PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Matthew A Fuller

Publications and source records attributed to Matthew A Fuller.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

Practical considerations for carbamazepine use in bipolar disorder.

Carbamazepine (CBZ) has a long history of successful use in epilepsy and, therefore, has a safety profile that is well characterised. Additionally, an extended-release formulation of CBZ (CBZ-ERC; Equetro, Shire US) has recently been approved for use in bipolar disorder. The most frequent adverse events associated with CBZ are somnolence, fatigue, dizziness and headache. Rash and leukopoenia may occur in approximately 10% of patients, but are benign and transient in most cases. Rare serious adverse effects include agranulocytosis, aplastic anaemia, Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Although changes in lipid profiles have been noted, hyperglycaemia does not occur with CBZ, and clinically significant weight gain is uncommon. Proper monitoring and careful titration of the extended-release formulation should allow for successful use of CBZ in psychiatric patients.

Antimanic Agents↗

Catatonic schizophrenia and the use of memantine.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of catatonic schizophrenia treated with memantine that resulted in a rapid reduction of catatonic symptoms. CASE SUMMARY: A 68-year-old male with catatonic schizophrenia presented with bizarre and catatonic behavior manifested by mutism, waxy flexibility, immobility, staring, nonresponsiveness to verbal commands, grimacing, rigidity, and posturing. During the course of his hospitalization, he was treated with memantine up to 10 mg/day. The catatonia responded rapidly and significantly to memantine. DISCUSSION: Few treatment options are available for the management of catatonia. Lorazepam is generally the agent that has been used most often and has had varying degrees of success. Our report adds to a recently published case that also suggested that memantine might be useful for the management of catatonic behaviors in a patient with schizophrenia. While its mechanism of action is unknown, it has been thought that glutamate antagonists, such as memantine, may be beneficial in catatonic schizophrenia due to a glutamatergic dysfunction present in catatonic patients. It also has been hypothesized that there is a decrease in gamma-aminobutyric acid released to the supplementary motor areas, resulting in less glutamate inhibition. This results in a net effect of glutamatergic hyperfunction in the striatum, which may produce catatonia. Based on this hypothesis, memantine would be beneficial as an N-methyl-D-aspartic acid antagonist to decrease the amount of glutamate in the striatum and thereby relieve symptoms of catatonia. However, these potential benefits must be weighed against recently reported adverse reactions associated with memantine use, namely, psychosis and seizures. CONCLUSIONS: Memantine produced a rapid and significant reduction in catatonic symptoms in our patient with catatonic schizophrenia.

Aged↗

Risperidone for bipolar disorders.

Atypical antipsychotic medications are a relatively new, increasingly prominent component of the treatment armamentarium for bipolar disorder -- a development that provides more options for potentially improved outcomes for patients and families affected by bipolar disorder. The US Food and Drug Administration-approved bipolar indications for risperidone include monotherapy for the short-term treatment of acute manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder and combination therapy with lithium or valproate for the short-term treatment of acute manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder. Risperidone is also approved in over 30 countries worldwide for bipolar mania either as monotherapy, adjunct therapy, or both monotherapy and adjunct therapy. A number of controlled and open-label treatment trials have shown risperidone's efficacy and tolerability in the manic phase of bipolar disorder. Risperidone has also been reported to be useful in the longer-term treatment of bipolar disorder. This drug profile of risperidone for bipolar disorder will address the chemistry, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and metabolism of risperidone, clinical trials in bipolar disorder, postmarketing surveillance, safety, tolerability and regulatory issues. Finally, a discussion of potential future directions, a summary of key issues and information resources are provided.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

Reassessing carbamazepine in the treatment of bipolar disorder: clinical implications of new data.

This monograph summarizes the proceedings of a roundtable meeting convened to discuss the role of carbamazepine in the treatment of bipolar disorder, in light of new data and the recent indication of carbamazepine extended-release capsules (CBZ ERC) for use in the treatment of acute manic and mixed episodes. Two lectures were presented, followed by a panel discussion among all 6 participants. A summary of the two pivotal trials of CBZ ERC and their pooled data along with other relevant data is presented first. Next, historical trends of carbamazepine and the agent's use in acute mania, bipolar depression, and maintenance are reviewed, emphasizing clinical implications of efficacy, safety, tolerability, and drug interactions. Finally, the panel discussion provides recommendations for the use of carbamazepine in different phases of the illness, taking into account adverse effects and drug-drug interactions. Panel discussants agree that current data confirm the utility of CBZ ERC as an effective treatment for acute manic and mixed episodes in bipolar disorder. Carbamazepine may also prove to be an option for maintenance treatment. Tolerability of the drug is related to dose and titration, and overall safety limitations regarding carbamazepine usage are comparable to other medications. For some patients, the main challenges to use of carbamazepine may be common drug-drug interactions and increased side effects related to aggressive introduction during treatment of acute manic and mixed episodes. Thus, carbamazepine may be a lower priority option for patients who are taking multiple medications, such as elderly individuals with medical comorbidity, due to the potential for drug interactions. Important benefits of carbamazepine include the low propensity toward weight gain and evidence of good tolerability with long-term treatment. (At present there are no available data from long-term, placebo-controlled studies evaluating the effects of carbamazepine or CBZ ERC on weight.) Thus, carbamazepine may be a good option for patients who are concerned about weight gain or who are intolerant of or respond poorly to other medications. Further efforts are needed to update physicians on the use of carbamazepine relative to other medications in the treatment of bipolar disorder.

Antimanic Agents↗

Duloxetine: a dual reuptake inhibitor.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety profile of duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). DATA SOURCES: Searches using MEDLINE and PsycINFO were conducted (1966 to November 2003). STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All duloxetine MDD information gathered was considered. Articles containing comprehensive information regarding duloxetine use for MDD were evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Duloxetine is a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor being considered for treatment of MDD and stress urinary incontinence. While approved dosing ranges have not yet been determined, studies support the efficacy and safety of 40-60 mg twice daily for the treatment of acute MDD. Adverse effects have been of mild to moderate severity and are considered to be transient. Cardiovascular effects (increased heart rate or blood pressure), while present, do not appear to be clinically significant. Overall, duloxetine appears to be well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Duloxetine is a safe and effective antidepressant. Approval of this agent provides another treatment option for the management of MDD.

Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors↗

Long-acting injectable risperidone.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety profile of long-acting (LA) risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia. DATA SOURCES: Information was selected from PubMed (1965-July 2004). Applicable scientific posters were also used. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All published information on risperidone LA was considered. Material providing a comprehensive description was considered. DATA SYNTHESIS: Risperidone LA is the first long-acting, injectable atypical antipsychotic. It is dosed at 25-50 mg every 2 weeks. Adverse effects are similar to those seen with oral risperidone. A short-term study showed that risperidone LA is better than placebo in reducing the signs and symptoms of schizophrenia, and a long-term trial showed that stable schizophrenic patients can be switched from either oral or other injectable antipsychotic medications to risperidone LA. CONCLUSIONS: Risperidone LA is efficacious and safe in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

Pharmacokinetics of quetiapine in elderly patients with selected psychotic disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of quetiapine in elderly patients with selected psychotic disorders. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicentre, open-label, 27-day, rising multiple-dose trial. Descriptive statistics summarised plasma quetiapine concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters by trial day. A two-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate all pharmacokinetic parameters, and 90% confidence intervals of the mean differences were calculated. METHODS: Antipsychotic drugs taken prior to the study period were discontinued on day 1. Quetiapine treatment began on day 3. Doses were increased stepwise, starting at 25mg three times daily and reaching 250mg three times daily by day 21. PATIENTS: Twelve patients (age 63-85 years) with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or bipolar disorder. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: Key assessments included quetiapine plasma concentrations, and neurological and safety evaluations. Under steady-state conditions, the 100 and 250mg doses of quetiapine were not significantly different in terms of dose-normalised area under the plasma concentration-time curve within an 8-hour dose administration interval, or in dose-normalised minimum plasma concentration (C(min)) at the end of a dose administration interval. The morning C(min) values for the seven discrete dose amounts evaluated also increased linearly with dose. The apparent oral clearance, volume of distribution and half-life did not change as a function of dose. There were no serious adverse events. The most common adverse events were postural hypotension (n = 6), dizziness (n = 5) and somnolence (n = 4). CONCLUSIONS: While quetiapine was well tolerated at doses up to 250mg three times daily, the potential for reduced clearance, as well as the adverse effects of postural hypotension and dizziness, indicated that quetiapine should be introduced at lower doses and titrated at a relatively slower rate in patients > or =65 years.

Aged↗

Comparative study of the development of diabetes mellitus in patients taking risperidone and olanzapine.

OBJECTIVES: A growing body of literature suggests that certain atypical antipsychotics, especially olanzapine and clozapine, may induce glucoregulatory dysfunction. We assessed the differences in risk of developing diabetes mellitus during treatment with olanzapine and risperidone by using patients treated with haloperidol and fluphenazine as control subjects in whom we would not expect to see an increased risk. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Veteran's Integrated Service Network 10 Veterans Affairs (VA) database. Data for patients receiving olanzapine, risperidone, haloperidol, or fluphenazine from January 1, 1997-December 31, 2000, were included. Diabetes was defined as any health system encounter associated with the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis for diabetes (250.xx) or prescription for a hypoglycemic agent. Data of patients with markers for diabetes within 1 year before their index date, female patients, racial groups other than Caucasian or African-American, and patients receiving clozapine were not analyzed. We performed a Cox regression, with antipsychotic therapy as a time-dependent covariate. Other covariates considered for inclusion in the final model were number of days supply of antipsychotic drug, age, race, psychiatric diagnoses, substance abuse, lithium, valproic acid, and other typical or atypical antipsychotic agents. RESULTS: Data for 5837 patients were analyzed. Overall rate of developing diabetes in the study population was 6.3% (368 of 5837 patients). Olanzapine therapy was associated with a significantly higher risk of development of diabetes compared with risperidone (hazard ratio [HR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.76, p=0.016) while controlling for race, age, diagnosis, substance abuse, lithium, valproic acid, and other atypical antipsychotic agents. No differences in the rate of developing diabetes were detected between fluphenazine and risperidone (HR 1.11, p=0.69), or haloperidol and risperidone (HR 0.89, p=0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Olanzapine was associated with a 37% (HR 1.37) increased risk of development of diabetes compared with risperidone in a VA population, even after adjusting for other factors associated with the development of diabetes and temporal exposure to study drug. Because of limitations associated with database research, prospective studies should be conducted to corroborate these findings.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

Service use and costs among VA patients with schizophrenia taking risperidone or olanzapine.

OBJECTIVE: The authors compared the changes in health care utilization and costs between a group of patients with schizophrenia who started treatment with risperidone and a group that started treatment with olanzapine. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with schizophrenia who were given an initial prescription for risperidone or for olanzapine between March 1997 and March 1999. The change in utilization and cost of inpatient hospitalizations, outpatient clinic visits, medications, and total health care services from one year before to one year after initiation of treatment for the two groups was compared. RESULTS: The risperidone and olanzapine groups comprised 325 and 285 patients, respectively. Total health care costs declined by $1,536 on average for patients in the risperidone group and increased by $4,217 on average for patients in the olanzapine group after initiation of treatment. The difference was statistically significant, and it was largely due to drug and hospitalization costs. Drug costs for patients in the risperidone group underwent a smaller increase than those for patients in the olanzapine group ($991 versus $1,861). Hospitalization costs decreased by $4,011 for patients in the risperidone group and increased by $1,423 for those in the olanzapine group. CONCLUSIONS: Total health care costs declined for patients taking risperidone and increased for patients taking olanzapine after treatment was initiated.

Analysis of Variance↗

Phenylpropanolamine appears not to promote weight loss in patients with schizophrenia who have gained weight during clozapine treatment.

BACKGROUND: Weight gain is a common side effect of clozapine treatment and may expose patients to obesity-associated health risks. We proposed that concomitant treatment with an appetite suppressant such as phenylpropanolamine (PPA) would lead to a decrease in appetite and therefore loss of weight. METHOD: This was a 12-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of PPA, 75 mg/day, in outpatients with treatment-refractory schizophrenia (DSM-IV) who were stable on clozapine treatment for at least 4 months and had gained > 10% of their baseline body weight since starting clozapine. Patients were evaluated for adverse effects and weighed weekly. A Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) assessment, a short dietary quiz, and blood indices were completed monthly. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were equally randomly assigned to receive PPA or placebo. The groups did not differ in mean age, baseline weight, dose of clozapine, baseline PANSS scores, or the percent of weight gained since the start of clozapine. There was no significant effect of treatment on weight (t = 0.219, df = 10, p = .831). There was no significant change in either the total PANSS scores (t = -0.755, df = 10, p = .468), the positive or negative symptom cluster scores, or any of the remaining variables. CONCLUSION: Phenylpropanolamine 75 mg/day was well tolerated but was not effective in reversing established weight gain associated with clozapine treatment in stable outpatients with schizophrenia.

Adult↗