Biomedical subjects

Matthew Hankins

Publications and source records attributed to Matthew Hankins.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Serum hypophosphatemia in tenofovir disoproxil fumarate recipients is multifactorial in origin, questioning the utility of its monitoring in clinical practice.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) has been anecdotally associated with isolated hypophosphatemia (HP) as well as proximal tubular toxicity and renal dysfunction in which HP has consistently been a feature. Consequently, routine phosphate measurements in TDF recipients have been recommended. We identified and compared the frequency of HP in TDF recipients with that in non-TDF recipients; assessed the reproducibility of HP; identified the incidence of renal dysfunction in hypophosphatemic patients; and evaluated associations between HP and host, HIV infection, or treatment factors. This prospective observational study measured serum phosphate, urea, and creatinine in HIV-positive individuals among the following treatment groups: TDF-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART, group A), TDF-sparing HAART (group B), HAART naive (group C), and off HAART but treatment experienced (group D). Phosphate measurements were obtained in 252 patients. Seventy-two percent of patients prescribed TDF received a phosphate measurement. The frequency of HP in groups A, B, C, and D was 31%, 22%, 10%, and 14%, respectively. Seventy-eight percent of phosphate measurements were reproducible. Kaletra (P = 0.016) administration and duration of antiretroviral therapy (P = 0.023) were independently associated with HP, but elevated creatinine and urea or use of TDF was not. The etiology of HP seems to be multifactorial and unrelated to TDF or renal dysfunction. This questions the utility of routine phosphate testing, in isolation, in TDF recipients.

Adenine↗

PubMed2005

The peak to mean pressure decrease ratio: a new method of assessing aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: The ratio of peak to mean pressure decrease is a new measure of transaortic continuous waveform shape that could be useful for grading aortic stenosis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed echocardiograms in 163 patients with all grades of aortic stenosis as assessed by the continuity equation. RESULTS: The peak to mean pressure decrease ratio was 1.75 (0.14) in mild stenosis, 1.66 (0.13) in moderate stenosis, 1.56 (0.10) in severe stenosis, and 1.57 (0.07) in severe aortic stenosis with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40%. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that a threshold of less than 1.50 gave a specificity of 94% against continuity area whereas a ratio less than 1.75 gave a sensitivity of 96%. CONCLUSION: The peak to mean pressure decrease ratio is a simple and quick cue to the likelihood of severe aortic stenosis in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction when transaortic pressure decreases appear only moderate.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Penetrating civilian craniocerebral gunshot wounds: a protocol of delayed surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Several factors have led to our unique approach of delayed definitive débridement. We wanted to evaluate the effectiveness of our management and compare it with the existing data in the literature. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 194 patients presenting between January 1996 and October 2003 with penetrating craniocerebral gunshot wounds. After exclusion criteria, 125 patients qualified. RESULTS: Of the patients, 88.8% were male. The mean age was 24.9 +/- 10.9 years. In 70.4% of patients, the presenting Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was 3 to 8. Only 38 (30.4%) of the 125 patients survived, with poor outcome in 2 and good outcome in 36. Bilaterally fixed and dilated pupils and bihemispheric tract on computed tomographic scan were significantly related to poor outcome. There were 49 surgical procedures performed on 27 of the patients, with a mortality rate of 7.4%. Of the 38 survivors, 13 underwent no surgery. Average time to surgery was 11.04 days. Total rate of infection was 8%, and it did not influence outcome. No patient presenting with a GCS score of 3 or 4 survived. Seventeen patients attended follow-up, for a total of 3609 days (average, 212 d) and very few late complications. CONCLUSION: Our supportive care of patients is not optimal. We should have saved more of our patients who presented with GCS scores of 14 and 15 who subsequently died. We have been able to report unconventionally late surgical management of two-thirds of survivors, with no surgery in one-third of survivors. Despite a high rate of infectious complications, infection did not lead to death or disability. Our protocol rarely leads to patients surviving in a permanently vegetative state. In the future, we would perform early surgery for patients who present awake and continue our current management for poor-grade patients. In this way, we will improve the number of good outcomes without increasing the population of severely damaged and dependent survivors.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

The use and reporting of cluster analysis in health psychology: a review.

PURPOSE: Cluster analysis is a collection of relatively simple descriptive statistical techniques with potential value in health psychology, addressing both theoretical and practical problems. There are many methods of cluster analysis from which to choose, with no clear guidelines to aid researchers. In the absence of guidelines it is likely that methods already reported by published researchers will be adopted, and so clear reporting of statistical methodology, while always important, is particularly crucial with cluster analysis. The aim of this review is to describe and evaluate the reporting of cluster analysis in health psychology publications. METHODS: Electronic searches of 18 health psychology journals identified 59 articles using cluster analysis published between 1984 and 2002. Articles were submitted to systematic evaluation against published criteria for the reporting of cluster analysis. RESULTS: Just 27% of the papers reviewed met all five criteria, although 61% met at least four. Details of the similarity measure and the computer program used were most frequently omitted. Furthermore, while researchers usually reported the procedures employed to determine the number of clusters and to validate the clusters, these procedures were often lacking in rigour, and were reported in insufficient detail for replication. CONCLUSIONS: The reporting of cluster analysis was found to be generally unsatisfactory, with many studies failing to provide enough information to allow replication or the evaluation of the quality of the research. Clear guidelines for conducting and reporting cluster analyses in health psychology are needed.

Behavioral Medicine↗

PubMed2004

Psychological impact of human papillomavirus testing in women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear test results: cross sectional questionnaire study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the psychological impact on women of being tested for human papillomavirus (HPV) when smear test results are borderline or mildly dyskaryotic. DESIGN: Cross sectional questionnaire study. SETTING: Two centres participating in an English pilot study of HPV testing in women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic smear test results. PARTICIPANTS: Women receiving borderline or mildly dyskaryotic smear test results tested for HPV and found to be HPV positive (n = 536) or HPV negative (n = 331); and women not tested for HPV with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic smear results (n = 143) or normal smear results (n = 366). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: State anxiety, distress, and concern about test result, assessed within four weeks of receipt of results. RESULTS: Women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic smear results who were HPV positive were more anxious, distressed, and concerned than the other three groups. Three variables independently predicted anxiety in HPV positive women: younger age (beta = -0.11, P = 0.03), higher perceived risk of cervical cancer (beta = 0.17, P < 0.001), and reporting that they did not understand the meaning of test results (beta = 0.17, P = 0.001). Testing HPV negative was not reassuring: among women with abnormal smear test results, those who were HPV negative were no less anxious than those who were not tested for HPV. CONCLUSIONS: Informing women more effectively about the meaning of borderline or mildly dyskaryotic smear test results and HPV status, in particular about the absolute risks of cervical cancer and the prevalence of HPV infection, may avoid some anxiety for those who are HPV positive while achieving some reassurance for those who test HPV negative.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Using the self-regulatory model to cluster chronic pain patients: the first step towards identifying relevant treatments?

The pain literature indicates that, despite extensive investigations and recommendations, treatment outcomes can be poor. This study assesses whether a theoretical approach using the self-regulatory model (SRM) could usefully categorise chronic pain patients on the basis of their illness representations, since these have been shown to influence outcomes for other health-related conditions. One hundred and thirty newly referred patients of a pain relief clinic completed the revised Illness Perceptions Questionnaire and other measures. Cluster analysis supported the utility of a theoretical model of illness representations to identify pain groups, with the groups so identified differing in measures of pain, mood, and functioning. This study can be viewed as a preliminary step for future research employing stronger design methodologies to explore the validity of the SRM for classifying chronic pain patients, and to compare efficacy of treatment choice and outcome for this population based on illness representations.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

PubMed2004

Medicine in a multi-cultural society: the effect of cultural background on beliefs about medications.

This exploratory, cross-sectional study examined the effect of self-reported cultural background on beliefs about medicines (modern pharmaceuticals) and perceptions of personal sensitivity to the adverse effects of taking medication. Using a validated questionnaire, beliefs about pharmaceutical medication were compared between 500 UK undergraduate students who identified themselves as having an Asian or European cultural background. There was a significant association between cultural background and beliefs about the benefits and dangers of medicines. Students who self-reported to have an Asian cultural background expressed more negative views about medication than those who reported a European cultural background. Students with an Asian cultural background were significantly more likely to perceive medicines as being intrinsically harmful, addictive substances that should be avoided. They were significantly less likely to endorse the benefits of modern medication. There was no significant relationship between cultural background and perceptions of personal sensitivity to medication effects or belief about how doctors use medication. In the total sample, past and present experience of taking medication was associated with a more positive orientation to medicines in general. Students who considered themselves to have a European cultural background had significantly more experience with prescribed medication than those who selected an Asian cultural background. The relationship between cultural background and beliefs about medicines in general was maintained after controlling for potential confounding variables, including chosen degree course, experience of taking prescribed medication, age, and gender. The identification of differences in beliefs about medication, between two specific cultural groups, suggests the need for a greater understanding of the effects of cultural background on medicine-usage with potential implications for the conduct of prescribing-related consultations and for the provision of patient information on medication.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Does medical school cause health anxiety and worry in medical students?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the self-reported experience of health anxiety and worry in medical students compared with control subjects. It was hypothesised that medical students would experience more health anxiety as a consequence of being exposed to medical education, compared to students who are not routinely exposed to such knowledge. DESIGN: The design was cross-sectional. SETTING: Participants were recruited from London University (Guy's, King's & St Thomas' School of Medicine and King's College). PARTICIPANTS: Medical students (n = 449) and non-medical students (n = 485) were recruited across Years 1-4. Questionnaires relating to health anxiety and worry were completed at the end of their lectures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health anxiety was measured using a questionnaire known as the Health Anxiety Questionnaire (HAQ). Worry was assessed using the Anxious Thoughts Inventory (ANTI). RESULTS: Health anxiety was significantly lower in medical students in Years 1 and 4 than in controls (P = 0.017 and P < 0.001, respectively). Worry was significantly lower in the medical students in all years of study. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students are not a cohort of preselected health-anxious people, nor are they 'worriers'. Medical education at a clinical level was shown to mitigate health anxiety in the medical student population.

Anxiety↗

PubMed2004

To be reassured or to understand? A dilemma in communicating normal cervical screening results.

BACKGROUND: Receiving negative test results may be associated with two problems: (a). not being reassured and wanting further, unnecessary screening; and (b). not understanding residual risk and not attending future recommended screening. AIM: To test two hypotheses: (1). Emphasizing test accuracy and low residual risk when giving negative test results reduces a desire for further unnecessary screening, while also reducing a correct understanding of the meaning of the result. (2). The effect of emphasizing low risk on desire for future screening is mediated by lack of reassurance. DESIGN: Experimental, vignette-based study, with a 2 x 2 factorial design. METHOD: A sample of 184 women was asked to imagine that they had recently undergone a cervical screening test and received a normal result. They were given one of four hypothetical letters from their GP,differing in whether or not it emphasized test accuracy and low residual risk of developing cervical cancer. Participants completed a questionnaire assessing perceived risk, reassurance about test results, desire for further screening within six months and understanding of the test results. RESULTS: Emphasizing test accuracy and low residual risk increases desire for inappropriate screening while reducing the understanding of residual risk. These effects are interactive, in that presenting both together has a larger effect than the sum of the two individual effects. The effect of emphasizing low risk on desire for future screening was mediated by reassurance. CONCLUSION: Emphasizing low residual risk and test accuracy is a double-edged sword: it reduces a desire for unnecessary screening, but also reduces correct understanding of the result.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Acute neuropsychological changes in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients.

This study examined the impact of different dialysis treatments on the neuropsychological (NP) functioning of 145 end-stage renal disease patients. Hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients were administered an NP test battery and measures of mood on 2 consecutive days (pre- and 24 hr postdialysis). Biochemistry was assessed at each session. Results indicated significant improvements in NP functioning (attention, concentration, verbal and visual memory, and psychomotor speed) in HD patients 24 hr postdialysis. No such fluctuations were found in PD patients. Although biochemical changes were found in the HD patients at the same time points, these were not consistently related to the NP changes.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

The expectancy-value muddle in the theory of planned behaviour - and some proposed solutions.

The authors of the Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behaviour recommended a method for statistically analysing the relationships between beliefs and the Attitude, Subjective Norm, and Perceived Behavioural Control constructs. This method has been used in the overwhelming majority of studies using these theories. However, there is a growing awareness that this method yields statistically uninterpretable results (Evans, 1991). Despite this, the use of this method is continuing, as is uninformed interpretation of this problematic research literature. This is probably due to the lack of a simple account of where the problem lies, and the large number of alternatives available. This paper therefore summarizes the problem as simply as possible, gives consideration to the conclusions that can be validly drawn from studies that contain this problem, and critically reviews the many alternatives that have been proposed to address this problem. Different techniques are identified as being suitable, according to the purpose of the specific research project.

Attitude↗

PubMed2002

Perceptions of risk of cervical cancer and attitudes towards cervical screening: a comparison of smokers and non-smokers.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare smokers' and non-smokers' perceptions of risks of cervical cancer and attitudes towards cervical screening. METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out in 722 women aged between 20 and 64 years. RESULTS: While smokers perceived their relative risk of heart disease to be greater than that of non-smokers, they did not perceive their risks of cervical cancer to be greater. Smokers held less positive attitudes towards cervical screening than did non-smokers. Smokers and non-smokers did not differ in their intentions to attend for cervical screening: for both groups, intentions were very high. Using logistic regression analysis, both attitudes towards cervical screening [odds ratio (OR) 1.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-2.2] and perceived relative risk of developing cervical cancer (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.0-2.1) were predictive of intentions to attend for screening, as well as educational level (OR 3.8; 95% CI 1.2-11.3) and marital status (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.3-0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Smokers seem unaware of their increased risks of cervical cancer and hence the increased value for them of regular smears. Evaluations are needed to determine the effectiveness of interventions delivered in the context of cervical screening aimed at (i) raising smokers' awareness of their increased risk of cervical cancer and (ii) stopping smoking.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Reliability and validity of the work and social adjustment scale in phobic disorders.

The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) is a simple widely used 5-item measure of disability whose psychometric properties need more analysis in phobic disorders. The reliability, factor structure, validity, and sensitivity to change of the WSAS were studied in 205 phobic patients (73 agoraphobia, 62 social phobia, and 70 specific phobia) who participated in various open and randomized trials of self-exposure therapy. Internal consistency of the WSAS was excellent in all phobics pooled and in agoraphobics and social phobics separately. Principal components analysis extracted a single general factor of disability. Specific phobics gave less consistent ratings across WSAS items, suggesting that some items were less relevant to their problem. Internal consistency was marginally higher for self-ratings than clinician ratings of the WSAS. Self-ratings and clinician ratings correlated highly though patients tended to rate themselves as more disabled than clinicians did. WSAS total scores reflected differences in phobic severity and improvement with treatment. The WSAS is a valid, reliable, and change-sensitive measure of work/social and other adjustment in phobic disorders, especially in agoraphobia and social phobia.

Adult↗