PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Markus Otto

Publications and source records attributed to Markus Otto.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Progress towards a biotypic biomarker profile for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal spectrum disorders.

Determining the optimal timing of disease-modifying therapies for neurodegenerative disorders will necessitate identification of when the underlying pathobiological process becomes active, well in advance of the point at which clinical manifestions appear. Phenoconversion, the emergence of clinically manifest syndomes, may be preceded by years to decades of silent pathobiological activity that can only be mapped by an array of biomarkers. ALS and FTD, traditionally identified as distinct clinical syndromes, are increasingly recognized to exist along a spectrum of clinical syndromes with shared genetic risk and shared underlying pathology. This clinicopathological spectrum is underpinned by cytoplasmic aggregation of TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) as the common neuropathological hallmark. In contrast, the majority of neuropathologically-defined frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is associated with alterations in either TDP-43 metabolism (FTLD-TDP) or of the microtubule associated protein tau (FTLD-tau), with a smaller percentage associated with either autosomal dominant genetic mutations or impairments in the ubiquitin proteasome system. As the field of neurodegenerative disorders increasingly shifts towards the frameworks of a pathobiological definition of disease, there is a growing imperative to develop biomarkers that reflect the varied pathobiologies that underly these disorders, and to determine the sensitivity of such biomarkers to detect the presence of these pathobiologies before phenoconversion. To that end, an international workshop was convened in London, Canada in 2025 to review the evidence for existing or evolving biomarkers suitable for (1) the detection of either ALS or FTD pathobiology prior to phenoconversion and/or (2) predict phenoconversion in at risk individuals. Such biomarkers might be conceptualized as "biotypic biomarkers", capturing their ability to describe an underlying pathophysiology whilst being agnostic to the emergent clinical manifestations. Whereas no single biotypic marker is yet able to predict the emergence of ALS, FTD or their intersection, a multimodal approach to developing a biotypic biomarker profile holds promise for the detection of relevant pathobiological processes. The strength of such an approach would be augmented by also addressing issues of resiliency/susceptibility both in terms of genetic risk susceptibility profiles and developing sensitive biomarkers of genomic and cellular aging. By including such nontraditional markers of disease, a more robust picture of not only the degenerative process but also of those factors that might potentially mitigate or drive a heightened probability of disease can be derived.

cryptic exons

Bi-compartmental CSF-serum analysis of NfL and GFAP differentiates central and peripheral pathology in neuroinfectious diseases: A monocentric real-world cohort study.

Neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), established biomarkers of neuroaxonal injury and astroglial pathology, are frequently only assessed in blood, which limits conclusions regarding their origin. Bi-compartmental analyses of CSF and serum may help differentiate central or peripheral origin of biomarker elevation. Moreover, studies on NfL and GFAP in distinct neuroinfectious disease (NID) phenotypes, particularly those based on real-world cohorts, are limited. This retrospective monocentric study analyzed CSF and serum from patients with (meningo-)encephalitis/myelitis (TI+; n&#xa0;=&#xa0;48), meningitis (TI-; n&#xa0;=&#xa0;80), (cranial) nerve palsies/polyradiculitis (PND; n&#xa0;=&#xa0;61), and 113 non-neuroinflammatory/non-neurodegenerative controls. A bi-compartmental model using scatter plots and simple linear regression was applied to assess the origin of blood biomarker levels and discriminate between central and peripheral pathology. CSF and serum NfL and GFAP z-scores were significantly higher in TI+ compared with TI- (CSF-GFAP p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001/sGFAP p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0083; CSF-NfL p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.003/sNfL p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0004). TI+ and PND differed only in GFAP levels, which were higher in TI+ (CSF-GFAP p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0049/sGFAP p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.003). The overall group effect (p&#xa0;&#x2264;&#xa0;0.003) and principal findings remained significant after adjustment for age, sex, QAlb, and time since (symptom) onset to LP. Bi-compartmental analysis revealed simultaneous elevation of CSF and serum NfL in TI+, indicating predominantly central origin, whereas PND demonstrated a shift toward higher sNfL levels suggesting peripheral origin. Higher clinical severity (modified Rankin Scale 3-5) was associated with elevated serum and CSF GFAP and NfL (sGFAP p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.012/sNfL p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.002; CSF-GFAP p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.0001/CSF-NfL p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0001), which also predicted unfavorable outcome at discharge (sGFAP p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.006/sNfL p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.004; CSF-GFAP p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.003/CSF-NfL p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.012). NfL and GFAP were associated with brain/myelon involvement in NID, predominantly reflecting central pathology. Despite strong CSF-serum correlations, bi-compartmental approaches provide additional insight into biomarker origin and disease compartment.

Humans

Proteomic analysis reveals distinct cerebrospinal fluid signatures across genetic frontotemporal dementia subtypes.

We used an untargeted mass spectrometric approach, tandem mass tag proteomics, for the identification of proteomic signatures in genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD). A total of 238 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from the Genetic FTD Initiative were analyzed, including samples from 107 presymptomatic (44 C9orf72, 38 GRN, and 25 MAPT) and 55 symptomatic (27 C9orf72, 17 GRN, and 11 MAPT) mutation carriers as well as 76 mutation-negative controls ("noncarriers"). We found shared and distinct proteomic alterations in each genetic form of FTD. Among the proteins significantly altered in symptomatic mutation carriers compared with noncarriers, we found that a set of proteins including neuronal pentraxin 2 and fatty acid binding protein 3 changed across all three genetic forms of FTD and patients with Alzheimer's disease from previously published datasets. We observed differential changes in lysosomal proteins among symptomatic mutation carriers with marked abundance decreases in MAPT carriers but not other carriers. Further, we identified mutation-associated proteomic changes already evident in presymptomatic mutation carriers. Weighted gene coexpression network analysis combined with gene ontology annotation revealed clusters of proteins enriched in neurodegeneration and glial responses as well as synapse- or lysosome-related proteins indicating that these are the central biological processes affected in genetic FTD. These clusters correlated with measures of disease severity and were associated with cognitive decline. This study revealed distinct proteomic changes in the CSF of patients with genetic FTD, providing insights into the pathological processes involved in the disease. In addition, we identified proteins that warrant further exploration as diagnostic and prognostic biomarker candidates.

Humans