PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michael C Rowbotham

Publications and source records attributed to Michael C Rowbotham.

28 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Gabapentin suppresses cutaneous hyperalgesia following heat-capsaicin sensitization.

BACKGROUND: The anticonvulsant gabapentin, proven effective for neuropathic pain in two large, placebo-controlled clinical trials, is widely used for treatment of chronic pain. Preclinical studies have demonstrated analgesic and antiallodynic effects in models involving neuronal sensitization and nerve injury, without affecting acute pain transmission. The aim of the present study was to link data from animal models and clinical trials for chronic pain by investigating the effect of gabapentin on acute nociception and experimentally induced cutaneous hyperalgesia in healthy volunteers. METHODS: The human experimental hyperalgesia model, the heat-capsaicin sensitization model, was induced in 25 healthy male volunteers. Subjects received oral gabapentin (1,200 mg) or placebo after heat-capsaicin sensitization was established on the forearm. The primary outcome measures were the sizes of the areas of secondary hyperalgesia to von Frey hair and brush stimulation on the forearm. Secondary outcome measures were as follows: (1) size of secondary hyperalgesia area in response to brief thermal sensitization procedure on the thigh; (2) heat pain detection thresholds in normal and sensitized skin; and (3) painfulness of 1 min of 45 degrees C stimulation in normal skin. RESULTS: Oral gabapentin profoundly suppressed established cutaneous sensitization on the forearm and prevented development of cutaneous sensitization on the thigh. Thermal nociception in normal skin was unchanged. Side effects were modest. CONCLUSION: The results link preclinical findings with results from clinical trials of neuropathic pain. The results further suggest that gabapentin may prove effective in acute pain disorders involving neuronal sensitization, such as postoperative pain and acute herpetic pain, and could prove effective in prevention of chronic pain.

Acetates↗
PubMed2000

Capsaicin evoked pain and allodynia in post-herpetic neuralgia.

The hypothesis that the pain and allodynia associated with post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) is maintained by a combination of input from preserved primary afferent nociceptors and sensitization of central pain transmitting neurons was examined in 17 subjects with PHN. Pain, allodynia, thermal sensory function, cutaneous innervation, and response to controlled application of 0.075% capsaicin were measured. Compared to mirror-image skin, applying capsaicin on a 9 cm(2) area of PHN skin significantly increased overall PHN pain and allodynia in 11 of 17 subjects. These 'capsaicin responders' were characterized by higher average daily pain, higher allodynia ratings, and relatively preserved sensory function at baseline compared to the non-responders. In three of the 'capsaicin responders' the area of allodynia expanded into previously non-allodynic and non-painful skin that had normal sensory function and cutaneous innervation. These observations support the hypothesis that allodynia in some PHN patients is a form of chronic secondary hyperalgesia maintained by input from intact and possibly 'irritable' primary afferent nociceptors to a sensitized CNS.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1999

Topical lidocaine patch relieves postherpetic neuralgia more effectively than a vehicle topical patch: results of an enriched enrollment study.

This study compared the efficacy of topical lidocaine patches versus vehicle (placebo) patches applied directly to the painful skin of subjects with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) utilizing an 'enriched enrollment' study design. All subjects had been successfully treated with topical lidocaine patches on a regular basis for at least 1 month prior to study enrollment. Subjects were enrolled in a randomized, two-treatment period, vehicle-controlled, cross-over study. The primary efficacy variable was 'time to exit'; subjects were allowed to exit either treatment period if their pain relief score decreased by 2 or more categories on a 6-item Pain Relief Scale for any 2 consecutive days. The median time to exit with the lidocaine patch phase was greater than 14 days, whereas the vehicle patch exit time was 3.8 days (P < 0.001). At study completion, 25/32 (78.1%) of subjects preferred the lidocaine patch treatment phase as compared with 3/32 (9.4%) the placebo patch phase (P < 0.001). No statistical difference was noted between the active and placebo treatments with regards to side effects. Thus, topical lidocaine patch provides significantly more pain relief for PHN than does a vehicle patch. Topical lidocaine patch is a novel therapy for PHN that is effective, does not cause systemic side effects, and is simple to use.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1996

Lidocaine patch: double-blind controlled study of a new treatment method for post-herpetic neuralgia.

Post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a common and often intractable neuropathic pain syndrome predominantly affecting the elderly. Topical local anesthetics have shown promise in both uncontrolled and controlled studies. Thirty-five subjects with established PHN affecting the torso or extremities completed a four-session, random order, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study of the analgesic effects of topically applied 5% lidocaine in the form of a non-woven polyethylene adhesive patch. All subjects had allodynia on examination. Up to 3 patches, covering a maximum of 420 cm2, were applied to cover the area of greatest pain as fully as possible. Lidocaine containing patches were applied in two of the four 12-h-long sessions, in one session vehicle patches were applied, and one session was a no-treatment observation session. Lidocaine containing patches significantly reduced pain intensity at all time points 30 min to 12 h compared to no-treatment observation, and at all time points 4--12 h compared to vehicle patches. Lidocaine patches were superior to both no-treatment observation and vehicle patches in averaged category pain relief scores. The highest blood lidocaine level measured was 0.1 micrograms/ml, indicating minimal systemic absorption of lidocaine. Patch application was without systemic side effect and well tolerated when applied on allodynic skin for 12 h. This study demonstrates that topical 5% lidocaine in patch form is easy to use and relieves post-herpetic neuralgia.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1989

Post-herpetic neuralgia: the relation of pain complaint, sensory disturbance, and skin temperature.

Twelve otherwise healthy patients with longstanding postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) were prospectively studied using clinical examination, infrared thermography and response to local anesthetic skin infiltration. All had at least 2 of 3 possible components to their PHN pain: continuous, neuralgic, or allodynic. In patients with allodynia, maximal reported pain and the location of maximal allodynia on sensory examination were largely overlapping and were often warm thermographically. Areas of dense sensory loss and skin scarring without allodynia were usually cool thermographically. Local anesthetic skin infiltration produced substantial pain relief in all 9 patients (essentially complete relief in 7) with allodynia: the 3 patients with predominantly continuous pain were not relieved. In 7 of 8 skin infiltration responders, the same dose of lidocaine i.m. in the deltoid muscle also produced significant, though less complete pain relief. These results suggest that PHN patients can be divided into at least 2 clinical groups: those with predominantly continuous pain localized to a region of significant sensory loss and those in whom allodynia is the most prominent sensory disturbance. The latter group has pain localized to areas with relatively preserved sensation. The differences in clinical features and response to lidocaine suggest that there are at least 2 different mechanisms contributing to the pain of PHN.

Aged↗
PubMed1989

Topical lidocaine reduces pain in post-herpetic neuralgia.

We report the results of a single session, non-blinded, trial of topical application of 10% lidocaine in gel form to the painful skin of 11 patients with well established post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN). Pain decreased as measured by 100 mm VAS pain scale and 100 mm VAS pain relief scale in both trigeminal and thoracic PHN patients.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The lidocaine patch 5% effectively treats all neuropathic pain qualities: results of a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, 3-week efficacy study with use of the neuropathic pain scale.

BACKGROUND: Several controlled clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the lidocaine patch 5% (LP) for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of the LP on distinct neuropathic pain qualities common to all neuropathic pain conditions, the authors analyzed data from one of the vehicle-controlled trials in which the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS), the only assessment tool specifically designed to measure the distinct components of neuropathic pain, was administered. METHODS AND RESULTS: To improve the sensitivity of the NPS to treatment effects, only patients who, at the time of enrollment in the study, reported moderate-to-severe pain on the NPS (as defined by a score > or =4/10 reported for at least 6 of the 10 individual NPS items) were included in the analysis. Thus, 96 patients were included in this analysis. After a 3-week, vehicle-controlled study, LP improved all assessed pain qualities to a greater extent than the placebo patch, as measured by the NPS 10, a sum score including all 10 NPS item scores ( = 0.043), and an NPS 8 score, which included scores for all 8 pain descriptors, excluding "unpleasantness" and "global intensity" ( = 0.042). Separate analysis of all 8 items believed not to reflect allodynia (NPS NA; excluding "skin sensitivity" and "surface pain") also demonstrated superiority ( = 0.022), as did analysis of the subitems that are believed not to be primarily related to peripheral pathophysiological events (the "NPS 4": "sharp," "hot," "dull," and "deep" pains; = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that LP reduces the intensity of all common neuropathic pain qualities and thus may be of potential benefit for nonallodynic neuropathic pain states. Furthermore, these findings suggest that peripheral mechanisms may play a role in the pathophysiological development of pain qualities that heretofore have been assumed not to involve peripheral mechanisms, such as "dull," "deep," "sharp," and "burning" pains.

Administration, Cutaneous↗