PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michael E Wolmetz

Publications and source records attributed to Michael E Wolmetz.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Brain-behavior relationships in reading acquisition are modulated by socioeconomic factors.

Functional neuroimaging may provide insights into the achievement gap in reading skill commonly observed across socioeconomic status (SES). Brain activation during reading tasks is known to be associated with individual differences in children's phonological language skills. By selecting children of equivalent phonological skill, yet diverse socioeconomic backgrounds, we use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to demonstrate that a child's experience, as operationalized by SES, can systematically modulate the relationship between phonological language skills and reading-related brain activity in left fusiform and perisylvian regions. Specifically, at lower socioeconomic levels, individual differences in skill result in large differences in brain activation. In contrast, as SES increases, this relationship between phonological language skill and activation is attenuated. Socioeconomic background factors are thus found to modulate brain-behavior relationships in reading, indicating that cognitive, social, and neurobiological influences on reading development are fundamentally intertwined.

Behavior↗

Two brain pathways for attended and ignored words.

The dependency of word processing on spare attentional resources has been debated for several decades. Recent research in the study of selective attention has emphasized the role of task load in determining the fate of ignored information. In parallel to behavioral evidence, neuroimaging data show that the activation generated by unattended stimuli is eliminated in task-relevant brain regions during high attentional load tasks. We conducted an fMRI experiment to explore how word encoding proceeds in a high load situation. Participants saw a rapid series of stimuli consisting of overlapping drawings and letter strings (words or nonwords). In different blocks, task instructions directed attention to either the drawings or the letters, and subjects responded to immediate repetition of items in the attended dimension. To look at the effect of attention on word processing, we compared brain activations for words and nonwords under the two attentional conditions. As compared to nonwords, word stimuli drove responses in left frontal, left temporal and parietal areas when letters were attended. However, although the behavioral measures suggested that ignored words were not analyzed when drawings were attended, a comparison of ignored words to ignored nonwords indicated the involvement of several regions including left insula, right cerebellum and bilateral pulvinar. Interestingly, word-specific activations found when attended and ignored words were compared showed no anatomical overlap, suggesting a change in processing pathways for attended and ignored words presented in a high attentional load task.

Adult↗