Biomedical subjects

Maryna Marynchenko

Publications and source records attributed to Maryna Marynchenko.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Employees with overactive bladder: work loss burden.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the indirect work loss costs to employers as the result of employees with overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: Study samples were drawn from an administrative database of 1.2 million beneficiaries, including medical and disability claims (1999-2002). OAB employees were compared with matched employees without OAB. RESULTS: OAB was associated with higher annual occurrences of work loss (P < 0.01). Employees with OAB had 2.2 excess work loss days as the result of medically related absenteeism and 3.4 excess days as the result of disability compared with employees without OAB (P < 0.01 for both comparisons). Employees with OAB had increased risk of disability (P < 0.01), and female employees with OAB had a higher risk of disability than male employees (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that OAB was associated with work loss costs to employers resulting from increased number of employee sick days and increased risk of employee disability.

Absenteeism↗

PubMed2004

Economic implications of treatment-resistant depression among employees.

BACKGROUND: Conservative estimates indicate between 10% and 20% of all individuals with major depressive disorders (MDDs) fail to respond to conventional antidepressant therapies. Amongst those with MDD, individuals with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) have been found to be frequent users of healthcare services and to incur significantly greater costs than those without TRD. Given the prevalence of the disorder, it is understandable that MDDs are responsible for a significant amount of both direct and indirect healthcare costs. OBJECTIVE: To provide empirical findings for employees likely to have TRD based on analysis of employer claims data, in the context of previous research. METHODS: We conducted a claims data analysis of employees of a large national (US) employer. The data source consisted of medical, pharmaceutical and disability claims from a Fortune 100 manufacturer for the years 1996-1998 (total beneficiaries >100000). The employee sample included individuals with medical or disability claims for MDDs (n = 1692). A treatment pattern algorithm was applied to classify MDD patients into TRD-likely (n = 180) and TRD-unlikely groups. Treated prevalence of select comorbid conditions and the patient costs (direct and indirect) from the employer perspective by condition were compared among TRD-likely and TRD-unlikely employees, and with a 10% random sample of the overall employee population for 1998. RESULTS: The average annual cost of employees considered TRD-likely was dollars US 14490 per employee, while the cost for depressed but TRD-unlikely employees was dollars US 6665 per employee, and dollars US 4043 for the employee from the random sample. TRD beneficiaries used more than twice as many medical services compared with TRD-unlikely patients, and incurred significantly greater work loss costs. CONCLUSION: TRD has gained increasing recognition due to both the clinical challenges and economic burdens associated with the condition. TRD imposes a significant economic burden on an employer. TRD-likely employees are more likely to be treated for selected comorbid conditions and have higher medical and work loss costs across all conditions.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: increased costs for patients and their families.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the direct (medical and prescription drug) and indirect (work loss) costs of children treated for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and their family members. METHOD: The data source was an administrative database from a national, Fortune 100 manufacturer that included all medical, pharmaceutical, and disability claims for beneficiaries (n > 100,000). The analysis involved four samples. The ADHD patient sample included individuals age 18 or younger with at least one ADHD claim during the study period (1996-1998). Resource utilization of ADHD patients was contrasted with a matched control sample of patients who did not have claims for ADHD. The ADHD and non-ADHD family samples included non-ADHD family members of ADHD patients and their matched controls. RESULTS: The annual average expenditure (direct cost) per ADHD patient was $1,574, compared to $541 among matched controls. The annual average payment (direct plus indirect cost) per family member was $2,728 for non-ADHD family members of ADHD patients versus $1,440 for family members of matched controls. Both patient and family cost differences were significant at the 95% confidence level. CONCLUSIONS: ADHD imposes a significant financial burden regarding the cost of medical care and work loss for patients and family members.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Economic impact of olanzapine plus fluoxetine combination therapy among patients treated for depression: a pilot study.

Individuals with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) utilize more health care services and are significantly more costly. Drug treatments for TRD may include concomitant administration of multiple antidepressants or augmentation with mood stabilizers or antipsychotic agents. An augmentation strategy currently under investigation is the use of an olanzapine plus fluoxetine combination (OFC) therapy. The objectives for this pilot study were to use claims data to: (1) describe the extent of current use of OFC in patients with depressive disorders, and (2) compare health care utilization patterns and medical costs of patients receiving fluoxetine therapy before and after the initiation of olanzapine treatment. Data source consisted of medical, pharmaceutical, and disability claims from a Fortune 100 manufacturer from 1996 to 1998 (N>100,000). The sample included individuals with medical or disability claims for major depressive disorders treated with OFC (nOFC=36). Resource utilization and costs were compared for fluoxetine patients before and after the initiation of olanzapine treatment. Eleven percent of patients on combination therapy received olanzapine and fluoxetine. For patients on fluoxetine, there was a statistically significant reduction in health care utilization, and overall medical costs (20%), following initiation of olanzapine therapy. Overall, it appears the addition of olanzapine to ongoing fluoxetine therapy is effective in reducing outpatient, office, and inpatient utilization, as well as medical costs of patients treated for depression. Further research is needed to investigate combination therapy more fully.

Adolescent↗