Biomedical subjects

Mark Ruschin

Publications and source records attributed to Mark Ruschin.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Inverse vs. forward breast IMRT planning.

Breast intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) improves dose distribution homogeneity within the whole breast. Previous publications report the use of inverse or forward dose optimization algorithms. Because the inverse technique is not widely available in commercial treatment planning systems, it is important to compare the 2 algorithms. The goal of this work is to compare them on a prospective cohort of 30 patients. Dose distributions were evaluated on differential dose-volume histograms using the volumes receiving more than 105% (V(105)) and 110% (V(110)) of the prescribed dose, and on the maximum dose (D(max)) or hot spot and the sagittal dose gradient (SDG) being the gradient between the dose on inframammary crease and the dose prescribed. The data were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank test. The inverse planning significantly improves the V(105) (mean value 9.7% vs. 14.5%, p=0.002), and the V(110) (mean value 1.4% vs. 3.2%, p=0.006). However, the SDG is not statistically significantly different for either algorithm. Looking at the potential impact on skin acute reaction, although there is a significant reduction of V(110) using an inverse algorithm, it is unlikely this 1.6% volume reduction will present a significant clinical advantage over a forward algorithm. Both algorithms are equivalent in removing the hot spots on the inframammary fold, where acute skin reactions occur more frequently using a conventional wedge technique. Based on these results, we recommend that both forward and inverse algorithms should be considered for breast IMRT planning.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2005

A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology.

Observer performance studies are time-consuming tasks, both for the participating observers and for the scientists collecting and analysing the data. A possible way to optimise such studies is to perform them in a completely digital environment. A software tool-ViewDEX (Viewer for Digital Evaluation of X-ray images)-has been developed in Java, enabling it to function on almost any computer. ViewDEX is designed to handle several types of studies, such as visual grading analysis (VGA), image criteria scoring (ICS) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC). The results from each observer are saved in a log file, which can be exported for further analysis in, for example, a special software for analysing ROC results. By using ViewDEX for an ROC experiment, an evaluation rate of approximately 200 images per hour can be achieved, compared to approximately 25 images per hour using hard copy evaluation. The results are obtained within minutes of completion of the viewing. The risk of human errors in the process of data collection and analysis is also minimised. The viewer has been used in a major trial containing approximately 2700 images.

Computer Simulation↗

PubMed2005

Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: summary of the RADIUS chest trial.

As a part of the Europe-wide research project 'Unification of physical and clinical requirements for medical X-ray imaging'-governed by the Radiological Imaging Unification Strategies (RADIUS) Group-a major image quality trial was conducted by members of the group. The RADIUS chest trial aimed at thoroughly examining various aspects of nodule detection in digital chest radiography, such as the effects of nodule location, system noise, anatomical noise, and anatomical background. The main findings of the RADIUS chest trial concerning the detection of a lung nodule with a size in the order of 10 mm can be summarised as: (1) the detectability of the nodule is largely dependent on its location in the chest, (2) the system noise has a minor impact on the detectability at the dose levels used today, (3) the disturbance of the anatomical noise is larger than that of the system noise but smaller than that of the anatomical background and (4) the anatomical background acts as noise to a large extent and is the major image component affecting the detectability of the nodule.

Artifacts↗

PubMed2005

Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: introduction to the RADIUS chest trial.

Most digital radiographic systems of today have wide latitude and are hence able to provide images with a small constraint on dose level. This opens up for an unprejudiced dose optimisation. However, in order to succeed in the optimisation task, good knowledge of the imaging and detection processes is needed. As a part of the European-wide research project 'unification of physical and clinical requirements for medical X-ray imaging'-governed by the Radiological Imaging Unification Strategies (RADIUS) Group-a major image quality trial was conducted by members of the group. The RADIUS chest trial was focused on the detection of lung nodules in digital chest radiography with the aims of determining to what extent (1) the detection of a nodule is dependent on its location, (2) the system noise disturbs the detection of lung nodules, (3) the anatomical noise disturbs the detection of lung nodules and (4) the image background and anatomical background act as pure noise for the detection of lung nodules. The purpose of the present paper is to give an introduction to the trial and describe the framework and set-up of the investigation.

Artifacts↗

PubMed2003

Digital fluoroscopy to quantify lung tumor motion: potential for patient-specific planning target volumes.

PURPOSE: To apply digital fluoroscopy integrated with CT simulation to measure lung tumor motion and aid in the quantification of individualized planning target volumes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A flat panel digital fluoroscopy unit was modified and integrated with a CT simulator. The stored fluoroscopy images were overlaid with digitally reconstructed radiographs, allowing measurement of the observed lung tumor motion in relation to the corresponding contours on the static digitally reconstructed radiographs. CT simulation and digital fluoroscopy was performed on 10 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Actual tumor motion was measured in three dimensions using the overlaid images. RESULTS: Combining the dynamic data with digitally reconstructed radiographs allowed the tumor shadow from the fluoroscopy to be tracked in relation to the CT lung tumor contour. For all patients, the extent of tumor motion in three dimensions was unique. The motion was greatest in the superoinferior direction and minimal in the AP and lateral directions. CONCLUSION: We have developed a tool that allows CT simulation to be combined with digital fluoroscopy. Quantitative evaluation of the tumor motion in relation to the CT plan allows for customization of the planning target volume. The variability observed clearly demonstrates the need to generate patient-specific internal motion margins.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Integration of digital fluoroscopy with CT-based radiation therapy planning of lung tumors.

Radiation dose escalation may be a means to increase the local control rate of inoperable lung tumors. Treatment plans involve the creation of a uniform planning target volume (PTV) to ensure proper coverage despite patient breathing and setup error. This may lead to unnecessary radiation of normal tissue in shallow breathers or target underdosing for patients with excess internal motion. Therefore, the nature of tumor motion for each patient should be measured in 3D, something that cannot be done with CT alone. We have developed a method that acquires 2D real-time fluoroscopic images (loops) and coregisters them with 2D digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) formed from the CT scan. The limitations of CT to encompass motion can be overcome by merging the two modalities together. The accuracy of the coregistration method is tested with a stationary grid of radio-opaque markers at various spatial positions. The in-plane (at-depth) displacement between markers on the fluoroscopic image versus the DRR varies with position across the image due to slight misalignments between the x-ray source used in fluoroscopy and the virtual source used for the DRR relative to the test object. At clinically relevant positions, the maximum, measured in-plane displacement, is 1.1 mm. The method is applied to the thorax of an anthropomorphic phantom and a good fit is observed between the appearances of the bony anatomical structures on the coregistered image. Finally, a series of motion measurements are carried out on two oscillating cylindrical objects. The degree of motion as measured by fluoroscopy is accurate to within 1.0 mm, whereas the DRR is inconsistent in predicting motion. The coregistration of fluoroscopic loops with the DRR shows at what point within the oscillation the DRR fails to encompass motion. For any treatment site involving target motion, this real-time imaging is a useful asset in the planning stage.

Fluoroscopy↗