PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Maziar Mir

Publications and source records attributed to Maziar Mir.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparative evaluation of the effects of Nd:YAG and Er:YAG laser in dentin hypersensitivity treatment.

Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is one of the most common complications that affect patients after periodontal therapy. So far, many investigators have successfully used different types of laser on DH treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative effect of Nd:YAG laser and Er:YAG laser on human teeth desensitization. A group of nine patients with a total of 63 chronic hypersensitive teeth were selected. Each one of them should at least have three hypersensitive teeth. These teeth were randomly allocated into three groups. Group 1, Nd:YAG laser (1 W, 15 Hz, 60 s, two times); group 2, Er:YAG laser (100 mJ, 3 Hz, 60 s, two times); and group 3 serves as control group without any treatment. Assessment of pain was performed by a visual analysing scale (VAS) after stimulation of sensitive tooth by using the sharp tip of an explorer. This test was performed before treatment, immediately after that and at 1-, 3- and 6-month intervals after treatment by one blinded examiner. Analysis of VAS score between the three groups at the time of treatment did not show any significant difference (p = 0.506). However, by using repeated-measurement analysis of variance test, significant differences were seen in the three groups between before-treatment VAS score and after treatment (p < 0.0005). This statistically significant difference in the control group demonstrated a placebo effect. However, the effect of using Nd:YAG and Er:YAG lasers was stronger than this placebo effect, so that after removing the effect of the placebo, differences immediately after, 1, 3 and 6 months post treatment between all three groups still were statistically highly significant (p < 0.0005). Compared to the Er:YAG laser group, using Nd:YAG laser resulted in a significant reduction of VAS score at each follow-up examination (p < 0.0005). Although using Nd:YAG and Er:YAG laser in desensitization of hypersensitive teeth showed a placebo effect limited to a short time, results of this study demonstrated that both of these lasers have an acceptable therapeutic effect. The observed effects seemed to last for at least 6 months. It was concluded that Nd:YAG laser is more effective than Er:YAG laser in reduction of patients' pain.

Analysis of Variance↗

Temperature evolution on human teeth root surface after diode laser assisted endodontic treatment.

The thermal rise threshold of an 810-nm semi-conductor diode laser on the root surface when used in root canals in vitro for laser assisted root canal treatment is investigated in this study. A total of 50 human single-rooted extracted teeth were included. For this study, the canals were enlarged up to an apical size of ISO#50 file. Laser irradiation was performed with six different settings. Specimens were irradiated at 0.6-1 W output power at the distal end of the fiber and about 1-1.5 W output power in the continuous mode (CW) as two groups. In the third group, 0.6-1 W output power, 10 ms pulse length (PL) and 10 ms interval duration (ID) were selected. In three other groups 1-1.5 W output power were used with different PL and ID as following: PL 10 and ID 10 ms, PL 10 and ID 20 ms and PL 20 and ID 20 ms. The total irradiation time was from 5 to 20 s per canal with a 200 mum in diameter and 25 mm long tip. After laser treatment, the temperature changes at the outer root surface were registered by means of NiCr-Ni measuring sensors and a T 202 thermometer. The safe temperature threshold for applying this diode laser in root canal is considered as 7 degrees C increase. To avoid increasing the temperature changes at the outer root surface related to this threshold, following total irradiation times were found: 0.6-1 W output power (10 ms PL/10 ms ID): 20 s (s), 1-1.5 W output power (10 ms/10 ms and 20 ms/20 ms): 15 s, 0.6-1 W output power CW and 1-1.5 W output power (20 ms PL/10 ms ID): 10 s and 1-1.5 W output power CW: 5 s. In the first three groups, 5 s irradiation and 5 s rest period avoided a temperature increase above the threshold of 7 degrees C).

Body Temperature↗