PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michael Bläker

Publications and source records attributed to Michael Bläker.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

The cholecystokinin2-receptor mediates calcitonin secretion, gene expression, and proliferation in the human medullary thyroid carcinoma cell line, TT.

Gastrin-induced release of calcitonin from medullary thyroid carcinomas (MTC) is based on the expression of the cholecystokinin(2)-receptor (CCK(2)R) in these tumors. Recently, we have shown that the CCK(2)R is expressed not only in MTC but also in C-cells within the normal thyroid gland. The functions of the CCK(2)R in MTC and C-cells are largely unknown. We therefore explored the effects of gastrin-induced CCK(2)R stimulation in the highly differentiated MTC cell line, TT. CCK(2)R expression in TT-cells is detectable by RT-PCR as well as immunocytochemistry. Stimulation of the CCK(2)R by gastrin induces immediate release of calcitonin from TT-cells. Moreover, quantitative (LightCycler) RT-PCR demonstrates that gastrin stimulates transcription of the calcitonin and chromogranin A genes in TT-cells. TT-cell proliferation, assessed by counting of viable cells and (3)H-thymidine uptake, is markedly increased by gastrin. This effect is inhibited by the CCK(2)R-specific antagonist L-365,260. Our findings suggest physiological functions for the CCK(2)R in calcitonin-secretion and gene expression as well as a pathophysiological role in MTC proliferation. CCK(2)R antagonists might have therapeutic potential in these tumors.

Calcitonin↗

Differential expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes in hepatocellular carcinomas.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Somatostatin analogues inhibit cell proliferation by stimulation of distinct somatostatin receptor (SSTR) subtypes. In recent years, these compounds have been introduced into the therapy of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The efficacy of this treatment is under debate due to the controversial results of clinical trials. Despite the widespread clinical use of somatostatin analogues in HCC, little is known about the expression of each of the five SSTRs in these tumors. METHODS: We analyzed the expression of SSTR subtypes in 56 HCCs by immunohistochemistry using subtype-specific antibodies. Six of the samples were also investigated by RT-PCR using subtype-specific oligonucleotide primers. RESULTS: HCCs display differential, individual expression patterns as well as variable expression levels for SSTRs. The overall expression rate of SSTR1, SSTR2, SSTR3, SSTR4, and SSTR5 is 46, 41, 64, 0, and 75%, respectively. No significant correlation was observed between SSTR expression and tumor stage, differentiation, histological tumor type, or underlying liver disease. CONCLUSIONS: Individual patterns and levels of SSTR expression might determine the response to treatment with somatostatin analogues in HCC. Selective treatment of these tumors based on the analysis of SSTR subtype expression might lead to an increase in response rates.

Adolescent↗

Ligand function at constitutively active receptor mutants is affected by two distinct yet interacting mechanisms.

It has been proposed that mutations that induce constitutive activity in G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) concomitantly enhance the ability of partial agonists to trigger second-messenger signaling. Using the cholecystokinin type 2 receptor (CCK-2R) as a model system, we have explored whether this association applies to a diverse set of activating mutations. Consistent with established principles, constitutively active CCK-2Rs resulting from amino acid substitutions within the third intracellular loop each systematically increased partial agonist activities versus corresponding wild-type values. In contrast, activating mutations within transmembrane domain segments near the extracellular loops led to an increase in efficacy of only a subset of compounds but decreased or did not change the function of others. When transmembrane domain amino acid substitutions were introduced in combination with intracellular amplifying mutations, observed changes in ligand activity were defined by the product of two discernible factors 1) systematic amplification caused by an equilibrium shift from the inactive to the active receptor conformation and 2) ligand-specific alterations in signaling, which probably result from mutation-induced changes in the putative binding pocket. These findings illustrate functional heterogeneity among GPCR mutants with ligand-independent signaling. A subgroup of activating mutations facilitates receptor isomerization to the active state and in parallel perturbs ligand receptor interactions. These mutants do not adhere to the previously proposed "hallmark criteria" of constitutive activity.

Animals↗

Conserved cholecystokinin receptor transmembrane domain IV amino acids confer peptide affinity.

The Cholecystokinin type 1 and type 2 receptors (CCK-1R and CCK-2R) share >50% amino acid identity, as well as subnanomolar affinity for the endogenous peptide cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8). Although it is likely that these two receptor subtypes share amino acids that confer CCK-8 affinity, it has been difficult to identify such residues. We have examined the role of several transmembrane domain (TMD) IV residues that are common to both CCK receptor subtypes. In both the CCK-1R and CCK-2R, we demonstrate that alanine substitution of two TMD IV residues, which are highly conserved among all known CCK receptor subtypes and species homologs, significantly decrease CCK-8 affinity. Despite the observed decrease in peptide binding, the mutant receptors maintain close to wild-type affinity for the respective subtype selective nonpeptide ligands, 3H-labeled L-364,714 (CCK-1R) and 3H-labeled L-365,260 (CCK-2R), suggesting conserved tertiary structure of these mutants. Assessment of CCK-8-induced inositol phosphate production at each of the mutant CCK receptors revealed normal peptide efficacy. In contrast, peptide potencies are reduced in parallel with the observed decreases in affinity. Taken together, these findings suggest that important peptide affinity determinants are localized on TMD IV, a region that has not previously been considered a major contributor to ligand affinity in either CCK receptors or other G protein-coupled peptide receptors.

Alanine↗