PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Matthew A Deardorff

Publications and source records attributed to Matthew A Deardorff.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Isolated lateralized overgrowth and the need for tumor screening: A clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

PURPOSE: To provide diagnostic guidance for individuals with lateralized overgrowth (LO) and implement appropriate screening protocols. LO without a syndromic presentation is considered idiopathic isolated lateralized overgrowth (ILO). METHODS: We performed a literature search of LO syndromes and malignancy risk and reviewed existing guidelines and expert input. RESULTS: We integrated 940 unique articles to form recommendations. We defined LO as significantly larger length and/or girth of aspect(s) of one side of the body compared with its contralateral side. It can be associated with somatic overgrowth syndromes. ILO was previously defined based on clinical features and deemed idiopathic by absence of molecular findings. Much of the tumor risk is likely because of specific LO syndromic causes now identified through improved diagnostic technologies; therefore, the tumor risk in idiopathic ILO is likely lower than previously accepted. CONCLUSION: Mosaicism complicates molecular diagnosis for children with LO. However, conditions such as Beckwith-Wiedemann spectrum and PTEN-related hamartoma tumor syndrome necessitate routine tumor screening. Establishing a specific diagnosis via comprehensive molecular testing on affected tissue will guide screening and management. In cases of idiopathic ILO, location of the overgrowth, estimation of tumor risk, regional practice approaches and family concerns all play roles in determining tumor screening.

Child

Optical genome mapping improves clinical interpretation of constitutional copy-number gains and reduces their VUS burden.

PURPOSE: Genomic structure of copy-number gains is critical for their clinical interpretation but cannot be determined by chromosomal microarray (CMA) analysis, which does not provide information about chromosomal location and orientation of multiplied regions. We thus hypothesized that in CMA testing gains have higher probability than losses to be classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and that structural information from optical genome mapping (OGM) may improve their interpretation. METHODS: Using a χ2 test, we assessed the association between classification of copy-number variants as VUS and their type (gains vs losses) in a cohort of 4073 CMA cases. Thirty-three VUS gains involving disease-associated genes were characterized by OGM to evaluate if OGM data enable their more conclusive clinical interpretation. RESULTS: The proportion of variants reported as VUS compared with likely pathogenic/pathogenic was significantly higher for gains than losses, confirming their increased VUS burden. OGM successfully determined genomic structure for all 33 copy-number gains, showing that 26 of 33 were tandem duplications and 7 of 33 were complex rearrangements. Structural information facilitated clinical interpretation in majority of the cases; it supported benign nature for 27 of 33 gains and was inconclusive or supported pathogenic role for 6 of 33. An estimated 20% of reported VUS gains would not have been reportable if we had OGM data. CONCLUSION: We illustrate a specific advantage of OGM compared with CMA: in addition to detecting both copy-number variants and balanced rearrangements, OGM improves clinical interpretation of copy-number gains by providing structural information and is thus expected to significantly decrease their VUS burden.

Humans