Biomedical subjects

Michael J Hartshorn

Publications and source records attributed to Michael J Hartshorn.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Automated protein-ligand crystallography for structure-based drug design.

An approach to automate protein-ligand crystallography is presented, with the aim of increasing the number of structures available to structure-based drug design. The methods we propose deal with the automatic interpretation of diffraction data for targets with known protein structures, and provide easy access to the results. Central to the system is a novel procedure that fully automates the placement of ligands into electron density maps. Automation provides an objective way to structure solution, whereas manual placement can be rather subjective, especially for data of low to medium resolution. Ligands are placed by docking into electron density, whilst taking care of protein-ligand interactions. The ligand fitting procedure has been validated on both public domain and in-house examples. Some of the latter deal with cocktails of low-molecular weight compounds, as used in fragment-based drug discovery by crystallography. For such library-screening experiments we show that the method can automatically identify which of the compounds from a cocktail is bound.

Crystallography, X-Ray↗

PubMed2005

Modeling water molecules in protein-ligand docking using GOLD.

We implemented a novel approach to score water mediation and displacement in the protein-ligand docking program GOLD. The method allows water molecules to switch on and off and to rotate around their three principal axes. A constant penalty, sigma(p), representing the loss of rigid-body entropy, is added for water molecules that are switched on, hence rewarding water displacement. We tested the methodology in an extensive validation study. First, sigma(p) is optimized against a training set of 58 protein-ligand complexes. For this training set, our algorithm correctly predicts water mediation/displacement in approximately 92% of the cases. We observed small improvements in the quality of the predicted binding modes for water-mediated complexes. In the second part of this work, an entirely independent set of 225 complexes is used. For this test set, our algorithm correctly predicts water mediation/displacement in approximately 93% of the cases. Improvements in binding mode quality were observed for individual water-mediated complexes.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2005

Fragment-based lead discovery using X-ray crystallography.

Fragment screening offers an alternative to traditional screening for discovering new leads in drug discovery programs. This paper describes a fragment screening methodology based on high throughput X-ray crystallography. The method is illustrated against five proteins (p38 MAP kinase, CDK2, thrombin, ribonuclease A, and PTP1B). The fragments identified have weak potency (>100 microM) but are efficient binders relative to their size and may therefore represent suitable starting points for evolution to good quality lead compounds. The examples illustrate that a range of molecular interactions (i.e., lipophilic, charge-charge, neutral hydrogen bonds) can drive fragment binding and also that fragments can induce protein movement. We believe that the method has great potential for the discovery of novel lead compounds against a range of targets, and the companion paper illustrates how lead compounds have been identified for p38 MAP kinase starting from fragments such as those described in this paper.

CDC2-CDC28 Kinases↗

PubMed2004

Structure-guided fragment screening for lead discovery.

Fragment-based ligand screening can be a highly effective strategy for drug discovery. In general, fragment hits interact efficiently with the target, and although the potency of these small binders is often low, their optimization into potent leads is tractable. For a hit optimization phase to take full advantage of a good quality fragment binder, we believe it is essential to obtain reliable structural data for the hits. In this review, we describe the methods used for structure-based fragment screening and fragment-to-lead optimization and discuss a number of applications from the literature.

Binding Sites↗

PubMed2003

Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD.

The Chemscore function was implemented as a scoring function for the protein-ligand docking program GOLD, and its performance compared to the original Goldscore function and two consensus docking protocols, "Goldscore-CS" and "Chemscore-GS," in terms of docking accuracy, prediction of binding affinities, and speed. In the "Goldscore-CS" protocol, dockings produced with the Goldscore function are scored and ranked with the Chemscore function; in the "Chemscore-GS" protocol, dockings produced with the Chemscore function are scored and ranked with the Goldscore function. Comparisons were made for a "clean" set of 224 protein-ligand complexes, and for two subsets of this set, one for which the ligands are "drug-like," the other for which they are "fragment-like." For "drug-like" and "fragment-like" ligands, the docking accuracies obtained with Chemscore and Goldscore functions are similar. For larger ligands, Goldscore gives superior results. Docking with the Chemscore function is up to three times faster than docking with the Goldscore function. Both combined docking protocols give significant improvements in docking accuracy over the use of the Goldscore or Chemscore function alone. "Goldscore-CS" gives success rates of up to 81% (top-ranked GOLD solution within 2.0 A of the experimental binding mode) for the "clean list," but at the cost of long search times. For most virtual screening applications, "Chemscore-GS" seems optimal; search settings that give docking speeds of around 0.25-1.3 min/compound have success rates of about 78% for "drug-like" compounds and 85% for "fragment-like" compounds. In terms of producing binding energy estimates, the Goldscore function appears to perform better than the Chemscore function and the two consensus protocols, particularly for faster search settings. Even at docking speeds of around 1-2 min/compound, the Goldscore function predicts binding energies with a standard deviation of approximately 10.5 kJ/mol.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2003

A web-based platform for virtual screening.

A fully integrated, web-based, virtual screening platform has been developed to allow rapid virtual screening of large numbers of compounds. ORACLE is used to store information at all stages of the process. The system includes a large database of historical compounds from high throughput screenings (HTS) chemical suppliers, ATLAS, containing over 3.1 million unique compounds with their associated physiochemical properties (ClogP, MW, etc.). The database can be screened using a web-based interface to produce compound subsets for virtual screening or virtual library (VL) enumeration. In order to carry out the latter task within ORACLE a reaction data cartridge has been developed. Virtual libraries can be enumerated rapidly using the web-based interface to the cartridge. The compound subsets can be seamlessly submitted for virtual screening experiments, and the results can be viewed via another web-based interface allowing ad hoc querying of the virtual screening data stored in ORACLE.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2002

AstexViewer: a visualisation aid for structure-based drug design.

AstexViewer is a Java molecular graphics program that can be used for visualisation in many aspects of structure-based drug design. This paper describes its functionality, implementation and examples of its use. The program can run as an Applet in a web browser allowing structures to be displayed without installing additional software. Applications of its use are described for visualisation and as part of a structure based design platform. The software is being made freely available to the community and may be downloaded from http://www.astex-technology.com/AstexViewer.

Computer Graphics↗

PubMed2002

Sensitivity of molecular docking to induced fit effects in influenza virus neuraminidase.

Many proteins undergo small side chain or even backbone movements on binding of different ligands into the same protein structure. This is known as induced fit and is potentially problematic for virtual screening of databases against protein targets. In this report we investigate the limits of the rigid protein approximation used by the docking program, GOLD, through cross-docking using protein structures of influenza neuraminidase. Neuraminidase is known to exhibit small but significant induced fit effects on ligand binding. Some neuraminidase crystal structures caused concern due to the bound ligand conformation and GOLD performed poorly on these complexes. A 'clean' set, which contained unique, unambiguous complexes, was defined. For this set, the lowest energy structure was correctly docked (i.e. RMSD < 1.5 A away from the crystal reference structure) in 84% of proteins, and the most promiscuous protein (1mwe) was able to dock all 15 ligands accurately including those that normally required an induced fit movement. This is considerably better than the 70% success rate seen with GOLD against general validation sets. Inclusion of specific water molecules involved in water-mediated hydrogen bonds did not significantly improve the docking performance for ligands that formed water-mediated contacts but it did prevent docking of ligands that displaced these waters. Our data supports the use of a single protein structure for virtual screening with GOLD in some applications involving induced fit effects, although care must be taken to identify the protein structure that performs best against a wide variety of ligands. The performance of GOLD was significantly better than the GOLD implementation of ChemScore and the reasons for this are discussed. Overall, GOLD has shown itself to be an extremely good, robust docking program for this system.

Algorithms↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Virtual screening using protein-ligand docking: avoiding artificial enrichment.

This study addresses a number of topical issues around the use of protein-ligand docking in virtual screening. We show that, for the validation of such methods, it is key to use focused libraries (containing compounds with one-dimensional properties, similar to the actives), rather than "random" or "drug-like" libraries to test the actives against. We also show that, to obtain good enrichments, the docking program needs to produce reliable binding modes. We demonstrate how pharmacophores can be used to guide the dockings and improve enrichments, and we compare the performance of three consensus-ranking protocols against ranking based on individual scoring functions. Finally, we show that protein-ligand docking can be an effective aid in the screening for weak, fragment-like binders, which has rapidly become a popular strategy for hit identification. All results presented are based on carefully constructed virtual screening experiments against four targets, using the protein-ligand docking program GOLD.

Ligands↗