PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Melissa A Clark

Publications and source records attributed to Melissa A Clark.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Variability of current symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse.

To describe the variability of current (day-to-day) symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and to compare women's overall (comprehensive) and current ratings of prolapse symptoms. This was a prospective observational study of 45 women with symptomatic POP followed-up for 3 months between November 2004 and June 2005. Women had a total of three visits during the study period. We measured current symptoms using daily symptom diaries completed for a total of 4 weeks during the study period. The diaries included 100-mm visual analogue scales anchored at 0 (no symptoms) and 100 (extremely severe symptoms) and patients completed these at three different times each day. At each study visit, patients were examined and completed a 10-item questionnaire, which included questions adapted from the PFDI. This questionnaire compared overall and current symptoms at each study visit. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and Pearson's correlation coefficient. Current symptoms of vaginal bulging varied on a day-to-day basis. Current symptoms varied depending on the time of day with women reporting more severe symptoms in the evenings (P<.01). Women reported experiencing their most severe symptoms at only 13.7% of all study visits. On average, women reported less severe ratings of current symptoms at the time of each visit compared to overall recall ratings (P<.05). Women seeking care for symptomatic POP can have dynamic symptoms and are often not evaluated at the time of their most severe symptoms. This should be considered by clinicians evaluating women for symptoms of POP.

Aged↗

Impact of hospital and surgeon volumes on outcomes following pelvic reconstructive surgery in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the effect of hospital and surgeon volumes on outcomes following urogynecologic surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent urogynecologic procedures between 1998 and 2003 from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Hospitals and surgeons were categorized as low, medium, or high volume based on average number of cases per year. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, complications, and nonroutine discharges. Multivariable analyses were performed using generalized estimation equations to estimate relative risks. RESULTS: There were 310,759 women and 2986 hospitals. Women who had procedures at low-volume hospitals were 2.75 (95% CI 2.33-3.16) times more likely to die and 1.63 (95% CI 1.44-1.83) times more likely to have a nonroutine discharge, compared to those at high-volume hospitals. Women who had procedures by low-volume surgeons were also more likely to suffer complications and have nonroutine discharges compared to those with high-volume surgeons. CONCLUSION: Differences in hospital and surgeon volumes of urogynecologic procedures may contribute to variations in mortality and morbidity risks.

Aged↗

Contraceptive usage, knowledge and correlates of usage among female emergency department patients.

OBJECTIVES: For female emergency department (ED) patients, we sought to assess the prevalence of contraceptive usage as well as the extent of contraceptive knowledge and to determine if demographic and sexual health history factors, comprehension of contraceptive methods and moral/religious opinions on contraception were associated with current usage of birth control pills (BCPs), prior usage of emergency contraception (EC) and frequency of condom usage. METHODS: English-speaking female ED patients aged between 18 and 55 years at a northeastern United States urban ED were surveyed on their usage, comprehension and opinions regarding BCPs, EC and condoms. RESULTS: Of the 539 respondents (64.6% were aged </=35 years), most were White (63.1%), single (42.5%), Catholic (48.4%) and privately insured (55.3%). Among the 223 women at pregnancy risk [not currently pregnant, not using any form of nonsurgical birth control (except condoms) and with no prior tubal ligation or hysterectomy], about 25% were using BCPs, fewer than 10% had used EC and almost 40% never used condoms. Most women displayed good knowledge about BCPs and condoms but poor understanding about EC. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, current BCP usage among women at risk of pregnancy was associated with younger age [odds ratio (OR)=0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.37-0.79], private insurance (OR=2.52; 95% CI=1.30-4.86) and recent intercourse (OR=1.61; 95% CI=1.19-2.18). Among women at risk of pregnancy, those who had an abortion (OR=2.56; 95% CI=1.17-5.61) and those who displayed greater EC knowledge (OR=3.23; 95% CI=1.50-6.95) had greater odds of having used EC. Among all women, more frequent condom usage was associated with being younger (OR=0.57; 95% CI=0.46-0.70), having never been married (OR=0.44; 95% CI=0.28-0.68) and not having intercourse recently (OR=0.79; 95% CI=0.64-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of female ED patients (41.4%) were at risk of pregnancy. Demographic and sexual history factors can help identify women who might benefit from receiving referrals or education on contraceptive measures.

Adolescent↗

Correlates of mammography in a national analysis compared to results in quintile- and regionally-defined samples.

BACKGROUND: National-level data are often used to identify groups of women at greater risk of not obtaining mammography, who might then receive targeted interventions. An important question, however, is how well results of national-level analyses match results from smaller samples of the same dataset. This study investigated the consistency of results about correlates of mammography from a single national-level analysis versus the results from analyses within each of five quintiles of mammography rates and nine Census subdivisions. METHODS: The sample for all analyses were women aged 42-79 from the Year 2002 United States' Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (N = 80,283). Recent mammography was defined as self-report of a mammogram within the 2 years prior to the interview. Independent variables included sociodemographics, health practices, and a combined insurance status/usual source of care variable. RESULTS: Only smoking status, Pap testing, dental visit, and health insurance/source of care had consistent results with mammography status across all levels of analysis. Results for the other covariates, including standard sociodemographics, showed varying degrees of consistency. CONCLUSIONS: Caution is advised when using national data to inform regional or local intervention planning. Local and regional data are necessary to target programs to groups at greatest need for intervention.

Adult↗

Health maintenance and screening in breast cancer survivors in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The general health maintenance and follow-up of breast cancer survivors has not been well-studied. In a population-based sample we sought to investigate the health practices of breast cancer survivors and to compare rates of screening to women with no history of breast cancer. METHODS: Subjects were participants of the medical expenditure survey in the years 1996 and 1998, years for which information on screening were available. We used a matched cohort design. Breast cancer survivors aged 40 and older were matched (on age and race/ethnicity) to women with no breast cancer history. We performed logistic regression to estimate the odds of receiving appropriate health care services in breast cancer survivors versus women with no breast cancer history. In addition, we examined demographic and socioeconomic differences between breast cancer survivors who reported appropriate screening and survivors who had inadequate screening. RESULTS: A small minority of breast cancer survivors report inadequate mammography (18%) and clinical breast exam (12%) follow-up. A significant portion of breast cancer survivors report inadequate screening for Pap smear (40%), general physical exam (GPE) (30%) and flu shot (33%). The odds of receiving appropriate screening were higher in survivors versus matched women for mammography, clinical breast and cholesterol screening. There were no differences for other screening. Across all health maintenance and screening practices, breast cancer survivors who did not receive appropriate screening were less likely to have private insurance, to be married and to be above the mean income level, though these differences were non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: Although survivors report high levels of screening, a small minority of women report inadequate mammography and clinical breast exam follow-up which is concerning given their risk of recurrence and second primary breast cancer. Additionally, a significant portion of survivors report inadequate screening for general health maintenance issues. Demographic and socioeconomic factors were associated with lower screening rates. However, the deficits in screening among breast cancer survivors appears to be smaller compared to women in the general population.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Correlates of repeat and recent mammography for women ages 45 to 75 in the 2002 to 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003).

BACKGROUND: Most national-level mammography data are for ever-had and most-recent screening. There are few national-level data on rates of repeat, on-schedule mammography, and on the prevalence and correlates of repeat mammography. It is also important to investigate the similarity of correlates for repeat and recent mammography. METHODS: Analyses were from data for women ages 45 to 75 in the 2002 to 2003 Health Information and National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003; N = 1,581). The two dependent variables were self-report of repeat mammography (two exams on schedule, based on an every-other-year interval) and recent mammography only (one mammogram within the past 2 years). RESULTS: The prevalence of recent mammography was 81.6% (95% confidence interval, 79.1-84.1) and for repeat mammography was 72.2% (95% confidence interval, 69.0-75.4). An access to care variable combining insurance coverage and regular source of care was the strongest sociodemographic correlate of both mammography indicators. Most other sociodemographic variables were not associated with mammography status. Five psychosocial/behavioral variables were associated with both mammography indicators (smoking status, attention to health information, knowledge of screening interval, worry about breast cancer, and recent mood status). Correlates were very similar for repeat and recent mammography. CONCLUSIONS: Although access to care had the strongest association with mammography, psychosocial and behavioral variables did better as a group than the sociodemographic variables. A standard set of such variables should be considered for all national surveys.

Aged↗

Discussions regarding reproductive health for young women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Young women who undergo chemotherapy for breast cancer face serious consequences to their reproductive health. Research in this area has previously focused on men, or on childhood cancer survivors. We sought to explore self-report of reproductive health counseling in young women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 166 premenopausal women aged < or = 50 years were recruited from oncology offices in academic and private practices in four northeastern states, as part of a randomized controlled clinical trial aimed at stress reduction. Women were asked a variety of questions regarding diagnosis and treatment, including whether they received any counseling regarding early menopause and fertility issues. RESULTS: Sixty-eight percent and 34% of women reported recalling a discussion with a physician regarding early menopause or fertility, respectively. In multivariate analysis, hormonal therapy and early stage of disease were associated with significantly increased odds of recall of a discussion regarding menopause. Difficulty communicating with medical team was associated with increased odds of recalling a discussion regarding fertility, whereas older age and anxiety in medical situations were associated with decreased odds. CONCLUSION: Many women fail to recall discussions regarding the reproductive health impact of chemotherapy. Demographic, psychological, and disease-related variables are related to recalling such discussions. Counseling about premature menopause and fertility changes is an overlooked aspect of preparation for adjuvant chemotherapy in young premenopausal women with breast cancer. Future research should explore this issue further.

Adult↗

Measuring sexual orientation and gender expression among middle-aged and older women in a cancer screening study.

BACKGROUND: The Cancer Screening Project for Women is about the experiences of legally unmarried women aged 40 to 75 years. METHODS: Prior to the implementation of a survey of experiences with breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings, we used cognitive-based interviewing to evaluate questions for measuring sexual orientation and gender expression. RESULTS: We conducted interviews with 40 women, 19 who partner with women and 21 who partner with men. Interviews highlighted respondent confusion, clarified the meaning of terms, and improved the comprehension and utility of questions. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive interview techniques can improve the validity and reliability of data collected by cancer screening programs.

Adult↗

Smoking status and mammography among women aged 50-75 in the 2002 behavioral risk factor surveillance system.

BACKGROUND: Since the late 1980's, data show an association between smoking status and mammography. Women smokers reported 12-15% lower rates than non-smokers. This study investigated whether an association persists in a recent national-level database. METHODS: The sample was women aged 50-75 years from the 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (N = 52,300). Analyses used two definitions of recent mammography, one based on a one-year interval between exams, the other on a two-year interval. Smoking was classified as current, former, or never. Other covariates included sociodemographic variables, health practices, insurance status and usual source of care. RESULTS: The rate of mammography for current smokers was 16% lower than for never smokers for the past-year interval, and 14.0% lower for the two-year interval. Multiple logistic regression supported the smoking/mammography association. Other covariates associated with lower mammography on both dependent variables were recent Pap test, health insurance/usual source of care, recent dental visit, seat belt use, marital status and age. CONCLUSIONS: Reasons for the persistent association between smoking and mammography must be determined. These variables will inform interventions with women who smoke. A key question is whether to intervene on smoking directly or whether mediating variables are sufficient targets of intervention.

Aged↗

Prevalence and correlates of repeat mammography among women aged 55-79 in the Year 2000 National Health Interview Survey.

BACKGROUND: Utilization of mammography has increased steadily since the early 1990s. It is now important to expand the attention given to obtaining repeat examination. This study examines the prevalence and cross-sectional correlates of repeat mammography, among women aged 55-79, using a 12-month (N = 3,502) and a 24-month interval (N = 3,491). METHODS: Data were from the Year 2000 Cancer Control Module of the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS-CCM). The NHIS-CCM asked about the most recent mammogram and the total number of mammograms over the prior 6 years. An algorithm estimated repeat mammography for the two intervals. RESULTS: Prevalence estimates were 49% for the 12-month interval, and 64.1% for the 24-month interval. Correlates of lower likelihood of repeat mammography for both indicators were: no regular source of care, having public or no health insurance, less than a college education, household income less than $45K, not being married, current or never smoking, age 65-79, and lower absolute risk of breast cancer (Gail Model score). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial percentage of women do not receive repeat mammography. The correlates of repeat mammography were similar to those often found for ever-had and recent mammography. There is probably some imprecision in the prevalence estimates due to the nature of NHIS-CCM questions. Issues pertinent to the definition of repeat examination are addressed.

Aged↗

Filling the gaps in physician communication. The role of the Internet among primary care patients.

BACKGROUND: Millions of people use the Internet as a source for health information yet little is understood about how the use of the Internet for health information is related to the doctor-patient relationship. OBJECTIVE: We conducted the present study to understand the association between one's interest in using the Internet for general and quality-oriented health information and attitudes about one's communications with health care provider(s). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Four community-based primary care practices in Rhode Island. MEASUREMENTS: A single self-administered survey included items to measure: interest in using the Internet to look for general and quality-oriented information and a patient's perceptions of the degree to which their doctors over the previous year have: (1) given them information and (2) engaged them in the decision-making process. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients completed the survey. Among patients without Internet access, interest in using the Internet for health related activities was less among patients who felt that their doctor gave less information: Odds ratio 0.83 (95% CI, 0.70-0.98) and greater among patients who felt that their doctor engaged them more in decision making: Odds ratio 1.3 (95% CI, 1.1-1.6). Among patients with Internet access, we found no relationship between interest in using the Internet for health related activities and measures of patient-physician communication or patient-physician decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Interest in using the Internet for health information is greater for those who (1) felt their doctors provided less information and (2) felt their doctors engaged them more in the decision-making process, but this is true only for those without access to the Internet.

Adolescent↗

Reminder letter, tailored stepped-care, and self-choice comparison for repeat mammography.

BACKGROUND: The main benefits of mammography come from regular on-schedule screening. However, few studies have examined interventions to achieve repeat screening. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants were women aged 50 to 74, recruited through one setting in Rhode Island and another in North Carolina. Participants had a mammogram already scheduled at recruitment, and had to keep that appointment in order to be eligible for the repeat mammography intervention. A total of 1614 women were in the intervention sample. DESIGN: A four-group randomized design was used: Group 1, a simple reminder letter; Group 2, a 2-month, tailored, stepped intervention delivered 2 months after the completed mammogram; Group 3, a 10-month, tailored, stepped intervention delivered 2 months before the repeat mammogram was due; and Group 4, self-choice of one of the above three strategies. INTERVENTION: The intervention took place between June 1996 and May 1997. The reminder letter and two levels of the stepped intervention were delivered by mail. The third level of the stepped strategy was a counselor telephone call. Groups 2 and 3 were identical, except for timing. OUTCOME MEASURE: Obtaining the next due mammogram within 15 months, based on clinic records. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences among the four groups, both in the total sample and at the two sites separately. CONCLUSIONS: On average, a simple reminder may be as effective as more complex strategies for women with a prior on-schedule exam. However, attention is still needed to identify women at risk of lapsing from screening. Some women may require more-intensive interventions.

Aged↗

Evaluating transdisciplinary science.

The past two decades have seen a growing interest and investment in transdisciplinary research teams and centers. The Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Centers (TTURCs) exemplify large-scale scientific collaborations undertaken for the explicit purpose of promoting novel conceptual and methodological integrations bridging two or more fields. Until recently, few efforts have been made to evaluate the collaborative processes, and the scientific and public policy outcomes, of such centers. This manuscript offers a conceptual framework for understanding and evaluating transdisciplinary science and describes two ongoing evaluation studies covering the initial phase of the TTURC initiative. The methods and measures used by these studies are described, and early evaluative findings from the first 4 years of the initiative are presented. These data reveal progress toward intellectual integration within and between several of the TTURCs, and cumulative changes in the collaborative behaviors and values of participants over the course of the initiative. The data also suggest that different centers may follow alternative pathways toward transdisciplinary integration and highlight certain environmental, organizational, and institutional factors that influence each center's readiness for collaboration. Methodological challenges posed by the complexities of evaluating large-scale scientific collaborations (including those that specifically aspire toward transdisciplinary integrations spanning multiple fields) are discussed. Finally, new directions for future evaluative studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration, both within and beyond the field of tobacco science, are described.

Humans↗

Classification and regression tree analysis in public health: methodological review and comparison with logistic regression.

BACKGROUND: Audience segmentation strategies are of increasing interest to public health professionals who wish to identify easily defined, mutually exclusive population subgroups whose members share similar characteristics that help determine participation in a health-related behavior as a basis for targeted interventions. Classification and regression tree (C&RT) analysis is a nonparametric decision tree methodology that has the ability to efficiently segment populations into meaningful subgroups. However, it is not commonly used in public health. PURPOSE: This study provides a methodological overview of C&RT analysis for persons unfamiliar with the procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: An example of a C&RT analysis is provided and interpretation of results is discussed. Results are validated with those obtained from a logistic regression model that was created to replicate the C&RT findings. Results obtained from the example C&RT analysis are also compared to those obtained from a common approach to logistic regression, the stepwise selection procedure. Issues to consider when deciding whether to use C&RT are discussed, and situations in which C&RT may and may not be beneficial are described. CONCLUSIONS: C&RT is a promising research tool for the identification of at-risk populations in public health research and outreach.

Decision Trees↗

Repeat mammography: prevalence estimates and considerations for assessment.

Despite recent controversies in mammography efficacy, encouraging women to obtain regular screenings is still an important public health priority. Published articles about repeat or regular screening were reviewed to determine trends in rates of mammography adherence. A search of MEDLINE and PsycINFO from January 1990 to December 2001 identified 45 empirical articles of U.S. samples that reported, or provided sufficient data to calculate, the percentage of women 50 years of age and older who obtained 2 or more consecutive, on-schedule mammograms. Keywords used in the searches included pairing mammography with regular, repeat, adherence, compliance, annual, rescreen, and maintenance. The weighted average repeat mammography percentage across all eventually included studies (N = 37) was 46.1% (confidence interval: 39.4%, 52.8%). There was no substantial difference in the average repeat screening percentages comparing studies that collected data from 1995 to 2001 versus 1991 to 1994. Within each of 3 time periods of data collection (pre-1991, 1991-1994, 1995-2001), there was substantial variation in repeat rates. This variation appears to be due to several characteristics of study design and sampling, including the definition/methods of collecting data about the adherence measure, prior mammography status, and use of an upper age limit at recruitment. Consensus is needed regarding the definition of repeat mammography. National surveys must include items to assess repeat mammography in order to have estimates that accurately represent population-level rates. Although this study involved mammography, similar challenges in assessing prevalence rates can occur with other screening behaviors.

Aged↗

The cancer screening project for women: experiences of women who partner with women and women who partner with men.

The Cancer Screening Project for Women is a study about the experiences of legally unmarried women with breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. During the initial phase of the study, we conducted focus groups to explore factors that influence unmarried women's decisions about cancer screenings. Women were invited to attend one of four group discussions: (1) never married women who either partner with women (WPW) or with both women and men (WPWM), (2) previously married women who now partner either with women (WPW) or with both women and men (WPWM), (3) never married women who partner with men (WPM), and (4) previously married women who partner with men (WPM). Twenty-eight women attended the focus groups, 14 WPW and 14 WPM. Several barriers to screening were consistent across the groups and included lack of acknowledgement and validation in medical settings, administrative barriers, pain, and concerns about body image. WPW specifically discussed fears about discrimination if and when they acknowledge their sexual orientation. WPW also described how women who express their gender androgynously are more likely to avoid health care facilities. Further studies are needed to determine if the themes we identified are consistent among larger samples of unmarried women.

Adult↗