PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Mark Schwartz

Publications and source records attributed to Mark Schwartz.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Advanced rhythm discrimination for implantable cardioverter defibrillators using electrogram vector timing and correlation.

INTRODUCTION: Discrimination of ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias remains one of the major challenges for appropriate implantable defibrillator (ICD) therapy delivery. The electrogram vector timing and correlation (VTC) algorithm was developed for such rhythm discrimination. The VTC algorithm differentiates normally conducted supraventricular beats from abnormally conducted ventricular beats by comparing the timing and correlation of rate and shock channel electrograms. METHODS AND RESULTS: Rate and shock channel electrograms of sinus rhythm and induced arrhythmias were collected from 93 patients during ICD placement. The algorithm was developed using data from 50 patients and prospectively tested in a software model with the remaining 43 patients. A sinus rhythm reference was formed by averaging complexes of the shock channel signal aligned by the peak amplitude of the rate channel. Eight features measuring the amplitude and timing of shock channel signal characteristics were extracted from the reference for comparison. When a high-rate rhythm was detected, the VTC algorithm computed the correlation of the arrhythmia complex features with the reference. Rhythms with a sufficient number of uncorrelated beats were classified as ventricular tachycardia (VT). In a dual-chamber implementation, the VTC algorithm is integrated with ventricular and atrial rate comparison (V>A) and stability above an atrial fibrillation rate threshold. The test set consisted of 117 arrhythmias. Dual-chamber sensitivity was 100% (81/81 VT) and specificity was 97% (35/36 supraventricular tachycardia). Single-chamber analysis demonstrated 99% sensitivity and 97% specificity. CONCLUSION: The VTC algorithm demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in discriminating between ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Open reduction and internal fixation of humeral nonunions : a biomechanical and clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have compared different methods for fixation of the midpart of the humeral shaft, but there are only scattered data regarding which type of plate construct provides the best fixation for humeral nonunion. The objectives of this study were (1) to obtain objective data on the performance of four different plate constructs used for fixation of humeral nonunion, and (2) to report our clinical experience with plate fixation of thirty-seven nonunions of the midpart of the humeral shaft. METHODS: In the first part of the study, four plate constructs were compared in a Sawbones model. The groups consisted of (1) a posterior limited-contact dynamic compression plate alone; (2) a posterior limited-contact dynamic compression plate and an interfragmentary screw; (3) a posterior limited-contact dynamic compression plate, a lateral 3.5-mm reconstruction plate, and an interfragmentary screw; and (4) a posterior limited-contact dynamic compression plate and a lateral 3.5-mm reconstruction plate. Tests were performed with use of an MTS Bionix machine in anterior-posterior four-point bending, medial-lateral four-point bending, and external rotation torque. In the second part of the study, the charts of thirty-seven consecutive patients in whom a nonunion of the midpart of the humeral shaft had been treated with plate fixation were reviewed retrospectively. The average age of the patients was forty-eight years (range, thirteen to seventy-eight years). Nineteen patients were treated with a single posterior plate, and eighteen were treated with a two-plate construct with the plates parallel and lying at 90 degrees to each other. All of the nonunions were treated with bone-grafting, and an interfragmentary screw was used in thirty-six of the thirty-seven patients. Radiographs and the clinical status were evaluated at an average of thirteen months postoperatively. RESULTS: The biomechanical testing showed that the two-plate constructs were significantly stiffer than the single-plate constructs in all test modes (p < 0.05). In the clinical part of the study, thirty-four (92%) of the nonunions healed without complications at an average of 4.8 months. Two nonunions treated with the two-plate construct and one treated with one plate failed to heal. CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in the healing rate was found between the two clinical groups (p = 0.4, beta = 0.9), and the overall healing rate was 92%. However, a two-plate construct with the plates at right angles is mechanically stiffer than a single-plate construct, which might be helpful if rigid stabilization of the humerus at the midshaft level is needed.

Adolescent↗