Biomedical subjects

Matthew Heath

Publications and source records attributed to Matthew Heath.

18 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

A lower visual field advantage for endpoint stability but no advantage for online movement precision.

It has been proposed that visually guided reaching movements performed in the lower visual field (LVF) of peripersonal space are more effective and efficient than their upper visual field (UVF) counterparts (Danckert and Goodale 2001). In the present investigation we sought to determine whether this purported visual field asymmetry reflects advantaged processing of online visual feedback. To accomplish that objective, participants performed discrete reaching movements to each of three target locations in the LVF and UVF. In addition, reaches were completed under conditions wherein target location remained constant throughout a reaching response (i.e., control trials) and a separate condition wherein target location unexpectedly perturbed at movement onset (i.e., experimental trials). We reasoned that the target perturbation paradigm would provide a novel means to assess a possible superior-inferior visual field asymmetry for online reaching control. In terms of the impact of a target perturbation, both visual fields demonstrated equal proficiency integrating visual feedback for online limb adjustments. Interestingly, however, the spatial distribution of movement endpoints in the LVF was less than UVF counterparts (cf. Binsted and Heath 2005). Taken together, the present findings suggest that although LVF and UVF reaches readily use visual feedback to accommodate an unexpected target perturbation, reaches in the LVF elicit advantaged spatial benefits influencing the effectiveness of online limb corrections.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Is there "feedback" during visual imagery? Evidence from a specificity of practice paradigm.

The specificity of practice hypothesis predicts the development of a sensorimotor representation specific to the afferent feedback available during skill acquisition (Proteau, 1992; Proteau, Marteniuk, Girouard, & Dugas, 1987). In the present investigation, we used the specificity of practice hypothesis to test whether skill acquisition through visual imagery would lead to the development of a sensory-specific movement representation similar to one resulting from actual practice. To accomplish this objective, participants practiced walking a 12-m linear path in one of three practice conditions, full-vision (FV), no-vision (NV), or visual imagery (VI), for either 10 or 100 trials. Knowledge of spatial and/or temporal results (KR) was provided to participants following each trial during this phase. Following acquisition, participants completed 10 NV trials without KR. An analysis of root-mean-squared-error (RMSE) indicated NV participants were more accurate than both FV and VI participants in the transfer condition. We believe the equivalence in transfer RMSE between FV and VI suggests that there are similarities between the movement representations attained by FV and VI practice.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Müller-Lyer figures influence the online reorganization of visually guided grasping movements.

In advance of grasping a visual object embedded within fins-in and fins-out Müller-Lyer (ML) configurations, participants formulated a premovement grip aperture (GA) based on the size of a neutral preview object. Preview objects were smaller, veridical, or larger than the size of the to-be-grasped target object. As a result, premovement GA associated with the small and large preview objects required significant online reorganization to appropriately grasp the target object. We reasoned that such a manipulation would provide an opportunity to examine the extent to which the visuomotor system engages egocentric and/or allocentric visual cues for the online, feedback-based control of action. It was found that the online reorganization of GA was reliably influenced by the ML figures (i.e., from 20 to 80% of movement time), regardless of the size of the preview object, albeit the small and large preview objects elicited more robust illusory effects than the veridical preview object. These results counter the view that online grasping control is mediated by absolute visual information computed with respect to the observer (e.g., Glover in Behav Brain Sci 27:3-78, 2004; Milner and Goodale in The visual brain in action 1995). Instead, the impact of the ML figures suggests a level of interaction between egocentric and allocentric visual cues in online action control.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Visual feedback schedules influence visuomotor resistance to the Müller-Lyer figures.

We examined whether blocked or random visual feedback schedules influence visuomotor resistance to the Müller-Lyer (ML) illusion. Participants completed closed-loop (CL) and open-loop (OL) grasping movements to an object embedded within fins-in and fins-out ML configurations. In the blocked feedback schedule, CL and OL trials were completed in separate blocks of trials, whereas visual conditions were randomly interleaved in the random feedback schedule. The results of the blocked feedback schedule showed that OL, but not CL, trials were influenced in a direction consistent with the perceptual effects of the ML illusion. For the random feedback schedule, however, both CL and OL trials were influenced by the illusion. We have interpreted these results to reflect the fact that participants evoked distinct control strategies based on the predicted availability of visual feedback. Specifically, the refractory nature of CL trials in the blocked feedback schedule suggests that advance knowledge that visual feedback would be available during a response encouraged an online control strategy wherein metrical visual information supported grasping. When visual feedback was unavailable (i.e., blocked OL trials), or could not be predicted in advance of a response (i.e., random CL and OL trials), it is proposed that movements were structured offline via perception-based visual information that was "tricked" by the cognitive properties of the ML illusion.

Feedback↗

PubMed2005

Role of the visuomotor system in on-line attenuation of a premovement illusory bias in grip aperture.

In this investigation participants formulated a grip aperture (GA) consistent with the size of an object embedded within a Muller-Lyer (ML) figure prior to initiating visually guided grasping movements. The accuracy of the grasping response was emphasized to determine whether or not the visuomotor system might resolve the premovement bias in GA very early in the response, as predicted by the perception/action model (PAM: ), or more gradually as the action unfolds over time, as predicted by the planning/control model (PCM: ). Grasping time (GT) was normalized and GA was measured at 11 time points: a premovement GA and ten time points beginning at 10% of GT and ending at 100% of GT. Not surprisingly, premovement GA was influenced in a direction consistent with the perceptual effects of the ML figure (cf. ). Interestingly, however, the bias in GA was not attenuated during the response, that is, a reliable illusory effect was observed for upwards of 90% of GT. Only at 100% of GT did we find resolution of the illusory effect. Based on these results, it is proposed that shaping GA in advance of response execution leads to a feedforward mode of grasping control in which the spatiotemporal characteristics of GA are controlled via an offline and context-dependent planning mechanism (i.e., the ventral visual pathway).

Bias↗

PubMed2005

Manual asymmetries in bimanual reaching: the influence of spatial compatibility and visuospatial attention.

The goal of the present investigation was to explore the possible expression of hemispheric-specific processing during the planning and execution of a bimanual reaching task. Participants (N = 9) completed 80 bimanual reaching movements (requiring simultaneous, bilateral production of arm movements) to peripherally presented targets while selectively attending to either their left or right hand. Further, targets were presented in spatially compatible (ipsilateral to the aiming limb) and incompatible (contralateral to the aiming limb) response contexts. It was found that the left hand exhibited temporal superiority over the right hand in the response planning phase of bimanual reaching, indicating a left hand/right hemisphere advantage in the preparation of a bimanual response. During response execution, and consistent with the view that interhemispheric processing time (Barthelemy & Boulinguez, 2002) or biomechanical constraints (Carey, Hargreaves, & Goodale, 1996) generate temporal delays, longer movement times were observed in response to spatially incompatible target positions. However, no hemisphere-specific benefit was demonstrated for response execution. Based on these findings, we propose lateralized processing is present at the time of response planning (i.e., left hand/right hemisphere processing advantage); however, lateralized specialization appears to be annulled during dynamic execution of a bimanual reaching task.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Action control: independent effects of memory and monocular viewing on reaching accuracy.

Evidence suggests that perceptual networks in the ventral visual pathway are necessary for action control when targets are viewed with only one eye, or when the target must be stored in memory. We tested whether memory-linked (i.e., open-loop versus memory-guided actions) and monocular-linked effects (i.e., binocular versus monocular actions) on action arise from a common mechanism as suggested by evidence from neuropsychology and psychophysics. Participants viewed targets with either one eye or two (vision: monocular versus binocular) and then reached to touch targets in open-loop and memory-guided conditions (condition: open-loop versus 0, 500, 1000, and 1500 ms delays). Results showed that memory-linked and monocular-linked increases in radial and variable movement error were additive (i.e., main effects of vision and condition, but no interaction). This suggests that the two effects on visuomotor control arise from separate mechanisms, in contrast to evidence from psychophysics and neuropsychology suggesting a common underlying mechanism.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Relative processing demands influence cerebral laterality for verbal-motor integration in persons with Down syndrome.

The study of cerebral specialization in the Down syndrome (DS) population has revealed an anomalous pattern of organization. In particular, dichotic-listening studies have suggested a left-ear/right hemisphere dominance for speech perception, whereas motor control research has revealed a left hemisphere dominance for executive-motor control. In the present investigation, we employed a recent adaptation of the dichotic listening procedure to examine interhemispheric integration during the performance of a lateralized verbal-motor task. Specifically, using the selective dichotic-listening procedure, participants were required to complete a rapid left or right hand pointing movement to one of two pictorial icons corresponding to the word presented to their precued ear. We observed that persons with DS (N = 17) and age-matched controls (N = 35) exhibited a right-ear advantage (REA) for our dichotic-aiming task. While these results appear to contradict previous dichotic listening studies, we propose that the manifestation of a lateral ear advantage in the DS population may have more to do with the response requirements of the task than with the characteristics or complexity of the stimulus material.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2005

Role of limb and target vision in the online control of memory-guided reaches.

This investigation tested the proposal that a "highly accurate" and temporally unstable stored target representation is available to the motor system for the online control of memory-guided reaches. Participants reached to a target that was: (a) visible during the response, (b) extinguished at movement onset, and (c) occluded for 0, 500, 1,500 and 2,500 ms in advance of response cueing. Additionally, trials were performed with (i.e., limb visible) and without (i.e., limb occluded) vision of the reaching limb. Results showed that limb occluded trials undershot the target location in each target condition, and were characterized by a primarily offline mode of control. In contrast, limb visible trials showed a consistent level of endpoint accuracy for each target condition and elicited more online reaching corrections than limb occluded trials. It is therefore proposed that a reasonably accurate and temporally stable stored target representation can be combined with vision of the moving limb for the online control of memory-guided reaches.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

No evidence of a lower visual field specialization for visuomotor control.

The lower visual field (loVF) has been hypothesized to demonstrate specialization for skilled, visually guided action. According to Danckert and Goodale, this visual field asymmetry indirectly suggests that the loVF has privileged connections to visuomotor networks within the dorsal visual pathway. Here we attempted to replicate the loVF advantage during the execution of a discrete aiming movement to targets of various widths (index of difficulty ranging from 1.5 to 5 bits). In addition, we employed trials in which vision of the target object was available or unavailable during the reaching movement to determine whether or not the purported visual field asymmetry reflects enhanced central planning (i.e., feedforward) or online control (i.e., feedback) processes. Reaching trajectories were examined for indicators of online amendments, and movement times and endpoint characteristics were examined to quantify possible visual field asymmetries in relative speed/accuracy trade-offs. In terms of reaching kinematics, it was found that vision of the target during the reaching movement resulted in greater online control of the reaching trajectory; however, no significant main effects or interactions involving visual field were observed. In other words, fixating in the upper or the lower region of peripersonal space did not influence the nature of reaching control (i.e., feedback vs. feedforward). Most importantly, our movement time and endpoint accuracy data elicited a robust speed/accuracy trade-off in both upper and lower regions of working space. Thus, and contrary to previous findings (such as those reported by Danckert and Goodale), the indices of difficulty coupled with the discrete aiming task used here did not elicit a lower visual field advantage for visually guided action.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture? Online analysis of grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.

The goal of the present investigation was to determine the time-course by which the motor system might resolve the context-dependent effects of a visual illusion [i.e., the Müller-Lyer (ML) figure]. Specifically, we asked participants to scale their grip aperture (GA) to the perceived size of an object embedded within a ML figure in advance of closed-loop (CL) and open-loop (OL) grasping movements. As a result, premovement GA was biased in a direction consistent with the perceptual effects of the illusion. We reasoned that such a manipulation might provide a novel opportunity to determine whether the motor system is able to resolve a biased GA immediately following the onset of a response [i.e., in accord with the perception/action model (PAM); Milner and Goodale 1995, The visual brain in action, Oxford University Press], or gradually as the action unfolds [i.e., in accord with the planning/control model (PCM); Glover and Dixon 2002, Percept Psychophys 64:266-278]. It was found that biasing GA in advance of movement resulted in a reliable effect of the ML figure throughout CL and OL trials (i.e., up to 80% of grasping time). Although the present findings appear contrary to the theoretical tenets of the PAM and the PCM, it is proposed that biasing GA in advance of movement leads to offline visual processing and a feedforward mode of grasping control, thus accounting for the illusion-induced effect throughout the grasping response.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Background visual cues and memory-guided reaching.

Recent research [e.g., Carrozzo, M., Stratta, F., McIntyre, J., & Lacquaniti, F. (2002). Cognitive allocentric representations of visual space shape pointing errors. Experimental Brain Research 147, 426-436; Lemay, M., Bertrand, C. P., & Stelmach, G. E. (2004). Pointing to an allocentric and egocentric remembered target. Motor Control, 8, 16-32] reported that egocentric and allocentric visual frames of reference can be integrated to facilitate the accuracy of goal-directed reaching movements. In the present investigation, we sought to specifically examine whether or not a visual background can facilitate the online, feedback-based control of visually-guided (VG), open-loop (OL), and memory-guided (i.e. 0 and 1000 ms of delay: D0 and D1000) reaches. Two background conditions were examined in this investigation. In the first background condition, four illuminated LEDs positioned in a square surrounding the target location provided a context for allocentric comparisons (visual background: VB). In the second condition, the target object was singularly presented against an empty visual field (no visual background: NVB). Participants (N=14) completed reaching movements to three midline targets in each background (VB, NVB) and visual condition (VG, OL, D0, D1000) for a total of 240 trials. VB reaches were more accurate and less variable than NVB reaches in each visual condition. Moreover, VB reaches elicited longer movement times and spent a greater proportion of the reaching trajectory in the deceleration phase of the movement. Supporting the benefit of a VB for online control, the proportion of endpoint variability explained by the spatial location of the limb at peak deceleration was less for VB as opposed to NVB reaches. These findings suggest that participants are able to make allocentric comparisons between a VB and target (visible or remembered) in addition to egocentric limb and VB comparisons to facilitate online reaching control.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

The control of memory-guided reaching movements in peripersonal space.

The goal of the present investigation was to explore the putative contributions of feedforward- and feedback-based processes in the control of memory-guided reaching movements. Participants (N = 4) completed an extensive number of reaching movements (2700) to 3 midline targets (20, 30, 40 cm) in 6 visual conditions: full-vision, open-loop, and four memory-guided conditions (0, 200, 400, and 600 ms of delay). To infer limb control, we used a regression technique to examine the within-trial correspondence between the spatial position of the limb at peak acceleration, peak velocity, peak deceleration, and the ultimate movement endpoint. A high degree of within-trial correspondence would suggest that the final position of the limb was largely specified prior to movement onset and not adjusted during the action (i.e., feedforward control); conversely, a low degree of within-trial correspondence would suggest that movements were modified during the reaching trajectory (i.e., feedback control). Full-vision reaches were found to be more accurate and less variable than open-loop and memory-guided reaches. Moreover, full-vision reaches demonstrated only modest within-trial correspondence between the spatial position of the limb at each kinematic marker and the ultimate movement endpoint, suggesting that reaching accuracy was achieved by adjusting the limb trajectory throughout the course of the action. Open-loop and memory-guided movements exhibited strong within-trial correspondence between final limb position and the position of the limb at peak velocity and peak deceleration. This strong correspondence indicates that the final position of the limb was largely determined by processes that occurred before the reach was initiated; errors in the planning process were not corrected during the course of the action. Thus, and contrary to our previous findings in a video-based aiming task, it appears that stored target information is not extensively (if at all) used to modify the trajectory of reaching movements to remembered targets in peripersonal space.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Selective dysfunction of tool-use: a failure to integrate somatosensation and action.

Apraxia is thought to reflect a disruption to high-level perceptual, cognitive and motor systems that form a distributed praxis network. Some authors suggest that apraxic deficits are unique to the neurology clinic; however, mounting evidence suggests that apraxic deficits are observable in natural contexts (e.g. Foundas et al., 1995). Naturalistic gesture production involves the integration of conceptual knowledge, gesture ideation, visual and somatosensory cues, and executive processes. Impairments in this context are therefore of interest from a clinical and theoretical standpoint. We present the case of a young female stroke patient (CK) demonstrating a novel limb praxis profile. CK's conceptual, evocation and praxis executive stages were evaluated: performance was contrasted to 30 healthy controls. CK was able to pantomime and imitate transitive gestures, suggesting that her ideational, executive and visual analytic systems were intact. Moreover, CK showed a good conceptual understanding of tools, objects and actions. However, CK demonstrated poor gesture production when actually using the tool associated with the action--a chronic and bilateral deficit that persisted at a 5-year follow-up assessment. Thus, CK's deficit appears to represent a specific and chronic disruption to high-level praxis systems that incorporates tactile inputs into the unfolding gesture production sequence.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

No evidence for accurate visuomotor memory: systematic and variable error in memory-guided reaching.

The authors explored whether the motor system has access to highly accurate information about the aiming environment after visual occlusion. Participants (N = 14) reached to 1 of 3 midsagittal targets in 4 visual conditions (open-loop, brief-delay, 500-ms delay, and 2,000-ms delay). In all conditions, the aiming environment was first viewed for 2,000 ms. Movements were cued immediately after the initial viewing period in the open-loop and brief-delay conditions. Vision was not occluded until movement onset in the open-loop condition, whereas vision was occluded coincidentally with the movement cue in the brief-delay condition. In the 2 longer delay conditions, the movement was cued following a 500- or a 2,000-ms no-vision delay period. Participants overshot the target in the open-loop condition, but that tendency was significantly reduced in the 3 delay conditions. Moreover, endpoint variability was greater in the 3 delay conditions than in the open-loop condition. A speed-accuracy tradeoff account could not explain the differences between open-loop and delayed reaching. Those findings suggest that the motor system does not have access to highly accurate information about the aiming environment for any appreciable period of time following visual occlusion, consistent with the view that the visuomotor system operates in real time.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2003

Can a visual representation support the online control of memory-dependent reaching? Evident from a variable spatial mapping paradigm.

We investigated whether a representation of a visual target can be stored in memory and used to support the online control of reaching movements. To distinguish between the use of a stored target representation for movement planning versus online control, we employed a novel movement environment in which participants could not fully plan their action in advance of movement initiation; that is, the spatial mapping between the movement of a computer mouse and the on-screen movement of a cursor was randomly varied from trial to trial. As such, participants were required to use online control to reach the target position. Reaches were examined in full-vision and three memory-dependent conditions (0, 2, and 5 s of delay). Absolute constant error did not accumulate between full-vision and brief delay trials (i.e., the 0-s delay), suggesting a stored representation of the visual target can be used for online control of reaching given a sufficiently brief delay interval. Longer delay trials (2 and 5 s) were less accurate and more variable than brief delay trials; however, the residual accuracy of these memory-dependent actions suggests that the motor system may have access to a stored representation of the visual target for online control processes for upwards of 5 s following target occlusion.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Manual asymmetries in tool-use: implications for apraxia.

Previous examinations of manual performance asymmetries have utilised relatively simple movements such as goal-directed aiming and rapid finger-tapping. In the present research, three-dimensional kinematic analyses were employed to examine manual asymmetries in the production of transitive limb gestures. Transitive limb gestures involve the use of tools and/or objects and are complex movements used in the evaluation of limb apraxia. Ten healthy right hand dominant participants produced two transitive limb gestures in response to verbal command both with (tool-use) and without (pantomime) the appropriate tool. Analyses revealed a dominant (right) hand advantage, although the magnitude of this advantage was influenced by movement context (pantomime vs tool-use). This study provides the first evidence that manual asymmetries are elicited during the production of transitive limb gestures, and mandates that future kinematic analyses of limb apraxia consider the impact of pre-morbid manual asymmetries when contrasting the performance of left and right hemisphere damaged patients.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1999

Goal-Directed Aiming: Correcting a Force-Specification Error With the Right and Left Hands.

In 2 experiments, the authors examined manual aiming asymmetries as well as the ability of participants to adjust their aiming trajectories following an unexpected change to the inertial resistance to movement. In Experiment 1, participants (N = 11) were able to rapidly adjust their movement trajectories to conform to the new movement requirements. They were faster and more consistent when aiming with their right hand than with their left hand, regardless of whether or not the movement was perturbed. In Experiment 2, participants' (N = 11) vision of the hand was manipulated so that the role of visual feedback in the corrective process could be examined. Vision had an impact not only on performance but also on the characteristics of the movement trajectories. Manual asymmetries in aiming were associated with a right hand superiority during the final corrective stages of the movement.

Journal Article↗