PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Matthias Elg

Publications and source records attributed to Matthias Elg.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Surveying improvement activities in health care on a national level--the Swedish internal collaborative strategy and its challenges.

In order to map improvement activities in Swedish health care, we surveyed the managers of all primary health care centers (n = 958) and clinical hospital departments (n = 1355), with a response rate of 46%. The majority reports that their staff view improvement work positively. The most common driver of improvement is work environment problems, whereas external drivers have less influence. Among 35 methods, the most commonly used are educational initiatives, stress management, guidelines, and leadership development, whereas accreditation is used the least. Respondents who report extensive improvement efforts indicate the greatest benefit from educational interventions, analysis of patient incidents, guidelines, and rapid cycle tests. Respondents claim that improvement initiatives yield positive results, in particular regarding the working environment, administrative routines, workflow, and communication, although only 15%-30% of respondents report having data to support their claims. Our findings indicate an introverted focus of most improvement efforts, starting with staff and administration needs. Further research is needed to understand how and why some centers and departments have managed to achieve strategic, measurable, patient-focused, systems improvements, whereas most have not.

Administrative Personnel↗

Reflections on transnational transferability of improvement technologies--a comparison of factors for successful change in the United States and northern Europe.

Two reliable models for predicting the success of change initiatives have been developed through the same research process. One model represents what is important in order to conduct successful improvements in the United States. The other model has been developed to predict successful improvement initiatives in Sweden. Through qualitative comparison between two reliable models we found some similarities and differences framing the underlying management heuristics for driving improvement initiatives. These findings are important pieces in transnational knowledge acquirement on quality improvements. They contribute a basis for discussions on transferability of management change concepts, and prompts for areas in need of considerations of adaptation before using different improvement ideas in other contexts than those for which they were developed.

Diffusion of Innovation↗

The one-person randomized controlled trial.

Currently, the gold standard for collection of clinical evidence is the randomized controlled trial (RCT), preferably with large, multicenter samples of subjects. Although this approach provides valuable information, many clinicians find it difficult to translate RCT results to the individual patient level. In this report, a statistical approach called Design of Experiments (DOE) is described as a method of applying the principles of RCTs one person at a time. An overview of the method, with a simple clinical example, is presented. As shown, DOE is a more efficient method than the sequential approach often taken by clinicians and their patients when evaluating various treatment choices. Further, the effect of multiple interventions can be assessed, alone or in combination with each other. In this way, DOE can be an important addition to the field of evidence-based medicine, although further studies are needed.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗