Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Michael D Ezekowitz.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine quality of life (QOL) and exercise performance (EP) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) converted to sinus rhythm (SR) compared with those remaining in or reverting to AF. BACKGROUND: Restoration of SR in patients with AF improving QOL and EP remains controversial. METHODS: Patients with persistent AF were randomized double-blind to amiodarone, sotalol, or placebo. Those not achieving SR at day 28 were cardioverted and classified into SR or AF groups at 8 weeks (n = 624) and 1 year (n = 556). The QOL (SF-36), symptom checklist (SCL), specific activity scale (SAS), AF severity scale (AFSS), and EP were assessed. RESULTS: Favorable changes were seen in SR patients at 8 weeks in physical functioning (p < 0.001), physical role limitations (p = 0.03), general health (p = 0.002), and vitality (p < 0.001), and at 1 year in general health (p = 0.007) and social functioning (p = 0.02). Changes in the scores for SCL severity (p = 0.01), functional capacity (p = 0.003), and AFSS symptom burden (p < 0.001) at 8 weeks and in SCL severity (p < 0.01) and AF symptom burden (p < 0.001) at 1 year showed significant improvements in SR versus AF. Symptomatic patients were more likely to have improvement. The EP in SR versus AF was greater from baseline to 8 weeks (p = 0.01) and to 1 year (p = 0.02). The EP correlated with physical functioning and functional capacity except in the AF group at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with persistent AF, restoration and maintenance of SR was associated with improvements in QOL measures and EP. There was a strong correlation between QOL measures and EP.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: The optimal pharmacologic means to restore and maintain sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation remains controversial. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 665 patients who were receiving anticoagulants and had persistent atrial fibrillation to receive amiodarone (267 patients), sotalol (261 patients), or placebo (137 patients) and monitored them for 1 to 4.5 years. The primary end point was the time to recurrence of atrial fibrillation beginning on day 28, determined by means of weekly transtelephonic monitoring. RESULTS: Spontaneous conversion occurred in 27.1 percent of the amiodarone group, 24.2 percent of the sotalol group, and 0.8 percent of the placebo group, and direct-current cardioversion failed in 27.7 percent, 26.5 percent, and 32.1 percent, respectively. The median times to a recurrence of atrial fibrillation were 487 days in the amiodarone group, 74 days in the sotalol group, and 6 days in the placebo group according to intention to treat and 809, 209, and 13 days, respectively, according to treatment received. Amiodarone was superior to sotalol (P<0.001) and to placebo (P<0.001), and sotalol was superior to placebo (P<0.001). In patients with ischemic heart disease, the median time to a recurrence of atrial fibrillation was 569 days with amiodarone therapy and 428 days with sotalol therapy (P=0.53). Restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm significantly improved the quality of life and exercise capacity. There were no significant differences in major adverse events among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Amiodarone and sotalol are equally efficacious in converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Amiodarone is superior for maintaining sinus rhythm, but both drugs have similar efficacy in patients with ischemic heart disease. Sustained sinus rhythm is associated with an improved quality of life and improved exercise performance.
AIMS: Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the Myocardial Ischaemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) study had diminished cardiovascular events after 16 weeks of treatment of atorvastatin 80 mg daily. We determined whether plasma lipoproteins at baseline and then at 6 weeks after randomization predicted clinical outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to determine relations between lipoproteins and clinical endpoint events. Baseline LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) did not predict outcome. In contrast, baseline HDL-C predicted outcome with a hazard ratio of 0.986 per mg/dL increment in HDL-C, P<0.001, indicating 1.4% reduction in risk for each 1 mg/dL increase in HDL-C. Atorvastatin treatment profoundly lowered LDL-C, but had minimal effect on HDL-C. Neither Week 6 LDL-C nor absolute change of LDL-C from baseline by Week 6 had any significant impact on clinical endpoints occurring between Week 6 and Week 16 after randomization. CONCLUSION: Plasma HDL-C, but not LDL-C, measured in the initial stage of ACS predicts the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events over the ensuing 16 weeks. LDL-C reduction does not account for the clinical risk reduction with atorvastatin treatment after ACS. This finding may suggest that the clinical benefit of atorvastatin after ACS is mediated by qualitative changes in the LDL particle and/or by non-lipid (pleiotropic) effects of the drug.
BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation (AC) with warfarin reduces the risk of thromboembolism (TE) in a variety of applications, yet despite compelling evidence of the value and importance of high quality AC, warfarin remains underused, and dosing is often suboptimal. Approaches to improve AC quality include (1) an AC service (ACS), which allows the physician to delegate day-to-day details of AC management to another provider dedicated to AC care, and (2) incorporating into the treatment plan patient self-testing (PST) under which, after completing a training program, patients perform their own blood testing (typically, using a finger-stick blood analyzer), have dosage adjustments guided by a standard protocol, and forward test results, dosing and other information to the provider. Studies have suggested that PST can improve the quality of AC and perhaps lower TE and bleed rates. The purpose of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) #481, "The Home INR Study" (THINRS) is to compare AC management with frequent PST using a home monitoring device to high quality AC management (HQACM) implemented by an ACS with conventional monitoring of prothrombin time by international normalized ratio (INR) on major health outcomes. PST in THINRS involves use of an INR monitoring device that is FDA approved for home use. STUDY DESIGN: Sites are VA Medical Centers where the ACS has an active roster of more than 400 patients. THINRS includes patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or mechanical heart valve (MHV) expected to be anticoagulated indefinitely. THINRS has two parts. In Part 1, candidates for PST are evaluated for 2 to 4 weeks for their ability to use home monitoring devices. In Part 2, individuals capable of performing PST are randomized to (1) HQACM with testing every 4 weeks and as indicated for out of range values, medication/clinical changes, or (2) PST with testing every week and as indicated for out of range values, medication/clinical changes. The primary outcome measure is event rates, defined as the percent of patients who have a stroke, major bleed, or die. Secondary outcomes include total time in range (TTR), other events (myocardial infarction (MI), non-stroke TE, minor bleeds), competence and compliance with PST, satisfaction with AC, AC associated quality of life (QOL), and cost-effectiveness. To assess the effect of PST frequency on TTR and other outcomes, at selected sites patients randomized to perform PST are assigned one of three test frequencies (weekly, twice weekly, or once every four weeks).
BACKGROUND: Warfarin decreases the activity of matrix Gla-protein and causes extensive arterial calcification leading to increased systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP) in rats. We performed post hoc analyses of the Stroke Prevention in Non-Rheumatic Atrial Fibrillation (SPINAF) trial, aiming to analyze the effects of warfarin on SBP and PP. METHODS: The SPINAF trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing warfarin and placebo in 525 subjects with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. After exclusions for inadequate follow-up, 284 subjects with average treatment lasting 23.7 months were available for analysis (144 given placebo and 140 warfarin). RESULTS: Baseline SBP, diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and PP were 132 +/- 18, 81 +/- 9, 98 +/- 11, and 50 +/- 16 mm Hg in the warfarin group, and 133 +/- 21, 80 +/- 13, 97 +/- 14, and 54 +/- 15 mm Hg in the placebo groups (all P values, NS). There was no statistically significant difference between the placebo and warfarin groups in any of the BP parameters at any time point. However, stratified analyses showed a significant increase in PP in warfarin-treated subjects with a history of hypertension (4.9 +/- 13.1 mm Hg v 0.2 +/- 11.9 mm Hg in the placebo group, P = 0.022), and those with baseline SBP > or =140 mm Hg (4.8 +/- 18.9 mm Hg v -3.4 +/- 11.2 mm Hg in the placebo group, P = .038). A similar trend was noted in diabetic subjects but it was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the study results, treatment with warfarin does not result in increased BP in men with atrial fibrillation. However, it is possible that subjects at higher baseline cardiovascular risk may be more susceptible to the chronic effects of warfarin on arterial hemodynamics.
Patients experiencing stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) are at high risk for recurrent (secondary) strokes, which comprise 29% of all strokes in the United States. Current recommendations for prevention of secondary stroke from the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) call for the broad use of platelet antiaggregation (antiplatelet) agents for patients with a history of noncardioembolic stroke or TIA. Five agents--aspirin, ticlopidine, clopidogrel, extended-release dipyridamole (ER-DP), and triflusal--have demonstrated efficacy in large-scale clinical studies in the prevention of recurrent vascular events and/or stroke in patients with a history of stroke. The results of the following studies are reviewed and compared: the Swedish Aspirin Low-Dose Trial (SALT), the United Kingdom Transient Ischaemic Attack (UK-TIA) Aspirin Trial, Dutch Transient Ischemic Attack (Dutch TIA) study (aspirin), the Canadian American Ticlopidine Study (CATS), the Ticlopidine Aspirin Stroke Study (TASS), the African American Antiplatelet Stroke Prevention Study (AAASPS) (ticlopidine), the Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Recurrent Ischemic Events (CAPRIE) trial, the Management of Atherothrombosis With Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients study (MATCH) (clopidogrel), the second European Stroke Prevention Study (ESPS2) (aspirin plus ER-DP), and the Triflusal versus Aspirin in Cerebral Infarction Prevention (TACIP) study. In comparative monotherapy studies of patients with previous stroke, ticlopidine demonstrates statistically significant improved efficacy over aspirin, and clopidogrel demonstrates nonsignificant slight improvement over aspirin for the prevention of ischemic cardiac and cerebrovascular events; however, the adverse event profile of ticlopidine (including rash, diarrhea, and neutropenia) will probably limit its long-term use. Among combination approaches, only aspirin plus ER-DP has demonstrated statistically significant, clinically meaningful additive benefit over monotherapy with each agent. Clopidogrel plus aspirin did not significantly improve preventive efficacy and increased the risk of serious side effects, including life-threatening bleeding episodes. The 15,500-patient PRoFESS (the Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes) study, with results expected in 2008, will directly compare aspirin plus ER-DP with clopidogrel monotherapy for the prevention of recurrent stroke and should provide statistically robust estimates of comparative efficacy for the development of improved recommendations.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Ischemic stroke, a major complication of atrial fibrillation (AF), is believed to result from atrial thrombus formation caused by ineffective atrial contraction. Oral anticoagulant therapy effectively reduces the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with AF; this therapy is recommended for patients with any frequency or duration of AF and other risk factors for stroke, such as increased age (>75 years), hypertension, prior stroke, left ventricular dysfunction, diabetes, or heart failure. Recently published data comparing rate-control and rhythm-control strategies in AF emphasized the importance of maintaining an international normalized ratio higher than 2.0 during warfarin therapy and the need for continuing anticoagulant therapy to prevent stroke in high-risk patients, even if the strategy is rhythm control. Hemorrhagic complications can be minimized by stringent control of the international normalized ratio (particularly in elderly patients) and appropriate therapy for comorbidities such as hypertension, gastric ulcer, and early-stage cancers. Undertreatment of patients with AF is a continuing problem, particularly in the elderly population. Patients perceived as likely to be noncompliant, such as the functionally impaired, are less likely to receive warfarin therapy. However, stroke prevention with anticoagulants is cost-effective and improves quality of life, despite the challenges of maintaining appropriate anticoagulation with monitoring and warfarin dose titration. New medications in development with more predictable dosing and fewer drug-drug interactions may reduce the complexities of achieving optimal anticoagulation and increase the practicality of long-term anticoagulant therapy for patients with AF at risk of stroke.
We reviewed the efficacy and safety of combination antithrombotic therapy with aspirin plus warfarin versus aspirin alone in patients with atherosclerotic heart disease. We performed a comprehensive MEDLINE search of English-language reports published between 1966 and 2002 and search of references and relevant papers. Only clinical research studies on primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease or patients experiencing unstable angina or myocardial infarction were included. Despite daily aspirin treatment, many patients break through aspirin treatment and experience cardiovascular events. Individuals at high risk for coronary disease or with established disease benefit from combination therapy with aspirin plus warfarin, if compliance with warfarin is greater than 70% and the target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0-2.5 is achieved. Combination therapy within these parameters leads to a 29-45% reduction in the risk of death, reinfarction and/or ischemic stroke. There is a significant increase in the rate of minor and a slight increase in the rate of major bleeding with combination therapy. Other potential indications for combination therapy include myocardial infarction associated with acute left ventricular aneurysm or significant left ventricular systolic dysfunction. In spite of reluctance to use oral anticoagulants, several large, randomized clinical trials support combination therapy with aspirin plus warfarin (INR, 2.0-2.5) in high-risk patients with atherosclerotic heart disease. Combination therapy increases the risk of minor and major bleeding, but not intracranial bleeding.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common acute or chronic cardiac disorder that can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Its incidence in the United States is increasing. Projections suggest that more than 5.6 million Americans (50% of whom will be > or =80 years of age) will have AF by 2050. The American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and the European Society of Cardiology define AF as a supraventricular tachyarrhythmia characterized by uncoordinated atrial activation with consequent deterioration of atrial mechanical function. On an electrocardiogram, AF is characterized by the replacement of P waves by rapid oscillations or fibrillatory waves that vary in size, shape, and timing. Evidence suggests that histological changes exist in the atria of patients with AF, however, it is not known if these changes are a cause or a consequence of AF. Although the fundamental mechanism underlying the disorder is not known, clinical identifying factors are associated with the condition. These may be divided into noncardiac (thyrotoxicosis, alcohol use, electrolyte imbalance, certain pharmacologic and recreational drugs) and cardiac causes (any cause of enlarged left atrium, poor ventricular function, heart surgery). The principles of treatment for this condition are to stabilize the patient hemodynamically, simultaneously determine whether a reversible cause of the AF exists, control the patient's heart rate, determine whether the patient should be cardioverted or maintained in AF, and then develop strategies to prevent the most important complications of stroke. This article will describe in detail the acute management of AF as well as its epidemiology.
Atrial fibrillation and heart failure are growing epidemics in the developed world and often coexist. From clinical trials, warfarin is highly effective in reducing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Equally important is the fact that in spite of well-designed trials, translation of the results of the data from the trials into clinical practice has been less than optimal. One of the reasons is that warfarin is a difficult drug to use. Thus there has been a concerted effort to develop an alternative to warfarin. Ximelagatran and Dabigatran, both direct thrombin inhibitors, are the furthest along in clinical development. Ximelagatran, while highly effective as an anticoagulant and safe with regard to bleeding, has been associated with liver function abnormalities; the importance of which needs resolution. Dabigatran is much earlier in development and is currently of unproven value. It is highly likely that alternatives to warfarin for stroke prevention will be available in the future and will likely result in a higher utilization rate of anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND: Tissue factor (TF), the main initiator of blood coagulation, is involved in cellular migration and angiogenesis processes. TF is expressed strongly in lipid-rich plaques and probably plays an important role in the thrombotic complications of plaque rupture. This study analyzes the effect of dietary lipid lowering on TF expression and cellular modifications in angioplasty-induced rabbit plaque rupture. METHODS AND RESULTS: After experimental plaque rupture by balloon angioplasty in atheromatous rabbits, animals were assigned a 0.2% or a 2% cholesterol diet, and the TF content of arterial wall and the associated histological modifications were analyzed after 4 weeks. Early effects of lipid lowering were observed: The increase of TF expression in the vascular wall was stronger in the 2% than in the 0.2% cholesterol diet group (iliac arteries: 1226+/-308 versus 72+/-29 mU TF/g artery, P<0.005). Immunohistochemistry indicated that TF expression was associated with sprout of neovessels, which was more pronounced in the 2% than in the 0.2% cholesterol group. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that dietary lipid lowering decreases the thrombotic potential of ruptured atherosclerotic plaques through TF decrease. Moreover, high TF expression is associated with marked angiogenesis in the vascular wall, which is reduced by lipid lowering. These results provide further arguments for strong dietary lipid lowering to reduce plaque instability and thrombogenicity.
The Sotalol-Amiodarone Fibrillation Efficacy Trial (SAFE-T) is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial in which the effects of sotalol and amiodarone in maintaining stability of sinus rhythm are being examined in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation at 20 Veterans Affairs medical centers. The time to the occurrence of atrial fibrillation or flutter in patients with atrial fibrillation converted to sinus rhythm is the primary outcome measure, with a number of parameters as secondary end points. SAFE-T had randomized 665 patients when enrollment terminated on October 31, 2001. Follow-up of patients continued until October 31, 2002, for a maximum period of 54 months and a minimum period of 12 months for all patients.
Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in adults. The prevalence of atrial fibrillation rises with age, reaching as high as 9% in those 70 years and older. Currently there are 2.2 million affected people in the United States, with twice the mortality rate of age-matched controls in sinus rhythm. Epidemiologic studies show atrial fibrillation to be responsible for as many as 15% of the total number of strokes, a higher incidence of dementia, cardiac function compromise, and decreased quality of life. Recent studies indicate that rate control and rhythm restoration are equally effective strategies in the treatment of atrial fibrillation, with a trend toward better survival in patients treated for rate control and anticoagulation. Data from several randomized controlled studies on stroke prophylaxis provided consistent evidence of the superiority of adjusted-dose warfarin over aspirin. Guidelines developed by the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, the European Society of Cardiology, and ACCP provide a convenient decision-making framework for the practicing physician. The safety and effectiveness of anticoagulation in clinical practice were found to be equal to those in major trials with rigorous controls. Despite the proven effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulation for thromboembolism prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation, warfarin remains underused, especially among the elderly (75 years and older), who are at the greatest risk of stroke and would likely benefit the most from prophylactic anticoagulation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The expression of tissue factor (TF), mainly by infiltrated inflammatory cells, has been shown to be responsible for the thrombogenicity associated with atheroma. The contribution of the nonlipid-related effects of statins to the clinical benefits of statin therapy is currently under intense investigation. In this study, we evaluated the ability of fluvastatin to modulate TF expression and macrophage accumulation in rabbit carotid intimal lesions independently of cholesterol lowering. Male rabbits were fed for 30 days a 1% cholesterol-rich diet with or without fluvastatin at 5 mg/kg per day. Two weeks from the start of treatment, a silastic collar was placed around the carotid artery. Fifteen days later, the animals were killed, and carotid segments were excised and processed. The atherogenic diet caused a consistent increase in plasma cholesterol levels (610+/-231 mg/dL versus 50+/-9 mg/dL at baseline), which were not affected by fluvastatin (603+/-248 mg/dL). In the rabbits fed a high cholesterol diet without fluvastatin, an intimal lesion with macrophage accumulation and TF expression was detected. Fluvastatin significantly reduced TF and macrophage content of the lesion (-50% for both). Results indicate that fluvastatin may attenuate the inflammatory and thrombogenic potential of atherosclerotic lesions through a mechanism(s) other than cholesterol reduction, providing new insight regarding the complex mode of action of statins.