PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Marta Boffito

Publications and source records attributed to Marta Boffito.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Atazanavir enhances saquinavir hard-gel concentrations in a ritonavir-boosted once-daily regimen.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir hard-gel capsules/ritonavir/atazanavir co-administered once daily at 1600/100/300 mg in HIV-infected individuals. METHODS: Eighteen patients receiving saquinavir/ritonavir switched to 1600/100 mg once daily a minimum of 3 days before the study. On study day 1, levels of saquinavir and ritonavir were determined over 24 h. Atazanavir (300 mg once daily) was then added to the regimen. On day 11, a pharmacokinetic analysis was performed. Atazanavir was discontinued on day 32. Drug concentrations were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to compare saquinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetic parameters, with and without atazanavir. A safety analysis was performed at screening, days 1, 11, 32 and follow-up. RESULTS: After the addition of atazanavir, statistically significant increases in saquinavir trough plasma concentration (Ctrough GMR, 95% CI 2.12, 1.72-3.50), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax 1.42, 1.24-1.94), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0-24 h (AUC0-24 1.60, 1.35-2.43) and ritonavir Cmax (1.58, 1.32-2.08), AUC0-24 (1.41, 1.22-1.74) were observed. The pharmacokinetics of atazanavir compared with those obtained in patients receiving atazanavir/ritonavir without saquinavir. Four patients developed scleral icterus and two jaundice. Total and unconjugated bilirubin increased approximately fivefold during atazanavir therapy. CONCLUSION: The addition of atazanavir to saquinavir/ritonavir increased saquinavir Ctrough, Cmax and AUC0-24 by 112, 42 and 60%. Ritonavir Cmax and AUCo-24 increased by 34 and 41%. The regimen was well tolerated, with no significant change in laboratory parameters, except for the occurrence of hyperbilirubinemia.

Adult↗

The relationship between nevirapine plasma concentrations and abnormal liver function tests.

Abnormal liver function tests are frequently observed in HIV-infected individuals receiving nevirapine (NVP). Here we investigate the relationship between total and unbound plasma concentrations of NVP and the liver enzymes alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (gammaGT). HIV-infected individuals [n = 85, 22 female, 34 hepatitis C or B virus (HCV or HBV(+))] receiving NVP (200 mg bd; median duration 66 weeks, range 3-189) and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) were enrolled into this study. Blood samples were taken at C(trough) (12 hr postdose) for measurement of NVP and liver function tests (ALT and gammaGT). Plasma protein bound and unbound drug was separated using ultrafiltration and NVP concentrations quantified using HPLC-MS/MS. A linear relationship was observed between total and unbound NVP C(trough) (r(2) = 0.77, p < 0.0001). Patients with elevated ALT (>37 IU/liter; n = 31) had higher NVP unbound C(trough) than those with ALT within the normal range (median 2268 vs. 1694 ng/ml, p = 0.04) but there was no difference in total C(trough). Logistic regression revealed no association between higher NVP C(trough) and ALT elevations. Significantly higher NVP total and unbound C(trough) were observed in patients with increased gammaGT (>40 IU/liter; n = 63; total 6747 vs. 4530 ng/ml, p = 0.001; unbound 2113 vs. 1557 ng/ml, p = 0.03). Significantly higher unbound NVP C(trough) was observed in HCV/HBV(+) (median 2275 vs. 1726 ng/ml, p = 0.02) and on bivariate analysis, higher NVP C(trough) was associated with HCV/HBV coinfection (chi(2) = 4.228; p = 0.04). Overall we found no strong association between NVP concentrations and hepatotoxicity. Although in this study NVP was well tolerated in HCV/HBV coinfected patients, higher plasma concentrations were observed.

Alanine Transaminase↗

Lopinavir protein binding in vivo through the 12-hour dosing interval.

Most protease inhibitors available for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are highly bound to plasma proteins, mainly alpha-1 acid glycoprotein. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of total protease inhibitor (PI) concentrations has been increasing in the past few years; however, the pharmacological activity of the PIs is dependent on unbound drug entering cells harboring HIV. There is little information available on unbound drug concentrations of these drugs in vivo. The aim of the study was to measure unbound plasma concentrations of lopinavir (LPV) and to relate them to the total plasma concentrations to establish the unbound percentage in vivo during a full dosage interval. A pharmacokinetic study was performed in HIV-infected subjects (n = 23; median CD4 cell count = 290 x 10(6) cells x L(-1); viral load < 50 copies x mL(-1)) treated with a LPV/ritonavir (RTV)-containing regimen. Ultrafiltration was used to separate unbound LPV in all plasma samples (n = 115). Equilibrium dialysis was also used to compare with ultrafiltration measurements in 10/23 patients at baseline and 2 hours after drug intake. Total and unbound LPV concentrations were measured by a fully validated method using high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Based on a comparison of AUC(unbound)AUC(total), the mean (+/- SD) unbound percentage of LPV from all the samples studied (n = 115) was 0.92% (+/- 0.22) when measured with ultrafiltration and 1.32% (+/- 0.44) when equilibrium dialysis was used (n = 20), showing a higher drug recovery (P = 0.048). The unbound percentage of LPV was found to be significantly higher after 2 h than at baseline (P < 0.05 with both methods), suggesting a concentration-dependent binding of LPV that has not been observed in vitro. However, the clinical significance of such phenomena is still unclear.

Adult↗

Intracellular and plasma pharmacokinetics of saquinavir-ritonavir, administered at 1,600/100 milligrams once daily in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients.

Ritonavir-boosted saquinavir (SQV/r) is currently licensed as a twice-daily regimen. Reducing the pill burden with once-daily dosing may improve adherence. Intracellular concentrations of drugs must be related to the clinical efficacy of protease inhibitors. The aims of the study were to determine the cellular and plasma saquinavir and ritonavir concentrations, to determine the half-lives (t(1/2)s) of the drugs in each compartment, and to examine relationships between drug accumulation and lymphocyte subset P glycoprotein (P-gp) expression. Venous blood samples from 12 human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients receiving a hard-gel formulation of SQV/r (1,600/100 mg once daily) were collected at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after dosing. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were separated by density gradient centrifugation, and P-gp expression was measured by dual-color flow cytometry. Plasma and intracellular (cell-associated) drug concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The ratio of the intracellular drug area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24 h)) to plasma drug AUC(0-24 h) was calculated to determine cellular drug accumulation. The median (range) AUC(0-24 h) of saquinavir in plasma was 16.2 (5.7 to 39.3) mg. h. liter(-1), and that in cells was 46.3 (24.7 to 114.6) mg. h. liter(-1). Corresponding ritonavir values were 7.5 (1.5 to 14.6) mg. h. liter(-1) and 10.4 (3.2 to 13.7) mg. h. liter(-1), respectively. The median accumulation ratios of cellular AUC to plasma AUC for saquinavir and ritonavir were 3.31 (range, 1.49 to 6.69) and 1.46 (range, 0.83 to 4.15), respectively. Significant differences between the plasma and intracellular saquinavir t(1/2)s (4.5 h [range, 2.5 to 9.3 h] and 5.9 h [range, 4.0 to 17.7 h]; P = 0.034) and between the plasma and intracellular ritonavir t(1/2)s (4.1 h [range, 2.6 to 8.3 h] and 6.2 h [range, 3.9 to 18.6 h]; P = 0.032) were observed. No relationship was observed between the accumulation of saquinavir or ritonavir and lymphocyte subset P-gp expression. The intracellular t(1/2)s of saquinavir and ritonavir were longer than the plasma t(1/2)s, indicating that intracellular drug may be available at a time when concentrations in plasma are below the minimum effective concentration.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗

Pharmacokinetics of once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected subjects: comparison with the standard twice-daily regimen.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics and safety of two once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/RTV) regimens, 1600/100 and 2000/100 mg, in HIV-positive patients. METHODS: Eighteen HIV-infected adults treated with the standard twice-daily SQV/RTV 1000/100 mg regimen were enrolled in this open-label, two-phase, crossover pharmacokinetic study. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of SQV administered with 100 mg RTV were investigated following once-daily doses of 1600 mg or 2000 mg or a twice-daily dose of 1000 mg. Plasma drug concentrations were determined by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental model. RESULTS: Compared with SQV 1000 mg twice daily, the Cmax of SQV following a 1600 mg and 2000 mg dose increased in a dose-proportional manner [geometric mean (95% CI) 1915 (1656-2850) ng/ml for 1000 mg, 2782 (2249-4330) ng/ml for 1600 mg and 4179 (3429-6105) ng/ml for 2000 mg doses, respectively]. SQV Ctrough values were 539 (453-1011), 106 (76-223) and 231 (75-822) ng/ml, respectively. A SQV Ctrough value greater than 100 ng/ml was achieved in all subjects on the twice-daily regimen, in 9/18 (50%) subjects on the 1600/100 mg once-daily regimen, and in 14/17 (82%) subjects on the 2000/100 mg once-daily regimen. The once-daily regimens were well tolerated, with mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal symptoms being the only events reported by a small number of patients. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of once-daily SQV/RTV 2000/100 mg in HIV-infected subjects. Our findings suggest that this regimen may be an alternative to twice-daily 1000/100 mg doses and should be further evaluated in efficacy studies. The data indicate that most patients (14/17) on once-daily 2000/100 mg achieve trough concentrations above target values (determined for HIV wild-type) for efficacy of SQV with the use of just 100 mg RTV/day and with good tolerability.

Adult↗

Nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor drug interactions.

Since their advent the nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors have consolidated their position as the 'backbone' of many antiretroviral therapy regimens. The ability of this class of drugs to combine successfully with members of their own as well as other antiretroviral classes has enabled the effective suppression of HIV replication to occur. Many of these therapeutic combinations rely on synergistic interactions to achieve this. There are, however, also many unfavourable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between the members of nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors, as well as with other antiretroviral classes and non-HIV drugs. This article aims to identify clinically relevant, beneficial and detrimental interactions of this class of antiretroviral agent.

Drug Interactions↗

Clearance of 14-3-3 protein from cerebrospinal fluid heralds the resolution of bacterial meningitis.

The 14-3-3 protein, a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) marker of neuronal damage that was recently adopted for the diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, is also found in the CSF of patients with a variety of neurological disorders. We prospectively studied 12 consecutive patients with purulent bacterial meningitis and found that 14-3-3 protein was detected in all patients at admission to the hospital. All patients who recovered cleared 14-3-3 protein from the CSF before discharge from the hospital (this was the first CSF marker to clear), whereas those who died never cleared the protein.

14-3-3 Proteins↗

Protein binding in antiretroviral therapies.

There is marked variability in the extent to which the three classes of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs bind to plasma proteins (<5 to >99%). Protease inhibitors (PIs), with the exception of indinavir, are more than 90% protein bound, mainly to alpha1-acid glycoprotein (AAG). Efavirenz, a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), is more than 99% bound, mainly to albumin. Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are not highly protein bound. The pharmacological activity of ARV drugs is dependent on unbound drug entering cells that harbor the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). There has been concern that changes in protein binding could impact on antiviral activity and management. However, for PIs and NNRTIs, and for many drugs given orally, altered plasma binding would not be expected to influence the average exposure to unbound (active) drug after chronic oral dosing. Nevertheless, there will be a change in the relationship between total and unbound concentrations that will be important if, as part of therapeutic drug monitoring, the total rather than the unbound drug is measured. Measuring drug concentrations that are needed to inhibit different HIV strains (wild type and drug resistant) in vitro could also cause confusion because most methods employ bovine serum in the assay medium, and unbound concentrations are not directly measured. Estimating unbound drug concentrations in human plasma and in incubation media can be highly method dependent and thus may affect the calculated IC50 (the concentration of drug that results in 50% inhibition of viral replication). Because inhibitory quotients (IQs = C(trough)/IC50) are becoming part of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analyses of clinical trial data, the strengths and weaknesses of the methods used for the determination of unbound drug concentration in plasma and in vitro systems--ultracentrifugation, ultrafiltration, and equilibrium dialysis--need to be understood. Consensus on standard procedures must be reached. In June 2002, a panel of experts assembled by the Forum for Collaborative HIV Research met in Washington, DC, to review the basic principles of protein binding of ARV drugs, and to discuss the impact that changes in plasma protein binding may have on the PKs and activity of ARV drugs as well as on therapeutic drug monitoring. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the following topics: (1) basic principles of protein binding and how changes in binding can impact on drug PKs and drug exposure in vivo, (2) variability in plasma protein binding among patients taking ARV drugs, (3) the impact of HIV infection and concomitant diseases on the extent of plasma protein binding, (4) the likelihood of clinically relevant drug interactions at the level of plasma protein binding, (5) the evidence that measuring unbound concentrations of ARV drugs in the plasma of patients gives more meaningful information than total drug concentration and, therefore, should be considered in routine therapeutic drug monitoring of ARV agents, (6) optimal method(s) for measuring the unbound concentration of drugs in vitro (for IC50 determination) and in vivo, and (7) future studies that need to be considered to fully understand the importance of plasma protein binding in therapeutic drug monitoring. This report summarizes the topics discussed at this meeting. It guides the reader through the discussions that allowed the panel to formulate a series of statements regarding the significance of plasma protein binding of ARV drugs when studied in vitro and in vivo. The roundtable participants also identified research priorities that are important for understanding the sources of inter- and intraindividual variability in protein binding in patients. These include obtaining data on unbound as well as on total concentrations in PK studies; looking at variants of AAG and whether they differ in binding affinity; and emphasizing the importance of developing a standard procedure for drug susceptibility assays used to determine IC50 values.

Animals↗

Antiretroviral therapy to reduce the sexual transmission of HIV.

Sexual transmission of HIV is the principal mode of spread of HIV throughout the world. Whether the use of combination antiretroviral therapy will affect the sexual transmission of HIV remains to be seen. For an effect to occur, the viral load reductions seen within the blood need to be mirrored at a mucosal level, within the rectal tissues, the female genital tract and the semen of HIV-1-infected men. In part, this will be determined by the local concentrations of drugs within the genital tract. In this overview, we summarise the current knowledge on antiretroviral drug penetration into the male and female genital tracts. We also review studies that have investigated the effect of antiretroviral therapy on genital-tract shedding. The clinical implications of these studies are discussed. We conclude that the risk of HIV transmission exists as a spectrum, with many factors, both behavioural and biological, at interplay. It is conceivable that the use of antiretroviral therapy could reduce the spread of HIV from certain individuals. However, this idea is based on biological plausibility and surrogate marker data, rather than prospective population studies. In the worst-case scenario, antiretroviral therapy may simply increase the transmission of drug-resistant virus.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Clinical use of lopinavir/ritonavir in a salvage therapy setting: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Lopinavir/ritonavir was administered to 35 HIV-infected patients after therapeutic failure with other protease inhibitors. The pharmacokinetics (trough concentrations) and baseline viral genotype were determined, together with the immunovirological outcome. The 22 responders had significantly higher mean lopinavir concentrations and lower baseline numbers of mutations. On multivariate analysis, a lopinavir concentration of 5.7 microg/ml or greater was an independent predictor of viral suppression over a 9-month follow-up period.

CD4 Lymphocyte Count↗