Biomedical subjects

Markus Wahrmann

Publications and source records attributed to Markus Wahrmann.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Rescue therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil does not prevent deterioration of graft function in C4d-positive chronic allograft nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Humoral alloresponses may contribute to chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in a subset of kidney transplant recipients. For chronic humoral rejection, the efficacy of rescue therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil has been suggested. METHODS: Eleven recipients with C4d-positive CAN (index biopsy performed after a median of 3 years posttransplantation), who had been on cyclosporine A-based immunosuppression, were converted to tacrolimus, and if not part of basal therapy, to mycophenolate mofetil. We evaluated the effect of this tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil rescue therapy on clinical outcomes and on alloantibody formation detected with flow cytometric testing of panel-reactive antibody. RESULTS: Tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil rescue therapy (plus anti-rejection treatment in six recipients with additional signs of acute cellular rejection) failed to prevent progressive deterioration of graft function. Four patients returned to dialysis after 4 to 18 months. Serial post-transplant serology detected HLA class I and/or II reactivity in seven recipients. Tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil therapy did not affect the time course of alloantibody levels. One patient with C4d-positive transplant glomerulopathy, who did not respond to tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil rescue therapy, developed nephrotic-range proteinuria associated with a rapid decline of allograft function. Despite considerable reduction in alloantibody levels and nearly complete clearance of C4d deposits, immunoadsorption failed to prevent graft failure in this patient. CONCLUSION: Our data argue against the efficacy of tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil rescue therapy in established C4d-positive chronic allograft dysfunction. Prospective trials are needed to evaluate whether early initiation of this or other antihumoral strategies are capable of effectively preventing alloantibody-mediated chronic graft injury.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

[C4d]FlowPRA screening--a specific assay for selective detection of complement-activating anti-HLA alloantibodies.

On waiting lists, transplant candidates are routinely screened for potentially harmful complement-fixing alloantibodies using complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) panel-reactive antibody (PRA) testing. We have recently developed a novel cell-independent assay for assessment of complement-activating panel reactivity ([C4d]FlowPRA), which is based on selective flow-cytometric detection of alloantibody-triggered C4 complement split product deposition to human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-coated FlowPRA beads. Serum specimens selected from 120 transplant candidates were evaluated by [C4d]FlowPRA (HLA class I vs II) in comparison with FlowPRA IgG alloantibody screening (HLA class I vs II), a method detecting both complement- and noncomplement-activating alloantibodies, and with CDC-PRA on separated T (T-CDC) or B cells (B-CDC, evaluation on platelet-absorbed sera). For each assay, >/=10% PRA reactivity was considered positive. Comparing complement-dependent PRA assays with standard FlowPRA, the specificity calculated for [C4d]FlowPRA (HLA class I: 92%; class II: 100%) was found to be superior to that of CDC testing (T-CDC-PRA: 79%; B-CDC-PRA: 86%). Because noncomplement-activating alloreactivities were not detected for both techniques, low sensitivities were calculated ([C4d]FlowPRA HLA class I: 61%; class II: 31%; T-CDC-PRA: 70%; B-CDC-PRA: 55%). Compared with CDC-PRA, [C4d]FlowPRA gave a high specificity (HLA class I compared with T-CDC: 89%, HLA class II compared with B-CDC: 95%) but, at least in part because of false-positive CDC results, a modest sensitivity (66% and 38%, respectively). For both HLA classes, we found a highly significant association between absolute [C4d]FlowPRA and CDC-PRA levels (p < 0.0001). Our results suggest that detection of C4 split product deposition to FlowPRA beads may represent an attractive HLA-specific and time-effective alternative to CDC-PRA screening.

B-Lymphocytes↗

PubMed2004

Risk factors for capillary C4d deposition in kidney allografts: evaluation of a large study cohort.

BACKGROUND: Capillary deposition of the complement split product C4d has turned out to be a valuable marker of antibody-mediated rejection. The impact of pre- and posttransplant variables including particular immunosuppressive regimens on the frequency of C4d deposition has not yet been systematically investigated in a large multivariate analysis. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the authors evaluated the incidence of C4d deposition in 388 kidney transplant recipients subjected to diagnostic biopsy within the first 6 months and analyzed the influence of potential confounders on the rate of C4d-positive graft dysfunction by applying multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Sixty-six recipients (17%) developed linear C4d deposits in at least a quarter of peritubular capillaries, a finding associated with inferior 1-year allograft survival (73% vs. 88% in C4d-negative patients, P=0.0003). A 50% reduction in the odds of C4d-positive graft dysfunction was found if calcineurin inhibitor or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapy was started 2 to 4 hr before transplantation when compared with initiation after surgery (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.5; P=0.03). No differences with respect to C4d staining results were found for the use of tacrolimus, MMF, or sirolimus, or for cyclosporine C2 monitoring. Retransplantation (OR, 3.6; P<0.001) and presensitization (OR, 3.1; P=0.002) turned out to be strong independent risk factors for C4d deposition. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' results suggest a reduced risk of C4d-positive graft dysfunction for patients receiving immunosuppression before transplantation. Apart from first dose timing, no influence of particular immunosuppressive strategies on C4d staining results was found.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Flow cytometry based detection of HLA alloantibody mediated classical complement activation.

Complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) panel reactive antibody (PRA) testing is used to assess recipient presensitization and post-transplant alloantibody formation in transplant recipients. However, CDC test results can be affected by false-positive reactions brought about by autoantibodies or antilymphocyte reagents. As an alternative to the CDC-PRA assay, detection of HLA alloantibodies using HLA antigen-coated microbeads (FlowPRA test) was recently established. FlowPRA testing, however, does not distinguish between (presumably more harmful) complement-fixing and noncomplement-fixing alloantibodies. In this study, we established a novel assay allowing flow cytometric detection of HLA alloantibody dependent classical complement activation using the FlowPRA test. For the detection of complement activation, FlowPRA beads were incubated with sera from highly sensitized dialysis patients (CDC-PRA reactivity >60%) and then stained for C4 (C4d, C4c) and C3 (C3d, C3c) fragments, as well as C1q deposition using indirect immunofluorescence. We demonstrate alloantibody induced induction of C4 fragment, and in parallel C1q deposition to HLA class I or class II beads. As shown by immunoblotting, C4 staining was not due to the presence of preformed C4 fragment-IgG/M complexes. Indeed, C4 fragment deposition in our in vitro system was demonstrated to result from de novo complement activation. First, inactivation of C4 by treatment of sera with methylamine, which inhibits cleavage of the internal thioester, completely abolished C4 fragment deposition. Second, C4 fragment deposition was not observed in the evaluation of C4-free immunoadsorption eluates obtained from highly sensitized dialysis patients. After supplementation with complement, however, eluates induced C4 deposition. Deposition of C4 split products and C1q was temperature-dependent with maximum binding after incubation at 4 degrees C for 60 min. In contrast, maximum C3 fragment deposition was found at 37 degrees C. At this temperature, C3 deposition occurred in an alloantibody and C4-independent fashion, presumably as a result of alternative complement activation. In summary, we describe a novel cell-independent and easy-to-perform PRA test that permits flow cytometry based detection of alloantibody induced classical complement activation. Future studies will have to evaluate its possible relevance as an alternative to CDC-PRA testing in clinical transplantation.

Case-Control Studies↗