Biomedical subjects

Michael Ariel

Publications and source records attributed to Michael Ariel.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

The effects of unilateral eighth nerve block on fictive VOR in the turtle.

Multiunit activity during horizontal sinusoidal motion was recorded from pairs of oculomotor, trochlear, or abducens nerves of an in vitro turtle brainstem preparation that received inputs from intact semicircular canals. Responses of left oculomotor, right trochlear and right abducens nerves were approximately aligned with leftward head velocity, and that of the respective contralateral nerves were in-phase with rightward velocity. We examined the effect of sectioning or injecting lidocaine (1-2 microL of 0.5%) into the right vestibular nerve. Nerve block caused a striking phase shift in the evoked response of right oculomotor and left trochlear nerves, in which (rightward) control responses were replaced by a smaller-amplitude response to leftward table motion. Such "phase-reversed" responses were poorly defined in abducens nerve recordings. Frequency analysis demonstrated that this activity was advanced in phase relative to post-block responses of the respective contralateral nerves, which were in turn phase-advanced relative to pre-block controls. Phase differences were largest (approximately 10 degrees) at low frequencies (approximately 0.1 Hz) and statistically absent at 1 Hz. The phase-reversed responses were further investigated by eliminating individual canal input from the left labyrinth following right nVIII block, which indicated that the activation of the vertical canal afferents is the source of this activity.

Abducens Nerve↗

PubMed2006

Modulation of visual inputs to accessory optic system by theophylline during hypoxia.

Neural tissues from fresh water turtles have been electrophysiologically studied in vitro due to their significant resistance to hypoxia. Such neurons have resting membrane potentials that are similar to intact animals and receive similar synaptic inputs evoked by sensory stimuli. One mechanism to reduce the brain's metabolic requirement in the absence of oxygenated blood flow was investigated by blocking adenosine receptors before and during hypoxia. Extracellular and whole-cell patch recordings were made from the basal optic nucleus, whose neurons respond to visual stimuli in vitro. While the addition of the adenosine antagonist theophylline to oxygenated superfusate had minimal effect on the neural activity, theophylline in superfusate bubbled with nitrogen strongly increased activity compared to either oxygenated theophylline or control superfusate bubbled with nitrogen. The increase in spontaneous activity was due to increases to both amplitude and frequency of excitatory synaptic events. Even during these increases, the neurons continued to exhibit their direction-sensitive responses. These results indicate that adenosine may play a role in protecting the viability of the brainstem during hypoxia without reducing visually mediated brainstem reflex control.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2005

Localization of GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid) markers in the turtle's basal optic nucleus.

Recent physiological data have demonstrated that retinal slip, the sensory code of global visual pattern motion, results from complex interactions of excitatory and inhibitory visual inputs to neurons in the turtle's accessory optic system (the basal optic nucleus, BON). In the present study, the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), its synthetic enzyme, glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD-67) and its receptor subtypes GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors were localized within the BON. GABA antibodies revealed cell bodies and processes, whereas antibodies against GAD revealed a moderate density of immunoreactive puncta throughout the BON. GAD in situ hybridization labeled BON cell bodies, indicating a possible source of inhibition intrinsic to the nucleus. Ultrastructural analysis revealed terminals positive for GAD that exhibit symmetric synaptic specializations, mainly at neuronal processes having small diameters. Neurons exhibiting immunoreactivity for GABA(A) receptors were diffusely labeled throughout the BON, with neuronal processes exhibiting more labeling than cell bodies. In contrast, GABA(B)-receptor-immunoreactive neurons exhibited strong labeling at the cell body and proximal neuronal processes. Both these receptor subtypes are functional, as evidenced by changes of visual responses of BON neurons during application to the brainstem of selective receptor agonists and antagonists. Therefore, GABA may be synthesized by BON neurons, released by terminals within its neuropil and stimulate both receptor subtypes, supporting its role in mediating visually evoked inhibition contributing to modulation of the retinal slip signals in the turtle accessory optic system.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Shunting inhibition in accessory optic system neurons.

The interaction of excitatory and inhibitory inputs to the accessory optic system was studied with whole cell recordings in the turtle basal optic nucleus. Previous studies have shown that visual patterns, drifting in the same preferred direction, evoke excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic events simultaneously. Analysis of the reversal potentials for these events and their pharmacological profile suggest that they are mediated by AMPA and GABA(A) receptors, respectively. Here, neurons were recorded to study nonlinear interaction between excitatory and inhibitory responses evoked by electrical microstimulation of the retina and pretectum, respectively. The responses to coincident activation of excitatory and inhibitory inputs exhibited membrane shunting in that the excitatory response amplitude, adjusted for changes in driving force, was attenuated during the onset of the inhibitory response. This nonlinear interaction was seen in many but not all stimulus pairings. In some cases, attenuation was followed by an augmentation of the excitatory response. For comparison, the size of the excitatory response was evaluated during a hyperpolarizing current pulse that directly modulated voltage-sensitive channels of a slow rectifying I(h) current. Injection of hyperpolarizing current did not cause the attenuation of the excitatory synaptic responses. We conclude that there is a nonlinear interaction between these excitatory and inhibitory synaptic currents that is not due to hyperpolarization itself, but probably is a result of their own synaptic conductance changes, i.e., shunting. Since these events are evoked by identical visual stimuli, this interaction may play a role in visual processing.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2004

Latencies of climbing fiber inputs to turtle cerebellar cortex.

Responses of separate regions of rat cerebellar cortex (Cb) to inferior olive (IO) stimulation occur with the same latency despite large differences in climbing fiber (CF) lengths. Here, the olivocerebellar path of turtle was studied because its Cb is an unfoliated sheet on which measurements of latency and CF length can be made directly across its entire surface in vitro. During extracellular DC recordings at a given Cb position below the molecular layer, IO stimulation evoked a large negative field potential with a half-width duration of approximately 6.5 ms. On this response were smaller oscillations similar to complex spikes. The stimulating electrode was moved to map the IO and the CF path from the brain stem to the Cb. The contralateral brain stem region that evoked these responses was tightly circumscribed within the medulla, lateral and deep to the obex. This response remained when the brain stem was bathed in solutions that blocked synaptic transmission. The Cb response to IO stimulation had a peak latency of approximately 10 ms that was not dependent on the position of the recording electrode across the entire 8-mm rostrocaudal length of the Cb. However, for a constant Cb recording position, moving the stimulation across the midline to the ipsilateral brain stem and along the lateral wall of the fourth ventricle toward the peduncle did shorten the response latency. Therefore a synchronous Cb response to CF stimulation seems to be caused by changes in its conduction velocity within the entire cerebellar cortex but not within the brain stem.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2004

Bilateral processing of vestibular responses revealed by injecting lidocaine into the eighth cranial nerve in vitro.

Extracellular unit responses were recorded from the vestibular nucleus (VN) and medial longitudinal fasciculus during horizontal head rotation of an in vitro turtle brainstem in which the temporal bones remained attached. Units were characterized as type I or type II based on the responses to ipsiversive or contraversive rotation, respectively. Lidocaine injections (0.5-2 microl of 0.5%) into the root of the eighth cranial nerve within the cranium caused rapid effects on unit responses to head rotation. Responses of type I units were reduced by ipsilateral injection but enhanced following contralateral injection. On the other hand, type II units had their responses increased by ipsilateral injections yet decreased by contralateral injections. In approximately half of the type II cells, decrease of the contraversive response was accompanied by the appearance of latent ipsiversive activity. Our findings not only confirm that each eighth nerve has afferents that drive ipsiversive excitation of both vestibular nuclei but also suggest that both nerves compete to dominate a central neuron's vestibular response. These results may be inconsistent with the push-pull vestibular model in which each nerve drives the central neuron with a complementary response that enhances the vestibular output. An alternate model is described in which vestibular neurons receive bilateral excitation, and that excitatory input is antagonized by crossed inhibition during contraversive motion.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2003

Connectivity of the turtle accessory optic system.

Recent whole-cell recordings show that there are multiple synaptic inputs to the accessory optic system of the pond turtle Pseudemys scripta elegans (the basal optic nucleus, BON), suggesting a complex role in visual processing. The BON outputs have now been investigated using transport of diI, rhodamine-conjugated and biotinylated dextrans. Although transport was primarily anterograde, contralateral retinal ganglion cells were labeled retrogradely, confirming that the injection site was a retinal target. Other retrogradely labeled neurons were found ipsilateral to the injection site, in the pretectum, the ventral tegmentum, the dorsal nucleus of the posterior commissure and the lateral habenular nucleus. However, other data indicate that the habenular cells were labeled by spread of the tracer from the BON to the adjacent fasciculus retroflexus and interpeduncular nucleus. Anterogradely labeled fibers projected from BON following three paths, a lateral bundle to the ipsilateral dorsal midbrain, an intermediate bundle to the ipsilateral pretectal area or the posterior commissure and a ventral fiber bundle to the tegmentum bilaterally. Some of these fibers projected caudally through the tegmentum and cerebellar peduncle to terminate just below the Purkinje cell layer of the cerebellar cortex. Fibers that coursed via the intermediate bundle to the posterior commissure were also seen reaching the contralateral pretectal area and the contralateral BON. Injections of the retrograde tracer Fluorogold were also made in the BON to confirm the reciprocal connectivity of both basal optic nuclei. The pathways revealed by these experiments indicate the existence of multiple afferent and efferent connections of the BON, supporting the view that the accessory optic system is more than a simple relay of retinal signals into the brainstem for optokinetic reflexes.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Synaptic pharmacology in the turtle accessory optic system.

The accessory optic system of the turtle (the basal optic nucleus, BON) receives both excitatory and inhibitory inputs that are direction-sensitive. When the dorsal midbrain is ablated, only the monosynaptic direction-sensitive input from the retina to the BON remains. To better understand the central visual processing performed by the accessory optic system, this study identifies the neurotransmitters and their receptors that mediate the synaptic excitation and inhibition of BON cells. We used a reduced in vitro turtle brainstem preparation in which the two eyes and brain were isolated pharmacologically. Patch recordings were made on BON neurons while drugs were applied to the brain, with the eyes bathed in control media and either exposed to visual pattern motion or subjected to electrical stimulation. An antagonist of the AMPA (alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid) subtype of glutamate receptor applied within the brain chamber blocked the visual responses. In response to electrical stimulation both excitatory and inhibitory synaptic events were blocked in BON cells, presumably by blocking direct excitation by retinal ganglion cell axons in the BON and indirect excitation of inhibitory interneurons elsewhere in the brainstem. An NMDA receptor antagonist was ineffective, even when the response was measured in a BON cell depolarized in Mg(2+)-free media. A GABA(A) receptor on the BON cell mediates the inhibitory responses to retinal stimulation. Injection of lidocaine into the contralateral eye caused an increase in spontaneous inhibitory post-synaptic potentials (IPSPs), suggesting that a tonic retinal output exists that reduces brainstem inhibition of BON cells. Also, there may be tonic inhibition of an excitatory path to BON neurons from within the brainstem, because bicuculline increased spontaneous excitatory post-synaptic potentials (EPSPs) observed in a BON cell without retinal input. These results indicate that the BON is a site of complex visual processing of competing visual signals and provide insight into how an interaction of excitation and inhibition creates a retinal slip signal in the accessory optic system.

2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerate↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Morphology of the turtle accessory optic system.

Neural signals of the moving visual world are detected by a subclass of retinal ganglion cells that project to the accessory optic system in the vertebrate brainstem. We studied the dendritic morphologies and direction tuning of these brainstem neurons in turtle (Pseudemys scripta elegans) to understand their role in visual processing. Full-field checkerboard patterns were drifted on the contralateral retina while whole-cell recordings were made in the basal optic nucleus in an intact brainstem preparation in vitro. Neurobiotin diffused into the neurons during the recording and was subsequently localized in brain sections. Neuronal morphologies were traced using appropriate computer software to analyze their position in the brainstem. Most labeled neurons were fusiform in shape and had numerous varicosities along their processes. The majority of dendritic trees spread out in a transverse plane perpendicular to the rostrocaudal axis of the nucleus. Neurons near the brainstem surface were often oriented tangential to that surface, whereas more cells at the dorsal side of the nucleus were oriented radial to the brainstem surface. Further analysis of Nissl-stained neurons revealed the largest neurons are located in the rostral and medial portions of the nucleus although neurons are most densely packed in the middle of the nucleus. The preferred directions of the visual responses of the neurons in this sample did not correlate with their morphology and position in the nucleus. Therefore, the morphology of the cells in the turtle accessory optic system appears dependent on its position within the nucleus while its visual responses may depend on the synaptic inputs that contact each cell.

Animals↗