PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michael F W Festing

Publications and source records attributed to Michael F W Festing.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Design and statistical methods in studies using animal models of development.

Experiments involving neonates should follow the same basic principles as most other experiments. They should be unbiased, be powerful, have a good range of applicability, not be excessively complex, and be statistically analyzable to show the range of uncertainty in the conclusions. However, investigation of growth and development in neonatal multiparous animals poses special problems associated with the choice of "experimental unit" and differences between litters: the "litter effect." Two main types of experiments are described, with recommendations regarding their design and statistical analysis: First, the "between litter design" is used when females or whole litters are assigned to a treatment group. In this case the litter, rather than the individuals within a litter, is the experimental unit and should be the unit for the statistical analysis. Measurements made on individual neonatal animals need to be combined within each litter. Counting each neonate as a separate observation may lead to incorrect conclusions. The number of observations for each outcome ("n") is based on the number of treated females or whole litters. Where litter sizes vary, it may be necessary to use a weighted statistical analysis because means based on more observations are more reliable than those based on a few observations. Second, the more powerful "within-litter design" is used when neonates can be individually assigned to treatment groups so that individuals within a litter can have different treatments. In this case, the individual neonate is the experimental unit, and "n" is based on the number of individual pups, not on the number of whole litters. However, variation in litter size means that it may be difficult to perform balanced experiments with equal numbers of animals in each treatment group within each litter. This increases the complexity of the statistical analysis. A numerical example using a general linear model analysis of variance is provided in the Appendix. The use of isogenic strains should be considered in neonatal research. These strains are like immortal clones of genetically identical individuals (i.e., they are uniform, stable, and repeatable), and their use should result in more powerful experiments. Inbred females mated to males of a different inbred strain will produce F1 hybrid offspring that will be uniform, vigorous, and genetically identical. Different strains may develop at different rates and respond differently to experimental treatments.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

The origins and uses of mouse outbred stocks.

Outbred mouse stocks, often used in genetics, toxicology and pharmacology research, have been generated in rather haphazard ways. Understanding the characteristics of these stocks and their advantages and disadvantages is important for experimental design. In many studies these mice are used inappropriately, wasting animals' lives and resources on suboptimal experiments. Recently, however, researchers from the field of complex trait analysis have capitalized on the genetics of outbred stocks to refine the identification of quantitative trait loci. Here we assess the most widely used outbred stocks of mice and present guidelines for their use.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

The choice of animal model and reduction.

Careful choice of the animal model is essential, if research is to be conducted efficiently, by using the minimum number of animals in order to provide the maximum amount of information. Inbred strains of rodents provide an excellent way of controlling and investigating genetic variation in characters of interest and in response to experimental treatments. Outbred stocks, in which genetic and non-genetic factors are inextricably mixed, are much less suitable, because random and uncontrolled genetic variation tends to obscure any treatment responses. In some cases, the use of inbred strains has led to major advances in scientific understanding. The specific example given here is in the understanding of host-parasite relationships but, more generally, inbred strains have been of critical importance in research which has resulted in the award of at least 17 Nobel prizes. And yet, despite the extensive literature on the properties and scientific value of inbred strains, many scientists continue to use outbred stocks in the mistaken belief that the use of such animals will, in some mysterious way, make their research more applicable to humans. There is really no evidence that this is so, and there is much evidence that the use of inbred strains has been highly successful in many disciplines.

Animal Use Alternatives↗
PubMed2002

Use of factorial designs to optimize animal experiments and reduce animal use.

Optimization of experiments, such as those used in drug discovery, can lead to useful savings of scientific resources. Factors such as sex, strain, and age of the animals and protocol-specific factors such as timing and methods of administering treatments can have an important influence on the response of animals to experimental treatments. Factorial experimental designs can be used to explore which factors and what levels of these factors will maximize the difference between a vehicle control and a known positive control treatment. This information can then be used to design more efficient experiments, either by reducing the numbers of animals used or by increasing the sensitivity so that smaller biological effects can be detected. A factorial experimental design approach is more effective and efficient than the older approach of varying one factor at a time. Two examples of real factorial experiments reveal how using this approach can potentially lead to a reduction in animal use and savings in financial and scientific resources without loss of scientific validity.

Allyl Compounds↗
PubMed2002

Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments using laboratory animals.

For ethical and economic reasons, it is important to design animal experiments well, to analyze the data correctly, and to use the minimum number of animals necessary to achieve the scientific objectives---but not so few as to miss biologically important effects or require unnecessary repetition of experiments. Investigators are urged to consult a statistician at the design stage and are reminded that no experiment should ever be started without a clear idea of how the resulting data are to be analyzed. These guidelines are provided to help biomedical research workers perform their experiments efficiently and analyze their results so that they can extract all useful information from the resulting data. Among the topics discussed are the varying purposes of experiments (e.g., exploratory vs. confirmatory); the experimental unit; the necessity of recording full experimental details (e.g., species, sex, age, microbiological status, strain and source of animals, and husbandry conditions); assigning experimental units to treatments using randomization; other aspects of the experiment (e.g., timing of measurements); using formal experimental designs (e.g., completely randomized and randomized block); estimating the size of the experiment using power and sample size calculations; screening raw data for obvious errors; using the t-test or analysis of variance for parametric analysis; and effective design of graphical data.

Animal Welfare↗
PubMed2002

Non-ahr gene susceptibility Loci for porphyria and liver injury induced by the interaction of 'dioxin' with iron overload in mice.

Among the actions of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (dioxin) in mice is the induction of hepatic porphyria. This is similar to the most common disease of this type in humans, sporadic porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT). Evidence is consistent with the actions of dioxin being mediated through binding to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) with different Ahr alleles in mouse strains apparently accounting for differential downstream gene expression and susceptibility. However, studies of dioxin-induced porphyria and liver injury indicate that the mechanisms must involve interactions with other genes, perhaps associated with iron metabolism. We performed a quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis of an F(2) cross between susceptible C57BL/6J (Ahr(b1) allele) and the highly resistant DBA/2 (Ahr(d) allele) strains after treatment with dioxin and iron. For porphyria we found QTLs on chromosomes 11 and 14 in addition to the Ahr gene (chromosome 12). Studies with C57BL/6.D2 Ahr(d) mice confirmed that the Ahr(d) allele alone did not completely negate the response. SWR mice are syngenic for the Ahr(d) allele with the DBA/2 strain but are susceptible to porphyria after elevation of hepatic iron. Analysis of SWRxD2 F(2) mice treated with iron and dioxin showed a QTL on chromosome 11, as well as finding other loci on chromosomes 1 (and possibly 9), for both porphyria and liver injury. These findings show for the first time the location of genes, other than Ahr, that modulate the mechanism of hepatic porphyria and injury caused by dioxin in mice. Orthologous loci may contribute to the pathogenesis of human sporadic PCT.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

The effect of daily disturbance on the breeding performance of mice.

The United Kingdom Home Office Code of Practice for the housing and care of breeding animals requires that, 'the general well-being of all animals must be checked at least once daily'. However, excessive daily disturbance of rodent breeding colonies could be counter-productive to animal welfare if it increases pre-weaning mortality. An experiment involving 100 breeding cages of BALB/c mice compared daily inspection of the mouse cages, but without disturbing the mice within the nest, with daily inspection in which every individual was studied even if this involved removing the cage lid and disturbing the nest. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in breeding performance or pre-weaning mortality, though the disturbed group produced marginally fewer offspring and had slightly higher mortality. Average weaning weight did not differ between the groups, but sexual dimorphism at weaning was significantly increased in the disturbed group. It is concluded that there are unlikely to be any welfare benefits in an inspection regimen that involves disturbance of breeding mice, provided the cage is inspected daily.

Animal Husbandry↗