PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Mark R Schmeler

Publications and source records attributed to Mark R Schmeler.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Demographic and socioeconomic factors associated with disparity in wheelchair customizability among people with traumatic spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if a standard of care for wheelchair provision exists within the participating centers and if there is disparity in wheelchair customizability among the study sample. DESIGN: Convenience sample survey. SETTING: Thirteen Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems that provide comprehensive rehabilitation for people with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) and that are part of the national database funded through the US Department of Education. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 412 people with SCI who use wheelchairs over 40 hours a week. INTERVENTION: Survey information was obtained from subjects via telephone and in-person interviews and from the national database. Collected information included age, race, education, level of injury, and wheelchair funding source. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number and type (manual or power) of wheelchairs. Wheelchair customizability as defined by design features (eg, adjustable axle position, programmable controls). RESULTS: Ninety-seven percent of manual wheelchair users and 54% of power wheelchair users had customizable wheelchairs. No power wheelchair user received a wheelchair without programmable controls. Minorities with low socioeconomic backgrounds (low income, Medicaid/Medicare recipients, less educated) were more likely to have standard manual and standard programmable power wheelchairs. Older subjects were also more likely to have standard programmable power wheelchairs. CONCLUSIONS: The standard of care for manual wheelchair users with SCI is a lightweight and customizable wheelchair. The standard of care for power wheelchairs users has programmable controls. Unfortunately, socioeconomically disadvantaged people were less likely to receive customizable wheelchairs.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Telerehabilitation position paper.

Though the use of telerehabilitation technologies is expanding quickly as a viable method of service delivery for many practitioners within the field of health care, there remain issues of efficacy, cost, reimbursement, legal and ethical ramifications, and practitioner competence. There is a significant need for occupational therapy practitioners to document, research, and publish on the efficacy of consultation, intervention, and follow-up services provided using telerehabilitation technologies. Further investigation of the use of telehealth technologies in professional development and supervision is needed to clarify effectiveness and efficiency, as demand for services, particularly in rural areas, threatens to exceed services available. Occupational therapy practitioners using telerehabilitation methods must adhere to the AOTA Occupational Therapy Code of Ethics (AOTA, 2000), maintain the AOTA Standards of Practice (AOTA, 2005), and comply with state regulations, ensuring both their proficiencies as practitioners and the well being of their clients.

Humans↗

Freestyle seating.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Arm↗