PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Mary McCullum

Publications and source records attributed to Mary McCullum.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Canadian nursing in the genomic era: a call for leadership.

With developments in genomics, there is an urgent need for Canadian nurses in all settings to be informed and involved in the incorporation of this new knowledge into healthcare. The purpose of this paper was to synthesize the literature on genetic nursing roles to provide a foundation for Canadian nursing leaders as they take on the challenges of nursing in the genomic era. A comprehensive review of 98 articles published between 1994 and 2004 revealed strong support for genetic nursing roles and recommendations for levels of genetic nursing practice. The few studies on genetic nursing roles suggested that nurses and other health professionals support the integration of genomics into nursing practice. Issues that need to be addressed related to nursing practice, education and research are offered to engage nursing leaders in advocating for the incorporation of genomics into nursing in Canada.

Canada↗
PubMed2005

Establishing roles in genetic nursing: interviews with Canadian nurses.

The purpose of this qualitative study was to describe nurses' roles in providing clinical genetic services related to adult onset hereditary disease and factors that influence genetic nursing practice in Canada. The study involved semi-structured telephone interviews with 22 nurses from 5 Canadian provinces with full-time or part-time roles in providing genetic services. The interviews included open-ended questions to elicit descriptions of genetic nursing roles and factors that support and limit opportunities in genetic nursing practice. Thematic analysis of the transcribed interviews revealed that, in addition to genetic counselling, the nurses reported a wide range of roles and responsibilities related to the provision of genetic services that drew directly on their nursing background (e.g., patient assessment, health promotion). Factors identified as supporting genetic nursing roles included nursing background, being part of a multidisciplinary team, and receiving mentorship. Challenges in establishing roles in genetic nursing were related to role ambiguity, lack of recognition of nursing expertise, limited availability of genetics education, isolation, and instability of nursing positions. Recommendations to support the development and expansion of genetic nursing practice were identified. A coordinated national effort among all stakeholders is needed to provide the resources necessary to support the appropriate and effective use of nursing expertise as genetics is integrated into the Canadian health-care system.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Unraveling women's perceptions of risk for breast cancer.

Inconsistent reports of the prevalence of risk perception accuracy may be related to the use of different classification strategies. The purpose of this study was to compare two approaches for assessing the accuracy of women's breast cancer risk perceptions. A telephone survey was conducted with an age-stratified random sample of British Columbian women 20-79 years of age without a breast cancer diagnosis (n = 761). A comparison of two methods employed to determine perception accuracy revealed substantial differences between the methods with regard to the classification of women as under- and over-estimators. The study highlights the need for researchers to consider the method used to determine the accuracy of risk perceptions and the implications of using different strategies to assess risk perception accuracy when such information is used in research or to guide interventions.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Finding and interpreting cancer screening guidelines: an oncology nursing challenge.

It is our hope that increased awareness of cancer screening recommendations will initiate a dialogue between individuals and their health care providers. Organizational screening recommendations differ as a result of evolving technology, financial and ethical considerations, and impact on mortality. It is through discussions with informed health care providers that patients and families will determine the most effective personal cancer screening strategies. We are hopeful that this discussion of cancer screening recommendations will encourage other oncology nurses to identify their provincial screening guidelines and to address them in discussions with people living with cancer, family members, community groups, and friendship circles. For those cancers where early detection correlates with improved survival, regular screening may have a direct impact on individual lives. We challenge you to implement strategies to incorporate cancer screening information in your professional and personal relationships.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2002

Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk: the influence of sociodemographics and knowledge.

The objective of this study was to assess women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk. Randomly selected samples of 761 women without breast cancer from the general population of British Columbia, Canada, and 260 women with breast cancer from the provincial cancer registry participated in a telephone survey that assessed interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk, knowledge of hereditary breast cancer and genetic testing, and sociodemographics. Women with breast cancer did not possess superior knowledge of breast cancer genetics compared with women from the general population. Of the women with breast cancer, 30.8% reported interest in testing or had been tested, compared with 28.5% of women without breast cancer. Controlling for differences in age, education, personal history of breast cancer, and knowledge of genetics, women with at least one relative with breast cancer were 2.3 times more likely to express interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk than those with no family history. There were significant interactions between breast cancer status and education and between age and knowledge of breast cancer genetics. Women without breast cancer and with a positive family history, who were between 20 and 40 years of age, were most likely to be interested in testing. The women with breast cancer who were interested in testing tended to be approximately 50 years of age, had a positive family history, and had more years of education. Women with a family history of breast cancer, well-educated women with breast cancer, and younger women, particularly those with knowledge of genetic testing, are important target audiences for community-based education on genetic testing for breast cancer risk.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The influence of question wording on assessments of interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk.

The purpose of this study was to compare the results of different measures of interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk. A telephone survey of a random sample of women without breast cancer was conducted in British Columbia, Canada. Interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk was measured in three ways: (1) an unprompted assessment of interest, (2) assessment of interest when prompted with a hypothetical offer of testing, and (3) assessment of interest when provided with supplementary information. Substantial differences in reported levels of interest in genetic testing were observed across the different assessment approaches, with the unprompted assessment of interest resulting in lowest levels of interest. The highest levels of interest were observed when the assessment of interest was prompted with a hypothetical offer of testing. Factors predicting interest in genetic testing varied depending on the assessment measure used. These findings suggest that more attention must be given to measurement issues, including complete reporting of measures used in research, development of standardized approaches to assessing interest in genetic testing, and more rigorous psychometric evaluations of measures of interest in genetic testing.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Women's perceptions of breast cancer risk: are they accurate?

BACKGROUND: The objective was to compare women's personal estimates of their risk with objective breast cancer risk estimates and to describe the risk factors for breast cancer identified by women. METHODS: Telephone survey of a random sample of 761 rural and urban women with no history of breast cancer. Survey instrument included measures of perceptions of lifetime risk for breast cancer for themselves and for the average woman, perceptions of risk factors that influenced their risk and the average woman's risk for breast cancer. Objective estimates of breast cancer risk were calculated using the Gail et al. algorithm. Descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Women's estimates of their own lifetime risk for breast cancer were significantly higher than their Gail model risk estimates (mean difference = 19%, p < 0.001). The women's personal breast cancer risk estimates were lower than estimates of risk for a hypothetical average woman (mean difference = -8%, p < 0.001). Fifty percent of the sample reported a perceived risk estimate at least 15% above their Gail risk estimate. The risk factors for breast cancer most frequently identified included family history, nutrition/diet, smoking, lifestyle, environment, stress and age. Although the risk factors used to calculate the Gail model risk estimates were reported by some study participants, these women consistently identified only family history as their personal risk factor. CONCLUSION: Women have difficulty accurately estimating their breast cancer risk and identifying known risk factors for breast cancer. Individual risk information may be more useful in enhancing accurate risk perceptions than the "1 in 9" message.

Adult↗