoxyphene hydrochloride or equivalent napsylate salt). Time-dependent Cox regression models were used to estimate the association between propoxyphene exposure and occurrence of hip fracture (using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 820.xx). RESULTS: A total of 362,503 patients were included in the analysis. During a mean follow-up of 464 days, approximately 10% (37,569) of the sample had > or =1 propoxyphene prescription filled and approximately l% (5065) sustained a hip fracture. Propoxyphene users had a 2-fold higher risk for hip fracture (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI], 2.05 [1.87-2.25]) compared with nonusers of analgesics. Multivariate analysis found a dose-response relationship between propoxyphene and hip fracture risk (low dose, HR [95% CI], 1.45 [1.26-1.67]; high dose, HR [95% CI], 2.05 [1.85-2.29]). Other opioid analgesics were associated with an increased risk for hip fractures. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this cohort database study suggest that propoxyphene use among adults aged > or =65 years is associated with increased risk for hip fracture and suggest a need for interventions to reduce propoxyphene use in older adults. Clinicians should be aware of the risk for hip fracture with other opioids as well and weigh them against potential benefits when prescribing for older adults.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

National trends in and predictors of propoxyphene use in community-dwelling older adults.

BACKGROUND: Several pain management guidelines and explicit medication-use criteria identify propoxyphene as an inappropriate medication for use in older adults. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to estimate trends in propoxyphene use among community-dwelling elderly (age > or = 65 years) Medicare beneficiaries from 1993 through 1999 and to determine whether beneficiaries' drug coverage and specific characteristics of their physicians were associated with receipt of propoxyphene in 1999. METHODS: Data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) were used to examine the prevalence of propoxyphene use in cross-sections of nationally representative samples of community-dwelling elderly Medicare beneficiaries from 1993 through 1999. The 1999 MCBS was linked with the 1999 Area Resource File to examine patient and physician factors associated with propoxyphene use in the community-dwelling elderly at the county level. RESULTS: Rates of propoxyphene use were generally stable over the 7-year period, from an annual prevalence of 6.8% in 1993 to the slightly decreased prevalence of 6.6% in 1999. No protective effects against propoxyphene use were observed based on beneficiaries' drug coverage or type of drug coverage. Rather, Medicaid beneficiaries were more likely to receive propoxyphene than those without drug coverage (odds ratio [OR] = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.02-1.92). Among physician characteristics, male sex (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.02-1.75) and medical specialty (OR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65-1.00) were strongly correlated with prescribing of propoxyphene. CONCLUSION: This study found a continuing high prevalence of propoxyphene use in the community-dwelling elderly Medicare population from 1993 through 1999, with > 2 million beneficiaries receiving the drug in 1999.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2005

The class effect: is it relevant to geriatrics?

The formulary of medications available today provides a remarkable range of choices to all prescribers and their patients. In some ways, choices have become easier to make, whereas in other ways, choosing has become a nightmare of dueling considerations. One approach to simplification has relied on class effect. The hypothesis is that drugs within a pharmacological class all work similarly, have similar advantages and disadvantages, and are-to a large extent-interchangeable. If one develops familiarity with one or two agents in a class, that is all one needs to know, because there is little difference between agents within a drug class. The question is whether this approach based on class effect is relevant to geriatrics.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Trends in the prescription of inappropriate drugs for the elderly between 1995 and 1999.

BACKGROUND: Using criteria developed by Beers et al between 1991 and 1997, previous studies have reported high levels of inappropriate drug prescribing for community-dwelling elderly patients (age>or=65 years). However, it is not known whether the Beers criteria have had a beneficial effect on prescribing practices. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare the prevalence of potentially inappropriate drug use (based on the Beers list) among older Americans between 1995 and 1999; to determine whether any decreases in such use were more likely to be the result of improved adherence to guidelines or of replacement of older medications by newer drugs; and to examine individual characteristics that place elderly patients at increased risk for inappropriate drug use. METHODS: This was a panel study involving nationally representative samples of community-dwelling elderly persons from the 1995 and 1999 Medicare Current Beneficiary Surveys (MCBS). For comparison, data were analyzed from samples of disabled Medicare beneficiaries aged <65 years for the same periods. The samples were assessed for the use of 36 individual drugs, drug classes, and combinations carrying a risk for adverse out comes in the elderly based on the 1997 Beers criteria for drugs to be avoided in this population. RESULTS: The study samples contained 7628 community-dwelling elderly persons from the 1995 MCBS and 8902 from the 1999 MCBS, and 1863 and 1851 disabled Medicare beneficiaries aged <65 years for the respective survey years. The proportion of elderly patients taking >or=1 drug on the Beers list declined from 24.8% in 1995 to 21.3% in 1999 (P<0.05). There was a nonsignificant increase in the proportion of disabled Medicare beneficiaries taking >or=1 drug on the Beers list from 31.1% in 1995 to 31.5% in 1999. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant decline in the use of potentially inappropriate drugs by elderly patients between 1995 and 1999, particularly in the use of those drugs linked to the most severe outcomes. However, approximately 7 million elderly patients still received potentially inappropriate drugs in 1999, underscoring the continued need for effective interventions to improve prescribing for this vulnerable population.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Updating the Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults: results of a US consensus panel of experts.

BACKGROUND: Medication toxic effects and drug-related problems can have profound medical and safety consequences for older adults and economically affect the health care system. The purpose of this initiative was to revise and update the Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in adults 65 years and older in the United States. METHODS: This study used a modified Delphi method, a set of procedures and methods for formulating a group judgment for a subject matter in which precise information is lacking. The criteria reviewed covered 2 types of statements: (1) medications or medication classes that should generally be avoided in persons 65 years or older because they are either ineffective or they pose unnecessarily high risk for older persons and a safer alternative is available and (2) medications that should not be used in older persons known to have specific medical conditions. RESULTS: This study identified 48 individual medications or classes of medications to avoid in older adults and their potential concerns and 20 diseases/conditions and medications to be avoided in older adults with these conditions. Of these potentially inappropriate drugs, 66 were considered by the panel to have adverse outcomes of high severity. CONCLUSIONS: This study is an important update of previously established criteria that have been widely used and cited. The application of the Beers criteria and other tools for identifying potentially inappropriate medication use will continue to enable providers to plan interventions for decreasing both drug-related costs and overall costs and thus minimize drug-related problems.

Aged↗