PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Maximo Rivero-Ayerza

Publications and source records attributed to Maximo Rivero-Ayerza.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Evaluation of morphology discrimination for ventricular tachycardia diagnosis in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: To reduce inappropriate therapy from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), electrogram morphology discrimination has been developed to improve arrhythmia discrimination without compromising device safety. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of the morphology discrimination algorithm for detecting ventricular tachycardia (VT). METHODS: Stored electrograms of 795 tachyarrhythmias from 106 patients with a St. Jude Medical ICD (51 single-chamber and 55 dual-chamber) were analyzed by the investigators. The data were analyzed for morphology discrimination alone, sudden onset and stability, and morphology discrimination in combination with sudden onset and stability. Data were corrected for multiple episodes within a patient with the generalized estimating equation method. RESULTS: Using the nominal template match of 60%, morphology discrimination alone provided sensitivity and specificity of 78% and 95% for single-chamber ICDs and 63% and 92% for dual-chamber ICDs, respectively. Based on the receiver operator characteristic curve, the optimal-match percent threshold was 80% to 85% but at the expense of specificity. Morphology discrimination combined with sudden onset and stability increased sensitivity to 98% with specificity of 86% in single-chamber devices. In dual-chamber devices, the loss in sensitivity is compensated by rate branch analysis, yielding a sensitivity of 98%. CONCLUSION: Arrhythmia discrimination based on electrogram morphology has the potential to reject atrial tachyarrhythmias. However, there is a risk for underdetection of ventricular tachyarrhythmias if arrhythmia discrimination is primarily based on morphology. To guarantee patient safety in single-chamber devices, the morphology discrimination algorithm must be programmed in combination with established detection algorithms. In dual-chamber devices, loss of sensitivity is compensated by the V > A rate branch.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2006

One-year follow-up in a prospective, randomized study comparing radiofrequency and cryoablation of arrhythmias in Koch's triangle: clinical symptoms and event recording.

AIMS: To rely solely on clinical symptoms of recurrent palpitations to evaluate the success of interventional procedures can be misleading. This study was designed to assess the efficacy of event recording in evaluating long-term success in patients treated for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) or right posteroseptally located accessory pathways (RPS) either by radiofrequency (RF) or by cryoablation (CA). METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-three patients with AVNRT and eight with RPS were randomized. Patients were encouraged to activate an event recorder in the case of recurrent palpitations for the first 3 months. One year after the procedure, patients were asked specific arrhythmia related questions. Thirty-six patients underwent RF and 35 CA. Acute success was finally achieved in 34 (94%) patients in the RF and 33 (94%) in the CA groups. Assessment of long-term success demonstrated a similar proportion of palpitations in the RF and CA groups: 11 (31%) vs. 17 (49%). Only 12 patients activated the event recorder, four patients in RF, including one patient with chest pain, and eight in the CA group. Analysis of recordings revealed recurrent AVNRT or circus movement tachycardia in four patients (one RF and three CA), atrial fibrillation in one RF patient, and sinus tachycardia in six (one RF and five with CA). In addition, a complete 12 lead ECG of a recurrent arrhythmia was made in three RF and two CA patients (in-hospital or after the event recording). A total of seven patients underwent a second procedure (four RF and three CA). Without the event recorder, seven patients would have been misclassified as having recurrent arrhythmia. CONCLUSION: Event recording enhances the sensitivity of detecting arrhythmia recurrences in evaluating therapy efficacy and should be considered in every interventional follow-up study. Analysis of recordings showed that CA is as effective as RF in the treatment of AVNRT and RPS at long-term follow-up.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗
PubMed2006

Left ventricular lead placement within a coronary sinus side branch using remote magnetic navigation of a guidewire: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: A novel magnetic navigation system (MNS) allowing remote guidance of catheters and guidewires might assist in implantation of left ventricular (LV) pacing leads. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of deploying a LV pacing lead into a coronary sinus (CS) side branch using a magnetically guided wire and of performing the procedure without a CS guiding sheath. METHODS: Twenty-one patients were included in this study. Nine underwent CRT device implantation using a MNS to steer the guidewire (MNS group) while 12 patients were conventionally implanted (control group). In 6 patients in the MNS group, the procedure was performed using a CS guiding sheath. In 3 others, the decision was to perform the procedure without a CS sheath. In these patients the wire was advanced manually, while the external magnets oriented it toward the CS os. In the CS, "vector based" navigation was used to guide the wire to the desired side branch. RESULTS: In all 9 patients in the MNS group, the target vessel could be successfully engaged by the magnetically guided wire. In 7, the LV lead was lodged in the target vessel. In 2 patients, the LV lead was repositioned in an anterolateral side branch due to instability or inability to engage the vessel with it. Mean total procedure time was 164 +/- 58 minutes (without sheath 229 +/- 52 vs with sheath 132 +/- 26 minutes; P = 0.007). Mean fluoroscopy time was 28 +/- 9 minutes. For control patients, the procedure and fluoroscopy time were similar (144 +/- 41 minutes and 26 +/- 12 minutes, respectively). No major complications occurred. CONCLUSION: LV lead implantation can be performed using a remote magnetically steered guidewire. Though the lead could be implanted without a CS guiding sheath, longer procedure times were required.

Cardiac Pacing, Artificial↗
PubMed2005

Tailored echocardiographic interventricular delay programming further optimizes left ventricular performance after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of cardiac resynchronization therapy is correction of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. However, little is known about the optimal timing of LV and right ventricular (RV) stimulation. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acute hemodynamic effects of biventricular pacing, using a range of interventricular delays in patients with advanced heart failure. METHODS: Twenty patients with dilated ischemic (n = 12) and idiopathic (n = 8) cardiomyopathy (age 66 +/- 6 years, New York Heart Association class III-IV, LV end-diastolic diameter >55 mm, ejection fraction 22% +/- 18%, and QRS 200 +/- 32 ms) were implanted with a biventricular resynchronization device with sequential RV and LV timing (VV) capabilities. Tissue Doppler echocardiographic parameters were measured during sinus rhythm before implantation and following an optimal AV interval with both simultaneous and sequential biventricular pacing. The interventricular interval was modified by advancing the LV stimulus (LV first) or RV stimulus (RV first) up to 60 ms. For each stimulation protocol, standard echocardiographic Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) echo were used to measure the LV outflow tract velocity-time integral, LV filling time, intraventricular delay, and interventricular delay. RESULTS: The highest velocity-time integral was found in 12 patients with LV first stimulation, 5 patients with RV first stimulation, and 3 patients with simultaneous biventricular activation. Compared with simultaneous biventricular pacing, the optimized sequential biventricular pacing significantly increased the velocity-time integral (P <.001) and LV filling time (P = .001) and decreased interventricular delay (P = .013) and intraventricular delay (P = .010). The optimal VV interval could not be predicted by any clinical nor echocardiographic parameter. At 6-month follow-up, the incidence of nonresponders was 10%. CONCLUSION: Optimal timing of the interventricular interval results in prolongation of the LV filling time, reduction of interventricular asynchrony, and an increase in stroke volume. In patients with advanced heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy, LV hemodynamics may be further improved by optimizing LV-RV delay.

Aged↗