Biomedical subjects

Matthew P Mullarney

Publications and source records attributed to Matthew P Mullarney.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Simulation of roller compaction using a laboratory scale compaction simulator.

A method for simulation of the roller compaction process using a laboratory scale compaction simulator was developed. The simulation was evaluated using microcrystalline cellulose as model material and ribbon solid fraction and tensile strength as key ribbon properties. When compacted to the same solid fractions, real and simulated ribbons exhibited similar compression behavior and equivalent mechanical properties (tensile strengths). Thus, simulated and real ribbons are expected to result in equivalent granulations. Although the simulation cannot account for some roller compaction aspects (non-homogeneous ribbon density and material bypass) it enables prediction of the effects that critical parameters such as roll speed, pressure and radius have on the properties of ribbons using a fraction of material required by conventional roller compaction equipment. Furthermore, constant ribbon solid fraction and/or tensile strength may be utilized as scale up and transfer factors for the roller compaction process. The improved material efficiency and product transfer methods could enable formulation of tablet dosage forms earlier in drug product development.

Cellulose↗

PubMed2004

Improving the prediction of exceptionally poor tableting performance: an investigation into Hiestand's "special case".

The mechanical and flow properties of selected pharmaceutical powdered excipients and drug substances were evaluated to investigate their behavior as extremely poor tableting, or "special case," materials. The compaction stress, dynamic indentation hardness, and tensile strength of compacts compressed to 15% porosity and their powder's effective angle of internal friction were measured using the tableting indices technology and a simple shear cell, respectively. It has been previously demonstrated that compacts of special case materials exhibit a dynamic indentation hardness greater than the stress required to form the compact under slow compression conditions. In addition, new data suggest that special case materials also exhibit low compact dynamic indentation hardness, low compact tensile strength, and low powder effective angle of internal friction. These findings support the theory that the particles of such materials preferentially rearrange rather than deform under compressive conditions because bonding between them is weak. The added special case indicator measurements can be used to clearly identify exceptionally poor tableting powders during the selection of components for solid dosage formulations. Careful consideration of the data will provide guidance to the proper use of the bonding indices equations.

Excipients↗

PubMed2003

The powder flow and compact mechanical properties of sucrose and three high-intensity sweeteners used in chewable tablets.

The physical, flow, and mechanical properties of four common pharmaceutical sweeteners were measured to assess their relative manufacturability in solid dosage formulations. Sucrose, acesulfame potassium (Sunett), saccharin sodium, and aspartame were evaluated to determine significant differences in particle shape, size distribution, and true density. Powder flow and cohesivity as well as compact mechanical properties such as ductility, elasticity, and tensile strength were measured and found to be noticeably different. Among these sweeteners, sucrose and acesulfame potassium demonstrated excellent flowability and marginal mechanical property performance relative to over 100 commonly used pharmaceutical excipients evaluated in the authors' laboratory. Saccharin sodium and aspartame demonstrated poor flowability and superior compact strength relative to sucrose and acesulfame, despite their noticeably higher brittleness. These data suggest that careful selection of an appropriate sweetener is warranted in obtaining desirable process and tableting robustness, particularly if sweetener loading is high. Detailed descriptions of each material property and recommendations for sweetener selection in formulation development are included.

Elasticity↗

PubMed2003

Modeling of transmitted X-ray intensity variation with sample thickness and solid fraction in glycine compacts.

The previous paper in this series introduced an X-ray diffraction quantitation method for the polymorphic content in tablets made of pure components. Before the method could be transferred, further studies were required to explain the commonly observed X-ray intensity variation in analyzing compacts. The literature typically attributes the variation to partial amorphization under compression and/or to preferred orientation, without much viable explanation or compelling evidence. In this study, changes in intensity in compacts analyzed in transmission geometry were found to be primarily a function of sample thickness and solid fraction. A theoretical model was developed to describe the X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) intensity as a function of solid fraction, mass absorption coefficient, and thickness. The model was tested on two sets of glycine compacts: one with varying thickness at constant solid fraction, and the other with various solid fractions at a given thickness. The results show that the model predicts the XRPD intensity at any given sample thickness and solid fraction. With this model, the intensity variation of compacts made under different compression conditions can be normalized, making the method transferable to various tablet geometries and facilitating the analysis over expected ranges of formulation and process variation.

Glycine↗

PubMed2002

Comparison of the mechanical properties of the crystalline and amorphous forms of a drug substance.

PURPOSE: To better understand the influence of long-range molecular order on the processing characteristics of an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). METHODS: Crystalline and amorphous samples of a model drug substance were isolated and their "true" density, crystallinity, melting point, glass transition temperature, particle size distribution, and powder flow characteristics determined. Compacts of a standard porosity were manufactured from each form and their dynamic indentation hardness, quasi-static indentation hardness, tensile strength and "compromised tensile strength" determined. X-ray powder diffraction was used to confirm that no changes were induced by compact formation or testing. RESULTS: The crystalline and amorphous forms of the drug substance had relatively high melting and glass transition temperatures (approximately 271 and 142 degrees C, respectively) and were physically and chemically stable under the conditions of the testing laboratory. Consistent with this there was no evidence of crystallinity in the amorphous samples or vice versa before, during or after testing. The two API lots were effectively equivalent in their particulate properties (e.g. particle size distribution), although differences in their particle morphologies were observed which influenced powder flow behavior. The compacts of the bulk drug samples exhibited moderate ductility, elasticity, and strength, and high brittleness, in keeping with many other drug substance samples. A significantly greater compression stress was required to form the compacts of the crystalline material, and these sample materials were more ductile, less brittle and less elastic than those made from the amorphous API. There were no major differences in the tensile strength or the viscoelasticity of the compacts made from the crystalline and amorphous samples. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanical properties of compacted amorphous and crystalline samples of a drug substance have been measured and the contributions due to the molecular ordering of the crystalline form proposed. Small but significant differences in the mechanical properties were noted which could potentially affect the processing performance of API.

Chemical Phenomena↗