PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Metehan Ciçek

Publications and source records attributed to Metehan Ciçek.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Line bisection task performance and resting EEG alpha power.

Neurologically normal subjects generally err to the left of veridical center when performing a line bisection task, a phenomenon termed "pseudoneglect." We hypothesized that resting electroencephalogram (EEG) alpha oscillations may show relationships with attentional mechanisms and give some clues about the underlying mechanisms of pseudoneglect. We recorded resting EEGs of 41 subjects and tested them with a paper-pencil line bisection task. Our results showed that line bisection scores of men (n=18) were less biased and their performance was higher compared to those of women (n=20), but these differences only approached significance. The eyes open resting EEG alpha power of women was significantly and positively correlated with their line bisection performance. In general, significant relationships were related to the left hand performance when the lines were presented in the left hemispace. Greater resting alpha power was correlated with lower absolute bisection score or, in other words, higher bisection performance. Greater alpha power also correlated with diminished leftward bisection bias (or reduced pseudo-neglect). The resting EEG alpha of men was weakly associated with bisection performance. Results discussed in terms of Kinsbourne's activation-orientation theory and Basar's view on brain oscillations.

Adult↗

[Reliability and validity of a handedness questionnaire].

OBJECTIVE: In this study, the validity and reliability of the hand preference item of a 13-item questionnaire adapted from Chapman and Chapman (1987) were investigated. METHOD: This questionnaire requires subjects to indicate which hand they usually use for various actions as follows: writing, drawing, throwing, using a hammer, using a toothbrush, using an eraser on paper, using scissors, holding a match when striking it, stirring a can of paint, using a spoon, using a screwdriver, twisting off the lid of a jar, and using a knife. Each item was scored as "1" for right, "2" for either, or "3" for left, and the handedness of subjects was scored from 13 (the strongest right-hand preference) to 39 (the strongest left-hand preference). In this study, 449 subjects filled in the questionnaire, and 43 subjects attended the test-retest study 3 weeks after the first examination. In order to determine the validity of the questionnaire, fine motor performance was measured using a finger tapping task, and the eye and foot preferences of the subjects were evaluated. RESULTS: The test-retest reliability (r=.993) and internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha=.97) were found to be high. In item-total score analysis, the best single item was "using a hammer", while the worst item was "twisting off the lid of a jar". Factor analysis yielded two factors, skilled and unskilled activities. Handedness scores were found to show a significant correlation with foot preference scores and the dominance score of the finger tapping task. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the handedness questionnaire is reliable and valid in measuring handedness.

English Abstract↗