Biomedical subjects

Matthew B Wall

Publications and source records attributed to Matthew B Wall.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

FMRI adaptation reveals separate mechanisms for first-order and second-order motion.

A key unresolved debate in human vision concerns whether we have two different low-level mechanisms for encoding image motion. Separate neural mechanisms have been suggested for first-order (luminance modulation) and second-order (e.g., contrast modulation) motion in the retinal image but a single mechanism could handle both. Human functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has not so far convincingly revealed separate anatomical substrates. To examine whether two separate but co-localized mechanisms might exist, we used the technique of fast fMRI adaptation. We found direction-selective adaptation independently for each type of motion in the motion area V5/MT+ of the human brain. However, there was a total absence of cross-adaptation between first-order and second-order motion stimuli. This was true in both of the two subcomponents of MT+ (MT and MST) and similar results were found in V3A. This pattern of adaptation was consistent with psychophysical measurements of detection thresholds in similar stimulus sequences. The results provide strong evidence for separate neural populations that are responsible for detecting first- and second-order motion.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMed2006

Time perception: manipulation of task difficulty dissociates clock functions from other cognitive demands.

Previous studies suggest the involvement in timing functions of a surprisingly extensive network of human brain regions. But it is likely that while some of these regions play a fundamental role in timing, others are activated by associated task demands such as memory and decision-making. In two experiments, time perception (duration discrimination) was studied under two conditions of task difficulty and neural activation was compared using fMRI. Brain activation during duration discrimination was contrasted with activation evoked in a control condition (colour discrimination) that used identical stimuli. In the first experiment, the control task was slightly easier than the time task. Multiple brain areas were activated, in line with previous studies. These included the prefrontal cortex, cerebellum, inferior parietal lobule and striatum. In the second experiment, the control task was made more difficult than the time task. Much of the differential time-related activity seen in the first experiment disappeared and in some regions (inferior parietal cortex, pre-SMA and parts of prefrontal cortex) it reversed in polarity. This suggests that such activity is not specifically concerned with timing functions, but reflects the relative cognitive demands of the two tasks. However, three areas of time-related activation survived the task-difficulty manipulation: (i) a small region at the confluence of the inferior frontal gyrus and the anterior insula, bilaterally, (ii) a small portion of the left supramarginal gyrus and (iii) the putamen. We argue that the extent of the timing "network" has been significantly over-estimated in the past and that only these three relatively small regions can safely be regarded as being directly concerned with duration judgements.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Transfer of interfered motor patterns to self from others.

Previous behavioural and neuroimaging data on humans demonstrated that kinematics and the level of brain activity vary according to whether participants reach towards and grasp a target object presented in isolation or flanked by a distractor object. Here we seek to explore whether a differential activation can be revealed by the mere observation of another person grasping an object in isolation or alongside a distractor. To this end we used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to localize neural activity related to action observation that was influenced by the presence of a distractor object. We found that observing a human model reaching-to-grasp a three-dimensional target alongside a distractor elicits a differential level of activation in a network of areas typically involved during action observation: the dorsal sectors of the premotor cortex and the inferior frontal gyrus. Whereas our previous understanding of the human action observation system has been restricted to actions directed to single objects, we provide compelling evidence that areas within this network modulate with respect to the context in which the observed action takes place. This may prove to be a fundamental process for our understanding of how others' actions can be represented at a neural level.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

When gaze turns into grasp.

Previous research has provided evidence for a neural system underlying the observation of another person's hand actions. Is the neural system involved in this capacity also important in inferring another person's motor intentions toward an object from their eye gaze? In real-life situations, humans use eye movements to catch and direct the attention of others, often without any accompanying hand movements or speech. In an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study, subjects observed videos showing a human model either grasping a target object (grasping condition) or simply gazing (gaze condition) at the same object. These two conditions were contrasted with each other and against a control condition in which the human model was standing behind the object without performing any gazing or grasping action. The results revealed activations within the dorsal premotor cortex, the inferior frontal gyrus, the inferior parietal lobule, and the superior temporal sulcus in both "grasping" and "gaze" conditions. These findings suggest that signaling the presence of an object through gaze elicits in an observer a similar neural response to that elicited by the observation of a reach-to-grasp action performed on the same object.

Adult↗