Matthew D Wilkerson | PubMed Health

PubMed2026

HRAS promotes mutant NRAS-driven transformation with codon and allele specificity.

Wild-type RAS family members determine the signaling and therapeutic response in cancers driven by mutant HRAS and KRAS because they activate alternate RAS effector pathways. Here, we found that the requirement for wild-type RAS to support mutant NRAS-driven transformation correlated with codon-specific differences in GTP hydrolysis. NRAS with mutations at either Gly12 (G12X) or Gly13 (G13X), which retained the GDP-GTP cycling function, had modest autonomous transforming potential. In contrast, NRAS with GTP-locking mutations at Gln61 (Q61X mutants) was uncoupled from receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) input, rendering wild-type RAS an obligate partner for RTK-stimulated signaling and oncogenesis. In RASless cells expressing mutant NRAS, reintroduction of wild-type HRAS was sufficient to restore signaling and transformation. Global dependency mapping in human cancer cells revealed functional partitioning, wherein mutant NRAS promoted MAPK signaling and wild-type HRAS promoted PI3K-AKT survival signaling. Consequently, allele-specific or pan-RAS(ON) inhibitors synergized with inhibitors of proximal RTK signaling or of wild-type HRAS or KRAS to overcome this signaling plasticity. Pan-RAS(ON) and HRAS inhibition was synergistic for all NRAS mutants tested, with Q61X mutants showing greater sensitivity. These findings define the signaling partnership between mutant NRAS and wild-type HRAS as a targetable vulnerability and provide a biochemical blueprint for dual RAS inhibition in NRAS-mutated malignancies.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

RAS signaling in lung adenocarcinoma is defined by lineage context and DUSP4 loss.

BACKGROUNDThe molecular landscape of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is often illustrated as a driver-oncogene pie chart, but identical mutations exhibit heterogeneous signaling shaped by comutations, transcriptional programs, and lineage context. We propose a lineage-integrated signaling framework using an EGFR mutation signature (mSig).METHODSWe defined EGFR mSig using differentially expressed genes in EGFR-mutant (EGFR-mt) LUADs. Semisupervised clustering and machine learning models were used to test reproducibility in different combinations of datasets. We analyzed molecular subtypes, lineage markers, co-occurring mutations, and EGFR copy number alterations in EGFR mSig-defined subtypes of LUAD.RESULTSEGFR mSig showed robust classification performance (area under receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.83-0.95; mean negative predictive value = 96.3%). Validated gene expression subtypes and lung lineage markers were closely aligned with EGFR mSig status. Most EGFR mSig+ tumors, including many without EGFR mutations, belonged to the bronchioid subtype. A subset of canonical RAS mutations were mSig+ and mirrored the EGFR mutation pattern. EGFR WT/mSig- tumors were enriched for nonbronchioid subtypes and had comutations in TP53 or RAS/RAF/RTKs. We highlight a parsimonious collection of coordinated mutations, including RAS, KEAP1, STK11, TP53, and CDKN2A, that taken together suggest coordination of tumor signaling previously suggested but now reproduced and expanded.CONCLUSIONA potentially novel EGFR mSig that captures the transcriptional footprint of EGFR activation revealed a subset of EGFR WT LUADs with mt-like features. mSig refines LUAD taxonomy beyond mutation-only pie-chart models by incorporating lineage and comutation context. Lineage-directed stratification with coalteration identifies clinically relevant groups across EGFR and RAS states and highlights treatment opportunities for patients currently considered oncogene-negative.FUNDINGNational Cancer Institute (NCI) U01CA272541, R01CA262296, U24CA264021, UG1CA233333, R01CA211939.

Humans↗