PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michael K Brawer

Publications and source records attributed to Michael K Brawer.

29 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Early diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer.

The need for accurate methods of ascertaining the malignant potential of any given man's prostate cancer has never been greater than it is today. The presenters at the session of the 13th International Prostate Cancer Update addressing early diagnosis and staging of disease discussed combined-modality staging of disease; color Doppler imaging for detection of cancer; pelvic lymphadenectomy as a diagnostic tool; and a new, artificial intelligence-based model to predict survival. A summary of these presentations is provided here.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2002

Attitudes and use of complementary medicine in men with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Patients with cancer are increasingly incorporating complementary therapies into the overall treatment. We determine the prevalence and patterns of use of complementary therapies among patients with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients attending 6 urology institutions for prostate cancer management completed a self-administered questionnaire on complementary therapy. All men diagnosed with prostate cancer were eligible, regardless of age, stage of disease or treatment. RESULTS: A total of 1,099 patients returned the questionnaire. The overall response rate was 78.5%. Complementary therapies had previously been or were currently being used by 23.5% (258) and 18.2% (200) of patients, respectively. Higher levels of education and income were associated with greater use of complementary therapy (p <0.002 by logistic regression). Patients with progressive disease or those primarily treated with hormones were most likely to use complementary therapy. Among the patients using complementary therapy 90% believed that it would help them live longer and improve quality of life, 60% believed it would relieve symptoms and 47% expected it to cure disease. CONCLUSIONS: Complementary therapies are used by a large number of patients with prostate cancer, particularly those with progressive disease or who have undergone multiple treatments. Health care providers need to recognize this growing pattern of use of complementary therapy. Among patients who use complementary therapy the perception of benefit is much greater than that supported by scientific data. Future research should aim to unravel the complex psychosocial dynamics that influence the decision to use complementary therapy by men with prostate cancer and to educate patients about the efficacy of such therapies.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Comparative analysis of complexed prostate specific antigen, free prostate specific antigen and their ratio in detecting prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We evaluate the diagnostic use of total, free and complexed serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), and their ratios for enhancing the specificity in detecting prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 354 nonconsecutive men undergoing prostate biopsy were eligible for this retrospective and prospective study. Cancer was found in 122 of these 354 men (34%). Receiver operating characteristics curve analyses were used to calculate and compare the performance of total PSA (Hybritech, San Diego California and Bayer, Tarrytown, New York), complexed PSA (Bayer), percent complexed PSA and percent free PSA. In addition, sensitivity and specificity were calculated and compared. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was highest for percent free PSA, followed by percent complexed PSA, complexed PSA and the 2 total PSA assays (Hybritech and Bayer). The cutoff value of 3.45 ng./ml. for complexed PSA detected the same number of cancers and resulted in 1 additional false-positive case compared with a Hybritech total PSA threshold of 4.0 ng./ml. At sensitivities of 80% to 95%, there were no significant differences for detection comparing the corresponding specificities between Hybritech total PSA and complexed PSA for all 354 men. Complexed PSA alone did not enhance the overall diagnostic accuracy compared with percent free PSA in the Hybritech total PSA range between 4.01 and 6.00 ng./ml., between 6.01 and 10.00 ng./ml., and between 2.50 and 6.00 ng./ml. At sensitivities of 80% to 95% specificity of percent complexed PSA was almost identical to that of percent free PSA except for the Hybritech total PSA range less than or equal to 4.00 ng./ml. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests complexed PSA is equivalent to total PSA for the early detection of prostate cancer. Percent free PSA outperforms complexed PSA and percent complexed PSA performed equivalently to percent free PSA in all total PSA ranges analyzed between 2.5 and 10 ng./ml.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Complexed prostate-specific antigen for early detection of prostate cancer in men with serum prostate-specific antigen levels of 2 to 4 nanograms per milliliter.

Complexed PSA (cPSA) has been shown to improve specificity in the detection of prostate cancer over that of total PSA (tPSA) testing in men with tPSA values greater than the cutoff value of 4.0 ng/mL. However, recent studies have reported a 25% incidence of prostate cancer in men with tPSA values in the 2.5- to 4.0-ng/mL range. We performed a multicenter study of cPSA in a population of men who underwent prostate biopsies because of elevated PSA levels or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE). As part of this study, we sought to assess the clinical value of cPSA in comparison to tPSA, the free/tPSA ratio (f/tPSA) and the complexed/tPSA ratio (c/tPSA) in early detection of prostate cancer in men with tPSA values in the range of 2 to 4 ng/mL. The study was performed at 7 centers. Sera were drawn from men who underwent biopsy procedures consisting of >10 prostate tissue cores. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed from the results of patients with tPSA values in the range of 2 to 4 ng/mL, including men with suspicious as well as unremarkable findings on DRE. Sera were collected and tested with the Bayer tPSA and cPSA assay and the Beckman free PSA and tPSA assays. ROC analysis was performed for all samples in the 2- to 4-ng/mL PSA range. At biopsy, 158 men had no evidence of malignancy and 57 (26.5%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer. ROC analysis indicated that the area under the curve (AUC) for cPSA was 0.64, which was statistically significantly greater than that achieved for tPSA (AUC, 0.57; P <0.0001). The AUC for f/tPSA and c/tPSA were 0.60 and 0.63, respectively, which was not statistically significantly different from that of tPSA or cPSA (P >or=0.252). A cutpoint of 2.5 ng/mL for tPSA and 2.1 ng/mL for cPSA provided a specificity of 20.3% and 34.2%, respectively, and sensitivity levels of 86%. Using cutpoints of 25% for f/tPSA and 74% for c/tPSA provided a specificity of 11.0% and 21.5%, respectively, and sensitivity levels of 97%. In all, >92% of the cancers treated with radical prostatectomy were organ confined, and the histologic grading of the tumors ranged from moderately to poorly differentiated with Gleason scores from 5 to 9. These data confirm that there is a high incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer in men with tPSA levels <4.0 ng/mL. Measurement of cPSA proved useful in stratifying men with tPSA values in the 2- to 4-ng/mL range into high- and low-risk groups for prostate cancer. The use of cPSA as a single test was found to enhance detection of prostate cancer over that of testing with tPSA and PSA ratios in men with tPSA values in the range of 2 to 4 ng/mL.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Can volume measurement of the prostate enhance the performance of complexed prostate-specific antigen?

We assessed whether volume-based complexed prostate-specific antigen (cPSA) indices could enhance prostate cancer detection in men with serum total PSA (tPSA) between 2.5 and 10.0 ng/mL. Between December 1998 and April 2000, cPSA assay was measured in 480 men who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies at 7 institutions. We compared the usefulness of cPSA and its indices with the ratio of free PSA (fPSA) to tPSA (percent fPSA) for early detection of prostate cancer. Overall, 168 men (35%) had cancer. In the 341 men with tPSA between 4.01 and 10.0 ng/mL at approximately 90% sensitivity and areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve, the performances of volume-based parameters were significantly better (P <0.05) than those of tPSA and cPSA. In the 139 men with tPSA between 2.5 and 4.0 ng/mL, at 90% sensitivity, the specificity of the ratio of cPSA to tPSA (percent cPSA) was best, followed by cPSA density (cPSAD). In the 101 men with the history of a previous prostate biopsy, at approximately 90% sensitivity, the specificity of cPSAD was significantly better than those of tPSA and percent fPSA (P <0.05). In the 371 men with a total prostate volume of >or=30 cm(3) at approximately 90% sensitivity, the specificity of the cPSAD was significantly better than that of tPSA, percent fPSA, and cPSA (P <0.05). In the 109 men with a total prostate volume of <30 cm(3), at 90% sensitivity the specificity of cPSA and cPSAD was better than that of percent fPSA. In conclusion, volume-based cPSA can modestly enhance the performance of cPSA.

Humans↗
PubMed2002

Complexed prostate-specific antigen as a staging tool: results based on a multicenter prospective evaluation of complexed prostate-specific antigen in cancer diagnosis.

Within a 7-site prospective evaluation of the Bayer complexed prostate-specific antigen PSA (cPSA) assay, we analyzed the ability of cPSA to predict extracapsular extension (ECE) before radical prostatectomy. Included in this analysis were 152 men diagnosed with cancer, who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy. Sera were tested with the Bayer total PSA (tPSA) and cPSA assays, and the Beckman free PSA (fPSA) and tPSA assays. Treating surgical pathology result as a binary variable (organ confined vs ECE), mean tPSA, cPSA, fPSA/tPSA (f/tPSA) ratios, tPSA density (tPSAD), and cPSA density (cPSAD) were compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and univariate analysis. In all, 28 men (18.4%) had pathologically identified ECE. Between those with and without ECE, significant differences were observed for tPSA (P = 0.0127), cPSA (P = 0.0120), tPSAD (P = 0.0001), and cPSAD (P = 0.0002), but not f/tPSA (P = 0.3774) or c/tPSA (P = 0.2882). All tested parameters except f/tPSA (P = 0.376) and c/tPSA (P = 0.288) predicted ECE (P <0.05) by logistic regression. The ROC area under the curve (AUC) was identical for tPSA and cPSA (0.621) and for tPSAD (0.692) and cPSAD (0.691). Kendall-tau correlation coefficients also demonstrated the strongest correlation with ECE for cPSAD and tPSAD. Either alone or as a tPSAD calculation, cPSA carries equivalent staging ability to tPSA. The use of f/tPSA appears to be less effective in staging than either cPSA or tPSA, whereas the use of either cPSAD or tPSAD provides maximal staging accuracy. Therefore, cPSA could be applied as an accurate predictor of ECE independently or in a nomogram along with other predictive variables.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Clinical usefulness of assays for complexed prostate-specific antigen.

Tests for the tumor marker prostate-specific antigen (PSA) vary widely in specificity and sensitivity. Use of an assay that tests the complexed form of PSA (cPSA) results in improved specificity and sensitivity. By improving specificity, similar results are obtained by cPSA compared with use of the free-to-total PSA ratio but are measured by a single analyte instead of two. Assays for cPSA can serve as a substitute for total PSA in all current applications.

Humans↗
PubMed2002

Chemoprevention strategies in the prostate: an overview.

Chemoprevention is the administration of agents (drugs, biologics, and nutrients) to prevent induction, inhibit, or delay the progression of cancers. Prostate cancer is an important target for chemoprevention because of its long latency and high prevalence. The development of rational chemopreventive strategies requires knowledge of the mechanisms of prostate carcinogenesis and identification of agents that interfere with these mechanisms. Because of the long time period for prostate carcinogenesis and the large size of the cohort required for an evaluable study, identification and characterization of early intermediate biomarkers and their validation as surrogate endpoints for cancer incidence are essential for chemopreventive agent development. Finally, suitable populations with appropriate risk factors, including the presence of premalignant lesions and genetic predispositions, need to be well characterized for future chemopreventive interventions.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2002

Selecting treatment for high-risk, localized prostate cancer: the case for radiation therapy.

Prostate cancers that clinically appear to be localized may nonetheless respond poorly to curative treatment. Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, biopsy Gleason score, and percentage of positive biopsies are all at least as important as clinical stage in predicting treatment outcome. A patient with a nonpalpable tumor, stage T1c disease, serum PSA of 12 ng/mL, and a Gleason score of 8 to 10 in 2 of 12 biopsy cores has a relatively poor prognosis. In a high-risk patient such as this one, the recommended treatment strategy involves a combination of brachytherapy and conformal external beam radiotherapy. In studies comparing treatments in patients stratified according to a variety of risk measures, this combination has shown biochemical disease-free survival rates superior to those seen following radical prostatectomy. The role of androgen suppression remains unclear.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2002

Radiation therapy failure in prostate cancer patients: risk factors and methods of detection.

Radiation therapy for clinically localized prostatic carcinoma remains one of the mainstays among therapeutic approaches; however, patients continue to fail radiation therapy at too high a rate. This article reviews the risk factors and methods of detection for prostate cancer recurrence. The relative merits of the three major pre-therapy prognostic indicators-TNM staging, Gleason score, and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels-are discussed. The use of staging and Gleason score, as well as digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound, and post-radiation prostate biopsies in detecting failure of radiation therapy is reviewed. Challenges relating to the use of serum PSA levels as an indicator of recurrence are examined. Finally, this article makes recommendations as to procedure for evaluating patients suspected of failing radiation therapy.

Journal Article↗