PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Mark Noble

Publications and source records attributed to Mark Noble.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Characterization of A2B5+ glial precursor cells from cryopreserved human fetal brain progenitor cells.

The identification and characterization of human neural precursor cells are critical in extending our understanding of central nervous system development from model animal systems to our own species. Moreover, availability of well-characterized populations of human cells is of potential value in endeavors ranging from cell transplantation to drug screening. We have isolated a population of continuously dividing glial-restricted precursor cells from commercially available cryopreserved 18-20 weeks old fetal brain neural progenitor cells. These human glial-restricted precursor cells are A2B5(+) and do not express polysialylated E-NCAM (PSA-NCAM). They can be grown as purified populations in serum-free medium supplemented with basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and can be induced to generate cells with the antigenic characteristics of oligodendrocytes and distinct astrocytic populations.

Astrocytes↗

Intersections between neurobiology and oncology: tumor origin, treatment and repair of treatment-associated damage.

The number of potentially intimate relationships between brain tumors and the precursor cells that contribute to normal central nervous system (CNS) development and repair now appears to be somewhat larger than would have been anticipated only a few years ago. It also appears that understanding the vulnerabilities of CNS precursor cells, and of the specific cells that they generate, might help us to reveal the biological basis for the cognitive impairment that is increasingly recognized as an adverse effect of systemic cancer therapies. Using neural stem cells as therapeutic vehicles in the treatment of brain tumors could be modified to allow repair of the damage caused by brain tumors themselves and of the neurological impairment that is frequently associated with traditional cancer treatment approaches.

Animals↗

Redox regulation of precursor cell function: insights and paradoxes.

Studies on oligodendrocytes, the myelin-forming cells of the central nervous system, and on the progenitor cells from which they are derived, have provided several novel insights into the role of intracellular redox state in cell function. This review discusses our findings indicating that intracellular redox state is utilized by the organism as a means of regulating the balance between progenitor cell division and differentiation. This regulation is achieved in part through cell-intrinsic differences that modify the response of cells to extracellular signaling molecules, such that cells that are slightly more reduced are more responsive to inducers of cell survival and division and less responsive to inducers of differentiation or cell death. Cells that are slightly more oxidized, in contrast, show a greater response to inducers of differentiation or cell death, but less response to inducers of proliferation or survival. Regulation is also achieved by the ability of exogenous signaling molecules to modify intracellular redox state in a highly predictable manner, such that signaling molecules that promote self-renewal make progenitor cells more reduced and those that promote differentiation make cells more oxidized. In both cases, the redox changes induced by exposure to exogenous signaling molecules are a necessary component of their mode of action. Paradoxically, the results obtained through studies on the oligodendrocyte lineage are precisely the opposite of what might be predicted from a large number of studies demonstrating the ability of reactive oxidative species to enhance the effects of signaling through receptor tyrosine kinase receptors and to promote cell proliferation. Taken in sum, available data demonstrate clearly the existence of two distinct programs of cellular responses to changes in oxidative status. In one of these, becoming even slightly more oxidized is sufficient to inhibit proliferation and induce differentiation. In the second program, similar changes enhance proliferation. It is not yet clear how cells can interpret putatively identical signals in such opposite manners, but it does already seem clear that resolving this paradox will provide insights of considerable relevance to the understanding of normal development, tissue repair, and tumorigenesis.

Animals↗