Biomedical subjects

Martin A Freilich

Publications and source records attributed to Martin A Freilich.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Use of a prefabricated fiber-reinforced composite resin framework to provide a provisional fixed partial denture over an integrating implant: a clinical report.

The development of fiber-reinforced composites offers new possibilities in minimally invasive tooth replacement approaches. This article describes the use of a prefabricated fiber-reinforced composite resin framework for the chairside fabrication of a provisional fixed partial denture over an integrating implant. The framework fabrication, theory, and a clinical scenario are illustrated.

Composite Resins↗

PubMed2006

Design and use of a prefabricated fiber-reinforced composite substructure for the chairside replacement of missing premolars.

Fiber-reinforced resin composites (FRCs) have been used to make frameworks to support particulate resin composite veneers in the replacement of missing teeth. Both prosthetic laboratory-fabricated and chairside-fabricated approaches have been used with varying degrees of success. The chairside FRC fixed partial denture has been mainly used for anterior tooth replacement where the emphasis is on esthetics rather than withstanding occlusal load. This article focuses on the use of this technology in the chairside replacement of premolars. The concept of using a prefabricated framework is described in detail. This approach allows for the efficient delivery of a consistently made chairside prosthesis. This is in contrast with the time-consuming and less consistent result of FRC framework fabrication directly in the mouth. The goal for this concept is to use a premade framework finalized by the provider at chairside to provide medium- to long-term posterior tooth replacement, with minimal abutment tooth reduction.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Fiber-reinforced composite prostheses.

Metal-free prosthetic dentistry continues to gain interest. Although the metal alloys contribute great strength and stiffness to restorations and prostheses, they do so at a considerable esthetic liability. Two somewhat divergent metal-free approaches to fixed tooth replacement continue to be developed for a variety of clinical applications. These are all-ceramic and all-polymeric systems. The polymeric prostheses are the subject of this article.

Composite Resins↗

PubMed2002

The design and fabrication of fiber-reinforced implant prostheses.

The use of fiber composite technology in the creation of metal-free implant prostheses may solve many of the problems associated with a metal alloy substructure such as corrosion, toxicity, complexity of fabrication, high cost, and esthetic limitations. Laboratory and clinical research evaluating glass fiber-reinforced composite prostheses used to restore and replace teeth has shown that these materials exhibit excellent mechanical properties and can form a chemical bond to resin-based veneer materials such as those used in the fabrication of certain types of implant prostheses. Two different designs of fiber-reinforced composite implant prostheses have been developed and placed in human subjects. One design (screw-retained, retrievable prosthesis) is used with implant abutments that allow for screw-retained prostheses; the other design is used with abutments that retain prostheses with a luting material. Both designs are described in this article. The prostheses have functioned well in a small group of preliminary subjects, but clinical trials with larger subject populations are needed to more completely evaluate the potential of fiber-reinforced composites in implant prosthodontics.

Cementation↗

PubMed2002

Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced fixed bridges.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the clinical performance of 39 light and heat polymerized fixed partial bridges made with a substructure of preimpregnated, unidirectional fiber-reinforced composite, or FRC, veneered with a hybrid particu late composite. METHODS: The authors evaluated 22 extracoronal, full-coverage retainer prostheses and 17 intracoronal, partial-coverage retainer prostheses placed over a 37-month period. All substructures initially were fabricated with a low-volume FRC. The authors reevaluated this design after early failures occurred, leading to a substructure with a higher volume of FRC. All prostheses were assessed for surface integrity, anatomical contour, marginal integrity and structural integrity at several intervals. RESULTS: The data show that survival was associated primarily with substructure design volume. When patients with severe parafunctional habits were excluded, the survival rate was 95 percent for prostheses made with a high-volume substructure (survival range, 2.77 to 4.30 years; mean +/- standard deviation survival, 3.75 +/- 0.4 years). Retainer configuration did not have a statistically significant influence on clinical survival. For all surviving prostheses, the authors observed few changes in any clinical parameters from baseline to 48 months. A loss of surface luster was observed in the majority of cases. Repairable surface defects were detected on two prostheses at 24 months. Scanning electron microscopic analyses indicated no exposed fibers on the occlusal surface and minimal wear. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a unidirectional, preimpregnated FRC can be used successfully to make bridges of variable retainer designs that last up to four or more years when a high-volume substructure is used. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Short-span polymer prostheses made with particulate composite and unidirectional glass FRC can be used in certain clinical situations in which a metal substructure is not desired.

Composite Resins↗