PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michael C Perry

Publications and source records attributed to Michael C Perry.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor, has been shown to benefit patients with a variety of cancers. METHODS: Between July 2001 and April 2004, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) conducted a randomized study in which 878 patients with recurrent or advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (stage IIIB or IV) were assigned to chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin alone (444) or paclitaxel and carboplatin plus bevacizumab (434). Chemotherapy was administered every 3 weeks for six cycles, and bevacizumab was administered every 3 weeks until disease progression was evident or toxic effects were intolerable. Patients with squamous-cell tumors, brain metastases, clinically significant hemoptysis, or inadequate organ function or performance status (ECOG performance status, >1) were excluded. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: The median survival was 12.3 months in the group assigned to chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, as compared with 10.3 months in the chemotherapy-alone group (hazard ratio for death, 0.79; P=0.003). The median progression-free survival in the two groups was 6.2 and 4.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio for disease progression, 0.66; P<0.001), with corresponding response rates of 35% and 15% (P<0.001). Rates of clinically significant bleeding were 4.4% and 0.7%, respectively (P<0.001). There were 15 treatment-related deaths in the chemotherapy-plus-bevacizumab group, including 5 from pulmonary hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of bevacizumab to paclitaxel plus carboplatin in the treatment of selected patients with non-small-cell lung cancer has a significant survival benefit with the risk of increased treatment-related deaths. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00021060.)

Aged↗
PubMed2006

The cancer and leukemia group B respiratory committee.

The Cancer and Leukemia Group B Respiratory Committee has a 30-year track record of clinical investigation in patients with small-cell lung cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and mesothelioma. The most widely recognized contributions of the Committee include the early confirmation of the role of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in LD-SCLC, the effect of combination chemotherapy followed by radiation in stage III NSCLC, the introduction of third-generation agents into concurrent chemoradiation for stage III disease, the prospective demonstration of the benefit of treating older (70 years old) and poorer performance status (performance status = 2) patients with first-line combinations for stage IV disease, and the development of the "Herndon prognostic index" to normalize patient characteristics and outcomes in sequential phase II trials of new agents in patients with mesothelioma. Many other contributions have also emerged from the Committee's clinical trials and correlative science programs. We look forward to making additional critical contributions during future decades of Cancer and Leukemia Group B Respiratory Committee research.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2006

Hepatotoxicity of chemotherapy.

The selection of an antineoplastic regimen for an oncology patient is based first on the availability of effective drugs and then on a balancing of potential treatment-related toxicities with the patient's clinical condition and associated comorbidities. Liver function abnormalities are commonly observed in this patient population and identifying their etiology is often difficult. Immunosuppression, paraneoplastic phenomena, infectious diseases, metastases, and poly-pharmacy may cloud the picture. While criteria for standardizing liver injury have been established, dose modifications often rely on empiric clinical judgment. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of hepatotoxic manifestations for the most common chemotherapeutic agents is essential. We herein review the hepatotoxicity of commonly used antineoplastic agents and regimens.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Evaluation of combined (177)Lu-DOTA-8-AOC-BBN (7-14)NH(2) GRP receptor-targeted radiotherapy and chemotherapy in PC-3 human prostate tumor cell xenografted SCID mice.

The focus of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic benefit of combined gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) receptor-targeted radiotherapy (TRT) with chemotherapy, using the PC-3 xenograft severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mouse model. (177)Lu-DOTA-8-AOC-BBN(7-14)NH(2) is a radiotherapeutic peptide that specifically targets the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor overexpressed on primary and metastatic prostate cancer. The chemotherapeutic agents, docetaxel and estramustine, were administered as single agents or in combination with the receptor-targeted radiotherapeutic agent. Combination receptor TRT/chemotherapy studies were begun 21 days postxenografting and were conducted as multiple-dose trials. The GRP receptor TRT agent was administered every 14 days, and single and combination chemotherapy dose regimens were given weekly. Tumor size, body weight, and body condition score were evaluated twice-weekly and a hematology profile once-weekly. Therapy study tumor volumes were evaluated by way of a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Tumor volume measurements at 12 days postdose administration demonstrated a statistically significant (two-tailed P-value <0.05) tumor growth suppression in all experimental groups receiving GRP receptor-targeted radiotherapy, when compared to the control group. The two combined GRP receptor TRT/chemotherapy treatment groups demonstrated the greatest tumor growth suppression of all treatment groups. In comparing the two combined GRP receptor TRT/chemotherapy groups to the GRP receptor TRT alone group, a statistically significant difference was demonstrated for the combined groups by day 30, postdose administration. These data demonstrate that GRP receptor-targeted radiation therapy, using (177)Lu-DOTA-8-AOC-BBN(7-14)NH(2), used either alone or in combination with conventional chemotherapy, can suppress the growth of androgen- independent prostate cancer (AIPC).

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Cardiotoxicity of cancer therapy.

Because cancer is a leading cause of mortality in the United States, the number of therapeutic modalities available for the treatment of neoplastic processes has increased. This has resulted in a large number of patients being exposed to a wide variety of cancer therapy. Historically, it has been well recognized that antineoplastic agents may have adverse effects on multiple organs and normal tissues. The most commonly associated toxicities occur in tissues composed of rapidly dividing cells and may spontaneously reverse with minimal long-term toxicity. However, the myocardium consists of cells that have limited regenerative capability, which may render the heart susceptible to permanent or transient adverse effects from chemotherapeutic agents. Such toxicity encompasses a heterogeneous group of disorders, ranging from relatively benign arrhythmias to potentially lethal conditions such as myocardial ischemia/infarction and cardiomyopathy. In some instances, the pathogenesis of these toxic effects has been elucidated, whereas in others the precise etiology remains unknown. We review herein the various syndromes of cardiac toxicity that are reported to be associated with antineoplastic agents and discuss their putative mechanisms and treatment.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) or chemoradiotherapy (CPORT) following resection of stages II and IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) does not increase the expected risk of death from intercurrent disease (DID) in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) trial E3590.

To determine the influence of adjuvant therapy on the risk of DID following resection of NSCLC, we compared the actuarial rate of non-cancer related deaths of patients who had been entered in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E3590 (a phase III trial of adjuvant therapy in patients with completely resected stages II and IIIA NSCLC) to the actuarial death rate of age and gender matched controls. Following surgery, patients were randomized to receive either PORT (5040 cGy in 28 daily fractions) or CPORT (PORT plus four cycles of cisplatin (60 mg/m2, day 1) and etoposide (120 mg/m2, days 1-3) administered concurrently). The study accrued 488 patients, 242 to the PORT only arm and 246 to the CPORT arm. The overall 4 years actuarial rate of DID for the two arms combined, with a median follow-up of 82 months, was 12.9%, not significantly different from the 10.1% expected rate of DID, based on mortality rates for age and gender matched controls derived from US vital statistics and corrected for smoking status (p=0.16). Survival distributions with regard to DID did not differ between the two treatment arms (p=0.96). DID increased with age (treated as a continuous variable, p<0.01), but was not affected by histology, side of chest irradiated, type of surgery, FEV1 or weight loss in the previous 6 months. The risk of DID following resection of stages II and IIIA NSCLC is not increased in patients who received PORT or CPORT.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2005

Single-agent versus combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the cancer and leukemia group B (study 9730).

PURPOSE: We compared the efficacy of combination chemotherapy versus single-agent therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 561 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive paclitaxel alone or in combination with carboplatin. RESULTS: The response rate was 17% in the paclitaxel arm and 30% in the carboplatin-paclitaxel arm (P < .0001). Median failure-free survival was 2.5 months in the paclitaxel arm and 4.6 months in the carboplatin-paclitaxel arm (P = .0002). Median survival times were 6.7 months (95% CI, 5.8 to 7.8) and 8.8 months (95% CI, 8.0 to 9.9), and 1-year survival rates were 32% (95% CI, 27% to 38%), and 37% (95% CI, 32% to 43%), respectively. The overall survival distributions were not statistically different: hazard ratio = 0.91 (95% CI, 0.77 to 1.17; P = .25). Hematological toxicity and nausea were more frequent in the combination arm, but febrile neutropenia and toxic deaths were equally low in both arms. There was no significant survival difference in elderly patients. Performance status 2 patients treated with combination chemotherapy had a better survival rate than those treated with single-agent therapy (P = .019). CONCLUSION: Combination chemotherapy improves response rate and failure-free survival compared with single-agent therapy, but there was no statistically significant difference in the primary end point of overall survival. The results in elderly patients were similar to younger patients. Performance status 2 patients had a superior outcome when treated with combination chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Failure of higher-dose paclitaxel to improve outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer: cancer and leukemia group B trial 9342.

PURPOSE: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Protocol 9342 was initiated to determine the optimal dose of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks to women with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred seventy-four women with metastatic breast cancer who had received one or no prior chemotherapy regimens were randomly assigned to one of three paclitaxel dosing regimens-175 mg/m(2), 210 mg/m(2), or 250 mg/m(2)-each administered as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks. Women completed self-administered quality of life and symptom assessment questionnaires at baseline and after three cycles of treatment. RESULTS: No evidence of a significant dose-response relationship was demonstrated over the dose range assessed. Response rates were 23%, 26%, and 21% for the three regimens, respectively. A marginally significant association (P =.04) was seen between dose and time to progression; however, in a multivariate analysis, the difference was even less apparent. No statistically significant difference was seen in survival. Neurotoxicity and hematologic toxicity were more severe on the higher dose arms. There was no significant difference in quality of life on the three arms. CONCLUSION: Higher doses of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion to women with metastatic breast cancer did not improve response rate, survival, or quality of life. There was a slight improvement in time to progression with higher dose therapy, which was offset by greater toxicity. When a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel is administered every 3 weeks, 175 mg/m(2) should be considered the optimal dose.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Prolonged survival in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer and single-level N2 disease.

OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that patients with non-small cell lung cancer and single-level N2 metastases constitute a favorable subgroup of patients with mediastinal metastases, we analyzed the results of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 3590 (a randomized prospective trial of adjuvant therapy in patients with resected stages II and IIIa non-small cell lung cancer) by site of primary tumor and pattern of lymph node metastases. METHODS: Accurate staging was ensured by mandating either systematic sampling or complete dissection of the ipsilateral mediastinal lymph nodes. The overall survival of patients with left lung non-small cell lung cancer and metastases in only 1 of lymph node levels 5, 6, or 7 and right lung non-small cell lung cancer with metastases in only 1 of levels 4 or 7 was compared with that of patients with N1 disease originating in the same lobe. RESULTS: The median survival of the 172 patients with single-level N2 disease was 35 months (95% confidence interval: 27-40 months) versus 65 months (95% confidence interval: 45-84 months) for the 150 patients with N1 disease (median follow-up 84 months, P =.01). However, among patients with left upper lobe tumors, survival was not significantly different between patients with N1 disease and patients with single-level N2 disease (49 vs 51 months, P =.63). The median survival of the 71 patients with single-level N2 metastases without concomitant N1 disease (skip metastases) was 59 months (95% confidence interval: 36-107 months) versus 26 months (95% confidence interval: 16-36 months) for the 145 patients with both N1 and N2 metastases (P =.001). CONCLUSIONS: Survival of patients with left upper lobe non-small cell lung cancer and metastases to single-level N2 lymph nodes is not significantly different from that of patients with N1 disease. The presence of isolate N2 skip metastases is associated with improved survival when compared with patients with both N1 and N2 disease. Survival should be reported by the lobe of primary tumor and metastatic pattern to guide future clinical trial development, treatment strategies, and revisions of the TNM staging system.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2004

Small cell lung cancer: state of the art and future perspectives.

Small cell lung cancer accounts for less than 20% of all lung cancer. The management of this distinct tumor entity differs from the more common non-small cell lung cancer. Primary prevention of smoking exposure remains the most important public health measure. Although small cell lung is an exquisitely chemosensitive disease it remains ultimately fatal for the great majority of patients. Combination chemotherapy regimens have improved response rate and survival of the last three decades. The combination of cisplatin and etoposide has been considered the standard therapy for over a decade. More intensive triplet combination chemotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy have shown improved response rates and survival. Early concomitant and accelerated radiotherapy improves survival in limited stage disease. This review summarizes the current state of the art and future perspectives in detection, staging and standard therapy of small cell lung cancer. Particular emphasis is given to the importance of concomitant and accelerated radiotherapy and consideration of dose-intensive combination chemotherapy regimens.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2004

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and docetaxel in locally advanced breast cancer.

Fifty patients with histologically confirmed stage III breast cancer were enrolled in this study of doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 intravenously infused over 1 hour every 21 days with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for 4 cycles. This was followed by surgery (mastectomy or lumpectomy) and 4 more cycles of doxorubicin/docetaxel postoperatively, then radiation and tamoxifen as indicated. Forty-six of the 50 patients (92%) completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 38 patients (76%) completed adjuvant chemotherapy. Clinical response (defined as > 50% decrease in size of tumor) was achieved after 2 cycles in 37 patients (74%) and after 4 cycles in 42 of the 46 patients (91%) who finished neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Pathologic complete response (pCR; no pathologic invasive cancer) at the primary site was obtained in 7 of 46 patients (15%); 11 had no residual gross disease but did have microscopic persistence or microscopic complete response (mCR), for a combined pCR and mCR of 18 of 46 patients (39%). No treatment-related deaths occurred, but 3 patients died during treatment: 1 from progressive disease, 1 from a gastrointestinal bleeding, and 1 from unexplained sudden cardiac death. Dose-limiting toxicities were hematologic (grade 3 neutropenia in 5 patients and grade 4 in 23 patients). Congestive heart failure developed in 4 of 50 patients (8%), with a mean decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 20% in affected patients and 1 asymptomatic decrease in LVEF of 25%. At last follow-up, 10 patients had died of progressive disease, and 1 each from sudden cardiac death and lower gastrointestinal bleeding. In locally advanced breast cancer, neoadjuvant doxorubicin/docetaxel is a very active regimen that achieved pCR of 15% and a combined pCR and mCR of 39%, for an overall clinical response rate of 91%. Adjuvant chemotherapy was complicated by dropouts and congestive heart failure. This regimen should be used with close monitoring of cardiac function.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Multicenter, randomized trial for stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer using weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by maintenance weekly paclitaxel or observation.

PURPOSE: To explore the efficacy and safety of three regimens of weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin as initial therapy and the feasibility of subsequent maintenance therapy versus observation in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred one patients were randomly assigned to one of the following arms: arm 1, paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 weekly for 3 of 4 weeks with carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] = 6) on day 1; arm 2, paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 and carboplatin (AUC = 2) weekly for 3 of 4 weeks; or arm 3, paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 cycle 1 and 100 mg/m2 cycle 2 and carboplatin (AUC = 2) weekly for 6 of 8 weeks. Patients who responded (n = 130) at week 16 were randomly assigned to either weekly paclitaxel therapy (70 mg/m2, 3 of 4 weeks; n = 65) or observation (n = 65). RESULTS: For the 390 assessable patients, the objective response rates observed with initial therapy were 32% for arm 1, 24% for arm 2, and 18% for arm 3. The median time to progression and median survival times were 30 and 49 weeks for arm 1, 21 and 31 weeks for arm 2, and 27 and 40 weeks for arm 3, respectively. The 1-year survival rates were 47% for arm 1, 31% for arm 2, and 41% for arm 3. CONCLUSION: Arm 1, paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 weekly for 3 of 4 weeks with carboplatin (AUC = 6) administered on day 1, demonstrates the most favorable therapeutic index in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Second primary tumors following adjuvant therapy of resected stages II and IIIa non-small cell lung cancer.

The occurrence of second primary tumors (SPTs) following adjuvant therapy for resected stages II and IIIa non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was investigated. Data regarding SPTs were prospectively collected in all patients accrued to Eastern Cooperative Group Oncology E3590 (a phase III trial of adjuvant therapy in patients with completely resected stages II and IIIa NSCLC). Four hundred eighty-eight patients were accrued to the study, 242 to the RT arm and 246 to the CRT arm. Median follow-up was 73 months. Thirty patients (6.1%) developed 33 SPTs, 20 in the RT arm and ten in the CRT arm. Ten SPTs occurred within the upper aerodigestive tract, six in the RT arm and four in the CRT arm. Twenty-three SPTs occurred in other organs, 17 in the RT arm and six in the CRT arm. Median time to detection of a SPT for those patients randomized to RT and CRT was 43 and 36 months, respectively. The incidence of SPTs was 1.8% per patient-year of follow-up. Excluding skin tumors, the relative risk of death following diagnosis of a SPT for patients randomized to the CRT arm as compared with those randomized to RT alone was 2.26 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-5.58, P=0.12). Patients are at risk for developing a SPT following resection of stages II and IIIa NSCLC. The majority of SPTs occur outside the aerodigestive tract. Following development of a non-skin SPT, the survival difference between patients who had received adjuvant CRT and those treated with adjuvant RT alone was not significant.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Phase II study of docetaxel and irinotecan in metastatic or recurrent esophageal cancer: a preliminary report.

The outcomes for patients with metastatic or recurrent esophageal cancer are dismal, with 1-year survival rates of approximately 20%. In this phase II study, we studied the combination of docetaxel (Taxotere) and irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar) in patients with metastatic or recurrent esophageal cancer. Eligible patients included those with histologic or cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma or squamous cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction who had received no previous chemotherapy for metastatic esophageal cancer. Previous chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting was allowed. Patients received irinotecan at 160 mg/m2 over 90 minutes followed by docetaxel at 60 mg/m2 intravenously over 1 hour, with chemotherapy cycles repeated every 21 days. Patients were reevaluated every two cycles. Of a planned 40 patients, 15 were enrolled, with 14 patients evaluable for toxicity and 10 evaluable for response and survival. The combination of docetaxel and irinotecan resulted in a response rate of 30%. An additional 40% achieved stable disease. The median survival was 130 days, with three patients still alive at the time of this analysis. The toxicities included 71% incidence of grade 4 hematologic toxicities, with 43% febrile neutropenia. One patient died of cecal perforation after one cycle. There was no evidence of pharmacokinetic interaction, as systemic clearance of both drugs was similar to that seen after single-agent administration. In conclusion, the regimen of docetaxel and irinotecan is active in metastatic or recurrent esophageal cancer. However, this combination chemotherapy regimen has an unacceptable rate of febrile neutropenia. This regimen needs to be modified to reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia.

Adult↗