Biomedical subjects

Masako Matsuzawa

Publications and source records attributed to Masako Matsuzawa.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Temporal relationship between action and visual outcome modulates brain activation: an fMRI study.

Monitoring the visual outcome of our actions is critical to our visuo-motor behavior. To investigate the neural basis of monitoring visual change produced by self-movement, we examined the temporal relationship between manual depression of a button and visual feedback on activation of the brain. Six neurologically normal subjects participated in 3 experiments (synchronous, delayed, and visual [control]). Magnetic resonance (MR) images of their brains were acquired during the experiments using a scanner operating at 3T. In the synchronous experiment, subjects pressed a button at self-paced intervals and received synchronous visual stimuli in response. In the delayed experiment, visual stimuli were presented with a delay after subjects pressed a button at self-paced intervals. In the control experiment (visual experiment), subjects did not press the button, but viewed visual stimuli generated by a computer at random intervals. In the synchronous experiment, activation in the cerebellum and right parietal lobe was stronger than in the delayed experiment, whereas activation in the primary visual cortex was weaker than in the delayed and visual experiments. These results suggest that visual outcomes produced synchronously with action are processed in the cerebellum and the parietal area for the organization of optimal motor behavior, rather than in the primary visual area that is known to process the visual properties of external objects. The cerebellar signal related to visuo-motor contingency may modulate the cortical processing of visual input that is synchronous with action.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Visual and anticipatory bias in three cortical eye fields of the monkey during an adaptive decision-making task.

To examine the role of three cortical eye fields during internally guided decision-making processes, we recorded neuronal activities in the frontal eye field (FEF), supplementary eye field (SEF), and lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP) using a free-choice delayed saccade task with two synchronized targets. Although the monkeys must perform the task in a time-locked manner, they were free to choose either the receptive field (RF) target or the nonreceptive field (nRF) target to receive reward. In all three areas we found neurons with stronger activation during trials when the monkey was going to make a saccade to the RF target (RF trials) than to the nRF target (nRF trials). Modulation occurred not only during target presentation (visual bias) but also before target presentation (anticipatory bias). The visual bias was evident as an attenuated visual response to the RF stimulus in nRF trials. The anticipatory bias, however, was seen as an enhancement of pretarget activity in the RF trials. We analyzed the activity during the 500 msec before target presentation and found that 22.5% of FEF and 31.3% of LIP neurons and 49.1% of SEF neurons showed higher activity during the RF trials. To more accurately determine when each neuron started to show preferential activity, we used a new inverse interspike interval analysis procedure. Our results suggest that although all three cortical eye fields reflect attentional and intentional aspects of sensorimotor processing, SEF plays an earlier and perhaps more cognitive role in internally guided decision-making processes for saccades.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMed2002

A neural correlate of oculomotor sequences in supplementary eye field.

Complex learned motor sequences can be composed of a combination of a small number of elementary actions. To investigate how the brain represents such sequences, we devised an oculomotor sequence task in which the monkey had to choose the target solely by the sequential context, not by the current stimulus combination. We found that many neurons in the supplementary eye field (SEF) became active with a specific target direction (D neuron) or a specific target/distractor combination (C neuron). Furthermore, such activity was often selective for one among several sequences that included the combination (S neuron). These results suggest that the SEF contributes to the generation of saccades in many learned sequences.

Animals↗