Biomedical subjects

Marshall Lindheimer

Publications and source records attributed to Marshall Lindheimer.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Mapping the theories of preeclampsia and the role of angiogenic factors: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate claims that elevated soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 receptor (sFlt-1) and decreased placental growth factor predict preeclampsia. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (1966-March 2006), EMBASE (1980-June 2006), POPLINE (1980-June 2006), CINAHL (1982-June 2006), and LILACS (1982-June 2006) were searched, and experts contacted. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Studies identified and included were those reporting blood and urine levels of sFlt-1 or placental growth factor obtained before gestational week 30 or overt preeclampsia. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Ten of 184 available studies analyzing sFlt-1 and 14 of 319 studies analyzing placental growth factor were included in this review. There was considerable interreport heterogeneity in methodology and results for sFlt-1 measured before gestational week 25. After week 25 placental growth factor and sFlt-1 levels varied consistently between the normal pregnancy group and women destined to develop preeclampsia, achieving significance in women who developed severe preeclampsia. CONCLUSION: Third-trimester increases in sFlt-1 and decreases in placental growth factor levels are associated with preeclampsia, specifically severe disease, based on retrospective data. The evidence is insufficient to recommend these markers to be used for screening, and prospective studies employing rigorous laboratory and study design criteria are needed to determine the clinical usefulness of these tests.

Female↗

PubMed2006

Neuropsychological performance in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate neurocognitive function in preeclampsia and normal pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: Three groups (each n = 15) were studied before and after delivery using standard neurocognitive test techniques. Group A consisted of normal laboring patients; group B, preeclamptics receiving magnesium; and group C, women in preterm labor receiving MgSO4 tocolysis (Mg control). The tests, examining attention, working memory, explicit memory, auditory comprehension, and measures for emotional distress, pain, and fatigue were analyzed via 4-way multivariate analysis of variance and multiple t tests. RESULTS: Preeclamptics receiving MgSO4 had better attention and working memory (P = .05), compared with normal laboring women and the preterm patients. Explicit memory was impaired in all groups, and this could not be accounted for by pain or emotional distress. CONCLUSION: We could detect no cognitive defects in preeclamptics, compared with normotensive gravidas, at least while the cerebral vasodilator MgSO4 is being infused.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Spirometry is related to perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with asthma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that maternal asthma symptoms and pulmonary function are related to adverse perinatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Asthmatic patients were recruited from the 16 centers of the Maternal Fetal Medicine Units. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second was obtained at enrollment and at monthly study visits, and the frequency of asthma symptoms was assessed from enrollment to delivery. Perinatal data were obtained at postpartum chart reviews. RESULTS: The final cohort included 2123 participants with asthma. After adjustment for demographic characteristics, smoking, acute asthmatic episodes, and oral corticosteroid use, significant relationships were demonstrated between gestational hypertension and preterm birth and lower maternal gestational forced expiratory volume in 1 second. The data did not show any significant independent relationship between asthma symptom frequency and perinatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Lower pulmonary function during pregnancy is associated with increased gestational hypertension and prematurity in the pregnancies of women with asthma, which may be due to inadequate asthma control or factors that are associated with increased asthma severity.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Preeclampsia, gestational hypertension and intrauterine growth restriction, related or independent conditions?

OBJECTIVE: Preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, and unexplained intrauterine growth restriction may have similar determinants and consequences. In this study, we compared determinants and perinatal outcomes associated with these obstetric conditions. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed 39,615 pregnancies (data from the WHO Antenatal Care Trial), of which 2.2% were complicated by preeclampsia, 7.0% by gestational hypertension, and 8.1% by unexplained intrauterine growth restriction (ie, not associated with maternal smoking, maternal undernutrition, preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, or congenital malformations). We compared the risk factors associated with these groups. Fetal death, preterm delivery, and severe neonatal morbidity and mortality were the primary outcomes. Logistic regression analyses were adjusted for study site, socioeconomic status, and (if appropriate) birth weight and gestational age. RESULTS: Diabetes, renal or cardiac disease, previous preeclampsia, urinary tract infection, high maternal age, twin pregnancy, and obesity increased the risk of both hypertensive conditions. Previous large-for-age birth, reproductive tract surgery, antepartum hemorrhage and reproductive tract infection increased the risk for gestational hypertension only. Independent of maternal age, primiparity was a risk factor only for preeclampsia. Both preeclampsia and gestational hypertension were associated with increased risk for fetal death and severe neonatal morbidity and mortality. Mothers with preeclampsia compared with those with unexplained intrauterine growth restriction were more likely to have a history of diabetes, renal or cardiac disease, chronic hypertension, previous preeclampsia, body mass index more than 30 kg/cm2, urinary tract infection and extremes of maternal age. Conversely, unexplained intrauterine growth restriction was associated with higher risk of low birth weight in previous pregnancies, but not with previous preeclampsia. Both conditions increased the risk for perinatal outcomes independently but preeclampsia was associated with considerable higher risk. CONCLUSION: Preeclampsia and gestational hypertension shared many risk factors, although there are differences that need further evaluation. Both conditions significantly increased morbidity and mortality. Conversely, preeclampsia and unexplained intrauterine growth restriction, often assumed to be related to placental insufficiency, seem to be independent biologic entities.

Female↗

PubMed2006

World Health Organization randomized trial of calcium supplementation among low calcium intake pregnant women.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this trial was to determine whether calcium supplementation of pregnant women with low calcium intake reduces preeclampsia and preterm delivery. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial in nulliparous normotensive women from populations with dietary calcium < 600 mg/d. Women who were recruited before gestational week 20 received supplements (1.5 g calcium/d or placebo) throughout pregnancy. Primary outcomes were preeclampsia and preterm delivery; secondary outcomes focused on severe morbidity and maternal and neonatal mortality rates. RESULTS: The groups comprised 8325 women who were assigned randomly. Both groups had similar gestational ages, demographic characteristics, and blood pressure levels at entry. Compliance were both 85% and follow-up losses (calcium, 3.4%; placebo, 3.7%). Calcium supplementation was associated with a non-statistically significant small reduction in preeclampsia (4.1% vs 4.5%) that was evident by 35 weeks of gestation (1.2% vs 2.8%; P = .04). Eclampsia (risk ratio, 0.68: 95% CI, 0.48-0.97) and severe gestational hypertension (risk ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61-0.82) were significantly lower in the calcium group. Overall, there was a reduction in the severe preeclamptic complications index (risk ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.89; life-table analysis, log rank test; P = .04). The severe maternal morbidity and mortality index was also reduced in the supplementation group (risk ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.91). Preterm delivery (the neonatal primary outcome) and early preterm delivery tended to be reduced among women who were < or = 20 years of age (risk ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.67-1.01; risk ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42-0.98, respectively). The neonatal mortality rate was lower (risk ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.88) in the calcium group. CONCLUSION: A 1.5-g calcium/day supplement did not prevent preeclampsia but did reduce its severity, maternal morbidity, and neonatal mortality, albeit these were secondary outcomes.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Late postpartum eclampsia: examples and review.

Eclampsia, defined as the occurrence of seizures in pregnant women, usually in the setting of preeclampsia and in the absence of other neurologic disorders, occurs mainly before, during , or within 48 hours after delivery. When convulsions occur later postpartum, diagnosis is difficult and treatment disputed. We review the entity of late postpartum eclampsia and report 2 examples in which the serum levels of antiangiogenic and angiogenic proteins were measured.

Abdominal Pain↗

PubMed2005

Reproduction and transplantation: report on the AST Consensus Conference on Reproductive Issues and Transplantation.

It has been almost 50 years since the first child was born to a female transplant recipient. Since that time pregnancy has become common after transplantation, but physicians have been left to rely on case reports, small series and data from voluntary registries to guide the care of their patients. Many uncertainties exist including the risks that pregnancy presents to the graft, the patient herself, and the long-term risks to the fetus. It is also unclear how to best modify immunosuppressive agents or treat rejection during pregnancy, especially in light of newer agents available where pregnancy safety has not been established. To begin to address uncertainties and define clinical practice guidelines for the transplant physician and obstetrical caregivers, a consensus conference was held in Bethesda, Md. The conferees summarized both what is known and important gaps in our knowledge. They also identified key areas of agreement, and posed a number of critical questions, the resolution of which is necessary in order to establish evidence-based guidelines. The manuscript summarizes the deliberations and conclusions of the conference as well as specific recommendations based on current knowledge in the field.

Female↗

PubMed2004

Randomized trial of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate versus theophylline for moderate asthma during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate to oral theophylline for the prevention of asthma exacerbation(s) requiring medical intervention. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, double-blind, double placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of pregnant women with moderate asthma was performed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference (P=.554) in the proportion of asthma exacerbations among the 194 women in the beclomethasone cohort (18.0%) versus the 191 in the theophylline cohort (20.4%; risk ratio [RR]=0.9, 95% CI=0.6-1.3). The beclomethasone cohort had significantly lower incidences of discontinuing study medications caused by side effects (RR=0.3, 95% CI=0.1-0.9; P=.016), and proportion of study visits with forced expiratory volume expired in 1 second (FEV1) less than 80% predicted (0.284+/-0.331 vs 0.284+/-0.221, P=.039). There were no significant differences in treatment failure, compliance, or proportion of peak expiratory flow rate less than 80% predicted. There were no significant differences in maternal or perinatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: The treatment of moderate asthma with inhaled beclomethasone versus oral theophylline resulted in similar rates of asthma exacerbations and similar obstetric and perinatal outcomes. These results favor the use of inhaled corticosteroids for moderate asthma during pregnancy because of the improved FEV1 and because theophylline had more side effects and requires serum monitoring.

Administration, Inhalation↗

PubMed2004

Is early-pregnancy proteinuria associated with an increased rate of preeclampsia in women with pregestational diabetes mellitus?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the rate of preeclampsia in pregnant diabetic women is increased in those women with early-pregnancy proteinuria of 190 to 499 mg/24 hours compared with women with proteinuria of <190 mg/24 hours. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis was performed with relevant data from 194 pregnant women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus whose condition required insulin and who were enrolled previously in a multicenter trial of low-dose aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia. The women were assigned to 1 of 3 groups, based on the level of proteinuria at enrollment (13-26 weeks of gestation). Group 1 comprised women with <190 mg protein/24 hours (n=94); group 2 comprised women with 190 to 499 mg protein/24 hours (n=35); and group 3 comprised women with >/=500 mg protein/24 hours (n=65). The rate of preeclampsia, according to strict predefined criteria, was then determined. RESULTS: The rate of preeclampsia was not increased statistically significantly in patients with early-pregnancy proteinuria of 190 to 499 mg/24 hours (7/35 women; 20%) when compared with women with proteinuria of <190 mg/24 hours (16/94 women; 17%). CONCLUSION: We did not find an increased rate of preeclampsia in women with pregestational diabetes mellitus with early-pregnancy proteinuria of 190 to 499 mg/24 hours when compared with women with pregestational diabetes mellitus with proteinuria of <190 mg/24 hours.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

The relationship of asthma medication use to perinatal outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Maternal asthma has been reported to increase the risk of preeclampsia, preterm deliveries, and lower-birth-weight infants, but the mechanisms of this effect are not defined. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the relationship between the use of contemporary asthma medications and adverse perinatal outcomes. METHODS: Asthmatic patients were recruited from the 16 centers of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Units Network from December 1994 through February 2000. Gestational medication use was determined on the basis of patient history at enrollment and at monthly visits during pregnancy. Perinatal data were obtained at postpartum chart reviews. Perinatal outcome variables included gestational hypertension, preterm births, low-birth-weight infants, small-for-gestational-age infants, and major malformations. RESULTS: The final cohort included 2123 asthmatic participants. No significant relationships were found between the use of inhaled beta-agonists (n=1828), inhaled corticosteroids (n=722), or theophylline (n=273) and adverse perinatal outcomes. After adjusting for demographic and asthma severity covariates, oral corticosteroid use was significantly associated with both preterm birth at less than 37 weeks' gestation (odds ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.02-2.33) and low birth weight of less than 2500 g (odds ratio, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.13-2.88). CONCLUSIONS: Use of inhaled beta-agonists, inhaled steroids, and theophylline do not appear to increase perinatal risks in pregnant asthmatic women. The mechanism of the association between maternal oral corticosteroid use and prematurity remains to be determined.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Asthma during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine neonatal and maternal outcomes stratified by asthma severity during pregnancy by using the 1993 National Asthma Education Program Working Group on Asthma and Pregnancy definitions of asthma severity. The primary hypothesis was that moderate or severe asthmatics would have an increased incidence of delivery at <32 weeks of gestation compared with nonasthmatic controls. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study conducted over 4 years at 16 university hospital centers. Asthma severity was defined according to the National Asthma Education Program Working Group on Asthma and Pregnancy classification and modified to include medication requirements. This study had 80% power to detect a 2- to 3-fold increase in delivery less than 32 weeks of gestation among the cohort with the moderate or severe asthma compared with controls. Secondary outcome measures included obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: The final analysis included 881 nonasthmatic controls, 873 with mild asthma, 814 with moderate, and 52 with severe asthma. There were no significant differences in the rates of preterm delivery less than 32 weeks (moderate or severe 3.0%, mild 3.4%, controls 3.3%; P =.873) or less than 37 weeks of gestation. There were no significant differences for neonatal outcomes except discharge diagnosis of neonatal sepsis among the mild group compared with controls, adjusted odds ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.2, 6.8. There were no significant differences for maternal complications except for an increase in overall cesarean delivery rate among the moderate-or-severe group compared with controls (adjusted odds ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval 1.1, 1.8). CONCLUSION: Asthma was not associated with a significant increase in preterm delivery or other adverse perinatal outcomes other than a discharge diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Cesarean delivery rate was increased among the cohort with moderate or severe asthma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2

Adult↗

PubMed2004

World Health Organization systematic review of screening tests for preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the usefulness of clinical, biophysical, and biochemical tests in the prediction of preeclampsia. DATA SOURCES: The sources of data we used to conduct this review included the computerized databases MEDLINE (1966 to February 2003), EMBASE, Popline, CINAHL, and LILACS plus reference lists, conference proceedings, textbooks, and contact with experts. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: All cohort or cross-sectional studies reporting data on the relationship between a predictive test that was performed during pregnancy and the development of preeclampsia were eligible for inclusion, whereas case-control studies were excluded. Eighty-seven (211,369 women) of 7,191 potentially relevant articles met inclusion criteria. We evaluated the methodologic quality for each included study. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Using a standardized protocol, one reviewer selected and extracted data on study characteristics, quality, and accuracy. Data abstracted from each study were arranged in 2 x 2 tables to construct receiver operating characteristics plots (sensitivity against 1 - specificity) and pooled to produce summary likelihood ratios for positive and negative tests results. Moderate predictive accuracy of anticardiolipin antibodies, the presence of bilateral diastolic notches during Doppler ultrasonography, and urinary kallikrein were found in women at low risk of developing preeclampsia. Nevertheless, because the pretest probability of preeclampsia with a positive result was but minimally increased, the clinical use of these tests is limited. Other ultrasonography characteristics and the measurement of fetal and placental peptides showed low predictive accuracy. In populations that were deemed at high risk for preeclampsia, the use of Doppler ultrasonography had low predictive accuracy. No definitive conclusions were possible in the case of many other tests, because the number of studies that met the minimal inclusion criteria was limited. CONCLUSION: As of 2004, there is no clinically useful screening test to predict the development of preeclampsia. Further prospective, longitudinal studies are needed.

Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory↗

PubMed2003

Summary of the NHLBI Working Group on Research on Hypertension During Pregnancy.

A Working Group on Research in Hypertension in Pregnancy was recently convened by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to determine the state of knowledge in this area and suggest appropriate directions for research. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, especially preeclampsia, are a leading cause of maternal death worldwide and even in developed countries increase perinatal mortality rates 5-fold. Much has been learned about preeclampsia, but gaps in the knowledge necessary to direct therapeutic strategies remain. Oxidative stress is a biologically plausible contributor to the disorder that may be amenable to intervention. Hypertension that antedates pregnancy (chronic hypertension) bears many similarities to hypertension in nonpregnant women, but the special setting of pregnancy demands information to guide evidence-based therapy. The recommendations of the Working Group are to attempt a clinical trial of antioxidant therapy to prevent preeclampsia that is be complemented by mechanistic research to increase understanding of the genetics and pathogenesis of the disorder. For chronic hypertension, clinical trials are recommended to direct choice of drugs, evaluate degree of control, and assess implications to the mother and fetus. Recommendations to increase participation in this research are also presented.

Antioxidants↗

PubMed2003

Asthma morbidity during pregnancy can be predicted by severity classification.

BACKGROUND: The 1993 National Asthma Education Program Working Group on Asthma and Pregnancy defined asthma severity as mild, moderate, or severe on the basis of symptoms and spirometry, but no studies have evaluated the relationship between this classification system and subsequent asthma morbidity during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between asthma severity classification during pregnancy and gestational asthma exacerbations. METHODS: Asthma severity was defined according to the 1993 classification, adjusted to include medication requirements, in a volunteer sample of 1739 pregnant asthmatic patients who were less than 26 weeks' gestation. RESULTS: Initial asthma classification (mild, moderate, or severe) was significantly related to subsequent asthma morbidity during pregnancy (hospitalizations, unscheduled visits, corticosteroid requirements, and asthma symptoms during labor and delivery). Exacerbations during pregnancy occurred in 12.6% of patients initially classified as mild, 25.7% of patients classified as moderate, and 51.9% of patients classified as severe (P <.001). Asthma morbidity was similar, whether patients were classified as moderate or severe by symptoms and spirometry or by medication requirement. Thirty percent of initially mild patients were reclassified as moderate-severe during pregnancy, and 23% of the initially moderate-severe patients were reclassified as mild later in pregnancy; asthma morbidity in these patients changed accordingly. CONCLUSION: The National Asthma Education Program Working Group on Asthma and Pregnancy classification of asthma severity, adapted to include medication use, predicts subsequent asthma morbidity during pregnancy.

Adult↗