Evidence-based forensic sampling - more questions than answers.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Mary Newton.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The introduction of this pathway for the prevention and management of pressure ulcers was influenced by the development of the pathway for the management of a patient with a fractured neck of femur. Systematic documentation of preventative measures for patients with a fractured neck of femur helped reduce the incidence of pressure ulcers in this high-risk group. The original draft was informed by evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. This draft of the pathway was piloted, reviewed and changed in line with current evidence and comments from users. It was invaluable to pilot the pathway and review as necessary in order to make this a true workable document that would enable continuity of care, help prevent hospital-acquired pressure ulcers and be an effective teaching aid. A trust-wide retrospective audit of documentation for the prevention and management of pressure ulcers has been conducted, which found that the pathway facilitated a more concise approach to inform care than standard documentation. A further audit has been undertaken in the care of the elderly directorate which has demonstrated various ways in which the pathway had been completed. Challenges remain for the effective use of this documentation. Further education needs to be completed in order to promote multiprofessional use of the pathway. The pathway is now being integrated into others, which will increase awareness and involvement of other professional groups in this important aspect of patient care. Ongoing audit will take place to assess the impact upon patient outcomes.
Pilot studies and a literature review suggested that fear-avoidance beliefs about physical activity and work might form specific cognitions intervening between low back pain and disability. A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) was developed, based on theories of fear and avoidance behaviour and focussed specifically on patients' beliefs about how physical activity and work affected their low back pain. Test-retest reproducibility in 26 patients was high. Principal-components analysis of the questionnaire in 210 patients identified 2 factors: fear-avoidance beliefs about work and fear-avoidance beliefs about physical activity with internal consistency (alpha) of 0.88 and 0.77 and accounting for 43.7% and 16.5% of the total variance, respectively. Regression analysis in 184 patients showed that fear-avoidance beliefs about work accounted for 23% of the variance of disability in activities of daily living and 26% of the variance of work loss, even after allowing for severity of pain; fear-avoidance beliefs about physical activity explained an additional 9% of the variance of disability. These results confirm the importance of fear-avoidance beliefs and demonstrate that specific fear-avoidance beliefs about work are strongly related to work loss due to low back pain. These findings are incorporated into a biopsychosocial model of the cognitive, affective and behavioural influences in low back pain and disability. It is recommended that fear-avoidance beliefs should be considered in the medical management of low back pain and disability.
There are several methods of wound debridement and the appropriate one should be chosen for maximum effectiveness. It therefore follows that practitioners must have a working knowledge of a wide variety of debridement methods and that they should recognize their own professional limitations and the need for referral for expert advice. This article aims to set out an overview of the indications, cautions and contraindications of the most commonly used methods of debridement at our disposal and to look briefly at some less often used alternatives.