Biomedical subjects

Maurizio Fava

Publications and source records attributed to Maurizio Fava.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

Functioning and interpersonal relationships as predictors of response in treatment-resistant depression.

The purpose of this study was to examine whether occupational functioning or the quality of interpersonal relationships is predictive of clinical response to a 6-week open trial of nortriptyline (NT) in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Ninety-two subjects with TRD were treated openly with NT for 6 weeks. The longitudinal interval follow-up evaluation (LIFE) scale was administered at baseline. A logistic regression was performed using occupational functioning and interpersonal relationships (over the past month and over the past 5 years) as predictors of treatment response. Unpaired t tests were performed to examine mean composite LIFE score values between responders and nonresponders. The composite scores that were statistically significant were used as single predictors of treatment status in separate logistic regression equations. Better occupational function over the past 5 years predicted better response to treatment with NT in patients with TRD. Beyond a history of nonresponse to antidepressants, long-term occupational function may be a predictor of outcome in the treatment of TRD.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Tolerability issues during long-term treatment with antidepressants.

Depressive disorders are highly prevalent in the general population. Long-term treatment with antidepressants consolidates the improvement obtained during the acute phase of the treatment and prevents relapses and recurrences of the disorder. On the other hand, there is growing evidence that antidepressant side effects may limit patients' quality of life and social functioning, as well as affect patients' health and treatment adherence. Most studies concerning antidepressant treatment have focused on short-term tolerability, ignoring both early-onset persistent side effects and late-onset side effects that are reported during long-term treatment. Nevertheless, these long-term treatment side effects are likely to have a dramatic impact on patient outcome and treatment adherence. Common long-term side effects of antidepressants are weight gain, sexual dysfunction, sleep disturbances, fatigue, apathy, and cognitive impairment (e.g., working memory dysfunction). Usual strategies for the management of these long-term side effects are: changing drug daily schedule, various augmentation therapies, antidepressant switches, drug-holidays, and dose tapering, with the latter two strategies being strongly discouraged on the basis of concerns that patients' depressive episodes may return. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and atypical antidepressants (e.g., venlafaxine, bupropion, and nefazodone) show a relatively favorable short-term as well as long-term tolerability compared with older drugs (e.g., tricyclics and monoamine oxidase inhibitors). Therefore, clinicians are likely to prefer them in usual practice, especially among patients requiring maintenance treatment. The present review focuses on management of long-term side effects.

Antidepressive Agents↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The overlap between personality disorders and major depressive disorder (MDD).

BACKGROUND: Research studies have focused attention on the importance of the comorbidity of personality disorders and depression. METHODS: The present review examines seven potential explanations for the overlap to clarify the nature of the relationship, if any, between depression and personality disorder diagnoses. RESULTS: There may be many explanations for the potential overlap of personality disorders (PD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). For example, the distinction between states and traits may not be as clear and definitive as suggested in the DSM-IV. In some cases, depression may influence personality pathology, and may even lead to personality disorders. In other cases, personality disorders may lead to MDD. CONCLUSION: Further research may clarify the nature of the relationship, if any, between depression and personality disorder diagnoses, as well as the relationship between comorbidity and treatment response.

Comorbidity↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Immediate switching of antidepressant therapy: results from a clinical trial of duloxetine.

BACKGROUND: Approximately half of all treated depressed patients fail to show adequate response to their initially prescribed antidepressant medication. Switching to another medication represents one possible next-step approach for nonresponsive or partially responsive patients. However, specific techniques for switching between antidepressants have not been well studied. We examined the efficacy and tolerability associated with a switch from a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or venlafaxine to duloxetine. METHODS: All patients met criteria for major depressive disorder as defined in DSM-IV. Patients (N = 88) exhibiting suboptimal response or poor tolerability to their current antidepressant medication (citalopram or=10% of patients in both treatment groups were nausea, headache, dry mouth, insomnia, and diarrhea. Patients switched to duloxetine reported significantly lower rates of nausea and fatigue compared with patients initiating duloxetine. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the efficacy of duloxetine in switched patients was comparable to that observed in patients initiating duloxetine therapy. Immediate switching from an SSRI or venlafaxine to duloxetine (60 mg QD) was well tolerated.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

A description of next-step switching versus augmentation practices for outpatients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder enrolled in an academic specialty clinic.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of naturalistic studies from depression specialty clinics describing the next-step (augmentation versus switching) practices of clinicians for outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) resistant to an antidepressant trial of adequate dose and duration. METHODS: Eighty-five MDD outpatients enrolled in one of two specialty clinics, who had not achieved remission after a first adequate prospective antidepressant trial conducted at the clinic underwent either augmentation (n = 36) or switching (n=49) of their antidepressant regimen. Outcome was defined with the use of the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Scale. RESULTS: Nonresponders (CGI-I>3) following the first antidepressant trial were more likely to have their treatment switched than patients who experienced incomplete response (CGI-I<4, CGI-S>1) (67.2% versus 28.5%, p = 0.001). Incomplete responders during the first trial who went on to receive augmentation had higher remission rates (60.0% versus 0%, p=0.01), lower endpoint depression severity scores (1.8 +/- 1.1 versus 3.3 +/- 0.8, p = 0.01) and greater clinical improvement scores (1.6 +/- 1.1 versus 3.0 +/- 0.0, p=0.03) than incomplete responders who had their antidepressant regimen switched. Although nonresponders to the first treatment who were switched experienced greater symptom improvement than nonresponders who were augmented (2.7 +/- 1.1 versus 3.4 +/- 1.2, p=0.03), there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between these two groups with respect to remission rates (18.6% versus 14.2%, respectively) and endpoint depressive severity (3.0 +/- 1.4 versus 3.4 +/- 1.4, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this nonrandomized, naturalistic treatment setting, nonresponders to an adequate, prospective antidepressant trial were more likely to have their antidepressant regimen switched, while patients with incomplete response during the first trial were more likely to have their regimen augmented. In addition, patients with incomplete response who had their treatment augmented had better outcome than patients with incomplete response who had their treatment switched.

Academic Medical Centers↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Clinical and demographic factors associated with DSM-IV melancholic depression.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this paper is to use demographic and clinical data from a large diverse group of outpatients diagnosed with non-psychotic major depression to investigate the validity of the DSM-IV concept of melancholic depression. METHODS: Baseline clinical and demographic data were collected on 1500 outpatients (1456 of whom melancholia could be determined) with non-psychotic major depressive disorder (MDD) participating in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study. Depressive symptom severity was assessed by clinical telephone interview using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRS-D17) and the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C30). The types and degrees of concurrent psychiatric symptoms were measured using a self report, the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ), by recording the number of items relevant to each diagnostic category endorsed by study participants. RESULTS: Adjusting for severity of depression (as measured by the total HRS-D17 scores), no differences were found in the rate of melancholic depression by race, marital status, education, employment status, family history of depression, primary care versus specialty care, monthly income, and degree of psychiatric and medical co-morbidity. Melancholic depression was significantly more likely in men than women. Melancholic depression after adjustment for severity was associated with a slightly younger age at study entry, as well as with greater illness severity, and slightly shorter duration of current episode. Hispanic ethnicity was associated with lower melancholic depression rates at the .06 level of significance. CONCLUSIONS: Among outpatients with MDD, melancholic features were less likely in Hispanic patients, but more likely in slightly younger patients and in men. Melancholic features were also related to a slightly shorter current episode. These findings are consistent with the notion that external socio-demographic factors do not play an important role in the pathophysiology of melancholic depression.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Substance use disorder comorbidity in major depressive disorder: a confirmatory analysis of the STAR*D cohort.

The demographics and clinical features were compared between those with (29.4%) and without concurrent substance use disorder (SUD) in 2541 outpatients with major depression (MDD) enrolled in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression study. Compared to those without SUD, MDD patients with concurrent SUD were more likely to be younger, male, divorced or never married, and at greater current suicide risk, and have an earlier age of onset of depression, greater depressive symptomatology, more previous suicide attempts, more frequent concurrent anxiety disorders, and greater functional impairment (p = 0.048 to <0.0001). They were also less likely to be Hispanic and endorse general medical comorbidities (p = 0.006 and 0.002, respectively).

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Cardiovascular risk factors may moderate pharmacological treatment effects in major depressive disorder.

OBJECTIVE: An increased association between depression and cardiovascular disease, as well as cardiovascular risk factors, led to the "vascular depression" hypothesis. This subtype of depression is postulated to have a different clinical presentation and to be more treatment-resistant. In this study, we measured the impact of cardiovascular risk factors on the outcome of antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder (MDD). METHOD: We enrolled 348 MDD subjects, ages 19 to 65 years, in an 8-week treatment study with 20 mg fluoxetine per day. We recorded for each subject 6 cardiovascular risk factors: age (male > or =45, female > or =55), smoking, family history, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia; and we defined a cardiovascular risk score (range, 0-6) by the number of risk factors present. Treatment outcome was measured as response (> or =50% improvement on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [Ham-D-17]) and remission (final Ham-D-17< or =7). RESULTS: In logistic regression analyses, the cardiovascular risk score was significantly associated with treatment nonresponse and lack of remission when adjusting for age of onset of MDD and baseline severity of depression. The cardiovascular risk score remained significantly associated with treatment nonresponse when we additionally controlled for overall medical burden (measured with the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale). Among individual cardiovascular risk factors, elevated total cholesterol was a significant predictor of treatment nonresponse and lack of remission. CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular risk factors may have negative effects on the course of treatment in MDD. These results support the concept of "vascular depression" in younger subjects.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Depression and renal disease.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent disease, frequently characterized by recurrent or chronic course, and by comorbidity with other medical illnesses. The lifetime prevalence of MDD ranges up to 17% in the general population, and it almost doubles in patients with diabetes (9-27%), stroke (22-50%), or cancer (18-39%). Moreover, MDD worsens the prognosis, quality of life, and treatment compliance of patients with comorbid medical illnesses. Similar to what is observed with other comorbid illnesses, MDD worsens the outcome of kidney disease patients by increasing both morbidity and mortality. Treatment of depressive symptoms in renal failure patients increases medication acceptability and therefore potentially improves the overall patient outcome. The issue of the safety of antidepressant treatment in subjects with renal failure is frequently counterbalanced by the risks associated with depression comorbidity, provided that antidepressants with a low volume of distribution and low protein binding are prescribed, and most important, at low initial doses. Screening for CYP isoenzyme interactions with current medications is also recommended before starting antidepressant treatment.

Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Antagonists↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Treatment approaches to major depressive disorder relapse. Part 1: dose increase.

OBJECTIVE: Although continuing antidepressant treatment after patients have responded to medication has been shown to greatly reduce the risk of relapse, this risk is not eliminated. A number of theories have been proposed to account for this apparent loss of efficacy. A common initial approach to managing relapse is to increase the dose of antidepressant. We prospectively evaluated the likelihood of response to increasing the fluoxetine doses in patients relapsing during a long-term efficacy study of two fluoxetine dosing regimens. METHOD: Patients meeting the DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder with modified HAMD17 scores > or =18 and CGI-severity scores > or =4 were treated for 13 weeks with open-label 20 mg/day fluoxetine in a multicenter US study. Responders (n = 501) were randomized to 20 mg fluoxetine daily, placebo, or 90 mg enteric-coated fluoxetine weekly for 25 weeks of double-blind continuation treatment. If the patients relapsed during the continuation phase, they were offered a 25-week optional rescue treatment phase during which the study medication dose was increased as follows: (1) patients on placebo had treatment with fluoxetine 20 mg/day reinitiated, (2) patients on fluoxetine 20 mg/day had their dose increased to 40 mg/day, and (3) patients on a 90-mg weekly dose had their dose increased to 90 mg twice a week. The results of the rescue phase for the latter two groups who relapsed while on continuation treatment with fluoxetine are reported. Response was defined as a 50% reduction in the modified HAMD17 score since time of relapse and a CGI-severity score < or =2. Additional efficacy analyses included HAMD and CGI-severity changes from baseline to endpoint. Safety measures included assessment of treatment-emergent adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory measures. RESULTS: Overall, patients relapsing during the continuation treatment responded to an increased dose (57% of the 40-mg-daily group and 72% of the enteric-coated 90-mg-twice-weekly group). Mean modified HAMD17 scores decreased from a mean of approximately 20 to below 8 and were maintained for up to 6 months in the responders. Thirty-five percent of patients either did not respond or initially responded but again relapsed after augmentation of medication. CONCLUSIONS: The patients relapsing after initially responding to fluoxetine can benefit from an increase in fluoxetine dose. These results also generally support increasing dose as a first-line treatment strategy for a patient who has relapsed while taking a previously effective dose of an antidepressant. Increasing enteric-coated fluoxetine 90 mg once weekly to twice weekly appeared to be as well-tolerated and effective in restoring response as increasing a daily fluoxetine dose from 20 to 40 mg.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Treatment approaches to major depressive disorder relapse. Part 2: reinitiation of antidepressant treatment.

BACKGROUND: Anecdotal reports concerning mood disorder patients suggest restarting drug treatment in patients who prematurely discontinue it may be associated with a diminished chance of response upon rechallenge. We evaluated the likelihood of response to reinitiation of fluoxetine treatment in patients relapsing after switching to placebo during a long-term efficacy study of two different dosing regimens of fluoxetine. METHOD: Patients who met the DSM-IV major depressive disorder criteria with modified HAMD17 scores > or =18 and CGI-Severity scores > or =4 were treated with open-label 20 mg/day fluoxetine for 13 weeks in a multicenter US study. Responders (n = 501) were randomized to placebo, 20 mg fluoxetine daily, or 90 mg enteric-coated fluoxetine weekly for 25 weeks of double-blind continuation treatment. Patients relapsing during the continuation phase were offered 25 weeks of double-blind rescue treatment during which the study medication dose was increased as follows: (1) patients on placebo had treatment with fluoxetine 20 mg/ day reinitiated; (2) patients on fluoxetine 20 mg/day had their dose increased to 40 mg/day, and (3) patients on a 90-mg weekly dose had their dose increased to 90 mg twice a week. Only the results of the rescue phase for the group who relapsed while on continuation treatment with placebo are reported here. Analyses included percentage of responders (50% reduction of modified HAMD17 and CGI-Severity < or =2) and assessments of change from baseline to endpoint (HAMD, CGI-Severity). Safety measures included assessment of vital signs, laboratory measures, and treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: Of 122 patients assigned to placebo, 57 (47%) relapsed during continuation treatment. Fifty-five (96%) of these elected to enter double-blind rescue treatment. Overall, patients who relapsed upon switching to placebo responded well to reinitiation of fluoxetine (62%). The mean modified HAMD17 score decreased from 20 to less than 9 and was maintained for up to 6 months. Thirty-eight percent of patients either did not respond or initially responded but again relapsed after reinitiation of medication. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that patients who, after an initial response to fluoxetine, relapse upon switching to placebo have a relatively high probability of responding to the reinitiation of fluoxetine treatment. These results challenge the view that the efficacy of an agent prematurely discontinued is diminished when such an agent is restarted. They also generally support reinitiation of the same antidepressant as a 'first-line' treatment strategy in patients who relapsed after stopping a previously effective antidepressant.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Treatment-resistant depression and Axis II comorbidity.

BACKGROUND: Researchers of unipolar depression have speculated that personality disturbance is a contributing factor in the development of treatment resistance. The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence of Axis II disorders between a sample of rigorously defined, treatment-resistant depressed outpatients and a sample of depressed outpatients not having experienced treatment resistance. METHODS: 53 patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and 105 patients with non-treatment-resistant depression (non-TRD) were recruited through respective outpatient clinical trials at the Massachusetts General Hospital's Depression Clinical and Research Program. Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder was made using the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-III-R, personality disorders were assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders, and antidepressant treatment resistance was defined using the McLean Hospital Antidepressant Treatment Record. Participants from both studies were matched for baseline HAM-D-17 total score and gender. Multiple chi-square analysis was used to compare frequencies of Axis II disorders between TRD and non-TRD patients as well as to compare categorical baseline demographic variables. Unpaired t tests were used to compare baseline demographic and clinical variables measured in a continuous manner. RESULTS: Non-TRD patients had a higher rate of obsessive-compulsive personality disorder than TRD patients, but this difference was not statistically significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. No other differences were found to be statistically significant. Range of Axis II comorbidity was 0.0-30.2% for TRD patients and 2.9-37.1% for non-TRD patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, treatment resistance in a current major depressive episode was not associated with an increased rate of Axis II disorders. Strengths of this study include the use of structured interview instruments to assess Axis I and II conditions, and having the two study groups matched for gender and baseline severity of depression. Limitations of this study include a modest sample size and reliance on DSM personality constructs.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Behavioral and emotional disturbances in the offspring of depressed parents with anger attacks.

BACKGROUND: To examine the emotional and behavioral characteristics of the offspring of depressed parents with and without anger attacks. METHODS: Forty-three parents who met criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) completed the Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist - Parent Report Version (CBCL) for each of their birth children (n = 58, age range 6-17 years). Unpaired t tests were used to evaluate the CBCL scale score differences between children of parents with and children of parents without anger attacks. Baseline demographics and clinical differences between the two groups of parents were also evaluated. RESULTS: Parents with anger attacks had a significantly younger age of onset of MDD. Offspring of depressed parents with anger attacks were found to have significantly lower social and school competency scale scores and higher scores for delinquency, attention problems, and aggressive behavior. In addition, this group was found to have a significantly higher total T score (a global measure of psychopathology). CONCLUSIONS: There are some important differences between offspring of depressed parents with and without anger attacks. This finding may be important in identifying and formulating intervention strategies for childhood problems in the offspring of depressed parents.

Achievement↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Depression and folate status in the US Population.

BACKGROUND: Folate deficiency and low folate status have been linked in clinic studies to depression, persistent depressive symptoms, and poor antidepressant response. These relationships have not been demonstrated in general populations. This study examined associations between depression and folate status indicators in an ethnically diverse general US population sample aged 15-39 years. METHODS: Healthy subjects whose red blood cell (RBC) folate concentrations had been measured were determined to have no depression (n = 2,526), major depression (n = 301), or dysthymia (n = 121) using a diagnostic interview schedule. Serum concentrations of folate and total homocysteine (tHcy) were also measured. RESULTS: After adjustment for sociodemographic factors, serum vitamin B(12) concentration, alcohol consumption over the past year and current status as to overweight and use of vitamin/mineral supplements, cigarettes and illegal drugs, subjects who met criteria for a lifetime diagnosis of major depression had folate concentrations in serum and RBCs that were lower than those of subjects who had never been depressed. Subjects who met criteria for dysthymia alone had lower RBC folate concentrations than never-depressed subjects, but the serum folate concentrations of the two groups were comparable. Serum tHcy concentration was not related to lifetime depression diagnoses. Low folate status was found to be most characteristic of recently recovered subjects, and a large proportion of such subjects were folate deficient. CONCLUSIONS: Low folate status was detectable in depressed members of the general US population. Folate supplementation may be indicated during the year following a depressive episode.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The problem of the placebo response in clinical trials for psychiatric disorders: culprits, possible remedies, and a novel study design approach.

The placebo response is a major issue in clinical trials for psychiatric disorders. Possible contributing factors to this problem include diagnostic misclassification, issues concerning inclusion/exclusion criteria, outcome measures' lack of sensitivity to change, measurement errors, poor quality of data entry and verification, waxing and waning of the natural course of illness, regression toward the mean phenomenon, patient and clinician expectations about the trial, study design issues, non-specific therapeutic effects, and high attrition. Over the past few decades, researchers have attempted to reduce the placebo effect in a variety of ways. Unfortunately, approaches with very little or no benefit have included restricting enrollment to selected populations, rater training, requirement of same rater, and placebo lead-in phases. Some benefits, although often marginal, have been derived from standardizing diagnostic procedures, managing clinicians' overestimation of change, simplification of study visits and assessments, minimizing non-specific, therapeutic effects, extending trial duration, reducing number of sites, increasing the sensitivity of outcome measures, and reducing the number of treatment arms. Thus far, there has been no attempt to develop new study designs aimed at reducing the placebo effect. We are proposing a novel study design, called 'Sequential Parallel Comparison Design', suitable for double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in psychiatric disorders. This design is aimed at reducing both the overall placebo response rate and the sample size required for such trials. Its usefulness in clinical research needs to be tested empirically. If this study design were to be found to meet its stated goals, this could markedly facilitate the process of clinical development of new compounds for the treatment of psychiatric disorders.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Elevated cholesterol levels associated with nonresponse to fluoxetine treatment in major depressive disorder.

Previous studies have suggested that patients with major depressive disorder may have lower cholesterol levels compared to healthy controls. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between pretreatment serum cholesterol levels and clinical response to treatment with fluoxetine among outpatients with major depression. Three hundred and twenty-two depressed outpatients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for major depressive disorder were enrolled in an 8-week, fixed-dose, open trial of fluoxetine 20 mg/day. Nonfasting serum cholesterol levels were obtained for all patients before starting fluoxetine. All patients were drug free for a minimum of 2 weeks prior to the onset of the study. Clinical response was defined as a 50% or greater decrease in the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) score at endpoint compared to baseline. Cholesterol levels were classified as either elevated (defined as a level equal to or greater than 200 mg/dL) or nonelevated (defined as a level less than 200 mg/dL). Among the 322 outpatients, 51.6% were classified as having elevated and 48.4% as having nonelevated cholesterol levels at baseline (mean cholesterol level 238.6 +/- 33.4 mg/dL vs. 170.4 +/- 22.2 mg/dL, respectively). Depressed patients with elevated cholesterol levels did not significantly differ in gender ratio but were significantly older than depressed patients with nonelevated cholesterol levels (P <.0001). After adjusting for age, gender, and Body Mass Index (BMI), depressed patients with elevated cholesterol levels were significantly more likely to be nonresponders to fluoxetine treatment than were depressed patients with nonelevated cholesterol levels (P < 0.05). Elevated serum cholesterol levels appear to be associated with poorer response to fluoxetine treatment. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Effect of medical comorbidity on response to fluoxetine augmentation or dose increase in outpatients with treatment-resistant depression.

This study assessed the effect of general medical comorbidity on response to next-step antidepressant treatments among subjects with major depressive disorder whose depression failed to respond to an 8-week open trial of 20 mg/day of fluoxetine. Of the 386 outpatients in the open trial, 101 who remained depressed were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with either an increased dose of fluoxetine or lithium or desipramine augmentation for 4 weeks. The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) was used to assess baseline general medical comorbidity, and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale was used to assess depressive symptoms. Logistic regression analysis showed that CIRS score was not associated with likelihood of remission or premature study discontinuation. Medical comorbidity thus does not appear to be associated with significantly poorer outcome among patients whose major depressive disorder failed initially to respond to an initial trial of 20 mg/day of fluoxetine.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Comorbid medical illness and relapse of major depressive disorder in the continuation phase of treatment.

The authors examined the impact of comorbid medical illness on the rate of relapse of major depressive disorder during continuation therapy. Subjects (N = 128) with major depressive disorder (according to DSM-III-R criteria) achieved clinical remission (a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score < or = 7) after 8 weeks of treatment with fluoxetine and entered the continuation phase of antidepressant treatment. They used the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale to measure the severity of comorbid medical illness. Eight patients (6.3%) relapsed during the 28-week continuation phase. With logistic regression, the total burden and the severity of comorbid medical illness significantly predicted the relapse of major depressive disorder during continuation therapy with fluoxetine. Greater medical comorbidity was also associated with higher increases in self-reported symptoms of depression, anxiety, and anger during the follow-up.

Adolescent↗