PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Mathew A Thomas

Publications and source records attributed to Mathew A Thomas.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Laparoscopic temporary packing for hemostasis.

Control of bleeding from the renal parenchyma remains one of the challenges of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. If adjuvant measures fail, packing of the surgical bed may achieve hemostasis. We report a novel series of temporary laparoscopic packing of the surgical bed with minimally invasive kidney surgery. Technique and potential complications are also discussed.

Aged↗

Outcome results in macular hole surgery: an evaluation of internal limiting membrane peeling with and without indocyanine green.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the anatomic closure rate and visual outcome in patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling with and without indocyanine green (ICG) enhancement. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred ninety-three consecutive patients (204 eyes) seen at the Barnes Retina Institute with the clinical diagnosis of macular hole who underwent PPV between January 1998 and December 2000. INTERVENTION: A consecutive series of 97 patients undergoing PPV with or without unilateral epiretinal membrane removal without ILM peeling (group 1), 44 patients with PPV and ILM peeling without ICG (group 2), and 35 patients with ICG-assisted ILM peeling (group 3). RESULTS: Overall, 86.4% of the holes closed with one operation, with 75 of 97 (77.3%) eyes in group 1, 43 of 44 (97.7%) eyes in group 2, and 34 of 35 (97.1%) eyes in group 3 (chi(2)= 10.51, P = 0.007). Of the eyes that did not close, 18 patients in group 1 underwent repeat surgery, with 90 of 97 (92.8%) eyes ultimately achieving closure. Visual acuity after surgery was 20/50 or better in 55 of 97 (56.7%) patients, 31 of 44 (70.4%) patients, and 18 of 35 (51.4%) patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (chi(2) = 3.43, P = 0.18) and increased by 2 or more lines from their preoperative status in 63 of 97 (64.9%) patients, 34 of 44 (77.3%) patients, and 25 of 35 (71.4%) patients, respectively (chi(2)= 2.25, P = 0.32). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that use of ILM peeling during vitrectomy increases the chances of developing 20/50 vision or better (odds ratio [OR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-5.45; P = 0.04). No eyes received concurrent cataract extraction with macular hole surgery, but 75 of 166 (45.2%) required cataract extraction postoperatively. Complications included 20 retinal tears, 4 retinal detachments, and 34 patients with postoperative elevations in intraocular pressure (IOP; defined as IOP greater than 30 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS: Although this study is limited by the shorter follow-up in patients undergoing ILM peeling with or without ICG relative to the control group, our experience indicates that the use of ILM peeling is associated with a statistically significant improvement in the rate of primary macular hole closure with a single operation.

Adult↗

Optical access trocar injuries in urological laparoscopic surgery.

PURPOSE: Inadvertent injuries during trocar and Veress needle placement are a rare but potentially serious complication of laparoscopic surgery. An access alternative is an optical trocar under direct vision. Limited data are available regarding the safety of this technique. We reviewed complications related to optical access trocars during standard transperitoneal urological laparoscopic procedures performed at a single institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1995 to 2001 the optical access trocar was used as the initial trocar in 1,283 urological laparoscopic procedures. The procedures included simple and radical nephrectomy in 309 cases, donor nephrectomy in 386, partial nephrectomy in 79, pyeloplasty in 173 and various other procedures in 336. Intra-abdominal complications caused by optical access trocar were assessed. RESULTS: The optical trocar was inserted at the umbilicus in 88 patients (7.4%), in the right upper quadrant in 445 (34.7%) and in the left upper quadrant in 750 (58.5%). There were 4 injuries (0.31%) associated with the optical access trocar. Complications occurred on the left side in 3 cases and on the right side in 1, including 1 injury to bowel, 1 mesenteric injury resulting in a retroperitoneal hematoma and 2 injuries to epigastric vessels. Three cases were recognized and repaired immediately but in a case of epigastric vessel injury the expanding abdominal wall hematoma required postoperative repair. CONCLUSIONS: Optical access trocars provide a safe and rapid technique for initial trocar placement. Results of this large series support the finding that few trocar related complications are associated with the optical access trocar.

Adolescent↗