Biomedical subjects

Maurizio Fava

Publications and source records attributed to Maurizio Fava.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

An open-label study of duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder: comparison of switching versus initiating treatment approaches.

This study compared the stabilized duloxetine dose through approximately 12 weeks of treatment in patients initiating duloxetine therapy with that in patients switching to duloxetine from selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or venlafaxine. All patients met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for major depressive disorder. Patients (n = 112) exhibiting suboptimal response or poor tolerability to their current antidepressant medication (citalopram, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, or venlafaxine) were switched to duloxetine 60 mg once daily (QD) without intermediate tapering or titration ("switching" group). A comparator group (n = 137), comprising patients not currently receiving antidepressant medication, was randomized to receive duloxetine 30 or 60 mg QD ("initiating" group). At the end of week 1, patients receiving 30 mg QD had their dose increased to 60 mg QD. During the remainder of the study, each patient's duloxetine dose could be titrated on the basis of degree of response within a range from 60 to 120 mg QD, with 90 mg QD as an intermediate dose. At the study end point, approximately one third of the patients in each treatment group were stabilized at each of the 3 studied duloxetine doses (60, 90, and 120 mg QD), and the distribution of stabilized doses among patients initiating duloxetine therapy did not differ significantly from that observed in patients switching to duloxetine. The efficacy of duloxetine in patients switching from selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/venlafaxine did not differ significantly from that observed in untreated patients initiating duloxetine therapy (baseline-to-end point mean changes: 17-Item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression total score, -13.1 vs. -13.5; Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety, -10.6 vs. -10.3; and Clinical Global Impression of Severity, -2.22 vs. -2.38, respectively). The rate of discontinuation caused by adverse events among patients switched to duloxetine was significantly lower than that in patients initiating duloxetine therapy (6.3% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.018). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in more than 10% of patients in both treatment groups were nausea, headache, dry mouth, insomnia, diarrhea, and constipation. In the first week of therapy, patients switched to duloxetine reported significantly lower rates of headache and fatigue compared with patients initiating duloxetine. Thus, the efficacy of duloxetine in switched patients was comparable to that observed in patients initiating duloxetine therapy. Immediate switching from a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or venlafaxine to duloxetine (60 mg QD) was well tolerated.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Personality disorders and the trimensional personality questionnaire factors in major depressive disorder.

We assessed the potential relationship between personality disorder (PD) clusters, as assessed by the SCID-II, and temperamental traits assessed by the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire (TPQ) among a well-characterized, unmedicated cohort of outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The TPQ and SCID-II were administered to 263 depressed outpatients (mean age = 39.9 +/- 10.5 years; women = 139, 53%; initial 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression = 19.6 +/- 3.4) who currently met criteria for MDD and who were enrolled in an 8-week treatment trial. The multiple linear regression method was used to evaluate the relationship between TPQ factors and personality disorder clusters, controlling for age, gender, and initial 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score as necessary. Among outpatients with MDD, meeting criteria for a Cluster A PD diagnosis was related to high harm avoidance (HA) scores, as well as low reward dependence and novelty seeking (NS) scores. Additionally, high HA scores were associated with meeting criteria for a Cluster C PD diagnosis, while high NS scores were associated with meeting criteria for a Cluster B PD diagnosis. Certain temperament traits, especially HA and NS, appear to be associated with specific patterns of personality clusters among depressed patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Tridimensional personality questionnaire factors in major depressive disorder: relationship to anxiety disorder comorbidity and age of onset.

OBJECTIVE: We used the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire (TPQ) to study the relationship between temperamental traits and comorbid anxiety disorders as well as age of onset of major depressive disorder (MDD) in 263 patients with MDD. METHODS: Patients recruited for a large clinical study on MDD underwent a Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R assessment and were administered the self-rated TPQ [mean age = 39.5 +/- 10.5 years, women = 138 (53%), initial 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) score = 19.6 +/- 3.4]. The TPQ was scored for three previously identified factors -- harm avoidance (HA), novelty seeking (NS), and reward dependence (RD). Multiple linear regression methods were used to evaluate the relationship between TPQ factors and each comorbid anxiety disorder as well as between early-- vs. late-onset MDD, after controlling for age, gender and initial HAM-D-17 score (when these were related to the dependent variable in simple regressions). RESULTS: Social anxiety disorder in MDD was strongly associated with higher scores on HA and lower scores on NS and RD (t = 5.4, p < 0.0001; t = 2.6, p = 0.009; t = 2.2, p = 0.028, respectively). A diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder in MDD was significantly related to higher HA scores (t = 2.8, p = 0.006). The presence of comorbid obsessive-compulsive disorder was associated with lower NS scores (t = 2.3, p = 0.023) as was that of comorbid panic disorder (t = 2.0, p = 0.051). Finally, the presence of simple phobias was associated with lower scores on RD (t = 2.4, p = 0.016). HA scores were higher in patients with early onset of MDD (adjusted p = 0.05). Early versus late onset of MDD was not significantly related to NS or RD scores. LIMITATIONS: Since our sample consisted of moderately depressed outpatients, our ability to generalize our findings to other populations is limited. CONCLUSIONS: Features of temperament are related to patterns of anxiety disorder comorbidity and age of onset among patients with MDD. Higher levels of HA and lower levels of RD and NS were associated with an increased risk of anxiety disorder comorbidity in our sample. HA may also be related to early onset of depression.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Antidepressant response and well-being in pre-, peri- and postmenopausal women with major depressive disorder treated with fluoxetine.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the impact of menopausal status on treatment response and well-being in a cohort of outpatient women with major depressive disorder (DSM-III-R criteria), who received treatment with fluoxetine (20 mg/day for 8 weeks). METHODS: Menopausal status was defined based on age, presence of menstrual irregularity or amenorrhea and vasomotor symptoms. Remission and response of depression were defined as a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17) score or=50%, respectively. Well-being was assessed by self-rating with the Symptom Questionnaire. Remitters were followed up for 28 additional weeks. RESULTS: No differences in rates of response and remission as well as in levels of well-being were observed among pre- (n = 121), peri- (n = 28) and postmenopausal (n = 35) women at the endpoint of the acute phase, even after adjustment for baseline depression severity. Residual symptoms, however, were significantly more common in postmenopausal women, except for the continuation phase endpoint. Differences in residual symptoms during the acute phase subsided after adjustment for baseline depression severity. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, menopausal status did not significantly affect the response to fluoxetine treatment and the degree of posttreatment well-being among major depressive disorder patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Ropinirole in treatment-resistant depression: a 16-week pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess the antidepressant efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive ropinirole in outpatients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). METHOD: The study sample consisted of patients with a major depressive episode (diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria) and TRD. Ropinirole 0.25 to 1.5 mg daily was added to tricyclic antidepressants or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. We conducted assessments at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16. We defined response as a 50% or greater reduction of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score plus a score of 1 ("very much improved") or 2 ("much improved") on the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement scale at endpoint. Tolerability was monitored with the Dosage Record Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale. RESULTS: Seven patients had major depressive disorder, and 3 had bipolar II disorder. The mean maximum dose of ropinirole was 1.33 mg daily. Mean (SD) scores on the MADRS decreased from 29.6 (7.6) at baseline to 16.9 (12.1) at endpoint (P < 0.02). At endpoint, 4 of 10 (40%) patients were responders. Two patients discontinued ropinirole because of dizziness. CONCLUSIONS: These pilot data suggest that, in selected cases of TRD, ropinirole augmentation of antidepressants is effective and relatively well tolerated.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Is there a placebo problem in antidepressant trials?

In psychiatry, particularly in antidepressant clinical studies, placebo-controlled trials often yield results that are very difficult to interpret because of robust placebo responses. Meta-analyses of trials in major depressive disorder (MDD) suggest that drug-placebo differences in response rates range from 11% to 18%. However, in trials of marketed antidepressants present in the FDA databases, antidepressant drugs were superior to placebo in only 45 out of 93 RCTs (48%), and the placebo response overall appears to have increased over time. This gradual increase in placebo response rates may lead to delays in bringing new antidepressant treatments to the market, increased costs of antidepressant drug development and, in some cases, decisions to stop the development of certain compounds, or FDA decisions to not approve new treatments. A number of possible contributing factors to this significant placebo response in MDD have been identified, but further studies are needed. Many of the remedies used by researchers to minimize the placebo response, such as lead-in periods or shortening the duration of study visits, have failed to show consistent benefits. From our analysis of published studies, it appears that expectations about the speed of response may be shaped by the duration of the trial and that most of the placebo response occurs in the first half of the trial, regardless of its duration. These observations have led us to develop a novel approach to the placebo response problem called the Sequential Parallel Comparison Design.

Antidepressive Agents↗

PubMed2005

Outcomes of recognizing depressed Chinese American patients in primary care.

PURPOSE: This study aims to examine the effect of identifying Chinese American patients as having major depressive disorder (MDD) to their primary care physicians (PCPs) on the latter's attention given to the treatment of depression. METHODOLOGY: Forty Chinese American patients from a primary care clinic were identified as having major depressive disorder (MDD), and their primary care physicians (PCPs) were notified of the diagnosis by letter. Three months later, medical records of subjects in the study were reviewed to see if their PCPs had intervened through referral and/or initiated treatment of depression. RESULTS: PCPs documented intervention in 19 patients (47%) regarding their depression. Two of these patients (11%) were started on an antidepressant. Four (21%) accepted and 13 (68%) declined referral to mental health services. No intervention was recorded for 21 (53%) patients. CONCLUSION: We conclude that recognition alone of MDD among Chinese Americans in the community primary care setting does not lead to adequate initiation of treatment for depression by PCPs.

Asian↗

PubMed2005

A multicenter, placebo-controlled study of modafinil augmentation in partial responders to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with persistent fatigue and sleepiness.

BACKGROUND: Up to one half of depressed patients have partial or no response to antidepressant monotherapy. This multicenter, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy of modafinil augmentation in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients with fatigue and excessive sleepiness despite selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) monotherapy. METHOD: Patients (18-65 years) with a DSM-IV diagnosis of MDD and partial response to SSRI monotherapy (> or = 8 weeks) at a stable dose for > or = 4 weeks were eligible. Patients had screening/baseline 31-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) scores of 14 to 26, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) scores > or = 10, and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) scores > or = 4. Patients were randomly assigned to augmentation therapy with modafinil 200 mg/day or placebo for 8 weeks. Assessments included the ESS, Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I), 31- and 17-item HAM-D, FSS, Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). RESULTS: Of 311 enrolled patients who received > or = 1 dose of study drug, 158 were randomly assigned to modafinil (70% women) and 153 to placebo (72% women); 85% of each treatment group completed the study. At final visit, modafinil significantly improved patients' overall clinical condition compared with placebo on the basis of CGI-I scores (p = .02), and there were trends toward greater mean reductions in ESS, 31- and 17-item HAM-D, and MADRS scores versus placebo. Modafinil significantly reduced BFI scores for worst fatigue at final visit (p < .05 vs. placebo). There were no significant differences between modafinil and placebo at final visit in FSS or BFI total scores. Adverse events significantly more common during modafinil compared with placebo treatment were nausea (9% vs. 2%; p = .01) and feeling jittery (4% vs. 1%; p = .03). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that modafinil is a well-tolerated and potentially effective augmenting agent for SSRI partial responders with fatigue and sleepiness.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

An open study of triiodothyronine augmentation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder.

OBJECTIVE: In an open trial, we investigated the efficacy of triiodothyronine (T(3)) adjuvant to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in subjects with major depressive disorder (MDD) resistant to SSRI treatment. METHOD: Twenty subjects who met DSM-IV criteria for MDD (mean +/- SD age = 44.3 +/- 10.3 years; 55% [N = 11] women) and had failed to respond to a course of treatment of at least 8 weeks with an SSRI antidepressant were enrolled in a 4-week open-label augmentation treatment with T(3) 50 microg/day. Atypical and melancholic sub-types of MDD were diagnosed using Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders criteria. We administered the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) 4 times during the study (which was conducted between 2001 and 2003). RESULTS: During T(3) augmentation, the severity of depression decreased from an initial mean +/- SD HAM-D-17 score of 20.5 +/- 3.6 to a final HAM-D-17 score of 14.0 +/- 7.1 (p < .001). Seven subjects (35.0%) were treatment responders (HAM-D-17 reduction >or= 50%), and 6 subjects (30.0%) achieved clinical remission (final HAM-D-17 <or= 7). The 5 subjects with atypical depression experienced significantly (p < .01) greater clinical improvement (final HAM-D-17 scores 6.6 +/- 1.8 vs. 16.4 +/- 4.5), and higher rates of treatment response (100% [5/5] vs. 13.3% [2/15]) and remission (80.0% [4/5] vs. 13.3% [2/15]), compared to subjects with nonatypical MDD. The 8 subjects with melancholic MDD experienced significantly (p < .05) greater depression severity at the end of the study compared to nonmelancholic MDD subjects (final HAM-D-17 scores = 18.3 +/- 6.6 vs. 11.1 +/- 6.1). CONCLUSION: Triiodothyronine augmentation of SSRIs may be a promising treatment strategy in SSRI-resistant MDD, particularly in subjects with the atypical MDD subtype.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Aripiprazole augmentation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Due to their favorable side effect profile, atypical antipsychotic agents offer important therapeutic advantages in mood disorders. Aripiprazole, an atypical antipsychotic agent with partial dopaminergic and serotonin 1A receptor agonist activity, may be particularly useful when used in conjunction with standard antidepressants in treatment-resistant depression. The purpose of this study was to test this hypothesis in depressed outpatients who have not experienced significant clinical improvement following an adequate trial of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). METHOD: 12 patients (mean +/- SD age = 46.6 +/- 11.3 years, 66.7% female) with major depressive disorder (MDD) diagnosed by use of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-Axis I Disorders, who had failed to experience a clinical response following an adequate trial of an SSRI, were treated with open-label aripiprazole in addition to their SSRI for 8 weeks. Clinical response was defined as a 50% or greater decrease in depressive symptoms during the course of the trial (baseline-endpoint) as measured by the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression total score. Data were collected from August 2003 to July 2004. RESULTS: 9/12 (75.0%) patients completed the trial. Using a completer analysis, 5/9 (55.6%) patients were classified as responders. An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis resulted in 7 responders (58.3%). The overall proportion of remitters was 3/9 (33.3%) using a completer analysis and 5/12 (41.7%) using the ITT analysis. Aripiprazole administration appeared safe, with no severe adverse events observed in any of the study participants. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a possible augmentation role for aripiprazole when used in conjunction with SSRIs in SSRI-resistant MDD.

Ambulatory Care↗

PubMed2005

15 years of clinical experience with bupropion HCl: from bupropion to bupropion SR to bupropion XL.

BACKGROUND: Bupropion has been available in the United States since 1989. Initially a thrice-daily immediate-release formulation, a twice-daily sustained-release formulation followed in 1996, and, in August 2003, a once-daily extended-release formulation was introduced. On the 15th anniversary of its introduction, we undertook a review of the background/history, mechanism of action, formulations, and clinical profile of bupropion. DATA SOURCES: Major efficacy trials and other reports were obtained and reviewed from MEDLINE searches, review of abstracts from professional meetings, and the bupropion SR manufacturer's databases. Searches of English-language articles were conducted from June 2003 through August 2004. No time limit was specified in the searches, which were conducted using the search terms bupropion, bupropion SR, and bupropion XL. DATA SYNTHESIS: Bupropion inhibits the re-uptake of norepinephrine and dopamine neurotransmission without any significant direct effects on serotonin neurotransmission. Bupropion is an effective antidepressant with efficacy comparable to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other antidepressants. It is well tolerated in short-and longer-term treatment. Headache, dry mouth, nausea, insomnia, constipation, and dizziness are the most common adverse events. Seizure and allergic reactions are medically important adverse events associated with bupropion and are reported rarely. Among all the newer antidepressants in the United States, bupropion appears to have among the lowest incidence of sexual dysfunction, weight gain, and somnolence. Although not U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved for these indications, bupropion has also been used as an adjunctive treatment to reverse antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction and to augment anti-depressant efficacy in partial responders and non-responders to other agents. CONCLUSION: Bupropion has played and will continue to play an important role as a treatment for major depressive disorder in adults, as well as for other related disorders.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2005

Prevalence and clinical correlates of irritability in major depressive disorder: a preliminary report from the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression study.

BACKGROUND: Irritability is a common feature of major depressive disorder (MDD), though it is not included in the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for adult MDD and is not assessed in most standard depression rating scales. Irritability with or without depression has been associated with risk for suicide, violence, and cardiovascular disease. METHOD: The prevalence of significant levels of irritability was examined among the first 1456 outpatients with nonpsychotic MDD entering the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study. Sociodemographic and clinical features were compared for participants who did and did not report irritability at least 50% of the time during the week preceding study entry. RESULTS: Of 1456 evaluable subjects, 582 (40%) reported irritability more than half the time. These individuals were more likely than nonirritable subjects to be female, to be younger, to be unemployed, and to report a history of at least 1 suicide attempt. Functional status and quality of life were also poorer in this group. Irritability was correlated with overall depressive severity, which accounted for nearly all of the clinical differences noted, with the exception of vascular disease, for which the association persisted after controlling for age, sex, and depressive severity. CONCLUSION: Irritability is prevalent among depressed outpatients and associated with a greater likelihood of suicide attempts, poorer functional status, and greater prevalence of vascular disease. It is correlated with overall depression severity and thus may not represent a distinct depressive subtype per se. The impact of irritability on course and treatment outcome merits further study.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Factors that differentiate early vs. later onset of major depression disorder.

This report explores the relationship between age of first onset of major depression and other demographic and clinical features in the first 1500 patients entering the Sequenced Treatment Alternative to Relieving Depression (STAR*D) study. Outpatients, 18-75 years of age, with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder (MDD) from either primary care or psychiatric practices constitute the population. Age of onset was defined at study intake by asking patients to estimate the age at which they experienced the onset of their first major depressive episode. This report divides the population in terms of pre-adult (before age 18) onset and adult (age 18 or later) onset. The results suggest that MDD that begins before age 18 has a distinct set of demographic (female gender) and clinical correlates (longer duration of illness; longer current episodes; more episodes; more suicidality; greater symptom severity; more psychiatric symptoms associated with Axis I comorbidity; and more sadness, irritability, agitation and atypical symptom features), and it appears associated with significant psychosocial consequences (lower educational attainment and marriage rates). Thus, pre-adulthood onset MDD is a particularly severe and chronic condition.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Hypericum extract in patients with MDD and reversed vegetative signs: re-analysis from data of a double-blind, randomized trial of hypericum extract, fluoxetine, and placebo.

Hypericum extract (HE) might be favourably active in depressed patients with reversed vegetative signs (RVS). Therefore, we performed an exploratory subgroup analysis of a three-armed study to compare HE, fluoxetine, and placebo in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) in a 12 wk trial. A total of 135 patients were randomized to 12 wk treatment with HE LI 160 (900 mg/d), fluoxetine (20 mg/d), or placebo. Patients with RVS were defined in two steps, according to DSM-IV. First, patients with melancholy-related vegetative signs were excluded. Secondly, patients had to have at least one score of 2 for the items 22-26 of the HAMD-28 scale, which are related to hypersomnia and hyperphagia. Twenty-seven patients remained in the group. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was applied using the HAMD-17 score. Secondly a chi2 test for response was performed, using the same and further an adapted criterium as in recently published studies. ANCOVA revealed a trend to a global difference. Post-hoc analysis showed a trend to superiority of HE compared to placebo and to fluoxetine, but a very large effect size for both differences. Fluoxetine was not different from placebo. The adapted response criterium showed a significant global difference as well as a significant superiority of HE over placebo and over fluoxetine. These data are based on a small sample size and must be considered tentative. A characterization of vegetative features of patients with depression could lead to an overall increased effect size in the treatment with HE.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2004

Obesity among outpatients with major depressive disorder.

Studies focusing on the prevalence of obesity in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), or the impact of excess body fat on the treatment of MDD are lacking. The aim of the present work is to systematically study obesity in MDD outpatients. A total of 369 MDD outpatients enrolled in an 8-wk trial of 20 mg fluoxetine had height and weight measured at baseline. We then examined: (1) the prevalence of being overweight or obese, (2) the relationship between obesity and a number of demographic and clinical variables, and, (3) the relationship between relative body weight and obesity with clinical response. We found that more than 50% of patients were overweight [body mass index (BMI) > or =2 5 kg/m2], while 20% were obese (BMI > or = 30 kg/m2). Obese patients presented with worse somatic well-being scores than non-obese MDD patients, but they did not differ with respect to depression severity, anxiety, somatic complaints, hopelessness or hostility. Greater relative body weight, but not obesity, predicted non-response. In conclusion, greater relative body weight was found to place MDD outpatients at risk for fluoxetine resistance.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Anxiety and somatic symptoms as predictors of treatment-related adverse events in major depressive disorder.

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the degree of anxiety or somatic symptoms present before treatment with the subsequent diagnosis of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) enrolled in an 8-week open trial of fluoxetine (20 mg). Baseline symptom questionnaires (SQ) were completed by 170 MDD patients enrolled in the trial. We then tested whether pre-treatment scores for anxiety and somatic symptoms predicted (1) whether patients were subsequently diagnosed with TRAEs; (2) whether they were subsequently diagnosed with moderate or severe TRAEs; or (3) whether a greater number of TRAEs were diagnosed during the trial. We found that depressed patients who presented with prominent somatic symptoms were significantly more likely to report at least one moderate or severe side effect during the course of treatment, but not more likely to report a greater number of side effects. Pre-treatment anxiety was not related to the development of side effects.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Ventromedial prefrontal cortex and amygdala dysfunction during an anger induction positron emission tomography study in patients with major depressive disorder with anger attacks.

CONTEXT: Although a variety of functional neuroimaging studies have used emotion induction paradigms to investigate the neural basis of anger in control subjects, no functional neuroimaging studies using anger induction have been conducted in patient populations. OBJECTIVE: To study the neural basis of anger in unmedicated patients with major depressive disorder with anger attacks (MDD + A), unmedicated patients with MDD without anger attacks (MDD - A), and controls. DESIGN: We used positron emission tomography, psychophysiologic measures, and autobiographical narrative scripts in the context of an anger induction paradigm. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty individuals, evenly divided among the 3 study groups. INTERVENTIONS: In separate conditions, participants were exposed to anger and neutral autobiographical scripts during the positron emission tomography study. Subjective self-report and psychophysiologic data were also collected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Voxelwise methods were used for analyses of regional cerebral blood flow changes for the anger vs neutral contrast within and between groups. RESULTS: Controls showed significantly (P<.001) greater regional cerebral blood flow increases in the left ventromedial prefrontal cortex during anger induction than patients with MDD + A, whereas these differences were not present in other between-group analyses. Also, in controls, an inverse relationship was demonstrated between regional cerebral blood flow changes during anger induction in the left ventromedial prefrontal cortex and left amygdala, whereas in patients with MDD + A there was a positive correlation between these brain regions during anger induction. There was no significant relationship between these brain regions during anger induction in patients with MDD - A. CONCLUSION: These results suggest a pathophysiology of MDD + A that is distinct from that of MDD - A and that may be responsible for the unique clinical presentation of patients with MDD + A.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

A preliminary open study of the tolerability and effectiveness of nefazodone in major depressive disorder: comparing patients who recently discontinued an SSRI with those on no recent antidepressant treatment.

Anecdotal evidence suggests that the recent discontinuation of an SSRI may confound the tolerability of the initiation of nefazodone treatment. We sought to determine whether recent discontinuation of an SSRI interferes with effectiveness and/or tolerability of nefazodone. Twenty-six depressed subjects, 21-63 years old, were recruited at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Thirteen subjects (50%) had discontinued an SSRI within 1-4 weeks due to ineffectiveness and/or side effects. Thirteen subjects (50%) had not taken antidepressants for the previous 6 months. Subjects were administered open nefazodone 50 mg p.o. b.i.d., and doses were increased as tolerated to a maximum of 600 mg/day. Subjects were followed for 12 weeks and were assessed for response and side effects using HAM-D-6 and clinical interviews. Both groups improved significantly on nefazodone; however, there was no statistically significant difference in response (>or=50% decrease in HAM-D-6) rates between completers with prior SSRI treatment (80%) and completers without recent exposure to antidepressants (67%). Response rates based on intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis were 31% for both groups. Association between prior SSRI treatment and discontinuation of nefazodone due to side effects or non-response was not statistically significant. Our study suggests that the rate of negative outcomes with nefazodone is no different whether patients have recently failed an SSRI.

Adult↗