PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michael A Mancini

Publications and source records attributed to Michael A Mancini.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

The role of extranuclear signaling actions of progesterone receptor in mediating progesterone regulation of gene expression and the cell cycle.

Human progesterone receptor (PR) contains a motif that interacts with the SH3 domain of Src and mediates rapid activation of Src and downstream MAPK (Erk-1/-2) without relying on the transcriptional activity of the receptor. Here we investigated the role and intracellular location of this nontranscriptional activity of PR. Progestin activation of Src/MAPK occurred outside the nucleus with the B isoform of PR that was distributed between the cytoplasm and nucleus, but not with PR-A that was predominantly nuclear. Breast cancer cells stably expressing wild-type PR-B or PR-B with disrupting point mutations in the SH3 domain binding motif (PR-BDeltaSH3) that do not affect the transcriptional activity of PR, were compared for effects of progestin on endogenous target gene expression and cell proliferation. Progestin induction of the cyclin D1 gene, which lacks a progesterone response element, was dependent on PR activation of the Src/MAPK pathway, whereas induction of the Sgk (serum and glucocorticoid regulated kinase) gene that contains a functional progesterone response element was unaffected by mutations that interfere with PR activation of Src. Progestin induction of cell cycle progression was also abrogated in cells expressing PR-BDeltaSH3, and no effect of progestin on cyclin D1 expression and cell cycle was observed in the presence of PR-A. These results highlight the importance of PR activation of the Src/MAPK signaling pathway for progesterone-induced transcription of select target genes and cell cycle progression.

Animals↗

Estrogen-receptor-alpha exchange and chromatin dynamics are ligand- and domain-dependent.

We report a mammalian-based promoter chromosomal array system developed for single-cell studies of transcription-factor function. Designed after the prolactin promoter-enhancer, it allows for the direct visualization of estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) and/or Pit-1 interactions at a physiologically regulated transcription locus. ERalpha- and ligand-dependent cofactor recruitment, large-scale chromatin modifications and transcriptional activity identified a distinct fingerprint of responses for each condition. Ligand-dependent transcription (more than threefold activation compared with vehicle, or complete repression by mRNA fluorescent in situ hybridization) at the array correlated with its state of condensation, which was assayed using a novel high throughput microscopy approach. In support of the nuclear receptor hit-and-run model, photobleaching studies provided direct evidence of very transient ER-array interactions, and revealed ligand-dependent changes in k(off). ERalpha-truncation mutants indicated that helix-12 and interactions with co-regulators influenced both large-scale chromatin modeling and photobleaching recovery times. These data also showed that the ERalpha DNA-binding domain was insufficient for array targeting. Collectively, quantitative observations from this physiologically relevant biosensor suggest stochastic-based dynamics influence gene regulation at the promoter level.

Active Transport, Cell Nucleus↗

Quantifying effects of ligands on androgen receptor nuclear translocation, intranuclear dynamics, and solubility.

Using manual and automated high throughput microscopy (HTM), ligand-dependent trafficking of green fluorescent protein-androgen receptor (GFP-AR) was analyzed in fixed and living cells to determine its spatial distribution, solubility, mobility, and co-activator interactions. Within minutes, addition of the agonist R1881 resulted translocation of GFP-AR from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, where it displayed a hyperspeckled pattern and extraction resistance in low expressing cells. AR antagonists (Casodex, hydroxyflutamide) also caused nuclear translocation, however, the antagonist-bound GFP-AR had a more diffuse nuclear distribution, distinct from the agonist-bound GFP-AR, and was completely soluble; overexpressed GFP-AR in treated cells was extraction resistant, independent of ligand type. To more dramatically show the different effects of ligand on AR distribution, we utilized an AR with a mutation in the DNA binding domain (ARC619Y) that forms distinct foci upon exposure to agonists but retains a diffuse nuclear distribution in the presence of antagonists. Live-cell imaging of this mutant demonstrated that cytoplasmic foci formation occurs immediately upon agonist but not antagonist addition. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) revealed that agonist-bound GFP-AR exhibited reduced mobility relative to unliganded or antagonist-bound GFP-AR. Importantly, agonist-bound GFP-AR mobility was strongly affected by protein expression levels in transiently transfected cells, and displayed reduced mobility even in slightly overexpressing cells. Cyan fluorescent protein-AR (CFP-AR) and yellow fluorescent protein-CREB binding protein (YFP-CBP) in the presence of agonists and antagonists were used to demonstrate that CFP-AR specifically co-localizes with YFP-CBP in an agonist dependent manner. Dual FRAP experiments demonstrated that CBP mobility mirrored AR mobility only in the presence of agonist. HTM enabled simultaneous studies of the sub-cellular distribution of GFP-AR and ARC619Y in response to a range of concentrations of agonists and antagonists (ranging from 10(-12) to 10(-5)) in thousands of cells. These results further support the notion that ligand specific interactions rapidly affect receptor and co-factor organization, solubility, and molecular dynamics, and each can be aberrantly affected by mutation and overexpression.

Active Transport, Cell Nucleus↗

High-resolution, high-throughput microscopy analyses of nuclear receptor and coregulator function.

Steroid nuclear receptors are ligand-dependent transcription factors that have been studied since the early 1960s by principally biochemical and reporter assay approaches. From these studies an elegant and complex model of nuclear receptor transcription regulation has been developed. Inherent to both biochemical and reporter assay approaches is the generation of averaged responses and it is not generally considered that individual cells could exhibit quite varied responses. In some cases, recent microscopic single-cell analyses provide markedly different responses relative to traditional approaches based on population averaging and underscore the need to continue refinement of the current model of nuclear receptor-regulated transcription. While single-cell analyses of nuclear receptor action have been hindered by the predominantly qualitative nature of the approach, high-throughput microscopy is now available to resolve this issue. This chapter demonstrates the utility of high-throughput microscopic analyses of nuclear receptor and nuclear receptor coregulator function. The ability of high-throughput microscopy to generate physiologically appropriate test populations by filtering based on morphological and protein of interest expression criteria is demonstrated. High-resolution, high-throughput microscopy is illustrated that provides quantitative subcellular information for both androgen and estrogen receptors. Efforts are ongoing to develop model systems that provide additional multiplex data and with refined image analyses to achieve true high-content imaging screens.

Algorithms↗

Colocalization of muscleblind with RNA foci is separable from mis-regulation of alternative splicing in myotonic dystrophy.

Myotonic dystrophy type I (DM1), which is caused by a non-coding CTG-repeat expansion in the dystrophia myotonica-protein kinase (DMPK) gene, is an RNA-mediated disease. Expanded CUG repeats in transcripts of mutant DMPK form nuclear foci that recruit muscleblind-like (MBNL) proteins, a family of alternative splicing factors. Although transcripts of mutant DMPK and MBNL proteins accumulate in nuclear RNA foci, it is not clear whether foci formation is required for splicing mis-regulation. Here, we use a co-transfection strategy to show that both CUG and CAG repeats form RNA foci that colocalize with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-MBNL1 and endogenous MBNL1. However, only CUG repeats alter splicing of the two tested pre-mRNAs, cardiac troponin T (cTNT) and insulin receptor (IR). Using FRAP, we demonstrate that GFP-MBNL1 in CUG and CAG foci have similar half-times of recovery and fractions of immobile molecules, suggesting that GFP-MBNL1 is bound by both CUG and CAG repeats. We also find an immobile fraction of GFP-MBNL1 in DM1 fibroblasts and a similar rapid exchange in endogenous CUG RNA foci. Therefore, formation of RNA foci and disruption of MBNL1-regulated splicing are separable events.

Adult↗

Making sense of it all: consumer providers' theories about factors facilitating and impeding recovery from psychiatric disabilities.

This qualitative study examined the accounts of fifteen adults regarding how they recovered from serious psychiatric disability. Interviews were analyzed using a grounded theory approach within a framework of Symbolic Interactionism. Recovery was identified as a dynamic process of personal growth and transformation. Barriers to recovery included paternalistic and coercive treatment systems, indifferent professionals, side effects from medication, and psychiatric symptoms. The existence of supportive relationships, meaningful activities and effective traditional and alternative treatments were identified as influential in facilitating recovery. The consumer providers who participated in this study provided important findings and fresh understanding about the recovery process.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Changes in androgen receptor nongenotropic signaling correlate with transition of LNCaP cells to androgen independence.

A cure for prostate cancer (CaP) will be possible only after a complete understanding of the mechanisms causing this disease to progress from androgen dependence to androgen independence. To carry on a careful characterization of the phenotypes of CaP cell lines before and after acquisition of androgen independence, we used two human CaP LNCaP sublines: LNCaP(nan), which is androgen dependent (AD), and LNCaP-HP, which is androgen independent (AI). In AD LNCaP(nan) cells, dihydrotestosterone (DHT) stimulated in an androgen receptor (AR)-dependent way a phosphorylation signaling pathway involving steroid receptor coactivator (Src)-mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) kinase (MEK)-1/2-ERK-1/2-cAMP-response element binding-protein (CREB). Activation of this pathway was associated with increased [(3)H]thymidine incorporation and resistance to apoptosis. Use of dominant-negative forms of MEK-1/2 and CREB demonstrated in LNCaP(nan) cells that DHT induced [(3)H]thymidiine incorporation through a thus far unidentified molecule activated downstream of MEK-1/2, and antiapoptosis through phosphorylation of the transcription factor CREB. In contrast, in AI LNCaP-HP cells, the Src-MEK-1/2-ERK-1/2-CREB pathway was constitutively active. Because it was not further stimulated by addition of DHT, no increase of [(3)H]thymidine incorporation or apoptosis resistance was demonstrated in LNCaP-HP cells. Additional experiments showed that Src and the scaffold protein MNAR coimmunoprecipitated with AR, indicating a role for Src as an apical molecule in the Src-MEK-1/2-ERK-1/2-CREB pathway. Interestingly, differences between the two cell lines were that in LNCaP-HP cells presence of an AI phenotype and lack of response to DHT were associated with constitutive activation of the protein kinase Src and interaction among Src, AR, and MNAR. In contrast, in LNCaP(nan) cells, presence of an AD phenotype and ability to respond to DHT were associated with DHT-dependent activation of Src kinase activity and interaction among Src, AR, and MNAR. Intriguingly, in LNCaP(nan) cells, we found that transcription through the prototypical CREB-responsive promoter c-fos could be induced in a DHT-dependent way, and this action was inhibited by the AR antagonist Casodex and MEK-1 inhibitor PD98059. In contrast, transcription through the PSA P/E promoter, a prototypical AR-dependent promoter directly activated by agonist, was obliterated only by Casodex. Additional experiments with genital skin fibroblasts derived from patients with a variety of AR abnormalities indicated that nongenotropic AR signaling does not depend on an intact DNA-binding domain or on the ability of AR to translocate to the nucleus. The results suggest the following: (1) Constitutive activation of the Src-MEK-1/2-ERK-1/2-CREB pathway is associated with the AI phenotype observed in LNCaP-HP cells. (2) Activation of the Src-MEK-1/2-ERK-1/2-CREB pathway is DHT dependent in AD LNCaP(nan) cells. (3) DHT activation of this pathway is associated with induction of [(3)H]thymidine incorporation by a molecule activated downstream of MEK-1/2 and of antiapoptosis through activation of the transcription factor CREB in AD LNCaP(nan) cells. (4) AR regulates transcription either directly upon ligand binding and nuclear translocation or indirectly through kinase pathways leading to activation of downstream transcription factors. (5) Nuclear translocation and ability of the DNA-binding domain of AR to interact with DNA are not prerequisites for nongenotropic AR activity.

Activating Transcription Factor 1↗

Inactivating Pit-1 mutations alter subnuclear dynamics suggesting a protein misfolding and nuclear stress response.

Pit-1, a POU-class nuclear DNA-binding transcription factor, specifies three of the parenchymal cell types in anterior pituitary ontogeny. Using fluorescent fusions and live cell imaging, we have compared the dynamic behavior of wild-type and inactivating Pit-1 point mutations. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and real-time extraction data indicate that wild-type Pit-1 has a dynamic mobility profile, with t(1/2s) approximately 5-7 s when expressed from low to high amounts, respectively. Biochemically, Pit-1 is approximately 50% retained according to direct observation during extraction, indicating a dynamic interaction with nuclear structure. An analysis of transiently expressed Pit-1 carrying two different debilitating mutations reveals that they translocate normally to the nucleus, but exhibit two different levels of mobility, both clearly distinguishable from wild-type Pit-1. At low expression levels, the t(1/2s) of Pit(W261C) and Pit(A158P) are extremely rapid (0.3 and 0.6 s t(1/2s), respectively). At higher expression levels, unlike wild-type Pit-1, both mutant proteins become immobilized and insoluble, and fractionate completely with the insoluble nuclear matrix. Relative to wild-type, over expression of mutated Pit-1 elicits a nuclear stress response indicated by increased levels of heat shock inducible heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70), and reorganization of heat shock factor-1. The decreased mobility of Pit(A158P) relative to Pit(W261C) at low expression levels correlates with its ability to partially activate when expressed at low levels and its ability to bind cognate DNA. At high expression levels, lower Pit(A158P) activation correlates with its immobilization and insolubility. These data suggest a link between specific rates of intranuclear mobility and Pit-1 transcription function, perhaps to insure sufficient interactions with chromatin, or in the case of non-DNA binding Pit-1, interaction as a repressor. These data imply inactivating mutations can lead to an intranuclear sorting away from transcription related pathways, and at least in part to a misfolded protein pathway. Taken together, caution is suggested when interpreting point (or other) mutational analyses of transactivator function, as new compartmentation, especially in the context of expression levels, may cloud the distinction between defining functional molecular domains and intranuclear processing of misfolded proteins.

Cell Nucleus↗

Reduced intranuclear mobility of APL fusion proteins accompanies their mislocalization and results in sequestration and decreased mobility of retinoid X receptor alpha.

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) cells contain one of five chimeric retinoic acid alpha-receptor (RAR alpha) genes (X-RAR alpha) created by chromosomal translocations or deletion; each generates a fusion protein thought to transcriptionally repress RAR alpha target genes and block myeloid differentiation by an incompletely understood mechanism. To gain spatiotemporal insight into these oncogenic processes, we employed fluorescence microscopy and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). Fluorescence microscopy demonstrated that the intracellular localization of each of the X-RAR alpha proteins was distinct from that of RAR alpha and established which portion(s) of each X-RAR alpha protein-X, RAR, or both-contributed to its altered localization. Using FRAP, we demonstrated that the intranuclear mobility of each X-RAR alpha was reduced compared to that of RAR alpha. In addition, the mobility of each X-RAR alpha was reduced further by ligand addition, in contrast to RAR alpha, which showed no change in mobility when ligand was added. Both the reduced baseline mobility of X-RAR alpha and the ligand-induced slowing of X-RAR alpha could be attributed to the protein interaction domain contained within X. RXR alpha aberrantly colocalized within each X-RAR alpha; colocalization of RXR alpha with promyelocytic leukemia (PML)-RAR alpha resulted in reduced mobility of RXR alpha. Thus, X-RAR alpha may interfere with RAR alpha through its aberrant nuclear dynamics, resulting in spatial and temporal sequestration of RXR alpha and perhaps other nuclear receptor coregulators critical for myeloid differentiation.

Active Transport, Cell Nucleus↗

Essential role for the dimerization domain of NuMA-RARalpha in its oncogenic activities and localization to NuMA sites within the nucleus.

Nuclear mitotic apparatus protein-retinoic acid receptor alpha (NuMA-RARalpha) is the fourth of five fusion proteins identified in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) patients. The molecular basis for its oncogenic activity has not been delineated. In gel-shift assays, NuMA-RARalpha bound to retinoic acid response elements (RAREs) both as a homodimer and as a heterodimer with RXRalpha. The binding profile of NuMA-RARalpha to a panel of RAREs was very similar to PML-RARalpha and PLZF-RARalpha. In transient transfection assays using HepG2 cells, NuMA-RARalpha inhibited wild-type RARalpha transcriptional activity, while it augmented STAT3 transcriptional activity. In GST-pull down experiments, NuMA-RARalpha formed a complex with the corepressor SMRT, was released from the NuMA-RARalpha/SMRT complexes by all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) at 10(-7)-10(-6) M and became associated with the coactivator TRAM-1 at 10(-8) M ATRA. Studies comparing NuMA-RARalpha with NuMA-RARalpha(deltaCC) demonstrated that the dimerization or alpha-helical coiled-coil domain of NuMA was required for homodimer formation, transcriptional repression of wild-type RARalpha, transcriptional activation of STAT3, and stability of the NuMA-RARalpha/SMRT complex. Confocal fluorescent microscopy of HeLa cells was performed following transient expression of cyan fluorescent protein (CFP)-tagged proteins and incubation of cells with or without ATRA. Within the nucleus, CFP-NuMA-RARalpha exhibited a speckled pattern identical to that observed in cells transfected with CFP-NuMA. Furthermore, CFP-NuMA-RARalpha colocalized with yellow fluorescent protein-tagged (YFP)-NuMA. In contrast, CFP-NuMA-RARalpha(deltaCC) exhibited a diffuse granular pattern within the nucleus, similar to RARalpha. These results indicate that the dimerization domain of NuMA-RARalpha is critical for each of the known oncogenic activities of NuMA fusion proteins as well as its sequestration to nuclear sites normally occupied by NuMA and is distinct from RARalpha.

Animals↗

The dynamic mobility of histone H1 is regulated by cyclin/CDK phosphorylation.

The linker histone H1 is involved in maintaining higher-order chromatin structures and displays dynamic nuclear mobility, which may be regulated by posttranslational modifications. To analyze the effect of H1 tail phosphorylation on the modulation of the histone's nuclear dynamics, we generated a mutant histone H1, referred to as M1-5, in which the five cyclin-dependent kinase phosphorylation consensus sites were mutated from serine or threonine residues into alanines. Cyclin E/CDK2 or cyclin A/CDK2 cannot phosphorylate the mutant in vitro. Using the technique of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, we observed that the mobility of a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-M1-5 fusion protein is decreased compared to that of a GFP-wild-type H1 fusion protein. In addition, recovery of H1 correlated with CDK2 activity, as GFP-H1 mobility was decreased in cells with low CDK2 activity. Blocking the activity of CDK2 by p21 expression decreased the mobility of GFP-H1 but not that of GFP-M1-5. Finally, the level and rate of recovery of cyan fluorescent protein (CFP)-M1-5 were lower than those of CFP-H1 specifically in heterochromatic regions. These data suggest that CDK2 phosphorylates histone H1 in vivo, resulting in a more open chromatin structure by destabilizing H1-chromatin interactions.

Binding Sites↗

Intranuclear ataxin1 inclusions contain both fast- and slow-exchanging components.

A hallmark of neurodegenerative diseases caused by polyglutamine expansion is the abnormal accumulation of mutant proteins into ubiquitin-positive inclusions. The local build-up of these ubiquitinated proteins suggests that the proteasome machinery inadequately clears misfolded proteins, resulting in their increase to potentially toxic levels. Inclusions may disrupt normal cell homeostasis by sequestering vital cellular factors, such as chaperones, proteasomes and transcription components. Here, we used fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to examine the intranuclear dynamics of polyglutamine-expanded ataxin1 and inclusion-associated proteins. These experiments demonstrated that at least two types of ataxin1 inclusions exist; those that undergo rapid and complete exchange with a nucleoplasmic pool and those that contain varying levels of slow-exchanging ataxin1. Slow-exchanging inclusions contain high ubiquitin levels, but surprisingly low proteasome levels, suggesting an impairment in the ability of proteasomes to recognize ubiquitinated substrates. Proteasomes and CBP remained highly dynamic components of inclusions, indicating that although enriched with ataxin1, they are not irreversibly trapped. These results redefine our perception of polyglutamine inclusions and demonstrate the usefulness of FRAP and live cell imaging to study factors that modulate their behaviour.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Alteration of large-scale chromatin structure by estrogen receptor.

The estrogen receptor (ER), a member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily important in human physiology and disease, recruits coactivators which modify local chromatin structure. Here we describe effects of ER on large-scale chromatin structure as visualized in live cells. We targeted ER to gene-amplified chromosome arms containing large numbers of lac operator sites either directly, through a lac repressor-ER fusion protein (lac rep-ER), or indirectly, by fusing lac repressor with the ER interaction domain of the coactivator steroid receptor coactivator 1. Significant decondensation of large-scale chromatin structure, comparable to that produced by the approximately 150-fold-stronger viral protein 16 (VP16) transcriptional activator, was produced by ER in the absence of estradiol using both approaches. Addition of estradiol induced a partial reversal of this unfolding by green fluorescent protein-lac rep-ER but not by wild-type ER recruited by a lac repressor-SRC570-780 fusion protein. The chromatin decondensation activity did not require transcriptional activation by ER nor did it require ligand-induced coactivator interactions, and unfolding did not correlate with histone hyperacetylation. Ligand-induced coactivator interactions with helix 12 of ER were necessary for the partial refolding of chromatin in response to estradiol using the lac rep-ER tethering system. This work demonstrates that when tethered or recruited to DNA, ER possesses a novel large-scale chromatin unfolding activity.

Acetylation↗

Molecular dynamics and nuclear receptor function.

The development of live cell and biochemical analysis methods has led to an increase in our understanding of the dynamic regulation of transcription. Live single cell studies using photobleaching techniques indicate that many proteins have a high nuclear mobility. Pioneering work using promoter array systems based on the lac operon or the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter enabled the study of chromatin structure, promoter occupancy and protein-chromatin interaction dynamics in relation to transcription. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-based assays allow an exhaustive analysis of the temporal recruitment of proteins to an endogenous promoter and provide evidence of cyclic protein-protein and protein-promoter interactions. Although reflecting different timescales, both ChIP and live cell studies indicate a highly dynamic control of transcription that until now has gone undetected and unappreciated.

Animals↗