PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Michael Knudsen

Publications and source records attributed to Michael Knudsen.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Molecular residual disease assessment in colorectal and bladder cancer by somatic structural variant analysis of cell-free DNA whole-genome sequencing data.

BACKGROUND: Whole-genome sequencing (WGS)-based methods for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection typically rely on tumor-informed identification of somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs). Somatic structural variants (SVs) are another type of cancer-specific genomic alteration, which owing to their larger genomic footprint and unique breakpoint junctions, are easier to distinguish from sequencing noise than SNVs. They are, however, rarely used for ctDNA detection because of (1) artifacts from WGS procedures that SV callers may falsely interpret as genuine SVs. This makes it difficult to establish high-confidence SV catalogos from short-read tumor WGS and can cause false-positive ctDNA detections. (2) Lack of robust strategies to quantify SV-supporting reads in plasma WGS. To address these barriers and enable integration of SV biomarkers into WGS-based ctDNA detection, we present a bioinformatic framework for algorithmic curation of somatic SV calls from fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumors, coupled with a novel approach for sensitive, accurate mapping and quantification of SV breakpoint-supporting reads in plasma WGS. METHODS: Tumor, normal and plasma WGS data from 144 patients with stage III colorectal cancer was used to establish the bioinformatic framework. This included ~30x WGS data from 1564 serially collected plasma samples. The framework was validated using tumor/normal/plasma WGS data from 32 patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. SV-based ctDNA detection was benchmarked against previously published SNV-based ctDNA results for the same samples. RESULTS: After curation of SV calls and quantification in plasma WGS, our SV-based approach enabled robust ctDNA detection with overall specificity exceeding 99% in plasma samples. Furthermore, we observed strong concordance (Pearson&#x2019;s r&#x2009;>&#x2009;0.93, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;2.2&#x2009;&#xd7;&#x2009;10&#x2212; 16) between ctDNA-positive samples identified by our SV-based method and previous SNV-based analyses, validating the reliability of our approach. Finally, we demonstrated application of the method in an independent bladder cancer cohort, highlighting its generalizability and potential clinical use. CONCLUSIONS: We provide a bioinformatic framework that establishes somatic SVs as ultra-specific biomarkers for WGS-based, tumor-informed ctDNA detection. The approach delivers specific detection even when the SV catalogos are established from FFPE samples. The SV framework can stand alone or enhance SNV-based analysis pipelines.

Humans

Diagnostic and Monitoring Strategies for VEXAS Syndrome: Evaluating Sanger Sequencing, NGS, and the SWIM-Score.

VEXAS syndrome is an adult-onset autoinflammatory disorder caused by somatic UBA1 variants, but there are no standardized criteria for genetic testing or diagnostics. This study compared Sanger sequencing and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for detecting UBA1 variants in patients with suspected VEXAS, assessed the ability of Sanger sequencing to estimate variant allele fractions (VAFs), and evaluated the Maeda et al. scoring system for selecting patients for genetic testing in a primary cohort and a validation cohort. In the primary cohort of 104 patients, Sanger sequencing identified VEXAS variants in 12%, with no additional cases detected by NGS. Sanger sequencing accurately quantified VAFs ranging from 0.1 to 0.9. In a small longitudinal subset (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;3), VAFs in blood correlated with CRP levels, increased over time despite various treatments, but decreased in two patients after initiation of Azacitidine treatment. The novel parameters, VAF in myeloid cells and VEXAS cell concentration, showed promise as exploratory markers for patient monitoring. The Maeda-score, requiring a threshold score of 2 for 100% sensitivity, exhibited low specificity-29% in the primary cohort and 41% in the validation cohort (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;62, with 2 carrying VEXAS variants). In contrast, the simplified SWIM-score-based on Skin involvement, Weight loss, Inflammation, and Macrocytic anemia-achieved 100% sensitivity in both cohorts, with higher specificities of 47% and 65%, respectively. In conclusion, Sanger sequencing reliably detected UBA1 variants and quantified VAFs. Monitoring VAF and VEXAS cell concentration may track disease progression, and the SWIM-score demonstrated potential for accurately selecting patients for UBA1 testing.

Humans