PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Matthew R Smith

Publications and source records attributed to Matthew R Smith.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Obesity and sex steroids during gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate effects of obesity on sex steroid levels during treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in men with prostate cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Forty-nine hormone-naïve men with recurrent or locally advanced prostate cancer were included in the analyses. All subjects were treated with leuprolide 3-month depot for 48 weeks. Serum levels of estradiol, sex hormone-binding globulin, total testosterone, and free testosterone were assessed at baseline, 24 weeks, and 48 weeks. Subjects were categorized by body mass index (BMI) and percent body fat. RESULTS: Pretreatment serum sex hormone-binding globulin and total testosterone levels were significantly lower in overweight and obese men than in men with normal BMI. In the overall study population, mean serum testosterone concentrations decreased from 372 +/- 18 ng/dL at baseline to 13 +/- 1 ng/dL at week 48 (P < 0.001). Free testosterone decreased from 6.75 +/- 0.33 ng/dL at baseline to 0.21 +/- 0.02 ng/dL at week 48 (P < 0.001). During treatment with leuprolide, obese men had significantly higher total and free testosterone levels than men with normal BMI. Compared with normal men, total and free testosterone levels during treatment were 1.8-fold and 2.3-fold higher in obese men. Similar results were observed when subjects were categorized by body fat. CONCLUSIONS: Despite lower pretreatment serum testosterone levels, obese men have higher total and free testosterone levels during leuprolide treatment than men with normal BMI. These differences may contribute to the association between obesity and increased prostate cancer mortality.

Aged↗

Treatment-related osteoporosis in men with prostate cancer.

The intended therapeutic effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists is hypogonadism, a major cause of acquired osteoporosis in men. Consistent with this observation, GnRH agonists increase bone turnover and decrease bone mineral density, a surrogate for fracture risk. Large claims-based analyses and other retrospective studies provide compelling evidence that GnRH agonists increase risk of clinical fractures. Estrogens play a central role in homeostasis of the normal male skeleton, and estrogen deficiency rather than testosterone deficiency seems to be primarily responsible for the adverse skeletal effects of GnRH agonists. In randomized controlled trials, bisphosphonates (pamidronate and zoledronic acid) and selective estrogen receptor modulators (raloxifene and toremifene) increased bone mineral density in GnRH agonist-treated men. Two ongoing large randomized placebo-controlled studies will prospectively define fracture outcomes in men with prostate cancer and assess the efficacy of novel pharmacologic interventions (AMG162, toremifene) during GnRH agonist treatment.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Advances in treating metastatic bone cancer: summary statement for the First Cambridge Conference.

The First Cambridge Conference on Advances in Treating Metastatic Bone Cancer, a symposium held in Cambridge, Massachusetts, October 28 to 29, 2005, was convened to discuss recent advances and research related to the natural history of bone metastases and skeletal complications, bone cancer biology, treatment of myeloma and other solid tumors, and treatment-induced bone loss. The conference format combined brief presentations with extended periods of discussion. The conclusions reached during the 2-day meeting are summarized in this article and presented in more detail in the individual articles and accompanying discussion sessions that comprise the conference proceedings.

Bone Neoplasms↗

Diabetes and cardiovascular disease during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Androgen deprivation therapy with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist is associated with increased fat mass and insulin resistance in men with prostate cancer, but the risk of obesity-related disease during treatment has not been well studied. We assessed whether androgen deprivation therapy is associated with an increased incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational study of a population-based cohort of 73,196 fee-for-service Medicare enrollees age 66 years or older who were diagnosed with locoregional prostate cancer during 1992 to 1999 and observed through 2001. We used Cox proportional hazards models to assess whether treatment with GnRH agonists or orchiectomy was associated with diabetes, coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, and sudden cardiac death. RESULTS: More than one third of men received a GnRH agonist during follow-up. GnRH agonist use was associated with increased risk of incident diabetes (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.44; P < .001), coronary heart disease (adjusted HR, 1.16; P < .001), myocardial infarction (adjusted HR, 1.11; P = .03), and sudden cardiac death (adjusted HR, 1.16; P = .004). Men treated with orchiectomy were more likely to develop diabetes (adjusted HR, 1.34; P < .001) but not coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, or sudden cardiac death (all P > .20). CONCLUSION: GnRH agonist treatment for men with locoregional prostate cancer may be associated with an increased risk of incident diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The benefits of GnRH agonist treatment should be weighed against these potential risks. Additional research is needed to identify populations of men at highest risk of treatment-related complications and to develop strategies to prevent treatment-related diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Aged↗

Randomized phase II study of atrasentan alone or in combination with zoledronic acid in men with metastatic prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic prostate cancer is characterized by the presence of osteoblastic bone metastases. Bone metastases account for most of the morbidity from this disease. Inhibition of osteoclast activity with the potent bisphosphonate zoledronic acid reduces skeletal complications and decreases serum levels of biochemical bone turnover markers compared with placebo. Atrasentan is an investigational agent that inhibits endothelin-1 receptor, resulting in decreased osteoblast activity. METHODS: The effects of atrasentan alone versus combination therapy with atrasentan and zoledronic acid were investigated on bone turnover markers in men with bone metastases from prostate cancer. Forty-four men were randomized to receive either atrasentan alone or combination therapy, and 33 completed at least 12 weeks of treatment and were included in the primary analysis. RESULTS: Treatment with the combination resulted in significantly lower serum levels of N-telopeptide, a marker of bone resorption, compared with treatment with atrasentan alone. There was no difference between groups in serum levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, a marker of bone formation, at 12 weeks. Commonly observed adverse effects were edema, rhinitis, fatigue, and shortness of breath, most of which were NCI CTC (version 3.0) Grade 1. No Grade 4 or 5 treatment-related toxicities were observed. There was minimal clinical efficacy, with no objective responses and only 1 prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence for additive or synergistic effects of combination therapy with atrasentan and zoledronic acid on bone turnover markers in men with metastatic prostate cancer.

Aged↗

Celecoxib versus placebo for men with prostate cancer and a rising serum prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To assess the biologic activity of celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, in men with recurrent prostate cancer using change in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time (PSADT) as the primary outcome variable. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants had histologically confirmed prostate cancer, no recent hormone therapy, rising serum PSA after radical prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy, and no radiographic evidence of metastases. Patients were randomly assigned to celecoxib (400 mg by mouth twice daily) or placebo. Treatment continued until disease progression or until adverse effects stopped treatment. A positive outcome was defined as post-treatment PSADT of more than 200% baseline PSADT with no new metastases. RESULTS: The study was terminated early after information about the cardiovascular safety of celecoxib prompted review of ongoing clinical studies. Before discontinuation of the study, 78 men were assigned randomly to either celecoxib or placebo. Eight (20%) of 40 men in the placebo group and 15 (40%) of 38 men in the celecoxib group had post-treatment PSADT of more than 200% of baseline PSADT with no new metastases (P = .08). Mean PSA velocity increased by 3.0% for the placebo group and decreased by 3.4% for the celecoxib group (P = .02). CONCLUSION: Although the primary efficacy objective was not met, this study provides some evidence for biologic activity of celecoxib in prostate cancer. Compared with placebo, celecoxib significantly decreased mean PSA velocity and tended to increase the proportion of men who doubled their PSADT.

Aged↗

Markers of bone metabolism and survival in men with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relative prognostic value for specific markers of osteoblast and osteoclast activity while controlling for previously reported prognostic variables among men with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The 643 subjects in this report were participants in multicenter randomized controlled trial of zoledronic acid in men with metastatic prostate cancer. All subjects had bone metastases and disease progression despite medical or surgical castration. Relationships between baseline covariates and overall survival were examined by Cox proportional hazard model. Serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and urinary N-telopeptide were assessed as representative specific markers of osteoblast and osteoclast activity, respectively. Other covariates in the model were age, log prostate-specific antigen, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, albumin, analgesic use, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. RESULTS: Serum BAP was significantly correlated with urinary N-telopeptide (correlation coefficient = 0.674; 95% confidence interval, 0.628-0.715; P < 0.0001). In univariate analyses, higher levels of serum BAP and urinary N-telopeptide levels were significantly associated with shorter overall survival. After controlling for the other variables, including N-telopeptide, in multivariate models, higher serum BAP levels were consistently associated with shorter survival. In contrast, urinary N-telopeptide levels were not significantly associated with survival in multivariate analyses. Variables retained in the reduced multivariate model were age, log prostate-specific antigen, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, analgesic use, and BAP. CONCLUSIONS: Serum BAP significantly correlates with urinary N-telopeptide in men with androgen-independent prostate cancer and bone metastases. In multivariate models, higher levels of serum BAP but not urinary N-telopeptide are associated with shorter overall survival.

Aged↗

Insulin sensitivity during combined androgen blockade for prostate cancer.

CONTEXT: GnRH agonists markedly increase fat mass in men with prostate cancer, but little is known about the effects of treatment on insulin sensitivity. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess the effects of short-term GnRH agonist treatment on insulin sensitivity. DESIGN: This was a prospective 12-wk study. SETTING: The study was conducted at a general clinical research center. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: We studied 25 men with locally advanced or recurrent prostate cancer, no radiographic evidence of metastases, no history of diabetes mellitus, and no evidence of diabetes mellitus at baseline visit. INTERVENTION: Leuprolide depot and bicalutamide were used in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Oral glucose tolerance tests and body composition assessment by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry were performed at baseline and wk 12. The primary study outcome was change in insulin sensitivity index. RESULTS: Mean (+/- se) percentage fat body mass increased by 4.3 +/- 1.3% from baseline to wk 12 (P = 0.002). Insulin sensitivity index decreased by 12.9 +/- 7.6% (P = 0.02). Insulin sensitivity by homeostatic model assessment decreased by 12.8 +/- 5.9% (P = 0.02). Fasting plasma insulin levels increased by 25.9 +/- 9.3% (P = 0.04). Mean glycosylated hemoglobin also increased significantly (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term treatment with leuprolide and bicalutamide significantly increased fat mass and decreased insulin sensitivity in men with prostate cancer. These observations suggest that GnRH agonists may increase the risk of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease in older men.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Risk of clinical fractures after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We assessed the relationship between GnRH agonists and the risk of clinical fractures in men with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a database of medical claims from 16 large American companies we identified a study group of 3,779 men with prostate cancer who received treatment with a GnRH agonist and a control group of 8,341 with prostate cancer who were not treated with a GnRH agonist. Men with 1 or more medical claims for bone metastases were excluded. The rates of any clinical fracture, hip fracture and vertebral fracture were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The rate of any fracture was 7.91/100 vs 6.55/100 person-years at risk in men who received vs did not receive a GnRH agonist (relative risk 1.21, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.34). The rates of hip fracture (relative risk 1.76, 95% CI 1.33 to 2.33) and vertebral fracture (relative risk 1.18, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.48) were also higher in men who received a GnRH agonist. GnRH agonist treatment was independently associated with fracture risk on multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: GnRH agonists increase the risk of clinical fracture in men with prostate cancer.

Aged↗

Markers of bone metabolism in prostate cancer.

Although bone metastases from prostate cancer are described as osteoblastic, markers of both osteoblastic and osteoclastic activity are strikingly elevated in men with metastatic prostate cancer. Elevated markers of osteoblastic and osteoclastic activity are associated with adverse clinical outcomes in men with prostate cancer--outcomes including shorter time to skeletal complications, disease progression, and death. Bone marker measurement appears to be a promising method for monitoring the efficacy of bone-targeted therapy. Additional studies are needed to assess the potential role of bone markers in identifying men at highest risk for development of bone metastases.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Toremifene--a promising therapy for the prevention of prostate cancer and complications of androgen deprivation therapy.

Deregulation of the estrogen axis in humans prompts a series of tissue-specific events. In the breast and prostate, alterations in estrogen signalling lead to genotypic and phenotypic molecular alterations that result in dysplastic cellular appearance, deregulated cell growth and carcinoma. In bone, decreased estrogen leads to increased osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption, decreased bone mineral density and a significant fracture risk. Toremifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator that exerts pharmacological activity in the breast, bone and prostate. An intense interest in developing this agent for prostate cancer chemoprevention is based on the reduction of premalignant and malignant prostate lesions in a transgenic model of prostate cancer. Biological and clinical activity was demonstrated in Phase II trials by the prevention of progression to prostate cancer in men with high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia and through suppression of bone turnover biomarkers and increased bone mineral density in men on androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

Androgen Antagonists↗

Bisphosphonates for treatment and prevention of bone metastases.

Bone metastases are a major cause of morbidity for men with prostate cancer. Complications of bone metastases include pain, fractures, and spinal cord compression. Although they appear osteoblastic by radiographic imaging, most bone metastases are characterized by excess osteoclast number and activity. In addition, pathologic osteoclast activation is associated with increased risk of skeletal complications. Zoledronic acid, a potent inhibitor of osteoclast activity, differentiation, and survival, decreases the risk of skeletal complications in men with androgen-independent prostate cancer and bone metastases. Other bisphosphonates, including pamidronate and clodronate, seem to be ineffective in this setting. The reduction in risk of skeletal complications with zoledronic acid must be weighed against potential adverse effects. Additional studies are needed to determine the optimal timing, schedule, and duration of treatment in men with bone metastases as well as the potential role of bisphosphonates in other settings including the prevention of bone metastases.

Bone Density Conservation Agents↗

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and fracture risk: a claims-based cohort study of men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists decrease bone mineral density, a surrogate for fracture risk, in men with prostate cancer. We conducted a claims-based cohort study to characterize the relationship between GnRH agonists and risk for clinical fractures in men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using medical claims data from a 5% national random sample of Medicare beneficiaries, we identified a study group of men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer who initiated GnRH agonist treatment from 1992 to 1994 (n = 3,887). A comparison group of men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer who did not receive GnRH agonist treatment during the study period (n = 7,774) was matched for age, race, geographic location, and comorbidity. Clinical fractures were identified using inpatient, outpatient, and physician claims during 7 years of follow-up. RESULTS: In men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer, GnRH agonists significantly increased fracture risk. The rate of any clinical fracture was 7.88 per 100 person-years at risk in men receiving a GnRH agonist compared with 6.51 per 100 person-years in matched controls (relative risk, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.29; P < .001). Rates of vertebral fractures (relative risk, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.75; P < .001) and hip/femur fractures (relative risk, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.53; P = .002) were also significantly higher in men who received a GnRH agonist. GnRH agonist treatment independently predicted fracture risk in multivariate analyses. Longer duration of treatment conferred greater fracture risk. CONCLUSION: GnRH agonists significantly increase risk for any clinical fracture, hip fractures, and vertebral fractures in men with prostate cancer.

Aged↗

Changes in bone mineral density and body composition during initial and long-term gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment for prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Initial treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist increases fat mass, decreases lean body mass, and decreases bone mineral density (BMD) in men with prostate carcinoma. To the authors' knowledge, little is known regarding either the long-term effects of treatment or predictors of treatment-related changes in BMD and body composition. METHODS: The authors analyzed prospective 12-month data from 65 men during initial and long-term GnRH agonist treatment for prostate carcinoma. Relationships between baseline characteristics (age, treatment duration, body mass index, and baseline values for outcome of interest) and changes in lean mass, fat mass, and BMD were assessed using univariate and multivariate regression models. RESULTS: Mean BMD of total hip decreased by 1.9 +/- 2.7%, lean body mass decreased by 2.0 +/- 3.3%, and fat mass increased by 6.6 +/- 9.4% at 12 months (P < 0.001 for each comparison). Twenty-three men (35%) had received treatment with a GnRH agonist before study entry, and the mean (+/- standard deviation) duration of previous treatment was 35 +/- 41 months. Longer duration of previous GnRH agonist treatment was found to independently predict less fat accumulation and less loss of lean body mass in multivariate models. In contrast, the duration of GnRH agonist treatment did not significantly predict changes in BMD. Other covariates did not appear to predict changes in body composition or BMD consistently. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study showed that fat mass increased and lean body mass decreased mostly during initial GnRH agonist therapy whereas BMD decreased steadily during initial and long-term treatment.

Aged↗

Zoledronic acid to prevent skeletal complications in cancer: corroborating the evidence.

Bone metastases are a major cause of cancer morbidity. Bone metastases are associated with pain, fractures, spinal cord compression, ineffective haematopoiesis, and hypocalcaemia of malignancy. The goals of treatment for bone metastases are to prevent disease-related skeletal complications, palliate pain, and maintain quality of life. Bisphosphonates are a standard part of supportive care for patients with bone metastases. Zoledronic acid, a nitrogen containing third generation bisphosphonate, is the most active and is the most thoroughly investigated bisphosphonate for metastatic bone disease. The efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid has been established in three pivotal prospective, randomized controlled trials involving more than 3000 subjects. The evidence is reviewed here with a focus on clinical relevance. Across a broad array of tumour types, zoledronic acid (4 mg intravenously over 15 min every 3-4 weeks) decreased the frequency of skeletal-related events, delayed the time to a first skeletal-related event, and reduced pain. Zoledronic acid is more effective than pamidronate in breast cancer and the only bisphosphonate proven effective for metastatic prostate cancer, lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma and other solid tumours.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Natural history of rising serum prostate-specific antigen in men with castrate nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To describe the natural history of nonmetastatic prostate cancer and rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) despite androgen deprivation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 201 patients in this report were the placebo control group from an aborted randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of zoledronic acid on time to first bone metastasis in men with prostate cancer, no bone metastases, and rising PSA despite androgen deprivation therapy. Relationships between baseline covariates and clinical outcomes were assessed by Cox proportional hazard analyses. Covariates in the model were baseline PSA, Gleason sum, history of bilateral orchiectomies, regional lymph node metastases at diagnosis, prior prostatectomy, time from androgen deprivation therapy to random assignment, time from diagnosis to random assignment, and PSA velocity. RESULTS: At 2 years, 33% of patients had developed bone metastases. Median bone metastasis-free survival was 30 months. Median time to first bone metastases and overall survival were not reached. Baseline PSA level greater than 10 ng/mL (relative risk, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.74 to 5.80; P < .001) and PSA velocity (4.34 for each 0.01 increase in PSA velocity; 95% CI, 2.30 to 8.21; P < .001) independently predicted shorter time to first bone metastasis. Baseline PSA and PSA velocity also independently predicted overall survival and metastasis-free survival. Other covariates did not consistently predict clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer and rising PSA despite androgen deprivation therapy have a relatively indolent natural history. Baseline PSA and PSA velocity independently predict time to first bone metastasis and survival.

Aged↗

A phase I study of estramustine, weekly docetaxel, and carboplatin chemotherapy in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To define the maximal tolerated dose, safety, and efficacy of docetaxel, carboplatin, and estramustine in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). METHODS: Patients with HRPC received docetaxel for 3 weeks, followed by a rest week. Docetaxel (20, 25, 30, 36, or 43 mg/m2) was given on days 2, 9, and 16 of a 28-day cycle. Patients also received estramustine (140 mg p.o. three times daily on days 1-5, 8-12, and 15-19) and carboplatin [area under the curve, AUC (5) or (6) on day 2]. RESULTS: Thirty patients were treated. Five patients received carboplatin [AUC (6)] but experienced delayed thrombocytopenia. After a protocol amendment, 25 subsequent patients received carboplatin [AUC (5)]. Median age was 64 years. Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 117 ng/mL. Fifty-three percent received prior ketoconazole and 10% had mitoxantrone. No dose-limiting toxicities were noted. Although maximal tolerated dose was not reached, docetaxel dose escalation was stopped at 43 mg/m2. Significant myelosuppression was not seen until the highest dose level, when seven and four patients experienced grade 3 and 4 toxicities, respectively. Among all patients, PSA declines of > or =50% occurred in 63%. At the recommended phase II dose, PSA declines of > or =50% occurred in 75% (95% confidence interval, 43-95). Four of 14 (29%) patients with measurable disease had partial responses. Median survival was 14.6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Estramustine, docetaxel, and carboplatin are well tolerated and active in HRPC. Myelosuppression is the primary toxicity. The recommended phase II dose of docetaxel is 43 mg/m2 combined with estramustine and carboplatin. PSA declines were seen at every dose level.

Aged↗

Future therapies in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) remains true to its name: it is largely refractory to attempts to delay its progression. Although the number of men presenting with metastatic prostate cancer has decreased significantly over the last several years, the death rate for those men is essentially unchanged. To alter the currently inevitable progression of HRPC to death, new targets and new therapies are needed. This article reviews investigational therapies directed against standard targets (eg, the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis) as well as novel targets (eg, the endothelin axis).

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗