PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michael E Zalis

Publications and source records attributed to Michael E Zalis.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Tagging-based, electronically cleansed CT colonography: evaluation of patient comfort and image readability.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the homogeneity, adequacy, and patient acceptance of nonionic iodine-based regimens with those of a barium-based regimen for computed tomographic (CT) colonography with electronic subtraction cleansing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained, 68 subjects (41 men (60%) men, 27 (40%) women; mean age, 60 years +/- 6 [standard deviation]) with average or moderate risk factors for development of colorectal carcinoma were recruited and placed into three study groups. Group 1 (n = 25) ingested 150-mL aliquots of 2% barium sulfate suspension with meals and snacks for 48 hours prior to imaging, without other diet modification or a cathartic. Group 2 (n = 21) ingested 10-mL aliquots of nonionic iodinated contrast material (iopromide) with a concentration of 300 mg per milliliter with meals and snacks for 2 days before imaging, without diet modification or a cathartic. Group 3 (n = 22) ingested nonionic iodinated contrast material (iohexol) with a concentration of 300 mg per milliliter with meals and snacks for 2 days before imaging and ingested 34 g of magnesium citrate the evening prior to imaging. CT colonography was also performed on 10 control subjects who ingested polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution prior to imaging. Subjective and numerical measures of bowel preparation quality, homogeneity, and patient comfort among the noncathartic and cathartic cohorts were compared with nonparametric analysis of variance, the Fisher exact test, and the F test, as appropriate. The study was HIPAA compliant. RESULTS: Study subjects who received tagging preparations reported significantly improved discomfort scores when compared with those of the control subjects (P < .05, each comparison). There was no significant difference in discomfort scores among groups 1, 2, and 3. For each reader, scores of subtracted image readability were highest for group 3. Dichotomized rates of preparation "success" were also greatest for group 3. CONCLUSION: In this series, the patient discomfort scores were significantly improved with tagging preparations for CT colonography. Nonionic iodinated contrast material in conjunction with a hyperosmotic laxative (magnesium citrate) was associated with the best subjective and numerical indices of readability.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

CT colonography: influence of 3D viewing and polyp candidate features on interpretation with computer-aided detection.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine if three-dimensional (3D) viewing improves radiologists' accuracy in classifying true-positive (TP) and false-positive (FP) polyp candidates identified with computer-aided detection (CAD) and to determine candidate polyp features that are associated with classification accuracy, with known polyps serving as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained; this study was HIPAA compliant. Forty-seven computed tomographic (CT) colonography data sets were obtained in 26 men and 10 women (age range, 42-76 years). Four radiologists classified 705 polyp candidates (53 TP candidates, 652 FP candidates) identified with CAD; initially, only two-dimensional images were used, but these were later supplemented with 3D rendering. Another radiologist unblinded to colonoscopy findings characterized the features of each candidate, assessed colon distention and preparation, and defined the true nature of FP candidates. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare readers' performance, and repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to test features that affect interpretation. RESULTS: Use of 3D viewing improved classification accuracy for three readers and increased the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to 0.96-0.97 (P<.001). For TP candidates, maximum polyp width (P=.038), polyp height (P=.019), and preparation (P=.004) significantly affected accuracy. For FP candidates, colonic segment (P=.007), attenuation (P<.001), surface smoothness (P<.001), distention (P=.034), preparation (P<.001), and true nature of candidate lesions (P<.001) significantly affected accuracy. CONCLUSION: Use of 3D viewing increases reader accuracy in the classification of polyp candidates identified with CAD. Polyp size and examination quality are significantly associated with accuracy.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Low-dose CT colonography in children: initial experience, technical feasibility, and utility.

BACKGROUND: CT colonography (CTC) is utilized as a diagnostic tool in the detection of colon polyps and early colorectal cancer in adults. Large studies in the literature, although focused on adult populations, have shown CTC to be a safe, accurate, non-invasive technique. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the technical feasibility of CTC in children using a low-dose technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November 2001 to April 2004 we evaluated eight patients (3-17 years) with non-contrast CTC. Seven of the patients had CTC, followed by standard colonoscopy (SC) the same day; in one patient, CTC followed a failed SC. CTC results were compared to results of SC. The estimated effective dose from each CTC was calculated and compared to that of standard barium enema. RESULTS: CTC results were consistent with those of SC. Sensitivity for polyps 5-10 mm was 100%, and sensitivity for polyps 10 mm and larger was 66.7%. The estimated mean effective dose was 2.17 mSv for CTC, compared to the 5-6 mSv for a standard air-contrast barium enema in a small child. CONCLUSION: Our initial experience shows CTC in children is well-tolerated, safe, and useful. The procedure can be performed successfully with a low radiation dose, and preliminary results compare well with SC.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed2005

Polyp size at CT colonography after electronic subtraction cleansing in an anthropomorphic colon phantom.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of various bowel contrast material concentrations and subtraction software on size measurements of well-defined polyp lesions in a colon phantom at CT colonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Repeated scanning and a precise reference standard required the use of a colon phantom in which 21 polyps were randomly distributed. Two readers who had each reviewed computed tomographic (CT) colonographic images from more than 100 cases evaluated polyp size on images obtained when the phantom was partially filled with varying concentrations of contrast material, scanned by using CT colonography, and subjected to electronic subtraction cleansing. The single largest dimension was recorded for each reader for a randomized series of polyps. These measurements were compared with a reference standard that was based on a combination of the manufacturer's polyp size specifications and the subsequent verification of these sizes by an independent consensus panel. Six weeks after initial observations, readers evaluated images of the phantom scanned without the presence of contrast material. Polyp size estimations for the two readers for each series were compared with the reference standard to obtain a mean absolute measurement error for each reader for each series. Data for each reader were compared by using a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance test. A pair-wise comparison of the experimental and control series was then performed by using the Dunn post hoc test. RESULTS: Contrast material dilutions resulting in an average attenuation of less than 500 HU resulted in complete subtraction and the absence of streak artifacts. There was no statistically significant difference between the average measurement error for contrast attenuations between 300 and 500 HU when compared with that of control. Streak artifact was noticeable for the highest dilution (mean, 840 HU). No statistically significant differences were observed for series in which cleansing software was used in the absence of bowel contrast material. CONCLUSION: The combination of electronic cleansing and bowel contrast enhancement in the range of 300-500 HU results in no substantial change in readers' estimations of polyp size at CT colonography.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2004

An analysis of the potential impact of computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) on colonoscopy demand.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There has been much speculation about the potential impact on the use of conventional colonoscopy if "virtual" computed tomographic colonography (CTC) became a widely accepted modality for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. However, no formal analysis of the impact of CTC on colonoscopy demand has been reported. METHODS: A mathematical model to predict colonoscopy demand based on several relevant input parameters was constructed. Current national colonoscopy practice, estimated using various published reports, was used as the foundation to project colonoscopy demand if CTC were implemented as the primary CRC screening modality. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, if CTC were used as the primary modality for CRC screening, 1.78 million colonoscopies could be eliminated from the total 6.47 million in 2003. Depending on the polyp size threshold used to define a CTC study as positive (6 or 10 mm), this loss would be partially offset by 1.21 million (6 mm) or .34 million (10 mm) follow-up colonoscopies for CTC examinations with positive findings, resulting in a net loss of .57 million (8.8% decrease) (6 mm) or 1.44 million (22.3% decrease) (10 mm). Extensive sensitivity analyses showed that the findings of this model were robust and insensitive to most parameters tested but were sensitive to a few parameters, including the percentage of CTC examinations with positive findings. CONCLUSIONS: Wide-scale implementation of CTC for CRC screening would likely lead to a decrease in use of conventional colonoscopy. The percentage of CTC studies with positive findings seemed to be a pivotal variable, which would be determined in large part by the polyp size ultimately established to define a positive finding.

Colonography, Computed Tomographic↗
PubMed2003

CT colonography: digital subtraction bowel cleansing with mucosal reconstruction initial observations.

The authors evaluated a computed tomography (CT) colonographic technique with a combination of preexamination orally ingested positive contrast material and postacquisition image processing to subtract out the ingested opacified bowel contents. With this technique, rigorous physical purging of the bowel was not necessary before structural examination of the colon. With images obtained in 20 patients, two readers were able to correctly identify the majority of polyps confirmed at colonoscopy. Their performance for detection of lesions larger than 1 cm was similar to that with conventional CT colonography.

Administration, Oral↗