PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michael A Akeroyd

Publications and source records attributed to Michael A Akeroyd.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

The across frequency independence of equalization of interaural time delay in the equalization-cancellation model of binaural unmasking.

The equalization stage in the equalization-cancellation model of binaural unmasking compensates for the interaural time delay (ITD) of a masking noise by introducing an opposite, internal delay [N. I. Durlach, in Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory, Vol. II., edited by J. V. Tobias (Academic, New York, 1972)]. Culling and Summerfield [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 785-797 (1995)] developed a multi-channel version of this model in which equalization was "free" to use the optimal delay in each channel. Two experiments were conducted to test if equalization was indeed free or if it was "restricted" to the same delay in all channels. One experiment measured binaural detection thresholds, using an adaptive procedure, for 1-, 5-, or 17-component tones against a broadband masking noise, in three binaural configurations (N0S180, N180S0, and N90S270). The thresholds for the 1-component stimuli were used to normalize the levels of each of the 5- and 17-component stimuli so that they were equally detectable. If equalization was restricted, then, for the 5- and 17-component stimuli, the N90S270 and N180S0 configurations would yield a greater threshold than the N0S180 configurations. No such difference was found. A subsequent experiment measured binaural detection thresholds, via psychometric functions, for a 2-component complex tone in the same three binaural configurations. Again, no differential effect of configuration was observed. An analytic model of the detection of a complex tone showed that the results were more consistent with free equalization than restricted equalization, although the size of the differences was found to depend on the shape of the psychometric function for detection.

Adult↗

Binaural specialisation in human auditory cortex: an fMRI investigation of interaural correlation sensitivity.

A listener's sensitivity to the interaural correlation (IAC) of sound plays an important role in several phenomena in binaural hearing. Although IAC has been examined humans, little is known about the neural basis of sensitivity to IAC in humans. The present study employed functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) activity in auditory brainstem and cortical structures in human listeners during presentation of band-pass noise stimuli between which IAC was varied systematically. The stimuli evoked significant bilateral activation in the inferior colliculus, medial geniculate body, and auditory cortex. There was a significant positive relationship between BOLD activity and IAC which was confined to a distinct subregion of primary auditory cortex located bilaterally at the lateral extent of Heschl's gyrus. Comparison with published anatomical data indicated that this area may also be cytoarchitecturally distinct. Larger differences in activation were found between levels of IAC near unity than between levels near zero. This response pattern is qualitatively compatible with previous measures of psychophysical and neurophysiological sensitivity to IAC. extensively in neurophysiological studies in animals and in psychophysical studies in

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Threshold differences for interaural time delays carried by double vowels.

Experimental measurements were made of threshold interaural time differences (ITDs) for a "target" vowel presented simultaneously with a fixed-ITD "distracter" vowel. Three double-vowel pairs were used, comprising an "er" (/e/) together with either an "ai," "ar," or "oo" (respectively, /e/, /c/, and /u/). Threshold ITDs were found to be larger for the target vowel when it was part of a double-vowel pair than in control conditions in which it was presented alone. The effect size depended upon the choice of target vowel and distracter vowel, the level of the target relative to the distracter, and whether the two vowels had the same or different fundamental frequencies. The experiment was analyzed using a multichannel modification of Heller and Trahiotis' [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 3632-3637 (1996)] model, which used a weighted combination of the detectabilities of the ITD of the target and the distracter. It gave predictions consistent with the observed effects of level and with some of the effects of the choice of target vowel, but it could not describe the effect of the target-distracter differences in fundamental frequency. It was found that a single-channel version of the model, in which the chosen channel was allowed to depend upon fundamental frequency (which could be derived using a monaural autocorrelation model) did give a set of predictions in qualitative accord with the data.

Adult↗

Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex.

Hierarchical processing suggests that spectrally and temporally complex stimuli will evoke more activation than do simple stimuli, particularly in non-primary auditory fields. This hypothesis was tested using two tones, a single frequency tone and a harmonic tone, that were either static or frequency modulated to create four stimuli. We interpret the location of differences in activation by drawing comparisons between fMRI and human cytoarchitectonic data, reported in the same brain space. Harmonic tones produced more activation than single tones in right Heschl's gyrus (HG) and bilaterally in the lateral supratemporal plane (STP). Activation was also greater to frequency-modulated tones than to static tones in these areas, plus in left HG and bilaterally in an anterolateral part of the STP and the superior temporal sulcus. An elevated response magnitude to both frequency-modulated tones was found in the lateral portion of the primary area, and putatively in three surrounding non-primary regions on the lateral STP (one anterior and two posterior to HG). A focal site on the posterolateral STP showed an especially high response to the frequency-modulated harmonic tone. Our data highlight the involvement of both primary and lateral non-primary auditory regions.

Acoustic Stimulation↗