Biomedical subjects

Massimo Leone

Publications and source records attributed to Massimo Leone.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Update on cluster headache.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although cluster headache has traditionally been thought of as a vascular headache disorder, its periodicity suggests an involvement of central areas such as the hypothalamus. This review covers the past 3 years, which have seen remarkable progress in understanding the pathophysiology of circadian headache syndromes and have brought exciting news. RECENT FINDINGS: As more cluster headache patients are seen by headache specialists, new forms of this well-defined primary headache syndrome are being identified. In addition, we discuss recent findings with regard to abnormalities in the secretion of hormones, genetic influences, neuroimaging of cluster headache attacks, and the use of newer substances as preventive therapy in cluster headache. SUMMARY: We have entered a new diagnostic and therapeutic era in primary headache disorders. In recent reports, the use of deep brain stimulation of the hypothalamus has enabled intractable chronic cluster headache patients to be successfully operated upon. Further research in this field is urgently needed and the recent possibility of combining deep brain stimulation with positron emission tomography will certainly help to unravel the brain circuitry implicated in stimulation-produced analgesia. The time has come to use the evidence for a disorder of circadian rhythm in cluster headache to further the development of chronobiotics in the treatment of this disorder.

Cluster Headache↗

PubMed2003

Stimulation of the posterior hypothalamus for treatment of chronic intractable cluster headaches: first reported series.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the results of deep brain stimulation of the ipsilateral posterior hypothalamus for the treatment of drug-resistant chronic cluster headaches (CHs). A technique for electrode placement is reported. METHODS: Because recent functional studies suggested hypothalamic dysfunction as the cause of CH bouts, we explored the therapeutic effectiveness of posterior hypothalamic stimulation for the treatment of CHs. Five patients with intractable chronic CHs were treated with long-term, high-frequency, electrical stimulation of the posterior hypothalamus. Electrodes were stereotactically implanted in the following position: 3 mm behind the midcommissural point, 5 mm below the midcommissural point, and 2 mm lateral to the midline. RESULTS: Since this treatment, all five patients continue to be pain-free after 2 to 22 months of follow-up monitoring. Two of the five patients have remained pain-free without any medication, whereas three of the five required low doses of methysergide (two patients) or verapamil (one patient). No adverse side effects of chronic, high-frequency, hypothalamic stimulation have been observed, and we have not encountered any acute complications resulting from the implant procedure. There have been no tolerance phenomena. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results indicate a role for posterior hypothalamic stimulation, which was demonstrated to be safe and effective, in the treatment of drug-resistant chronic CHs. These data point to a central pathogenesis for chronic CHs.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Behavioral and pharmacologic treatment of transformed migraine with analgesic overuse: outcome at 3 years.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether combined treatment using medication and biofeedback would be more effective than drug treatment alone for treating transformed migraine complicated by analgesic overuse. BACKGROUND: Headaches that are chronic, daily, and aggravated by medication overuse are particularly difficult to treat. METHODS: Sixty-one consecutive patients with transformed migraine and analgesic overuse were treated with inpatient pharmacologic therapy alone or with inpatient pharmacologic therapy combined with biofeedback-assisted relaxation. All patients then were followed prospectively for 3 years. RESULTS: Both treatment groups exhibited similar levels of improvement immediately following treatment and for 1 year thereafter. At year 3, participants receiving combined treatment showed greater sustained improvement on two of three outcome measures assessed (ie, fewer days of headache and reduced consumption of analgesic medication). In addition, a greater number of patients assigned to pharmacologic treatment alone relapsed (ie, resumed overuse of analgesics) compared to patients receiving combined treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that a combination of pharmacologic and behavioral treatment is more effective than drug therapy alone in the long-term management of transformed migraine with analgesic overuse. Confirmation of these findings, as well as extension to other forms of behavioral and cognitive-behavioral treatment, is required.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Trigeminal autonomic cephalgia with periorbital ecchymosis, ocular hemorrhage, hypertension and behavioral alterations.

We describe a 38-year-old male in whom severe unilateral headache was associated with marked palpebral edema, periorbital ecchymosis, lacrimation, conjunctival injection, nasal congestion and rhinorrhea. A second, less severe headache form developed subsequently. The patient often presented severe labile hypertension and behavioral disturbances during the crises, and there was an episode of intra-ocular hemorrhage. General, neurological and ophthalmological examinations revealed nothing remarkable. We discuss possible pathogenetic mechanisms and the nosology of this case within the trigeminal autonomic cephalgias.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Cervicogenic headache: a critical review of the current diagnostic criteria.

Opinions are divided on the use of the term cervicogenic headache (CGH) in cases with no evidence of cervical damage. According to Sjaastad et al. (1990), CGH is diagnosed from three features: (1) unilateral headache triggered by head/neck movements or posture; (2) unilateral headache triggered by pressure on the neck; (3) unilateral headache spreading to the neck and the homolateral shoulder/arm. Other characteristics are not essential for CGH diagnosis, including pain improvement after greater occipital nerve (GON)/C2 block. However, other authors give different definitions of CGH, and this may explain why reported frequencies for this headache vary so widely. In this paper we critically review the major diagnostic criteria of Sjaastad et al. for CGH in the light of clinical studies conducted at our institute and other literature findings. In a study of 500 headaches we found only two patients with unilateral headache triggered by head/ neck movements or posture, and no cases of neck pressure-induced headache. No clear-cut criteria are given in the literature for differentiating CGH trigger points from myofascial trigger points. In another study of 440 primary headache patients we found that in the unilateral long-lasting headache group (64 migraines and 10 tension-type headaches), a pain involving the occiput/neck was present in 30 migraine and seven tension headache patients; thus, according to the CGH major criteria, 10% (30/307) of 'migraines' and 7% (7/96) of 'tension headaches' could be diagnosed as CGH. However, one cannot exclude that the association of unilateral pain with posterior irradiation is due to the high prevalence of migraine, tension-type headache and chronic neck pain. The relation between CGH and whip-lash injury has been put in doubt by a recent study which found no difference in headache frequency between trauma and control groups and reported no specific headache pattern in the trauma group. Other reports suggest that, when it occurs, CGH usually disappears within a year of whip-lash, throwing doubt on the appropriateness of surgery for post-traumatic CGH. The lack of specificity of GON/C2 block as a treatment for CGH adds further difficulties to the diagnosis of this headache. We conclude that, although neck structures play a role in the pathophysiology of some headaches, clinical patterns indicating a neck-headache relationship have still not been adequately defined. We believe that further rigorous studies are needed to definitively confirm the validity of CGH as a nosological entity.

Head↗